Re: using clang (was: Re: ps, clang and make variables)
/etc/make.conf : .if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*) .endif clang for ports, YMMV as always. http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang "libreoffice 3.5.x builds and run sucessfully with clang 3.0 and (upcoming) 3.1" - @bapt So wait for libreoffice 3.5 for clang support. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/ps-clang-and-make-variables-tp5608586p5609272.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Building youtube-dl from Ports causes trouble?
youtibe_dl is just python script, nothing related. 20120531: AFFECTS: users of graphics/png AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org The PNG library has been updated to version 1.5.10. Please rebuild all ports that depend on it. If you use portmaster: portmaster -r png- If you use portupgrade: portupgrade -fr graphics/png This is VERY related I'm afraid.. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Building-youtube-dl-from-Ports-causes-trouble-tp5714957p5714959.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Why Clang
That's interesting discussion. I hit some cases where clang produced binaries were clearly faster than those made with latest gcc. But it's far from rule. Where you have found statements that clang is always faster than gcc? >From my perspective, it's almost as good OR better than gcc, with potential for further improvement and nice license, errors etc. Fair enough. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5719484.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Why Clang
Really, this format of discussion is rather exception than rule (from my experience). Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me, but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD mailing list at all. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5720039.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
> I am more concerned about an aspect of the language the clang tools are > written in, namely the use of object-oriented paradigm of c++ (it is a > phony > paradigm, one that does not exist in nature or reality, which explains > the failure rate of C++ OO projects historically and current usage > decline). > I sense that the relative slowness of generated code has to do with it. > Perhaps > some other attributes of that code's quality too, even if not now, then in > the > future. Yes, this is one thing really puzzled me. Maybe it's related to Apple's affinity to Objective-C? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5721495.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Omega Zip Drives on FreeBSD 8.*
In the next episode: Modern home video with Betamax and LaserDisc ;) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Omega-Zip-Drives-on-FreeBSD-8-tp5721532p5721678.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: llvm/clang 3.1
If you really want/need clang 3.1 you should be tracking 9-STABLE, source branch not RELEASE. Port system is separate from base system, and installs things only in /usr/local/*. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/llvm-clang-3-1-tp5722315p5722483.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: 32 bit to 64 bit
It has been done, it's just rally not recommended. Sorry, don't know what was exact procedure/ if it works currently. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/32-bit-to-64-bit-tp5722481p5722485.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
At least he should have used one or at very least identical systems, not 3 different, albeit similar. And I do not care If it would change results or not, comparing different systems invalidates benchmarks period. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Anatomy-of-Perfomance-tests-tp5722932p5722964.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
portmaster embarrassingly simple question (y- option)
===>>> Starting check for runtime dependencies ===>>> Gathering dependency list for archivers/unzip from ports ===>>> No dependencies for archivers/unzip ===>>> Installing package ===>>> Installation of archivers/unzip (unzip-6.0_1) succeeded ===>>> Delete unzip60.tar.gz? y/n [n] What option do I need to specify with -y to automatically answer those? I've tried --clean-distfiles, --clean-packages but it's not it. It usually happens when doing portmaster --packages-build --delete-build-only build. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work
Try with: WITHOUT_MODULES= usb/ulpt -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WITHOUT-MODULES-in-etc-make-conf-doesn-t-work-tp5723832p5723880.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work
and consider using MODULES_OVERRIDE if you will precisely know your needs. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WITHOUT-MODULES-in-etc-make-conf-doesn-t-work-tp5723832p5723883.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portmaster embarrassingly simple question (y- option)
Excellent, I knew I was missing something simple. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878p5723916.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portmaster embarrassingly simple question (y- option)
Now I see that I even used -d in my own portupdating wrapper, but forgot about it and it's meaning, embarrassing. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878p5723918.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work
> Sort of a dirty trick that you have to use usb/ulpt as > opposed to ulpt, and a deficiency in the documentation. No, I'm just borderline sure that WITHOUT_MODULES works the same way as MODULES_OVERRIDE, that is it looks in top directory in /usr/src/sys/modules/ and ulpt is in /usr/src/sys/modules/usb/ulpt Speaking of RAM savings, things you would always load should be compiled in kernel, modules per design take more RAM than compiled in stuff. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WITHOUT-MODULES-in-etc-make-conf-doesn-t-work-tp5723832p5724110.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: wlan setup
- launch dhclient manually -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/wlan-setup-tp4748233p4761835.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: wlan setup
- FreeBSD 9 has latest wpa_supplicant. - Try upgrading router's firmware. - Try detailing wpa_supplicant.conf more. eg. proto= pairwise= group= regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/wlan-setup-tp4748233p4761824.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: A quality operating system
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Why Sorry, it's looks roughly applicable here. I'm guilty too, but I don't want/use binary upgrades. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/A-quality-operating-system-tp4717703p4765099.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Thinkpad audio question
See man snd_hda, you probably need to set device.hints. For example, I with T400 have something like this in device hints: hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid22.config="as=1 seq=15" hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid24.config="as=3" hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid26.config="as=1" hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid29.config="as=2" best regards, Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Thinkpad-audio-question-tp4802936p4803609.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Thinkpad audio question
For maximum verbosity you can also try setting in sysctl.conf hw.snd.verbose=3 and $ cat /dev/sndstat then. Not sure if you really need it though. As for man page, that was my experience as well, and I just shamelessly copied device.hints some kind spirit provided, so I'm not exactly pinout expert either :) On a lighter note, once correct pinout will be set, you shouldn't have any more problems with CX20561, it's common and well supported chip. regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Thinkpad-audio-question-tp4802936p4804292.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Thinkpad audio question
I would love to investigate it properly further, however I'm critically low on time, so I can only offer pinout dump with my device.hints at this time, sorry http://pastebin.com/ig54CwT9 good luck, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Thinkpad-audio-question-tp4802936p4804434.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Thinkpad audio question
It was mav (Alexander Motin), he proposed those hints after I complained that sound stopped working after update. He wondered how I got sound to work in the first place, with hints I had previously. I don't think pushing those specific hints somewhere would be so beneficial, subtle hardware revision could change pin associations. (e.g. Your friend's T500?) I don't think man page is missing something, it's verbose and exhaustive, with 4 examples of hints for various purposes. (The truth is out there! heh.) The problem is, most people don't want (or don't know they need) to swap line-out and speaker functions, to split headphones and mic to separate device etc. They do not know why default pinout is not working as it should, and what they should change. They just want to have headphones and speakers working as intended :) But I'm afraid this can't be directly addressed, as possibilities of default wrong pin associations are "endless". If you think otherwise you are free to submit PR as well :) best regards, - Jakub Lach PS. I suspected that If by chance my device.hints will "just work", the "pedantic engineer" in you would be silenced somehow :P -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Thinkpad-audio-question-tp4802936p4805409.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: 9.0 and burncd error
Don't take my word for it, but I suppose burncd wasn't updated for ahci support, and ahci driver is used by default in 9. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-0-and-burncd-error-tp4830395p4838303.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Progress of Intel GEM/KMS/DRI laptop video driver?
It's still WIP. http://wiki.freebsd.org/DriDrivers http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Progress-of-Intel-GEM-KMS-DRI-laptop-video-driver-tp4837864p4838324.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Can't access a music CD
Strange thing is, that cdcontrol "works" for me, disc is spinning but no sound out of speakers. Sound system is working, and this is laptop. I usually rip to hdd, and play those files, but it was annoying last time I tried to play audio cd. Before CAM it was the same, if I recall correctly, however then I used something like cdparanoia or cdrtools to play cds. So I'm afraid, that cdcontrol is not best diagnostic tool. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Can-t-access-a-music-CD-tp4886683p4898453.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Can't access a music CD
Correct, "cd" entry from mixer is missing. However, then it didn't stop other tools from working (I think that at one point I also used mplayer for CD playback). best regards and thanks, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Can-t-access-a-music-CD-tp4886683p4899154.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UPDATING 20120116 -- x11/xcb-util -- instructions not working
Try rebuilding libtool first. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UPDATING-20120116-x11-xcb-util-instructions-not-working-tp5430407p5431468.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Nasty reference loop in login.conf
It's my fault. I'm running 9-STABLE. During mergemaster run, I forgot to add localised settings to login.conf. No problem I thought, then I edited login.conf by hand before running /usr/bin/cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf. By sloppy paste, I accidentally created :tc=default: loop in default:\. Now, of course I cannot login as anybody nor use sudo. e.g. login_getclass: 'tc=' reference loop 'root' su: pam_acct_mgmt: error in service module sudo: login_getclass: 'tc=' reference loop 'default' Moreover I'm afraid to power down machine, as currently I'm logged as wheel group user, and I'm not sure if change from :passwd_format=md5:\ to :passwd_format=sha512:\ didn't complicate it further... Currently all my solutions would require to power down machine, which I'm afraid to do frankly. 1. Hope I can still log in single user mode and correct /etc/login.conf? I'm afraid of md5 -> sha512 change. 2. Use some LiveCD and correct login.conf, then run /usr/bin/cap_mkdb . Has anybody have other ideas? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
If remember correctly, accessing single user mode here requires root password, but will it use login.conf? Killing init is not solution (I think I lack privileges as user anyway, remember I can't su account) because I'm running KMS patches and will not see anything (lacking visible system console output). -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727686.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
Initially dropped to single user mode, but when I saw ED(1) I reconsidered and dusted off trusty LiveCD :) Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727712.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
Or vi in place. Really, it always surprises me there's no vi available in single user mode. vi 352k, ed 54k. And I bet some historical vi could be smaller still. ...but I have nothing against ed, I simply never memorized how to use it properly. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727716.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
That's substantial "if", no? But in this case, yes, I should have mounted fs maybe. But really didn't know what to expect. Thanks for help again. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727720.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
Good catch, totally missed it. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727755.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
-offtopic- (...) > like he works at a small Polish SMB, more > commonly referred to as a SOHO in more > developed countries. Not really sure what you wanted to imply, as "SMB" looks like americanism to me. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/fsck-on-FAT32-filesystem-tp5727015p5728037.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
This topic went totally off, but anyway there are interesting bits, do you say that e.g. Gutmann method is totally unneeded? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/fsck-on-FAT32-filesystem-tp5727015p5728126.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
Follow up is even more interesting than epilogue, especially: "Another problem with the article is the fact that a magnetic force microscope, which is a scanning probe microscope, is nothing like an electron microscope, and yet the article repeatedly refers to using an electron microscope to try and recover data (the same mistake has also been pointed out by others). So saying "the chances of recovery of any amount of data from a drive using an electron microscope are negligible" is quite true, in the same way that saying "the chances of recovery of any amount of data from a drive using an optical microscope are negligible" is true" And DiskStroyer kit made me chuckle. If I comprehend it correctly, that doesn't make Gutmann method obsolete in principle, it only means that those passes were tailored at (various) old technology, and on modern drives could be bit overkill and just as good as random scrubs. That's still makes a robust procedure, even If overkill and dated (which isn't exactly bad thing). Thanks for replies. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/fsck-on-FAT32-filesystem-tp5727015p5728161.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
"da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
Hi, I was fortunate enough to buy USB 3.0 pendrive, which actually works with FreeBSD just ripped from package! (normal _empty_ FAT filesystem, no garbageware added, no need to format). It actually bounces from 40MB/s limit when reading from it. Writing is about 18MB/s. Device is supposed to be "467x" which should be about 70MB/s. And USB 2.0 hard limit is 60MB/s. Wouldn't be nice to squeeze few additional MB/s? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
This could be deducted, but I will add for clarity, that I bought USB 3.0 pendrive to use in 2.0 port, to take advantage of 2.0 to the fullest (as 2.0 pendrives have slow flashes inside). -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729030.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
18MB/s write is figure from few dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=1 to 15M runs, 13-14MB/s from actual files copied in mc to flash and 36-39MB/s file copied from flash to hdd in mc. dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=15m gives 33MB/s read. Speaking of advertisements, yes I know but USB 3.0 drives with nice flashes are capable of speeds well above 2.0 limits, and that's the point anyway. Speaking of formatting, I can't agree, as I bought such awfully formatted drive, that it had to be FAT formatted in Windows to be even recognized in FreeBSD as device. And I don't usually have Windows around. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729035.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
Speaking of misunderstanding, that's certainly possible. How much overhead is "normal" and alternatively, why in FreeBSD USB 2.0 reports as "40MB/s" and not other arbitrary number. I hope I didn't sound like "PLEASE HELP I WANT USB 3.0 SPEEDS ON USB 2.0"... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729042.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
Apparently my speeds are pretty decent, as this this advertised speed relates to read speed, and write one is pretty weak. People are reporting 62-70MB/s read and 17-31MB/s write. Are you saying that disk clearly bumping from 40MB/s read barrier (as I saw in midnight commander is my imagination or it's cause is totally unrelated to OS? I thought it's worth investigating, as FreeBSD coincidentally reports USB 2.0 ports as such. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729100.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
> i have never seen USB 2.0 exceeding 35MB/s write and 40MB/s read. That means I essentially got what I wanted- as high read output as possible on USB 2.0. Thanks. Indeed 35MB/s-40MB/s is common reported maximum throughput. > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=64k count=1 > newfs_msdosfs /dev/da0 Apart from bs= that's exactly what I did (Well, there was one /dev/random/ run prior.) What I previously meant is that I had such pendrive, that without former formatting in Windows, didn't even show up as device in FreeBSD- was completely useless. That does not mean I didn't newfs_msdosfsed it after that in FreeBSD (worked perfectly fine since) :) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729143.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
> However, after formatting it in Windows why duplicate it again in > FreeBSD? Just to check if it works as should, also trim sectors and whatever. Format without partition table? But in this case, no 1 reason was probably most important. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729157.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: version of clang in HEAD?
The same as in 9-STABLE? $ cc -v FreeBSD clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) 20120523 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0 Thread model: posix -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/version-of-clang-in-HEAD-tp5729532p5729576.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD Stable production version.
8.3 or 9.1. Using 9.0 when 9.1 is behind the corner is going backwards IMHO. or 9-STABLE if you want your system evolving up to release, which is nice because you can catch and solve all possible problems one at the time, and not be overwhelmed upgrading only to RELEASE. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Stable-production-version-tp5729696p5729739.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: laptop with no BIOS? or BIOS reflash pain
More civilised notebook manufactures usually provide also self booting (CD) image to update BIOS (e.g. Lenovo/ThinkPad). -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/laptop-with-no-BIOS-or-BIOS-reflash-pain-tp5753237p5756381.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I need a simple cli tool to rotate mp4 video.
Just something that wouldn't pull in whole KDE/latest flavour of the month DE. Any recommendations? Online video flippers have severe size limits. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/I-need-a-simple-cli-tool-to-rotate-mp4-video-tp5756670.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I need a simple cli tool to rotate mp4 video.
Thanks, I'm was already playing with mencoder, but I had no luck with it; either I was destroying/misaligning audio track or loosing video quality. (or encoding raw with 54x size increase). I have more success with ffmpeg, e.g. $ ffmpeg -i A.mp4 -vf "transpose=1" -r 30 -sameq -acodec copy B.mp4 Is _almost_ ideal, apart from x1.5 increase in size... playing with fps does not change it too. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/I-need-a-simple-cli-tool-to-rotate-mp4-video-tp5756670p5756683.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: I need a simple cli tool to rotate mp4 video.
Strange thing is, -sameq should give same quality as original. Thanks for all help! -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/I-need-a-simple-cli-tool-to-rotate-mp4-video-tp5756670p5756776.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
valgrind on pure amd64 (64 bit system _only_)
What's state of valgrind port on pure amd64 system? Here, it core dumps upon linking both with clang and gcc47, with complaint that looks suspicious (expected i386 not X86_64 or something to that effect). -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/valgrind-on-pure-amd64-64-bit-system-only-tp5762993.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: i386 vs amd64
If it was from me, my system is without 32bit compat whatsoever, and this is not default setting on amd64. Maybe on def. amd64 there are no problems, I don't know, nobody replied to my thread. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765188.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: i386 vs amd64
The problem is, it gets recreated upon updating from source. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765488.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: i386 vs amd64
Even that I was aware of that, I've just lost track of it. Thanks for simple solution. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765489.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Xorg - how can I configure this thing??
Hello. "6. Make sure the following 2 lines are in /etc/rc.conf: hald_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES"" That's not necessary if you (re)configure X server without HAL. Just pointing, since lots of people recommends anybody with input problems to add those lines. It's still possible to run X server without HAL, even the newest one. -best regards, Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Xorg---how-can-I-configure-this-thing---tp24417470p24428745.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD for a high school class? (long)
Mel Flynn-2 wrote:
>
> I remember running KDE3 with firefox-1 on a P-III 900 with 256MB, FBSD 4.x
> and
> window switching ('alt-tab') wasn't a joy, being in permanent swap.
>
Hello.
The key to running KDE3 with PIII is 512MB<=RAM I think. With 768MB RAM and
1400...@1300mhz PIII I'm not using swap at all (stripped KDE3/7.2-STABLE).
I'm runnig opera-devel, firefox35 (fresh ports tree). If memory serves me
right,
PIII 750/1000Mhz wasn't that bad either. Also, with 512MB it was swapping a
little
only when compiling something heavy. OO.o could be not usable tho.
-best regards,
Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FreeBSD-for-a-high-school-class--%28long%29-tp24411741p24461017.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portupgrade policykit problem
Same problem here, policykit-gnome also. Alain G. Fabry wrote: > > > Hi, > > Hope I didn't do something stupid here > > Tried to 'portupgrade -R policykit' but it came back with an error. So I > deinstalled it and now I'm trying to reinstall it, but it fails with the > following error. > > > R=\""/usr/local/etc"\" -DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR=\""/usr/local/share"\" > -DPACKAGE_BIN_DIR=\""/usr/local/bin"\" -DPACKAGE_LOCALSTATE_DIR=\""/var"\" > -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\""/usr/local/share/locale"\" > -DPACKAGE_LIB_DIR=\""/usr/local/lib"\" -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS > -D_REENTRANT -DKIT_COMPILATION -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include-I/usr/local/include -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations > -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Wformat > -Wformat-security -MT kit-string.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/kit-string.Tpo -c -o > kit-string.lo kit-string.c > cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src -I../../src > -DPACKAGE_LIBEXEC_DIR=\"/usr/local/libexec\" > -DPACKAGE_SYSCONF_DIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" > -DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR=\"/usr/local/share\" > -DPACKAGE_BIN_DIR=\"/usr/local/bin\" -DPACKAGE_LOCALSTATE_DIR=\"/var\" > -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" > -DPACKAGE_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS > -D_REENTRANT -DKIT_COMPILATION -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations > -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Wformat > -Wformat-security -MT kit-string.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/kit-string.Tpo -c > kit-string.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/kit-string.o > kit-string.c:141: error: redefinition of 'strndup' > kit-string.c:119: error: previous definition of 'strndup' was here > gmake[3]: *** [kit-string.lo] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9/src/kit' > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9/src' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/policykit. > > > Also tried 'make distclean' and a new 'make install clean', but it keeps > on failing. > > I hope that in case I need to reboot, it won't crash my system. But I'll > postpone my reboot as long as possible. Maybe I can reinstall it with your > advice. > > Thanks, > > Alain > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/portupgrade-policykit-problem-tp18625533p18633730.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
When gcc43 is expected to be in base?
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing gcc43 as base. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18736784.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base?
Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: > > Jakub Lach wrote: >> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >> gcc43 as >> base. > > I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by > the GPLv3. > > Kris > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is going to be omitted? If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18737322.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base?
Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: > > Jakub Lach wrote: >> >> >> Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >>> Jakub Lach wrote: >>>> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >>>> gcc43 as >>>> base. >>> I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by >>> the GPLv3. >> >> Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is going >> to >> be omitted? > > There is basically no chance the GCC developers will reconsider their > decision to relicense GCC 4.3 to GPLv3. > >> If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? > > The existing gcc 4.2 will be supported for some time by the gcc > developers. In the meantime hopefully llvm/clang will mature enough to > provide an alternative. It is already quite far along and has > significant resources behind it (apple, etc). > > Kris > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Thank you very much for all answers. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18742235.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base?
I'm now wondering why CPUTYPE=core2 is supposed to work in -current. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10783746.html http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10787174.html http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-GSoC2007%3A-cnst-sensors.2007-08-20.patch-p12334133.html I'm particular interested in Penryn instructions support. Jakub Lach wrote: > > > > Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >> >> Jakub Lach wrote: >>> >>> >>> Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >>>> Jakub Lach wrote: >>>>> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >>>>> gcc43 as >>>>> base. >>>> I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by >>>> the GPLv3. >>> >>> Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is >>> going to >>> be omitted? >> >> There is basically no chance the GCC developers will reconsider their >> decision to relicense GCC 4.3 to GPLv3. >> >>> If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? >> >> The existing gcc 4.2 will be supported for some time by the gcc >> developers. In the meantime hopefully llvm/clang will mature enough to >> provide an alternative. It is already quite far along and has >> significant resources behind it (apple, etc). >> >> Kris >> ___ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> >> > > Thank you very much for all answers. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18753406.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Using CPUTYPE=core2, Penryn instructions support
Hello. >From what I understand, gcc42 does not support core2 option. How it's possible that some people are using it with FreeBSD -CURRENT (and it's not used as mere prescott alias). http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10787174.html Is -CURRENT using newer version of gcc, despite licensing problems? I'm interested in using full Penryn instructions, if that would be possible... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-CPUTYPE%3Dcore2%2C-Penryn-instructions-support-tp18792525p18792525.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
qt4-moc-4.4.1 not compiling (compiler/system not supported)
This is the Qt/X11 Open Source Edition. The specified system/compiler is not supported: /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.4.1/mkspecs/freebsd-g++ Please see the README file for a complete list. ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. In README there is no FreeBSD whatsoever. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not-compiling-%28compiler-system-not-supported%29-tp18829459p18829459.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: qt4-moc-4.4.1 not compiling (compiler/system not supported)
g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 28 17:27:04 CEST 2008 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not-compiling-%28compiler-system-not-supported%29-tp18829459p18829569.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: qt4-moc-4.4.1 not compiling (compiler/system not supported)
/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.4.1/mkspecs/ is empty directory. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not-compiling-%28compiler-system-not-supported%29-tp18829459p18829813.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: qt4-moc-4.4.1 not compiling (compiler/system not supported)
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports: > > # portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib > # portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib > > - - Martin > > I have already tried upgrading corelib (===> qt4-corelib-4.4.1 depends on package: qt4-moc>=4.4.1 - not found ===> Found qt4-moc-4.3.4, but you need to upgrade to qt4-moc>=4.4.1) now (re)building qmake4, fingers crossed. Thanks for fast help. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not-compiling-%28compiler-system-not-supported%29-tp18829459p18831048.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: qt4-moc-4.4.1 not compiling (compiler/system not supported)
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports: > > # portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib > # portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib > Still cannot upgrade qt4-corelib without qt4-moc>=4.4.1. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not-compiling-%28compiler-system-not-supported%29-tp18829459p18831591.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: qt4-moc-4.4.1 not compiling (compiler/system not supported)
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports: > > # portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib > # portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib > I have forced packages one by one today. Thanks for help and updating UPDATING file. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not-compiling-%28compiler-system-not-supported%29-tp18829459p18853066.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Linux Wolfenstein Enemy Territory - no sound
Hello. I recently installed from ports (games/linux-enemyterritory). At first it complained about missing X11 lib, and I concluded that installing linux-xorg-libs should sort it out. I wass correct (perhaps it should be added as dependency?). Running et it gives: --- sound initialization --- /dev/dsp: Invalid argument Could not mmap /dev/dsp Apparently, it's common problem on Linux too. Simplest solution reported to be working is: echo "et.x86 0 0 direct">/proc/asound/card0/pcm1p/oss So I think something like sysctl -w something.something="et.x86 0 0 direct" should work for me. Searching for device, I have found: sysctl -a | grep 'pcm' dev.emu10kx.0._pcm_front_l: 100 dev.emu10kx.0._pcm_front_r: 100 dev.pcm.0.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP front PCM interface dev.pcm.0.%driver: pcm dev.pcm.0.%parent: emu10kx0 dev.pcm.0.eapd: 1 dev.pcm.0.play.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.0.play.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.0.play.vchanformat: s16le dev.pcm.0.rec.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.0.rec.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.0.rec.vchanformat: s16le dev.pcm.0.buffersize: 65536 dev.pcm.1.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP rear PCM interface dev.pcm.1.%driver: pcm dev.pcm.1.%parent: emu10kx0 dev.pcm.1.play.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.1.play.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.1.play.vchanformat: s16le dev.pcm.1.buffersize: 65536 and sysctl -a | grep 'oss' compat.linux.oss_version: 198144 However, I don't have idea what to do next. Symlinking /dev/dsp/ to /dev/dsp0.0 or /dev/dsp1.0 doesn't cut it. regards -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Linux-Wolfenstein-Enemy-Territory---no-sound-tp19021118p19021118.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: transcode doesn't build....
Shooting in the dark, try installing lzo or lzo2. Gary Kline-5 wrote: > > > Hi Y'all:-) > > About the only thing that fails to portupgrade is > multimedia/transcode [v 1.0.6]. I've poked around, but only > superficially. Is there a bug report on this? Should I have > checked online further? Please excuse if so. This is the first > time that things have hung up and that I have not been able to > resolve. > > thanks in advance, > > gary > > > > -- > Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thought.org Public Service > Unix > http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org > > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/transcode-doesn%27t-build-tp18993356p19023527.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Linux Wolfenstein Enemy Territory - no sound
Many thanks, works splendid :) Ironically, I'm leaving at dawn for two weeks AFK. Hugo Silva wrote: > > Jakub Lach wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I recently installed from ports (games/linux-enemyterritory). >> At first it complained about missing X11 lib, and I concluded >> that installing linux-xorg-libs should sort it out. I wass correct >> (perhaps it should be added as dependency?). >> >> Running et it gives: >> >> --- sound initialization --- >> /dev/dsp: Invalid argument >> Could not mmap /dev/dsp >> >> >> Apparently, it's common problem on Linux too. Simplest >> solution reported to be working is: >> >> echo "et.x86 0 0 direct">/proc/asound/card0/pcm1p/oss >> >> So I think something like >> >> sysctl -w something.something="et.x86 0 0 direct" >> >> should work for me. >> >> Searching for device, I have found: >> >> sysctl -a | grep 'pcm' >> dev.emu10kx.0._pcm_front_l: 100 >> dev.emu10kx.0._pcm_front_r: 100 >> dev.pcm.0.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP front PCM interface >> dev.pcm.0.%driver: pcm >> dev.pcm.0.%parent: emu10kx0 >> dev.pcm.0.eapd: 1 >> dev.pcm.0.play.vchans: 1 >> dev.pcm.0.play.vchanrate: 48000 >> dev.pcm.0.play.vchanformat: s16le >> dev.pcm.0.rec.vchans: 1 >> dev.pcm.0.rec.vchanrate: 48000 >> dev.pcm.0.rec.vchanformat: s16le >> dev.pcm.0.buffersize: 65536 >> dev.pcm.1.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP rear PCM interface >> dev.pcm.1.%driver: pcm >> dev.pcm.1.%parent: emu10kx0 >> dev.pcm.1.play.vchans: 1 >> dev.pcm.1.play.vchanrate: 48000 >> dev.pcm.1.play.vchanformat: s16le >> dev.pcm.1.buffersize: 65536 >> >> and >> >> sysctl -a | grep 'oss' >> compat.linux.oss_version: 198144 >> >> However, I don't have idea what to do next. >> >> Symlinking /dev/dsp/ to /dev/dsp0.0 or /dev/dsp1.0 >> doesn't cut it. >> >> regards >> >> > > > You need hw.snd.compat_linux_mmap=1 > > Happy frags :) > > Regards, > > Hugo > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Linux-Wolfenstein-Enemy-Territory---no-sound-tp19021118p19024428.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sort: write error with portsnap
Julien Cigar-2 wrote: > > Am I the only one to have sort: write errors since a few days with > portsnap ? : > Same here. FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #0 r209773 - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sort%3A-write-error-with-portsnap-tp29105763p29109444.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: sort: write error with portsnap
andrew clarke-3 wrote: > > Same here. No idea why! > I think this issue would have got more attention on freebsd-stable. regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sort%3A-write-error-with-portsnap-tp29105763p29143811.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
