Re: zfs on disk with ufs
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas wrote: Hi all, I have 2 disk using raid 1 (hardware) ~ 250gb with default freebsd partition schema, I would like to resize /usr partition and to use ZFS on the space left on disk. It is posible to do so ? Or can I reinstall freebsd and only have 10GB for /usr and the rest of the disk for ZFS. It is posible to have ZFS and UFS on the same disk. freebsd-questions@ might be a better place to ask. Reply-To: set /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: LRO support for IPv6
On 22. May 2012, at 16:50 , Jack Vogel wrote: > The LRO code as it stands right now is IPV4 specific, it would be nice to > extend it, one of > many improvements that may get done at some point. I am about to commit it to HEAD. Bear another few days with me; I know I am running late but committing new code had less prio than some other real life things currently. I'll also bring TSO6, etc... /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: LRO support for IPv6
On 22. May 2012, at 17:04 , Jack Vogel wrote: > Oh, that's right, distracted with other projects and I forgot, now we just > need > to have an LRO that works with forwarding eh :) That's a 6 line bainaid commit afterwards, basically returning form the LRO queuing function in case forwarding is turned on for that address family; a proper solution for long term can than be done whenever we feel like it. The above we should have done years ago;) > You ROCK bz :) > > Jack > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > On 22. May 2012, at 16:50 , Jack Vogel wrote: > > > The LRO code as it stands right now is IPV4 specific, it would be nice to > > extend it, one of > > many improvements that may get done at some point. > > I am about to commit it to HEAD. Bear another few days with me; I know > I am running late but committing new code had less prio than some other > real life things currently. > > I'll also bring TSO6, etc... -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: LRO support for IPv6
On 23. May 2012, at 08:22 , Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > Folks, > Can somebody please explain me why "tcp checsum" calculation is mandated in > the freebsd network stack (tcp_input--->in6_cksum) albeit the card supports > it? > > Probably Steve is the right person who can answer this. Just for public reference; we talked offline. The code simply was never done and let's see how much of it I can get into the tree the next 48 hours. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Please help me diagnose this crazy VMWare/FreeBSD 8.x crash
On 24. May 2012, at 13:47 , Mark Felder wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:30:40 -0500, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> can you please, -please- file a PR? And place all of the above >> information in it so we don't lose it? >> > > I'd be glad to post a PR and assist in helping to get it permanently fixed. I > certainly don't want this data to get lost and honestly our business uses > FreeBSD on VMWare so much that we really need a permanent fix as much as > anyone else :-) > > The reason I've hesitated to post a PR so far is that I didn't have any truly > useful or concrete evidence of where the problem lies. After Dane Foster > contacted me and told me he could recreate the crash on demand with his > workload it was easier to narrow things down. The suggestion that it was an > interrupts issue (by possibly Bjoern Zeeb?) Just for the public archives. Interrupts wasn't me. I might have mentioned disabling cdrom and fdc as good as possible but everything else I cannot remember... > and Dane's discovery that his crashes ceased when em0 and mpt0 share an IRQ, > but em0 is completely unused was starting to prove there is some strong > evidence here in favor of the interrupts issue. > > Dane, what's the status on your end? Has your fix still been successful? Is > it also stable if you simply set hint.mpt.0.msi_enable="1" ? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Passing additional options to jail(8) via rc.conf
On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed to freebsd-jail. Which is your problem as the real solution is being discussed there and is really looking for more eyes. Search for Jamie's posts in the list archive. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: sk0: discard oversize frame (ether type ....)
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, > Using freeBsd 5.3. ... > Maybe one of you guys can shed some light on this for me. please update to RELENG_5; it's fixed there already:) -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sk0 driver problem and (with luck) approach to a fix
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Chris Landauer wrote: Hi, ... > Marvell Yukon 88E8050 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Adapter ... > relevant output from pciconf -l -v: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x3032107b chip=0x436111ab > rev=0x17 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' > class= network > subclass = ethernet > > relevant output from dmesg: > > skc0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xc810-0xc8103fff > irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3 > skc0: unknown device! > device_attach: skc0 attach returned 6 ... I have added following patch http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/EXPERIMENTAL/if_sk-marvell-88e8050-id.diff with the contents on what you already (should) have done/described. It's pretty much straight forward. Changing more logic (switch case,..) is not done because of other changes going on there atm. If the driver will work for your card with the above patch is unknown because nobody tested and noone I know has specs from Marvell. But you might be quite lucky with it. Please let me know the results of your tests and I will continue to handle this. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sk0 driver problem and (with luck) approach to a fix
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Chris Landauer wrote: > ... > > Marvell Yukon 88E8050 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Adapter > ... > > relevant output from pciconf -l -v: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x3032107b chip=0x436111ab > > rev=0x17 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' > > class= network > > subclass = ethernet > > > > relevant output from dmesg: > > > > skc0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem > > 0xc810-0xc8103fff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3 > > skc0: unknown device! > > device_attach: skc0 attach returned 6 > ... > > I have added following patch > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/EXPERIMENTAL/if_sk-marvell-88e8050-id.diff had been told that this will only make the phy 'work' but there are other problems. Someone else seems to work on it but I don't know anything more beyond that yet. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: arp problem in /var/log/messages
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Mark wrote: > But what causes them ? I get them too. one host, two NICs same braodcast domain ? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Long Uptime
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Bob Bomar wrote: > I have a machine that is about to turn 700 days > uptime, and I have no plans on rebooting it any > time soon. I just wanted to see if there was > any infomation from the machine that anybody > wanted. Well, I think there are enough people around with nnn days uptime (for nnn > 500). I myself can think of a handfull of internal machines with such an uptime. In case you are interested in FreeBSD uptimes see for example: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy/2003-August/000225.html PS: In case this thread will continue please consider freebsd-chat or freebsd-advocacy. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Jail source address selection in 8.1-RELEASE
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: Hi, There appears to be a loosely documented sysctl 'security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel' which should limit source IP selection of jails to their primary jail interface/IP. The sysctl does not appear to do anything, however: # sysctl security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel=0 -> # echo $? 0 # sysctl security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel # # sysctl -d security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel: Do (not) use IPv4 source address selection rather than the primary jail IPv4 address. Is this tunable only available when VIMAGE jails are built? The 8.1-RELEASE Release Notes suggest it is for VIMAGE jail(8) containers, while 7.3-RELEASE Release Notes suggest that it is available for the entire jail(8) subsystem as 'security.jail.ip4_saddrsel', a different OID. Don't use the systctl; the param tree only tells you which options are available; ip4.saddrsel is an option to the jail -c|-m command. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FTPD not working properly on jail
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Redd Vinylene wrote: Hello! I'm trying to set up a virtual vsftpd-ssl-2.3.2 server so my band can share new tracks, production material or what not, but I'm getting all kinds of strange errors: http://pastie.org/1358536 Anybody know why? The server runs on a jail. There are no firewalls on either the host or the jail. I've tried other ftpd's and gotten similar results so I don't think it's vsftpd there's something wrong with here. a) have you tried without SSL? b) have you tried ftpd from base? It pretty much smells like a bug in vsftpd. Out of curiosity - which version of freebsd is that? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FTPD not working properly on jail
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Redd Vinylene wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: a) have you tried without SSL? b) have you tried ftpd from base? It pretty much smells like a bug in vsftpd. Out of curiosity - which version of freebsd is that? /bz Greetings! a) Good question. Just tested - without a doubt, yes it works perfectly without SSL. But we need SSL though. application or configuration issue unrelated to jails. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life. Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 6.0 "Squeeze" has been released
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Bahman Kahinpour wrote: Hi, I was planning to download Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 6.0 today in order to test it to see if it's ready for deployment on server platforms that I noticed something. The download links are: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.0/kfreebsd-amd64/iso-dvd/ http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.0/kfreebsd-i386/iso-dvd/ And according to the CHECKSUMS available in that directory there should be 7 DVD-ROMs for each architecture (amd64, i386): debian-6.0.0-kfreebsd--DVD-.iso where =amd64/i386 and N=1...7 but only the first DVD-ROM is available for each architecture. Where are other DVD-ROMs? http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.0/kfreebsd-amd64/iso-dvd/debian-6.0.0-kfreebsd-amd64-DVD-1.iso http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.0/kfreebsd-i386/iso-dvd/debian-6.0.0-kfreebsd-i386-DVD-1.iso now that question is better asked on debian-...@lists.debian.org as it's a Debian release not a FreeBSD one. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
hard disc spindown ?
Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to spindown selected IDE discs from either STABLE or CURRENT ? Any pointers would be appreciated. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
ISO 5.0 - is this all ?
Hi, does anybody know if there will also be a disc3 and disc4 ISO for 5.0 (i386) ? -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: probrem PPP
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Helizonaldo wrote: Hi, this question might be better asked on freebsd-questions@ I have a problem, I get 2 link ADSL of the "TELEMAR Brazil", but don't to connect whit PPP. my script its ppp.conf: -- default: set timeout 0 set log local phase lcp ipcp tun nat enable yes enable dns velox1: set device PPPoE:xl1 set server /var/run/velox1 "" 0177 set authname [EMAIL PROTECTED] set authkey yyy add default HISADDR velox2: set device PPPoE:xl0 set server /var/run/velox2 "" 0177 set authname [EMAIL PROTECTED] set authkey yyy #ppp -ddial -unit0 velox1 #ppp -ddial -unit1 velox2 but when swith on, my ifconfig stay like this tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1492 inet 189.12.186.216 --> 200.217.255.30 netmask 0x Opened by PID 525 tun1: flags=8051 mtu 1500 Opened by PID 527 #no matching session #no matching session #no matching session then how to swith on 2 link ADSL with PPP? do a man ppp then type: /MULTI-LINK PPP and read ;-) -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cyclades isa card in 5.x not found ?
Hi, I am having problems to make my kernel find a cyclades ISA card in a 5-CURRENT system. kernel conf has: options COMPAT_OLDISA device cy 1 and [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> tail -5 /boot/device.hints # cyclades hint.cy.0.at="isa" hint.cy.0.irq="11" hint.cy.0.maddr="0xd4000" hint.cy.0.msize="0x2000" what am I missing ? Thanks in advance for any hints. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Nagios & Jail
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Albert Shih wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail. I've a problem with check_ping. [r...@]# /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_ping -H some_host -w 3000.0,80% -c 5000.0,100% -p 5 CRITICAL - You need more args!!! Could not open pipe: So I think it's become the «ping problem». So I put sysctl -w security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 in the host-jail-server. In the jail I can make a ping but the nagios check_ping don't work. Anyone have succefully install a nagios server in a jail ? so do you know what check_ping is trying to do? Does it give you an error message? Anything? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
OT: Re: listserver problems?
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Michael Scheidell wrote: Hi, might be generic listserver issues, but I noticed that at least on freebsd-jail list, it does NOT strip out dkim/domainkeys signatures. that might not be to bad, but it does 'mung' the headers, so dkim signed email passed through freebsd mailing list server comes back as a forged signature. whoever is working on the listservers can contact me for assistance on it. maybe just a postfix header IGNORE rule would strip it back out. please mail postmas...@f.o. and discuss with them. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Problem with ezjail: Manually restarted jails don't come up again
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Frank Steinborn wrote: ... jails are hanging somewhere in the boot-process, and i guess it's /etc/rc. I even doubt that this is an ezjail-only problem, but this is just a guess. Any hints? if it's network services hanging on startup, check firewall and resolve.conf inside the jail or wait a few minutes to let possible dns queries timeout. Also tpcdumping on the nase system for the jail IP might give a clue in that case. If it's something else that's hanging you can find out easily looking at jail startup logs and/or the last process started inside the jail... /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: identd on jail with multiple IPs
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Redd Vinylene wrote: I cannot seem to make identd work on a jail with multiple IPs (Bjoern Zeeb's patch): So do you have any kind of error message? packet traces or anything to further isolate the problem rather than "does not work"? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
