Re: c++ error compiling kdelibs3

2005-03-31 Thread dick hoogendijk
On 31 Mar 2005 12:08:04 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:51:26 +0200 Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> 
> > I have a very nasty error lately. I have asked for help on the
> > freebsd questions list. But that list is too general ;-)
> > I'm running a fbsd-4.11R system with up2date ports.
> > I want to portupgrade (or just a 'make install clean' kde3 to the
> > latest 3.4version but something goes wrong with kdelibs3.
> [skip]
> > Any advice on how to investigate this any further?
> 
> Have you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?

Sure I did. I always do that. You never know, can you? ;-) I followed
procedures! Yes sir, I did, so that is not the point. On a second
(almost identical) machine I even removed every trace of kde ever
installed. Still, the same error. On that machine I can only get older
kde packages back, because the most recent one will not compile.

As you can see in the error file lots of dependencies get compiled
before the error takes place. It seems kde related. Someone suggested to
contact the kde.freebsd team, but I don't know how that one goes.

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


ACPI

2005-03-31 Thread Quinn Ellis
Hello list. 

I am running FreeBSD 5.3 AMD64.  It however, won't boot when I leave 
ACPI installed. Is this a bios issue? (Epox 8kda3+ AMD64).

Thanks
Quinn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: gbde - destroying master key without lockfile

2005-03-31 Thread Kees Plonsz
On Monday 28 March 2005 17:34, Peter Schuller wrote:
> > Instead of "destroy" I use "nuke".
> 
> Thanks!
> 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


How to debug the sound driver?

2005-03-31 Thread Peter Much

Hi all,

from Release 5.2.1 to 5.3 there were changes done at the soundcard
support. (The release-notes say so.)

Now my soundcard does not work anymore with 5.3.
I have carefully studied the manpages (sound and snd_sbc), and did
not find out what I could have done wrong.

Now I am in the need some information or suggestions about how to 
debug this problem. I did not find useful debug switches in the driver 
sourcecode, or other useful approach.

The soundcard is ESS ES1869 based ISA bus card.
It should work after loading "sound" and "snd_sbc" (and did so until
5.2.1). 
I do not get any errors when loading "sound" and "snd_sbc".
When loading "snd_sbc", the kernel issues a one-line message that it 
found the ESS ES1869 (and all the io-ports and irq and dma). This
message is literally the same that I was seeing since Release 4.4,
so this part seems ok. I also get the interrupt 5 assinged to sbc1.

But the "sound" driver does not recognize the card anymore. In 
/dev/sndstat it shows no devices installed, and there are no "dsp" 
devicenodes. But since /dev/sndstat is present (and also some
sysctl variables), it seems that "sound" also got operative.

There is no problem with the hardware - I can reboot to Release 4.4,
and it is still working there.

>From my impression, the problem could be somewhere with the "sound"
driver. I would like to find out what is going wrong, but my main
difficulty is I have no idea about the logical-flow-of-functionality
there - especially how "sound" and "snd_sbc" are supposed to inter-
operate.

I reported to freebsd-multimedia, but did not get an answer.

Now, before I go the hard way analyzing changes via commitlog
(actually I never had reason to understand how the sound system
is implemented - it just worked), I would much appreciate any
idea about more straight-forward approaches.

PMc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Youngest girls in hard fucking. As in your dream.

2005-03-31 Thread Latonya
Haven't we met somewhere before? :)))

Russiann model virgins hardcoree type piics and movies.

Something you don't want is dear at any price.
http://www.geocities.com/myrna_mckinley_96/
Extremal> excusiive about Actionn speecial for you about

We're all stumbling towards the light with varying degrees of grace at 
any given moment.

See by your want own eyes.

Martyrdom does not end something, it only a beginning.The regeneration of 
society is the regeneration of society by individual education.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


making freebsd known to the world

2005-03-31 Thread Ronald Klop
Hello,
Maybe this is the wrong list for this, but why is FreeBSD never listed on  
websites of third party applications like firefox?
In this directory I can't find a FreeBSD package for example.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0.1/contrib/

I know the ports/packages system works great, so the freebsd user doesn't  
need it, but wouldn't it be good for publicity?

Greetings,
Ronald.
--
 Ronald Klop, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


possible bug report re: (malformed?) internet addresses

2005-03-31 Thread fredthetree
$ ping "mr-chips-.deviantart.com"
ping: cannot resolve mr-chips-.deviantart.com: Unknown server error

$ ping "etc-etc-etc.deviantart.com"
PING etc-etc-etc.deviantart.com (69.28.181.43): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 69.28.181.43: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=108.127 ms


At first it may seem logical to point the blame to the server, after
noting "Unknown server error," however, I am perfectly able to connect
to this address on a Windows machine.  The problem is reproducible
with any address which has a "-" before a "."

I am not sure where the problem lies, it is obviously not just within
'ping,' as I first noticed this problem within firefox/mozilla.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: possible bug report re: (malformed?) internet addresses

2005-03-31 Thread fredthetree
Almost forgot.

$ uname -a
FreeBSD computer 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar  1
05:39:33 AST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MACHINE  i386


(I haven't cvsup'd and re-built in a little while.. maybe one of you
who have could verify the problem still exists..)

-dan

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:43:12 -0400, fredthetree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ ping "mr-chips-.deviantart.com"
> ping: cannot resolve mr-chips-.deviantart.com: Unknown server error
> 
> $ ping "etc-etc-etc.deviantart.com"
> PING etc-etc-etc.deviantart.com (69.28.181.43): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 69.28.181.43: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=108.127 ms
> 
> At first it may seem logical to point the blame to the server, after
> noting "Unknown server error," however, I am perfectly able to connect
> to this address on a Windows machine.  The problem is reproducible
> with any address which has a "-" before a "."
> 
> I am not sure where the problem lies, it is obviously not just within
> 'ping,' as I first noticed this problem within firefox/mozilla.
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: making freebsd known to the world

2005-03-31 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Maybe this is the wrong list for this, 

It is, you need to go to freebsd-advocacy

> but why is FreeBSD never
> listed on websites of third party applications like firefox?
> In this directory I can't find a FreeBSD package for example.
> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0.1/contrib/
>

Have you ever built firefox?  It requires about 28 ports or so that
are not in the base FreeBSD install, at least for version 4.11, and
that is for the native version of it.  And many of these are GPL
so you are just adding trouble for BSD users who need a system they
can use as a base for a commercial product - the last thing they want
to discover is their app linked into some GPL library.

If the Linux distributors want to bloat their base systems for every
3rd party application that comes along that is fine.
 
> I know the ports/packages system works great, so the freebsd user
> doesn't need it, but wouldn't it be good for publicity?
> 

It would.  But why are you asking us, ask the Mozilla people why they
haven't at least put up a link saying firefox is available in the ports
directories.

Ted
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: possible bug report re: (malformed?) internet addresses

2005-03-31 Thread Freminlins
Interesting. Host can look it up:
bash-2.05b$ host mr-chips-.deviantart.com
mr-chips-.deviantart.com has address 69.28.181.43

But the host name is itself invalid. From RFC 1035:

  The labels must follow the rules for ARPANET host names.  They must
  start with a letter, end with a letter or digit, and have as interior
  characters only letters, digits, and hyphen.

My guess is Windows is actually munging it, when it would be better to
return an error.


Frem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


sshd listening on more than one port.

2005-03-31 Thread Mick Walker
Hello,

I am wanting to know if it is possible to enabled the sshd to listen on
more than one port, without having to spawn another instance of the
server itself.
If it is possible does anyone have any idea how I could accomplish this.

Thanks in advance.

Mick Walker
Business Analyst 
IMPORTANT NOTICE: 
This email is confidential. It must not be read, copied disclosed or used by 
any person other than the named recipient. Unauthorised use, disclosure or 
copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The views expressed in this 
mail are the views of the author and may not be the views of the company. If 
you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediatly. 
There may be attachments to this email which may contain viruses which could 
damage your own computer system. BodyCare International has taken every 
reasonable precaution to minimise the risk, but cannot accept liability for any 
damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry 
out your own virus checks before opening attachments. 
  
BodyCare International 
BodyCare House, Blackett Road, Darlington, Co. Durham, DL1 2BJ 
Tel: 01325 360900 
Fax: 01325 363922 
  
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problem with PF

2005-03-31 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm trying to set up PF on a server, and when I run pfctl -nf
> /etc/pf.conf, I get the following error:
> pfctl: ifa_load: pfi_get_ifaces: Bad file descriptor

More info is required. 

Which FreeBSD and PF versions (not all permutations of pf and FreeBSD
will work, see the handbook), pf relevant rc.conf lines, your pf.conf,
ifconfig output

> Google doesn't come up with anything, I've got no clue what that is.  Any 
> help?

Check your ruleset for obvious errors, such as trying to address a
non-existent interface. Then again, this is guesswork based on very
little information.

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: SATA II NCQ Sil3124 AMD64 NForce4 Ultra Support?

2005-03-31 Thread Andrew P.
EvilTwinkie wrote:
Question is what's the status of the driver support for the NForce4 Ultra
Chipset? I am planning on purchasing the below setup, and would like to use
a raid1 config. Any other issues??
Here's the setup.
Maxtor 6B250S0 250GB SATA150 7200rpm 16MB Hard Drive x2
Microstar K8N Neo4 Platinum Socket 939 AMD Athlon 64
SATA 1.0 Sil3114, Sil3124-1
SATA 2.0 Sil3124-2

Hello,
AFAIK, So/ren is still waiting for SATA II docs/equipments
from different manufacturers to arrive. And nForce chipsets
seem to have always been supported a little worse than
VIA, not to say anything about Intel.
Consider sticking to what is supported best.
Andrew P.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: making freebsd known to the world

2005-03-31 Thread Svein Halvor Halvorsen

* Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-03-31 01:45 -0800]
>  > but why is FreeBSD never
>  > listed on websites of third party applications like firefox?
>  > In this directory I can't find a FreeBSD package for example.
>  > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0.1/contrib/
>  >
>  
>  Have you ever built firefox?  It requires about 28 ports or so that
>  are not in the base FreeBSD install, at least for version 4.11, and
>  that is for the native version of it.  And many of these are GPL
>  so you are just adding trouble for BSD users who need a system they
>  can use as a base for a commercial product - the last thing they want
>  to discover is their app linked into some GPL library.
>  
>  If the Linux distributors want to bloat their base systems for every
>  3rd party application that comes along that is fine.


I think you misunderstood. Noone is asking to add firefox (or any other 
third-party application) to the base system. I think the OP is asking the 
FreeBSD community to put some pressure on third-party vendors to make 
freebsd-packages available on their websites. This way the word "FreeBSD" 
would be mentioned and hopefully noticed.

To the OP, I can only say that I might agree, but this is really up to the 
vensors if they see it profitable or otherwise advantegous to do so. Opera 
for instance, are marketing their support for FreeBSD.

However, I stand by Ted's advice to ask this in the advocacy mailing list.


Svein Halvor
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay

2005-03-31 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Martin McCann writes:
>
>> then stop complaining to a list of 'kiddies', and use that.
>
> MS doesn't support FreeBSD.
>

Sorry guys, I couldn't resist.

Bullshit, Anthony!

http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/07/SharedSourceCLI/

"...Microsoft built the Shared Source CLI to compile and run on FreeBSD
Unix as well as Windows XP..."

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=3a1c93fa-7462-47
d0-8e56-8dd34c6292f0&displaylang=en

"...This implementation builds and runs on Windows XP, the FreeBSD
operating system..."


Ted




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay

2005-03-31 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On 31 Mar Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Sorry guys, I couldn't resist.

Please, control yourself Ted. It's /so/ quite lately ;-)

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: making freebsd known to the world

2005-03-31 Thread Ronald Klop
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:42:52 +0200 (CEST), Svein Halvor Halvorsen  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

* Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-03-31 01:45 -0800]
 > but why is FreeBSD never
 > listed on websites of third party applications like firefox?
 > In this directory I can't find a FreeBSD package for example.
 >  
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0.1/contrib/
 >

 Have you ever built firefox?  It requires about 28 ports or so that
 are not in the base FreeBSD install, at least for version 4.11, and
 that is for the native version of it.  And many of these are GPL
 so you are just adding trouble for BSD users who need a system they
 can use as a base for a commercial product - the last thing they want
 to discover is their app linked into some GPL library.
 If the Linux distributors want to bloat their base systems for every
 3rd party application that comes along that is fine.

I think you misunderstood. Noone is asking to add firefox (or any other
third-party application) to the base system. I think the OP is asking the
FreeBSD community to put some pressure on third-party vendors to make
freebsd-packages available on their websites. This way the word "FreeBSD"
would be mentioned and hopefully noticed.
To the OP, I can only say that I might agree, but this is really up to  
the
vensors if they see it profitable or otherwise advantegous to do so.  
Opera
for instance, are marketing their support for FreeBSD.

However, I stand by Ted's advice to ask this in the advocacy mailing  
list.
I just mailed mozilla about it, but I don't expect an answer soon.
I will ask this on freebsd-advocacy also.
Ronald.
--
 Ronald Klop, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: making freebsd known to the world

2005-03-31 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-03-31 01:45 -0800]
>>  > but why is FreeBSD never
>>  > listed on websites of third party applications like firefox?
>>  > In this directory I can't find a FreeBSD package for example.
>>  >
> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0.1/contrib/
>>  >
>> 
>>  Have you ever built firefox?  It requires about 28 ports or so that
>>  are not in the base FreeBSD install, at least for version 4.11, and
>>  that is for the native version of it.  And many of these are GPL
>>  so you are just adding trouble for BSD users who need a system they
>>  can use as a base for a commercial product - the last thing they
>>  want to discover is their app linked into some GPL library.
>> 
>>  If the Linux distributors want to bloat their base systems for every
>>  3rd party application that comes along that is fine.
> 
> 
> I think you misunderstood. Noone is asking to add firefox (or
> any other
> third-party application) to the base system. I think the OP is asking
> the FreeBSD community to put some pressure on third-party vendors to
> make freebsd-packages available on their websites. This way the
> word "FreeBSD"
> would be mentioned and hopefully noticed.
> 

I should have been more clear.  I knew what the OP was suggesting,
it is impractical though because you can't just compile firefox
then package it up, then install the package and be done with it.
Along with that package you would have to install a number of other
packages.  On other systems like Linux you don't have to install these
since they are already part of the base Linux system.

Ted
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problems with man

2005-03-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-03-30 17:06, Lord Raiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 06:11 PM 3/30/05 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>install -o root -g wheel -m 644 \
>>/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config \
>>/etc/manpath.config
>
> Awesome, that worked.  Thanks!!

It's a "hackish" workaround for the symptom of the problem you
described, but you're welcome.  Glad that it worked :-)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


How do I know what a meta port installs?

2005-03-31 Thread Per Berger
Hi all!

I am running freebsd 5.3 RELEASE p5 and have installed several ports, so 
now I have X, gnome 2.10, firefox, openoffice and several other 
"goodies" installed. And most of it without a glitch! :-)

However, I have a question... (Of course, why else bother the list?? ;-) 
)

I have installed a couple of "meta" ports, for example gnome2. How can I 
see exactly which ports the meta port installs? I have tried to figure 
it out but failed...

I am right now installing "gnome2-power-tools" and can see that it 
installs apache (!) which causes some concern regarding configuration 
and security. So; what else did it install? How do I find out?

Regards,

Per Berger
Sweden

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


violation copyright

2005-03-31 Thread Rod Sortons.Net
Hi, I'm Rod

I'm working on a website + magazine in Rouen (France) about night : clubs, 
pubs, concerts ...

look at this : http://bistrot.diablotins.free.fr 

Regarding your copyright legal mention page, this pub uses your logo for 
commercial reasons.

You can post at http://sortons.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2993 about this pub : 
he abuses with
a lot of things (musicians, free magazines ...) but uses your logo to promote 
his events.

If your logo is not copyrighted, no problem. If yes, post on our website : we 
plan to stop it with
his several abuses.

You can post in english, we'll translate.


Sincerly.



Rod
http://www.sortons.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


mysql upload_max_filesize

2005-03-31 Thread Dennis Olvany
Everything I've seen says to put the upload_max_filesize into php.ini, but I 
searched my drive and I don't have a php.ini. Anyone know the deal?

FreeBSD 5.3
PHP 4.3.10
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Disable loader.conf when booting? Can't boot because of it ..

2005-03-31 Thread Daniel Johansson
Hi, I really need some help here. I'm running a raid0, with vinum, and read
the errata about adding geom_vinum_load="YES" to loader.conf because
vinim_start="YES" in rc.conf paniced my system when booting. I'm running
5.3-RELEASE and the errata mentioned that one too. 

So I added gvinum to loader.conf and now I can't boot. All I get is a lot of
scrolling text that says something about gvinum error, can't remember the
exact message but it can't boot anyway. Tried single mode to delete this line
but can't boot into single mode either. Tried disable-module geom_vinum in the
loader but that didn't help either. It loaded the module anyway.

So I'm really desperate here .. is there any way to tell my system to
completly ignore loader.conf when booting so that I at least can access the
system and edit loader.conf?

Please CC to me if you reply.

-- 
Daniel Johansson - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


firefox doesn't show up

2005-03-31 Thread T.F. Cheng
hi, 
   My firefox stop to show up after I started it these
days, from "ps" and "top" I can see the process is
running (firefox-bin), but it won't show up in the
x-windows. Is there any reason that it did something
like this? 

thanks!!

 

Best Regards,

Tsu-Fan Cheng

_
Do You Yahoo!?
登記免費的 @yahoo.com 中文電子郵件 @ http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: How do I know what a meta port installs?

2005-03-31 Thread Erik Nørgaard
Per Berger wrote:
I have installed a couple of "meta" ports, for example gnome2. How can I 
see exactly which ports the meta port installs? I have tried to figure 
it out but failed...

I am right now installing "gnome2-power-tools" and can see that it 
installs apache (!) which causes some concern regarding configuration 
and security. So; what else did it install? How do I find out?
A meta port installs a number of packages by depending on them. For 
example in the ports/x11/gnome2/Makefile you will find a variable 
"RUN_DEPENDS=" and then a long list of things.

All these dependencies are installed when you "make install" but since 
it is a run-time dependency, nothing happens if you just type "make".

What you won't see, is that each of these packages most likely depends 
on other packages etc. that are also installed. Tracing this till the 
end is hard.

What may give you some idea is to install the portupgrade tools and run
  portupgrade -rRn gnome2
This will not install anything (-n) but recurse up and down in the 
dependencies to tell you what would be done. This may not show you all 
dependencies as portupgrade should only want to upgrade what is _not_ up 
to date.

Regarding gnome2-power-tools:
First, it may install apache as a (sub-) dependency, but apache won't 
start unless you start it, as such it does not introduce new network 
accessible services.

Second: Do you actually need all that? The easiest way to keep a system 
clean and updated is to stay at minimal needs, install as needed. You 
will learn that first time you try to upgrade a major package ...

Cheers, Erik
--
Ph: +34.666334818   web: http://www.locolomo.org
S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt
Subject ID:  A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9
Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Disable loader.conf when booting? Can't boot because of it ..

2005-03-31 Thread wizlayer
On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:36 am, Daniel Johansson wrote:
> Hi, I really need some help here. I'm running a raid0, with
> vinum, and read the errata about adding geom_vinum_load="YES"
> to loader.conf because vinim_start="YES" in rc.conf paniced my
> system when booting. I'm running 5.3-RELEASE and the errata
> mentioned that one too.
>
> So I added gvinum to loader.conf and now I can't boot. All I
> get is a lot of scrolling text that says something about gvinum
> error, can't remember the exact message but it can't boot
> anyway. Tried single mode to delete this line but can't boot
> into single mode either. Tried disable-module geom_vinum in the
> loader but that didn't help either. It loaded the module
> anyway.
>
> So I'm really desperate here .. is there any way to tell my
> system to completly ignore loader.conf when booting so that I
> at least can access the system and edit loader.conf?
>
> Please CC to me if you reply.

I'm not sure if you can disable loader.conf during boot (would be 
a cool thing to know, though).  The only thing I know to do is 
boot from a live filesystem or from the install floppies and 
ttyv2(?) to get a shell.  You can then mount your 
slices/partitions and comment the vinum_start line out.

HTH,

WizLayer
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay

2005-03-31 Thread Chris
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin McCann writes:

then stop complaining to a list of 'kiddies', and use that.
MS doesn't support FreeBSD.

Sorry guys, I couldn't resist.
Bullshit, Anthony!
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/07/SharedSourceCLI/
"...Microsoft built the Shared Source CLI to compile and run on FreeBSD
Unix as well as Windows XP..."
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=3a1c93fa-7462-47
d0-8e56-8dd34c6292f0&displaylang=en
"...This implementation builds and runs on Windows XP, the FreeBSD
operating system..."
Ted
If I know Anthony, he'll reply to the above something like:
Perhaps - but I'm talking about WindowsNT...
--
Best regards,
Chris
Why worry about tomorrow?  We may not make it through today!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: How do I know what a meta port installs?

2005-03-31 Thread Per Berger
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:58:41PM +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
> Per Berger wrote:
> >I have installed a couple of "meta" ports, for example gnome2. How can I 
> >see exactly which ports the meta port installs? I have tried to figure 
> >it out but failed...
> >
> >I am right now installing "gnome2-power-tools" and can see that it 
> >installs apache (!) which causes some concern regarding configuration 
> >and security. So; what else did it install? How do I find out?
> 
> A meta port installs a number of packages by depending on them. For 
> example in the ports/x11/gnome2/Makefile you will find a variable 
> "RUN_DEPENDS=" and then a long list of things.
> 
> All these dependencies are installed when you "make install" but since 
> it is a run-time dependency, nothing happens if you just type "make".
> 
> What you won't see, is that each of these packages most likely depends 
> on other packages etc. that are also installed. Tracing this till the 
> end is hard.
> 
> What may give you some idea is to install the portupgrade tools and run
> 
>   portupgrade -rRn gnome2
> 
> This will not install anything (-n) but recurse up and down in the 
> dependencies to tell you what would be done. This may not show you all 
> dependencies as portupgrade should only want to upgrade what is _not_ up 
> to date.

Thanks! I'll check it out...

> 
> Regarding gnome2-power-tools:
> 
> First, it may install apache as a (sub-) dependency, but apache won't 
> start unless you start it, as such it does not introduce new network 
> accessible services.

Yes, I added apache_enable="NO" to /etc/rc.conf but I am a bit concerned what 
else got installed...

> 
> Second: Do you actually need all that? The easiest way to keep a system 
> clean and updated is to stay at minimal needs, install as needed. You 
> will learn that first time you try to upgrade a major package ...

I know I do not need all that got installed... I am usually conservative 
regarding what I install but now I wanted to be a little wild and try out 
the new gnome 2.10 and after reading the gnome faq on freebsd.org I also 
wanted to check out the power tools... This is after all an old PC at 
home, but being an IT professional the "Pro" part of me woke up when I 
saw apache flying by... ;-)

> 
> Cheers, Erik
> -- 
> Ph: +34.666334818   web: http://www.locolomo.org
> S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt
> Subject ID:  A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9
> Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2
> 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


ifconfig

2005-03-31 Thread Grant Peel
Hi all,
Is there a way to ask infconfig to report what the virtual aliase names are 
when ./ifconfig is run? i.e. the alias names like em0:0, em0:1 em0:3 ... 
that are assigned to them in rc.conf?

-Grant 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


4.11-STABLE

2005-03-31 Thread dick hoogendijk
Now that FreeBSD-4.11 is deprecated, it will be the last release from
the 4.xx series, what is it about RELENG-4 (the 4.11-STABLE)? This build
will be /newer/ than 4.11R and always will be. Will it be safe to use?
What about security updates? Or will it be safer to stick with 4.11R and
update the sources to RELENG-4_11?

What are the benefits of using 4.11-stable if it's deprecated? Are there
any?

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: problem with Azureus

2005-03-31 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I recently had trouble with Azureus using approx 53% of my mem and 90% of my 
> SWAP so idecided to upgrade my RAM from 512 to 1gig thinking this would solve 
> my problem, but alas i was mistaken.
> 
> Is there a way i can instruct it so Azureus only uses a certain %?  As it is 
> when this program is running it pritty well much bogs down my machine making 
> it damn near impossible to do anything else.
> 
> It also uses so much it gets to the point where there is no more SWAP left 
> for 
> it to use and ends up closing itself down.

You can always use process limits, but that will just cause the
process to close down sooner.

Azureus is a Java application, and Java does its own memory
management.  One implication of this is that its memory use should not
be able to grow unbounded.

A quick search pointed me at:
http://azureus.aelitis.com/wiki/index.php/MemoryUsage
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay

2005-03-31 Thread Bernt Hansson
Anthony Atkielski skrev:
Someone must be running my machine, since it is mentioned on the 5.3
compatibility list.
Your machine is NOT on the HCL list.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: problem with Azureus

2005-03-31 Thread Warren
> You can always use process limits, but that will just cause the
> process to close down sooner.
>
> Azureus is a Java application, and Java does its own memory
> management.  One implication of this is that its memory use should not
> be able to grow unbounded.

Unfortunately it quite frequently runs to the stage where i have nothing left 
and it closes itself down.

> A quick search pointed me at:
> http://azureus.aelitis.com/wiki/index.php/MemoryUsage

i'll look it up
-- 
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
http://www.shinji.nq.nu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: System Panic (Trap 12)

2005-03-31 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"James Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have posted this message to hackers but have not gotten a response.  I 
> think this is networking related, but I don't know how to solve it?  Any 
> ideas?
>   
>   I am getting numerous panics.  It seems to be totally random with no 
> bearing on load.  This is a dual proc. AMD 2600, 2 GB Ram.
> 
> 
> I have included the where results of three seperate core files.
> 
> Please advise.

Those aren't debugging kernels, are they?  If they are, you're getting
serious stack corruption.  If not, you really need to follow the
Handbook and FAQ instructions for kernel debugging, because those
traces aren't showing much that's useful.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


IPsec How-to

2005-03-31 Thread Monah Baki
Hi all,

I'm reading the FreeBSD handbook, the vpn over ipsec how-to section, but how
do I apply it if I have 1 freebsd machine with 1 NIC, and multiple XP boxes in
a LAN. All communications nfs, ftp etc etc to that Freebsd machine must be
encrypted.
Can it be done? is there any how to for this scenario somewhere?


Thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: sshd listening on more than one port.

2005-03-31 Thread Daniel Bye
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:29:29AM +0100, Mick Walker wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am wanting to know if it is possible to enabled the sshd to listen on
> more than one port, without having to spawn another instance of the
> server itself.
> If it is possible does anyone have any idea how I could accomplish this.

Yes, it is possible - this is from man sshd_config:

 PortSpecifies the port number that sshd listens on.  The default is
 22.  Multiple options of this type are permitted.  See also
 ListenAddress.


I have just tested it - your sshd_config needs to include something like
this:

Port 22
Port 

etc.

It works just fine:

# sockstat -4l | grep sshd
root sshd   38948 3  tcp4   *:*:*
root sshd   38948 4  tcp4   *:22  *:*

HTH

Dan

-- 
Daniel Bye

PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc
PGP Key fingerprint: 3B9D 8BBB EB03 BA83 5DB4 3B88 86FC F03A 90A1 BE8F
 _
  ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
 - against HTML, vCards and  X
- proprietary attachments in e-mail / \


pgpXQ0L2J403w.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: 4.11-STABLE

2005-03-31 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:26:01PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> Now that FreeBSD-4.11 is deprecated, it will be the last release from
> the 4.xx series, what is it about RELENG-4 (the 4.11-STABLE)? This build
> will be /newer/ than 4.11R and always will be. Will it be safe to use?
> What about security updates? Or will it be safer to stick with 4.11R and
> update the sources to RELENG-4_11?
> 
> What are the benefits of using 4.11-stable if it's deprecated? Are there
> any?

I don't know if "deprecated" is the word I would use about RELENG_4
(aka 4-STABLE.)  It is true that no new releases planned from that
branch, and since most developers have switched over to RELENG_5 (or
-CURRENT) there is little new development happening for 4.x.

There is still the occasional commit going in to the RELENG_4 branch
but mostly bugfixes and few if any new features (and certainly not
anything that is supposed to disrupt existing configurations.)
I would expect new commits to trickle in slowly to RELENG_4 for another
2-3 years or so until it is completely abandoned. (The latest commit to
RELENG_3 happened in Dec. 2003 - two and half years after the last 3.x
release.)

Since the commit rate has gone down considerably for 4.x since 5.x was
declared as -STABLE, there is really very little difference between
RELENG_4 and 4.11-RELEASE at this point in time, but there is some.

The advantage of running RELENG_4 instead of RELENG_4_11 is that you
will get a some extra bugfixes and possibly one or two minor new
features. The disadvantage is of course that some of those bugfixes may
inadvartently introduce new bugs that have yet been detected.

Security updates will be applied to RELENG_4 as well as to RELENG_4_11
at least until 31 Jan. 2007.

Personally I would certainly choose RELENG_4 over RELENG_4_11, but if
you are extremely cautious (and have not run into any of the bugs fixed
in RELENG_4 but not in RELENG_4_11) you might prefer RELENG_4_11.


For a new installation I would recommend the upcoming 5.4-RELEASE, but
for systems that already have 4.x installed and are happy with it might
make sense to stick with 4.x for a while longer.
(There are also some systems where 4.x works but 5.x does not - and
vice versa.  That 5.x is somewhat more resource hungry than 4.x could
also be a consideration very low-end systems (here defined as '486 or
slower and 32MB RAM or less.))


-- 

Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: mysql upload_max_filesize

2005-03-31 Thread Mario Hoerich
# Dennis Olvany:
> Everything I've seen says to put the upload_max_filesize into php.ini,
> but I searched my drive and I don't have a php.ini. Anyone know the deal?

IIRC there are two files (php.ini-dist and php.ini-recommended) in
/usr/local/etc.  Copy either to php.ini and you're all set. :)

 HTH,
Mario
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: IPsec How-to

2005-03-31 Thread Luke Kearney

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:36:01 -0400
"Monah Baki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus:

> Hi all,
> 
> I'm reading the FreeBSD handbook, the vpn over ipsec how-to section, but how
> do I apply it if I have 1 freebsd machine with 1 NIC, and multiple XP boxes in
> a LAN. All communications nfs, ftp etc etc to that Freebsd machine must be
> encrypted.
> Can it be done? is there any how to for this scenario somewhere?
> 
> 
> Thank you

Hi,
Yes it is possible though I won't claim to have done it myself but you
would probably be best to start off by looking into a program like
racoon or something then set up each machine with the private keys or
certificates. I believe XP is pretty easy setup when it comes to IPSec.

Good Luck

LukeK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: IPsec How-to

2005-03-31 Thread Libby Charles-CCL044
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Kearney
>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:46 AM
>To: Monah Baki
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: IPsec How-to
>
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm reading the FreeBSD handbook, the vpn over ipsec how-to section, 
>> but how do I apply it if I have 1 freebsd machine with 1 NIC, and 
>> multiple XP boxes in a LAN. All communications nfs, ftp etc etc to 
>> that Freebsd machine must be encrypted. Can it be done? is there any 
>> how to for this scenario somewhere?
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you
>
>Hi,
>Yes it is possible though I won't claim to have done it myself but you
would probably be best to start off by looking
>into a program like racoon or something then set up each machine with
the private keys or certificates. I believe XP is
> pretty easy setup when it comes to IPSec.

It is easy to set up, but it only has single key functionality.  It does
not fully support IPSec.  This is a big reason why they do not broadcast
it usablity.  They rely on other VPN solutions.  One that is up and
coming is VPN through SSL.

Charles
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Realtek RTL8201BL PHY on FBSD 5.3

2005-03-31 Thread Waldenio Almeida

Hi,

I'am having trouble with the network configuration
under FreeBSD 5.3 in an Opteron Machine that have
a ASUS SK8N motherboard with an on-board LAN Realtek
RTL8201BL PHY.

Ok, this LAN isn't is in the hardware notes for the
FreBSD release notes. So, there is no way to do it work ?

Many Thanks,
Waldenio.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: c++ error compiling kdelibs3

2005-03-31 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:07:13 +0200
Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thursday, 31. March 2005 09:51, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> > I have a very nasty error lately. I have asked for help on the
> > freebsd questions list. But that list is too general ;-)
> > I'm running a fbsd-4.11R system with up2date ports.
> > I want to portupgrade (or just a 'make install clean' kde3 to the
> > latest 3.4version but something goes wrong with kdelibs3.
> >
> > I get this 'cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple
> > compilations.
> 
> See
> http://freebsd.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2004-September/008878.html

[quote]

> > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include @INCLUDE_des@
>
>  ^
> That shouldn't be there. It's picked up from krb5-config output
> (from /usr/bin/krb5-config --cflags).
>
> I suspect that the krb5-config you have 
> is probably stale (i.e. you installed the crypto distribution from an
> installation CD at some point and subsequently updated your system
> without having MAKE_KERBEROS5=yes set in your /etc/make.conf). If it's
> not stale and you did indeed build kerberos with your world,

So simple! It works! I had an /usr/bin/krb5-config too and after
deleting the rule you mentioned here the compilation went well! Thank
you!

Remains one qustion: is it better to rebuild freebsd-4.11-stable WITH
kerberos5 or do I remove that (now) unwanted kerberos5 piece of
software. And if so, how? Because it's in the base, how can it be
removed? Or, again, should I just rebuild world with /etc/make.conf ->
"make_kerberos5=yes"

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Rebuilding everything

2005-03-31 Thread Vittorio
As a newbye with freebsd 5.3 on a pentium 3 and many source packages compiled 
& installed from the ports, I've just learnt that I could "tailor" my box 
modifying make.conf. I'm focusing now on the fact that I could add a 
"CPUTYPE=p3" in that file to make the all box faster due to a more refined 
compilation.
BUT...
How could I re-compile and re-install everything to take into account the new 
directives in make.conf?
Ciao
Vittorio 

 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Rebuilding everything

2005-03-31 Thread Darksidex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Vittorio wrote:
> As a newbye with freebsd 5.3 on a pentium 3 and many source packages compiled 
> & installed from the ports, I've just learnt that I could "tailor" my box 
> modifying make.conf. I'm focusing now on the fact that I could add a 
> "CPUTYPE=p3" in that file to make the all box faster due to a more refined 
> compilation.
> BUT...
> How could I re-compile and re-install everything to take into account the new 
> directives in make.conf?
> Ciao
> Vittorio 
> 

You can use portupgrade -vaf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFCTC1fLWSOuibjjvIRAtC6AKCNP6KYLj/Z0JWxWVWiWrRjY6hy9gCfTFBy
kwm1+oNeBj9Uur9G7T6om7s=
=76jN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problem with PF

2005-03-31 Thread Pat Maddox
FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5.  I'm not sure how to check the pf version.

I just started getting this error a couple days ago, and I've got
absolutely no clue why.  I don't recall making any significant changes
to the box.  Anyway, here's pf.conf:

# --- pf.conf skeleton for server
#
# --- MACRO Section  -

EXT_IF="fxp0"

PING = "echoreq"

# --- allowed incoming services initiated by clients

TCP_IN = "{ ssh, smtp, ftp, imap, http, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, 5005 }"
UDP_IN = "{ domain }"

# --- allowed services initiated by server

TCP_OUT = "{ ssh, smtp, ftp, http, ntp, 5999 }"
UDP_OUT = "{ domain, ntp }"

# -- TABLE Section --

# -- OPTIONS Section
set loginterface $EXT_IF

# - TRAFFIC NORMALIZATION 
scrub in all
# -- TRANSLATION Section (NAT/RDR)

# -- FILTER section

# --- DEFAULT POLICY
block log all

# --- LOOPBACK
pass quick on lo0 all

# === INCOMING 
# --- EXTERNAL INTERFACE

# --- TCP
pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp from any to $EXT_IF port
$TCP_IN flags S/SA keep state

# --- UDP
pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto udp from any to $EXT_IF port
$UDP_IN keep state

# --- ICMP
pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto icmp from any to $EXT_IF icmp-type
$PING keep state

# === OUTGOING 
# --- EXTERNAL INTERFACE

# --- TCP
pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp from $EXT_IF to any port
$TCP_OUT flags S/SA  keep state

# --- UDP
pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto udp from $EXT_IF to any port
$UDP_OUT keep state

# --- ICMP
pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto icmp from $EXT_IF to any
icmp-type $PING keep state

# - end of pf.conf


On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:31:13 +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I'm trying to set up PF on a server, and when I run pfctl -nf
> > /etc/pf.conf, I get the following error:
> > pfctl: ifa_load: pfi_get_ifaces: Bad file descriptor
> 
> More info is required.
> 
> Which FreeBSD and PF versions (not all permutations of pf and FreeBSD
> will work, see the handbook), pf relevant rc.conf lines, your pf.conf,
> ifconfig output
> 
> > Google doesn't come up with anything, I've got no clue what that is.  Any 
> > help?
> 
> Check your ruleset for obvious errors, such as trying to address a
> non-existent interface. Then again, this is guesswork based on very
> little information.
> 
> --
> Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
> http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
> "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problem with PF

2005-03-31 Thread Pat Maddox
Sorry, I grabbed pf.conf from the wrong machine.  I basically just
copied the previous one, made the couple changes I needed.  The real
difference is that there's no UDP in, and not as many TCP ins are
allowed:

# --- pf.conf skeleton for server
#
# --- MACRO Section  -

EXT_IF="rl0"

PING = "echoreq"

# --- allowed incoming services initiated by clients

TCP_IN = "{ ssh }"
#UDP_IN = "{  }"

# --- allowed services initiated by server

TCP_OUT = "{ ssh, ftp, http, ntp, 5999 }"
UDP_OUT = "{ domain, ntp }"

# -- TABLE Section --

# -- OPTIONS Section
set loginterface $EXT_IF

# - TRAFFIC NORMALIZATION 
scrub in all
# -- TRANSLATION Section (NAT/RDR)

# -- FILTER section

# --- DEFAULT POLICY
block log all

# --- LOOPBACK
pass quick on lo0 all

# === INCOMING 
# --- EXTERNAL INTERFACE

# --- TCP
pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp from any to $EXT_IF port
$TCP_IN flags S/SA keep state

# --- UDP
#pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto udp from any to $EXT_IF port
$UDP_IN keep state

# --- ICMP
pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto icmp from any to $EXT_IF icmp-type
$PING keep state

# === OUTGOING 
# --- EXTERNAL INTERFACE

# --- TCP
pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp from $EXT_IF to any port
$TCP_OUT flags S/SA  keep state

# --- UDP
pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto udp from $EXT_IF to any port
$UDP_OUT keep state

# --- ICMP
pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto icmp from $EXT_IF to any
icmp-type $PING keep state

# - end of pf.conf



On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:53 -0700, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5.  I'm not sure how to check the pf version.
> 
> I just started getting this error a couple days ago, and I've got
> absolutely no clue why.  I don't recall making any significant changes
> to the box.  Anyway, here's pf.conf:
> 
> # --- pf.conf skeleton for server
> #
> # --- MACRO Section  -
> 
> EXT_IF="fxp0"
> 
> PING = "echoreq"
> 
> # --- allowed incoming services initiated by clients
> 
> TCP_IN = "{ ssh, smtp, ftp, imap, http, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, 5005 }"
> UDP_IN = "{ domain }"
> 
> # --- allowed services initiated by server
> 
> TCP_OUT = "{ ssh, smtp, ftp, http, ntp, 5999 }"
> UDP_OUT = "{ domain, ntp }"
> 
> # -- TABLE Section --
> 
> # -- OPTIONS Section
> set loginterface $EXT_IF
> 
> # - TRAFFIC NORMALIZATION 
> scrub in all
> # -- TRANSLATION Section (NAT/RDR)
> 
> # -- FILTER section
> 
> # --- DEFAULT POLICY
> block log all
> 
> # --- LOOPBACK
> pass quick on lo0 all
> 
> # === INCOMING 
> # --- EXTERNAL INTERFACE
> 
> # --- TCP
> pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp from any to $EXT_IF port
> $TCP_IN flags S/SA keep state
> 
> # --- UDP
> pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto udp from any to $EXT_IF port
> $UDP_IN keep state
> 
> # --- ICMP
> pass in quick on $EXT_IF inet proto icmp from any to $EXT_IF icmp-type
> $PING keep state
> 
> # === OUTGOING 
> # --- EXTERNAL INTERFACE
> 
> # --- TCP
> pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp from $EXT_IF to any port
> $TCP_OUT flags S/SA  keep state
> 
> # --- UDP
> pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto udp from $EXT_IF to any port
> $UDP_OUT keep state
> 
> # --- ICMP
> pass out quick on $EXT_IF inet proto icmp from $EXT_IF to any
> icmp-type $PING keep state
> 
> # - end of pf.conf
> 
> 
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:31:13 +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I'm trying to set up PF on a server, and when I run pfctl -nf
> > > /etc/pf.conf, I get the following error:
> > > pfctl: ifa_load: pfi_get_ifaces: Bad file descriptor
> >
> > More info is required.
> >
> > Which FreeBSD and PF versions (not all permutations of pf and FreeBSD
> > will work, see the handbook), pf relevant rc.conf lines, your pf.conf,
> > ifconfig output
> >
> > > Google doesn't come up with anything, I've got no clue what that is.  Any 
> > > help?
> >
> > Check your ruleset for obvious errors, such as trying to address a
> > non-existent interface. Then again, this is guesswork based on very
> > little information.
> >
> > --
> > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
> > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
> > "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
> >
> > ___
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> >
>
___
freebs

How to find needed modules for rebuilding kernel

2005-03-31 Thread Pat Maddox
In rebuilding a kernel, how do you know exactly what modules you need?
 The Handbook is a good start, and a lot of them are obvious (i.e. if
I have no SCSI disks, disable all SCSI modules).  Others aren't so
easy, particularly serial devices, and the pseudo devices.  How can I
find out exactly what I need to enable, so I can make the kernel as
tight as possible?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: sshd listening on more than one port.

2005-03-31 Thread jshamlet
> Hello,
> 
> I am wanting to know if it is possible to enabled the sshd to listen on
> more than one port, without having to spawn another instance of the
> server itself.
> If it is possible does anyone have any idea how I could accomplish this.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Mick Walker

Yes, simply add additional Port lines to your sshd_config file and kill -HUP 
your sshd server.

For example, my ssh server listens on 22 & 23 because of the way I handle 
incoming NAT connections, so I have:

Port 22
Port 23

in my config file.

Regards,
Seth Henry
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


kerberos4 / kerberos 5

2005-03-31 Thread dick hoogendijk
FreeBSD-4.11-stable has kerberos4/5 unchecked in the defaults/make.conf
Does that mean those two are not used? Probably so..

But how about when I want to get rid of earlier installs of kerberos4/5
using /stand/sysinstall once (long time ago..)

What files do I remove than? There is no uninstall option..
Or is it better do do a rebuild with kerberos and if so, which version?

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


my ethernet to my laptop/getting the tcp/X11 socket up

2005-03-31 Thread Chuck Robey
Well, I need to get two problems off my chest, so to speak, well, really 
3 problems.  May as well hit the easiest first, which is getting the X11 
tcp socket opened up.

BACKGROUND: I want to give the database I wrote to the friend of mine I 
wrote it for.  I got a laptop that sort of fell into my lap, but it 
didn't come with an ethernet, so I had a ethernet card lying around (I 
forget the name of the outboard cards for laptops, this is the very 
first time for me, using a laptop).  I installed it, it worked with the 
rl0 driver.  Sometimes.

Why sometimes?  Smart guy, that's question 1.  The indication I get is, 
I get an error (tcp error) soemthing like this one below (they're not 
all alike):

Mar 30 21:37:52 september kernel: rl0: discard frame w/o leading 
ethernet header (len 2 pkt len 2)

Well, the result is always the same, which is that the rl0 line stops 
dead in it's tracks.  I can do a ifconfig down/ifconfig up and clear it, 
but every time I do that, I take a 1 in 5 chance of getting a kernel 
panic.  It's not something I crave to do a lot, so I can't just dismiss 
it by making a utility to down/up the interface.  I need this fixed.

My kernel is 5.3 stable.  I picked it because it was the only one of all 
of the ones I could pick (and I did try them all) that seemed compatible 
not only with the ethernet card, but also the usb trackball I like (I 
hate mice) and that the available X for that version knows the usb 
drivers.  Too early and it won't work with ums0.

OK, I'd like suggestions from someone who knows the history, is there 
any easy fix for the rl0 driver I'm using, that will allow it to work 
stably?  Anyone know of any problem like what I've described?

Second set of problems is easier to describe: I want to get the tcp 
sockets on X turned on.  I know about the -no-tcp, and there are 
unfortunately too many places that it could be turned off.  On my 
server, running FreeBSD-6.0 (it's an opteron, dual) I am running a very 
 very reent kde (damn but that compiled easily!)  On the other machine, 
well, today it's FreeBSD-5.3 like I said.  Maybe you'll change my mind. 
On neither machine am I running any sort of login daemon, it's just 
startx.  I sure wish that the darned security person who got them to 
bias the options against running that socket would undo his work.  I 
don't mind the option existing, but making it the default was a rotten 
thing to do to me.

I won't listen to anyone who tells me to upgrade my laptop for the hell 
of it, because my app is python/gtk, and needs too many parts to work 
together for me to risk breaking what works today just for the hell of 
it.  Give me a solid reason, and then I'll do it.

I'm quite, *quite* willing to buy another ehternet card.  The one I have 
is a D-Link, the dmesg reports:

miibus0:  on rl0
Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rlphy0:  on miibus0
Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 
100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rl0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:88:27:c4:38

OK, so I'm looking for advice on the ethernet problem, and maybe
--

Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | electronics, communications, and SF/Fantasy.
New Year's Resolution:  I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up
fictitious words in the dictionary (on the wall at my old fraternity,
Signa Phi Nothing).

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: mksnap_ffs woes

2005-03-31 Thread Francisco Reyes
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I'll explain my needs briefly: I export (via Samba) a whole bunch of 
databases that 9 clients read and write.
What databases?
a) backup data so that in case of severe failure we can get it rapidly back 
(we are going to loose the last transactions, obviously);
In my experience databases DO NOT like file system backups unless the 
database is NOT running. The more heavily you use the database the least 
it will play nice with file system backups.

Is using the database backup routines an option?
Does the database has any type of replication?
We probably can live with some incoherent records in a)
Depending on the database system you are using the copies may be totally 
useless if you do a filesystem backup/sync.

BTW, we have almost no room for changes on the client side :(
What is the client side?
Given that you said it is in Samba is seems it's some type of windowd 
database. Is it a workgroup type of DB like Access or Foxpro? SQL server?

--
http://stringsutils.com
Utility for developers. Compute length, MD5, CRC and more.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: error installing openssh-portable

2005-03-31 Thread Redmond Militante
please if anyone has any ideas...


> Don't top-post, please.
> 
> Redmond Militante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > is /usr/ports/cryptlib the port you're referring to?
> 
> No, I'm talking about the crypto distribution in the base system.  I
> don't remember when it was folded into the main distribution, but for
> a long time it was separate because of concerns about export
> regulations and patent issues.
> 
> > i've also read that make -DWITHOUT_KERBEROS=yes would also work, but it 
> > didn't in my case.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 09:14:07AM -0500]
> > This one time, at band camp, Lowell Gilbert said:
> > 
> > > Redmond Militante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 
> > > > hi all
> > > > 
> > > > i get this installing the openssh-portable port on a 4.8-RELEASE machine
> > > > 
> > > > ===>  Building for openssh-portable-3.9.0.1,1
> > > > if test ! -z ""; then  /usr/bin/perl5 ./fixprogs ssh_prng_cmds ;  fi
> > > > (cd openbsd-compat && make)
> > > > cc -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop.o sshtty.o  sshconnect.o 
> > > > sshconnect1.o sshconnect2.o -L. -Lopenbsd-compat/ -L/usr/lib  
> > > > -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lssh -lopenbsd-compat 
> > > > -lcrypto -lutil -lz -lcrypt -lkrb5 -lcrypto -lcom_err -lasn1 -lroken
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_is_weak_key'
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_pcbc_encrypt'
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_cfb64_encrypt'
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_cbc_encrypt'
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_set_odd_parity'
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_read_pw_string'
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_set_key'
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_ede3_cbc_encrypt'
> > > > /usr/lib/libkrb5.so: undefined reference to `des_cbc_cksum'
> > > > *** Error code 1
> > > > 
> > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-3.9p1.
> > > > *** Error code 1
> > > > 
> > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > any ideas on how to fix?  cvsup'ing ports didn't work.
> > > 
> > > I seem to recall DES being optional back when; you'll need to install
> > > it to get this linking.  It should be in the crypto library.
> > > 
> > > Or maybe my memory is just off...
> > 
> > -- 
> > Redmond Militante
> > Software Engineer / Medill School of Journalism
> > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p13 #0: Mon Mar 28 17:07:51 CST 2005 i386
> > 11:15AM  up 45 mins, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.02, 0.05
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
>   http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/

-- 
Redmond Militante
Software Engineer / Medill School of Journalism
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p13 #0: Mon Mar 28 17:07:51 CST 2005 i386
12:00PM  up 2 days,  1:30, 1 user, load averages: 0.41, 0.16, 0.05


pgpwZV057j3VB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: my ethernet to my laptop/getting the tcp/X11 socket up

2005-03-31 Thread wizlayer
On Thursday 31 March 2005 12:41 pm, Chuck Robey wrote:
[snip]
> I installed it, it worked with the rl0 driver. 
> Sometimes.
>
> Why sometimes?  Smart guy, that's question 1.  The indication I
> get is, I get an error (tcp error) soemthing like this one
> below (they're not all alike):
>
> Mar 30 21:37:52 september kernel: rl0: discard frame w/o
> leading ethernet header (len 2 pkt len 2)
>
> Well, the result is always the same, which is that the rl0 line
> stops dead in it's tracks.  I can do a ifconfig down/ifconfig
> up and clear it, but every time I do that, I take a 1 in 5
> chance of getting a kernel panic.  It's not something I crave
> to do a lot, so I can't just dismiss it by making a utility to
> down/up the interface.  I need this fixed.
>
> [snip]
>
> I'm quite, *quite* willing to buy another ehternet card.  The
> one I have is a D-Link, the dmesg reports:
>
> miibus0:  on rl0
> Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rlphy0:  media interface> on miibus0
> Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rlphy0:  10baseT,
> 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
> Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rl0: Ethernet address:
> 00:0d:88:27:c4:38
>
> OK, so I'm looking for advice on the ethernet problem, and
> maybe
[snip]

Are you sure the network card itself isn't hosed?

I had a cheapo network card that did something very similar.  In 
fact, I'm pretty sure it had a realtek chipset too (although I'm 
not lifting a finger in their direction)...  Worked fine, then 
weird errors and *lights out*...  Turned out to be the NIC itself 
(why sometimes?  who knows...  temperature, defunct buffer 
maybe?).

my .02,

WizLayer
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Rebuilding everything

2005-03-31 Thread Tom Trelvik
Darksidex wrote:
How could I re-compile and re-install everything to take into account the new 
directives in make.conf?
Ciao
Vittorio 


You can use portupgrade -vaf
	Though that would only affect ports/packages you've installed, and not 
the rest of your system.

	I regularly cvsup /usr/ports and /usr/src and use "portupgrade -arR" to 
upgrade my ports and "make buildworld && make buildkernel 
KERNCONF=GENERIC && make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC && make 
installworld" to update the rest of my system.

	I still consider myself very new to most of this, though, so I'm not 
certain, but I think the system should be able to determine your CPUTYPE 
automatically, without needing it hardcoded in make.conf.  I think you 
should only need to use this directive if for some reason it's 
improperly detecting your cpu type.  Hopefully someone can confirm or 
disprove that for you, though.

Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: my ethernet to my laptop/getting the tcp/X11 socket up

2005-03-31 Thread Chuck Robey
wizlayer wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2005 12:41 pm, Chuck Robey wrote:
[snip]
I installed it, it worked with the rl0 driver. 
Sometimes.

Why sometimes?  Smart guy, that's question 1.  The indication I
get is, I get an error (tcp error) soemthing like this one
below (they're not all alike):
Mar 30 21:37:52 september kernel: rl0: discard frame w/o
leading ethernet header (len 2 pkt len 2)
Well, the result is always the same, which is that the rl0 line
stops dead in it's tracks.  I can do a ifconfig down/ifconfig
up and clear it, but every time I do that, I take a 1 in 5
chance of getting a kernel panic.  It's not something I crave
to do a lot, so I can't just dismiss it by making a utility to
down/up the interface.  I need this fixed.
[snip]
I'm quite, *quite* willing to buy another ehternet card.  The
one I have is a D-Link, the dmesg reports:
miibus0:  on rl0
Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rlphy0:  on miibus0
Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rlphy0:  10baseT,
10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
Mar 30 21:44:23 september kernel: rl0: Ethernet address:
00:0d:88:27:c4:38
OK, so I'm looking for advice on the ethernet problem, and
maybe
[snip]
Are you sure the network card itself isn't hosed?
I had a cheapo network card that did something very similar.  In 
fact, I'm pretty sure it had a realtek chipset too (although I'm 
not lifting a finger in their direction)...  Worked fine, then 
weird errors and *lights out*...  Turned out to be the NIC itself 
(why sometimes?  who knows...  temperature, defunct buffer 
After a lot of swimming thru the mail search page, I found that there 
are a LOT of problems that have  in common these items:

1) rl0 interface
2) FreeBSD5.3
3) error messages of the form "rl0: discard oversize frame"
There are a pretty fair number of these, from various sources.  Fact. 
At least one of them claimed it was solved in RELENG_5.  Sure wish I 
could locate the other mails in THAT chain (I spent 20 minutes trying to).

So my fix sounds like it boils down to one of two items: either getting 
someone who knows 5.3 better than I do to recommend a cardbus device 
that would be sound (a vendor) and I would run right out and buy it, or 
I suppose I could get the required sources burnt onto a cdrom, and get 
them on that laptop that way, recompile, and see about reinstalling.

I am loath to try that second method only cause I have all that userland 
software that I mustn't lose compatibiilty with, and it's got all those 
dependencies (sleepycat database, python, gtk, 3 1/2 pounds of my 
coding).  I want to do the minimum necessary to get it working.

So, if one of you folks can recommend a cardbus card that I oughta buy, 
that doesn't use the rl0 driver, that would be nice.  mail me a *.ko for 
it, and I would love you forever.  Skip that last part if you want, 
cause maybe I could do it, but I wasn't joking about wanting to mess 
with this the least I can, it's a fragile stack of software.

maybe?).
my .02,
WizLayer
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

--

Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | electronics, communications, and SF/Fantasy.
New Year's Resolution:  I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up
fictitious words in the dictionary (on the wall at my old fraternity,
Signa Phi Nothing).

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Secured Swiss Pharmacy

2005-03-31 Thread Switzerland Discreet Stuff
Hi
Swiss Pharm, did this ring a bell in your mind?
Curious? - read on..
In the heart of Switzerland since 1931. Our online store
carries a wide assortment of medicines.
With laxed laws we ask no questions & leave the discretion
up to the individual.
Iron-clad Swiss privacy & security laws allow for complete
safety of personal information.
Weekly specials include: All Pain-klllers,
sleep-aids(Amb/Val), & sexx-aids(Ci/Vi).
We ship around the world, quickly & discretley.
Bulk discounts on mid-large orders
http://Lorena.dgak.com/p/864/Lorena
regards
Lorena Putnam
Trusted, Tried & Proven
Did this reach you in error?
please let us know and your contact email will be discarded
http://Lorena.aekb.com/a.php
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


downgrade 4.11-stable to 4.11R

2005-03-31 Thread dick hoogendijk
Is it possible to go back to 4.11R if you've updated src to 4.11-stable
first and updated sthe system w/ make buildworld, install..

If I put the 4.11R sources back in /usr/src and do a make/build etc..
again will my fbsd system really be 4.11R again without soem 'nasty'
traces of the update?

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: downgrade 4.11-stable to 4.11R

2005-03-31 Thread Charles Swiger
On Mar 31, 2005, at 2:26 PM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Is it possible to go back to 4.11R if you've updated src to 4.11-stable
first and updated sthe system w/ make buildworld, install..
If I put the 4.11R sources back in /usr/src and do a make/build etc..
again will my fbsd system really be 4.11R again without soem 'nasty'
traces of the update?
Switch to using RELENG_4_11_RELEASE as your cvsup tag, and you can 
revert your sources back.  You'll be missing the recent security patch, 
though-- using RELENG_4_11 might be better.

Why do you want to revert back to the older sources?
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: How do I know what a meta port installs?

2005-03-31 Thread RW
On Thursday 31 March 2005 13:57, Per Berger wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I am running freebsd 5.3 RELEASE p5 and have installed several ports, so
> now I have X, gnome 2.10, firefox, openoffice and several other
> "goodies" installed. And most of it without a glitch! :-)
>
> However, I have a question... (Of course, why else bother the list?? ;-)
> )
>
> I have installed a couple of "meta" ports, for example gnome2. How can I
> see exactly which ports the meta port installs? I have tried to figure
> it out but failed...

cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome2-power-tools && make run-depends-list

also look at 

make pretty-print-run-depends-list

which is recursive. If your readmes are up to date you can see this in the 
README.html file
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: downgrade 4.11-stable to 4.11R

2005-03-31 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:31:27 -0500
Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mar 31, 2005, at 2:26 PM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > Is it possible to go back to 4.11R if you've updated src to
> > 4.11-stable first and updated sthe system w/ make buildworld,
> > install..
> >
> > If I put the 4.11R sources back in /usr/src and do a make/build
> > etc.. again will my fbsd system really be 4.11R again without soem
> > 'nasty' traces of the update?
> 
> Switch to using RELENG_4_11_RELEASE as your cvsup tag, and you can 
> revert your sources back.  You'll be missing the recent security
> patch,  though-- using RELENG_4_11 might be better.
> 
> Why do you want to revert back to the older sources?

RELENG_4_11 was the idea. Why I want back? I want my server on the
internet to be as secure as it can be and for what I understand 4.11 is
safer to use as 4-stable (in which always can sneak in little bugs, or
is this to paranoid?)

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Trouble Compiling courier-authlib-0.55

2005-03-31 Thread Ed Stover
I can't get courier-authlib-0.55 from source package to compile on
FreeBSD4.11 any have any pointers? Your time and help is appreciated.

./configure --prefix=/usr/local --exec-prefix=/usr/local\
--with-authvchkpw --without-authldap --without-authmysql \
--disable-root-check --with-ssl \
--with-authchangepwdir=/usr/local/libexec/authlib 

courier-authlib-0.55 source package error on make:
HAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.  -g -O2 -c -o testbdb.o testbdb.C
Linking testbdb
rm -f libshbdbobj.a
cd .libs && ar rl ../libshbdbobj.a bdbobj.$(OBJEXT) bdbobj2.$(OBJEXT)
bdbobj3.$(OBJEXT)
OBJEXT: not found
OBJEXT: not found
OBJEXT: not found
/usr/libexec/elf/ar: bdbobj.: No such file or directory
*** Error code 1

It also fails in ports.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: gcc error - SOLVED

2005-03-31 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:00:05 -0800
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:24:42PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm getting desperate. First I couldn't compile just a gnome
> > package. OK, it could be missed.. But now I want to compile the new
> > KDE-3.4 and it does not work :-( Compiling kdelibs3 I get (again)
> > this annoying error. Googling learned it shows up quit often, but I
> > found no solution. So, what is this and waht can be done about it? I
> > guess it's a gcc compiler error. I deleted all gcc packages that
> > were installed (back to the systems's version - FreeBSD-4.11R). It
> > did not help.
> > 
> > The error I get:
> > 
> > "c++: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations"
> > The same error happens sometimes with 'cc'
> 
> Show us the full error, not a context-free excerpt.

for the record :: PROBLEM IS SOLVED

See
http://freebsd.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2004-September/008878.html

[quote]

> > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include @INCLUDE_des@
>
>  ^
> That shouldn't be there. It's picked up from krb5-config output
> (from /usr/bin/krb5-config --cflags).
>
> I suspect that the krb5-config you have 
> is probably stale (i.e. you installed the crypto distribution from an
> installation CD at some point and subsequently updated your system
> without having MAKE_KERBEROS5=yes set in your /etc/make.conf). If it's
> not stale and you did indeed build kerberos with your world,

So simple! It works! I have an /usr/bin/krb5-config too and after
deleting this rule the compilation went well! Thank you!
=-=end of solve=-=

Remains one question: is it better to rebuild freebsd-4.11-stable WITH
kerberos5 or do I remove that (now) unwanted kerberos5 piece of
software. And if so, how? Because it's in the base, how can it be
removed? Or, again, should I just rebuild world with /etc/make.conf ->
"make_kerberos5=yes"

-- 
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.3
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: downgrade 4.11-stable to 4.11R

2005-03-31 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:46:53PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:31:27 -0500
> Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Mar 31, 2005, at 2:26 PM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > > Is it possible to go back to 4.11R if you've updated src to
> > > 4.11-stable first and updated sthe system w/ make buildworld,
> > > install..
> > >
> > > If I put the 4.11R sources back in /usr/src and do a make/build
> > > etc.. again will my fbsd system really be 4.11R again without soem
> > > 'nasty' traces of the update?
> > 
> > Switch to using RELENG_4_11_RELEASE as your cvsup tag, and you can 
> > revert your sources back.  You'll be missing the recent security
> > patch,  though-- using RELENG_4_11 might be better.
> > 
> > Why do you want to revert back to the older sources?
> 
> RELENG_4_11 was the idea. Why I want back? I want my server on the
> internet to be as secure as it can be and for what I understand 4.11 is
> safer to use as 4-stable (in which always can sneak in little bugs, or
> is this to paranoid?)

Although there is a small *possibility* that some bug has managed to
sneak in to RELENG_4 that is not present in RELENG_4_11, you should
contrast this to the *fact* that there are bugs which has been fixed in
RELENG_4, but which has not been - and will not be - fixed in
RELENG_4_11.

That being said, in terms of security there is probably no difference
whatsoever between RELENG_4 and RELENG_4_11 and going back to
RELENG_4_11 from RELENG_4 for security reasons is mostly just a waste
of time and energy.


-- 

Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


device.hints help

2005-03-31 Thread Alejandro Pulver
Hello,

I have two sound cards:

SiS 7012 (C-Media Electronics CMI9739 AC97 Codec) - 'snd_ich'
Genius Sound Maker Value 5.1 (CMedia CMI8738) - 'snd_cmi'

The first is integrated in the motherboard, and it is detected first and
used as the default output device (pcm0). The second it detected after
the first, so it is used as the second output device (pcm1).

I want to use my second sound card as the default output device. I tried
using the loader.conf variables "*_after" and "*_before", but they
always load them before booting the kernel, so the integrated card is
detected first and assigned to the default output device (pcm0). So I
have the drivers as modules, and load the driver for the second card
when booting the kernel, and then from the command line I load the
driver for the integrated card.

Is it possible to put the sound card PCI addresses manually in
'device.hints'? How?

Here is the relevant output of 'pciconf -vl' (after loading the
drivers in the desired order):

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:7:  class=0x040100 card=0x70121849 chip=0x70121039 rev=0xa0
hdr=0x00vendor   = 'Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS)'
device   = 'SiS7012 PCI Audio Accelerator'
class= multimedia
subclass = audio

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0:  class=0x040100 card=0x03f6 chip=0x03f6 rev=0x10
hdr=0x00vendor   = 'C-Media Electronics Inc.'
device   = 'CMI8738/PCI C3DX PCI Audio Chip中国'
class= multimedia
subclass = audio

I am posting this question again because I did not get a response. If I
should ask this question somewhere else please inform me.

Thanks and Best Regards,
Ale
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: portupgrade questions

2005-03-31 Thread RW
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 10:55, Darksidex wrote:
> Richard Danter wrote:
> > 1. If I do "portupgrade -rR port" it will recompile the new version of
> > "port" and related ports as expected but it will also try to compile up
> > any packages that are dependent. Is there a way to tell it not to
> > upgrade packages, or to upgrade them using a new package?
>
> portupgrade -rRPP port => this will force portupgrade to use only ports



Also look at the HOLD_PKGS array in pkgtools.conf


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Help needed Secure Http Tunneling

2005-03-31 Thread Tomas Quintero
putty also supports tunneling if you're connecting from a Windows
desktop. I'm sure other SSH clients do as well.


On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:37:23 +0530 (IST), Mangesh Bhalerao
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Thanx, dan for the great help I am trying to configure it .
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mangesh Bhalerao
> M.Tech. (II nd Sem)
> DA-IICT ,(www.da-iict.org)
> Gandhinagar - 382009
> 
> Ph#. 9426366185
> --
> 
> On Tuesday 29 March 2005 09:04, Mangesh Bhalerao wrote:
> > Friends,
> >
> > Can some one let me know what are the tools
> > avilable to have a secure tunneling through a "http proxy + firewall"
> > combination. Any help on the configuration would be a great help.
> 
> Perhaps stunnel? You can set it up at some port and it can proxy for your
> http
> proxy. It's been awhile since I used it, but it was very easy to setup.
> Performance was ok but it's not for very heavy traffic sites I'd think. Http
> over ssl is always slower. If performance isn't the greatest concern but
> rather functionality and managability this might be just what you're looking
> for. It's in /usr/ports/security/stunnel
> 
> Using a high level (scripting) language which has ssl functionality it would
> also be quite easy to write your own if it needs some specific (exotic) local
> requirements.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 


-- 
-Tomas Quintero
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Rebuilding everything

2005-03-31 Thread stheg olloydson
it was said:

Darksidex wrote:
>>How could I re-compile and re-install everything to take into
>>account the new directives in make.conf?
>>Ciao
>>Vittorio 
>>
> 
> 
> You can use portupgrade -vaf



>I still consider myself very new to most of this, though, so
>I'm not certain, but I think the system should be able to
>determine your CPUTYPE automatically, without needing it 
>hardcoded in make.conf.  I think you should only need to use 
>this directive if for some reason it's improperly detecting 
>your cpu type.



Hello,

Using CPUTYPE= in make.conf causes the complier to optimize for
the specific CPU. Otherwise, it does a "generic" compile that
would run on any CPU. The two easiest ways to improve system
performance are to build a custom kernel that has all the
uneeded options and devices removed and to tweak make.conf.
Before doing either, read man tuning and man make.conf. Also, to
find out what all the stuff in the kernel conf does, see
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES (assuming you're running 5.x on an
Intel or Intel-compatible platform.

hth,

stheg



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. 
http://personals.yahoo.com

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


top display weirdness

2005-03-31 Thread Glenn McCalley
When I run top, the summary and memory lines at the top of the display are 
updating in the next line down, overwriting that line.  The process #'s are 
showing up in the state line, state #'s in the memory line, memory #'s in the 
swap list.

I saw a post recently about something similar caused by compiling with 
different userland and core versions or something: this is a straight 5.3 
install from the CD set.  Only disk 1 was needed.  This is also the 3rd install 
from this same disk and the other 2 system do not exhibit the incorrect 
behavior.  1 of the other 2 system has the same MB, drives, etc.  

Ideas appreciated.
Glenn.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Setting up network

2005-03-31 Thread Jonathan Arnold
Something I've never been able to figure out. When installing a
new machine, and you come to the "Network Configuration" dialog,
what do you put in for the Host: and Domain: if it is a machine
on an internal network (ie., 192.168.1.149)?  Does it matter?
Just give it a simple hostname and be done with it? Make something
up?
--
Jonathan Arnold (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog:
http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Setting up network

2005-03-31 Thread Tomas Quintero
Essentially, the host is the 'name of the machine' if you will. So if
you want, you can name it betty, or uberserver1. It doesn't matter.
For that fact, as far as I really know, nor does the domain matter.
However commonly when naming servers and such, they have corresponding
names and domains so that they can be labeled and people who need to
know, know what these machines do.

In short, no, the names do not matter for your internal home network.


On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:52:52 -0500, Jonathan Arnold
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something I've never been able to figure out. When installing a
> new machine, and you come to the "Network Configuration" dialog,
> what do you put in for the Host: and Domain: if it is a machine
> on an internal network (ie., 192.168.1.149)?  Does it matter?
> Just give it a simple hostname and be done with it? Make something
> up?
> 
> --
> Jonathan Arnold (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog:
> http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/
> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 


-- 
-Tomas Quintero
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Setting up network

2005-03-31 Thread Charles Swiger
On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Arnold wrote:
Something I've never been able to figure out. When installing a
new machine, and you come to the "Network Configuration" dialog,
what do you put in for the Host: and Domain: if it is a machine
on an internal network (ie., 192.168.1.149)?  Does it matter?
Just give it a simple hostname and be done with it? Make something
up?
If you're using DHCP via one of the ubiquitous broadband 
firewall/gateway thingies from Linksys or D-Link or whoever, it really 
doesn't matter.  However, most people like to give their machines a 
name, anyway, even if they don't have a domain to attach it to.

You might want to get your own domain, in which case you control the 
names in it, or one can use dyndns.org or one of the similar sites to 
obtain a reversible hostname in a domain like homeip.net, even when 
using a dynamic IP.

"Making stuff up" is ok, so long as you don't make stuff up that 
conflicts with properly configured names.  Pretending to be a host in a 
domain you don't belong to is considered impolite at best, and if you 
have a local config problem than ends up generating errors or messages 
sent to the real host (think bounced mail), you will not thrill whoever 
it is that has to clean up the mess

--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Setting up network

2005-03-31 Thread Marty Landman
At 05:13 PM 3/31/2005, Tomas Quintero wrote:
In short, no, the names do not matter for your internal home network.
I would just add that on your internal network you may literally use any 
valid name. I have an office network and several of the boxes run apache, 
providing me with a web development environment. But I have a self made 
rule of not naming my websites anything which is legal on the WWW.

Because you can create your own yahoo.com on your network, but the problem 
is that if you create thisnameisnotbeingused.com on your network, in the 
future that site may exist but you'll only see your own internal version.

So my internal sites have domains like
yoyomaplayscello
raycharles
nosoup4you-next
and the like.
Marty
Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387
Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml
Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: How to find needed modules for rebuilding kernel

2005-03-31 Thread Danny Pansters
On Thursday 31 March 2005 19:43, Pat Maddox wrote:
> In rebuilding a kernel, how do you know exactly what modules you need?
>  The Handbook is a good start, and a lot of them are obvious (i.e. if
> I have no SCSI disks, disable all SCSI modules).  Others aren't so
> easy, particularly serial devices, and the pseudo devices.  How can I
> find out exactly what I need to enable, so I can make the kernel as
> tight as possible?

Modules are not your concern, they get built anyway (or mostly .. not sure but 
probably not each and every possible module gets built). The idea is that if 
you for example need support for a new soundcard, you can just load the 
module (loader.conf) without needing to recompile the kernel. On an IDE/ATA 
system I generally turn down the scsi delay (I always do) and remove:

- all scsi raid cards and support
- all ethernet cards, both pci/isa and usb except the one(s) I have (most can 
be loaded as a module also); beware whether it needs mii too
- from the pseudo devices ppp/tun/slip as I'm connected via ethernet (cable) 
sometimes I disable ipv6 and gif/faith, sometimes I don't
- all CPUs except the one you actually have (performance!)

I also remove most scsi support but beware that cdrecord (atapicam) requires 
the basic scsi devices, as does umass (camera's, cf fards, usb scanners, ..).

Generally unless you need to _add_ something to your kernel you don't really 
need to stray from GENERIC at all. If you want to have a kernel at least 
tuned for your CPU and without a lot of stuff you don't have anyway, do the 
above). But depending on the purpose of the box you can strip out quite a 
lot. Check NOTES, both in /usr/src/sys/conf and /usr/src/sys//conf. 
(on FreeBSD4 that is LINT).

Also most if not all drivers and devices have manual pages and from the 
synopsis you can see which other devices or options come with them.

HTH,

Dan

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: How to find needed modules for rebuilding kernel

2005-03-31 Thread Pat Maddox
Thanks for the info.  My terminology is off...apparently what I really
meant is I'm wondering what drivers I need to compile into the kernel.
 I've done what you've suggested - removed SCSI support, all of the
NIC drivers besides the one I need, etc.  I'm just wondering how I can
find out EXACTLY what I need in there, so I can have as little as
possible.  It's a server, so it has a pretty narrow purpose, and I'd
like to keep the kernel as small and fast as I can.


On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:31:36 +0200, Danny Pansters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 March 2005 19:43, Pat Maddox wrote:
> > In rebuilding a kernel, how do you know exactly what modules you need?
> >  The Handbook is a good start, and a lot of them are obvious (i.e. if
> > I have no SCSI disks, disable all SCSI modules).  Others aren't so
> > easy, particularly serial devices, and the pseudo devices.  How can I
> > find out exactly what I need to enable, so I can make the kernel as
> > tight as possible?
> 
> Modules are not your concern, they get built anyway (or mostly .. not sure but
> probably not each and every possible module gets built). The idea is that if
> you for example need support for a new soundcard, you can just load the
> module (loader.conf) without needing to recompile the kernel. On an IDE/ATA
> system I generally turn down the scsi delay (I always do) and remove:
> 
> - all scsi raid cards and support
> - all ethernet cards, both pci/isa and usb except the one(s) I have (most can
> be loaded as a module also); beware whether it needs mii too
> - from the pseudo devices ppp/tun/slip as I'm connected via ethernet (cable)
> sometimes I disable ipv6 and gif/faith, sometimes I don't
> - all CPUs except the one you actually have (performance!)
> 
> I also remove most scsi support but beware that cdrecord (atapicam) requires
> the basic scsi devices, as does umass (camera's, cf fards, usb scanners, ..).
> 
> Generally unless you need to _add_ something to your kernel you don't really
> need to stray from GENERIC at all. If you want to have a kernel at least
> tuned for your CPU and without a lot of stuff you don't have anyway, do the
> above). But depending on the purpose of the box you can strip out quite a
> lot. Check NOTES, both in /usr/src/sys/conf and /usr/src/sys//conf.
> (on FreeBSD4 that is LINT).
> 
> Also most if not all drivers and devices have manual pages and from the
> synopsis you can see which other devices or options come with them.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Dan
> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: DRAC with BerkeleyDB 4.2

2005-03-31 Thread Mark

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: dinsdag 29 maart 2005 19:15
> To: 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'
> Subject: DRAC with BerkeleyDB 4.2
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I recently compiled sendmail 8.13.3 for BerkeleyDB 4.2; and everything
> works fine, except that my pophash database (DRAC) is apparently no
> longer read/honored by sendmail.
> 
> So, does anyone know how to compile drac-1.12_3 for use with 
> BerkeleyDB 4.2? (FreeBSD 4.10-R). The Makefile offers no options for
> that.

Perhaps it is too early for a 'booster' message, but I was really hoping
someone out there has done this before.

Thanks,

- Mark

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: possible bug report re: (malformed?) internet addresses

2005-03-31 Thread J65nko BSD
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:45:37 -0400, fredthetree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Almost forgot.
> 
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD computer 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar  1
> 05:39:33 AST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MACHINE  i386
> 
> (I haven't cvsup'd and re-built in a little while.. maybe one of you
> who have could verify the problem still exists..)
> 
> -dan
> 
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:43:12 -0400, fredthetree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $ ping "mr-chips-.deviantart.com"
> > ping: cannot resolve mr-chips-.deviantart.com: Unknown server error
> >
> > $ ping "etc-etc-etc.deviantart.com"
> > PING etc-etc-etc.deviantart.com (69.28.181.43): 56 data bytes
> > 64 bytes from 69.28.181.43: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=108.127 ms
> >
> > At first it may seem logical to point the blame to the server, after
> > noting "Unknown server error," however, I am perfectly able to connect
> > to this address on a Windows machine.  The problem is reproducible
> > with any address which has a "-" before a "."
> >
> > I am not sure where the problem lies, it is obviously not just within
> > 'ping,' as I first noticed this problem within firefox/mozilla.
> >

No problem on  "FreeBSD plato.utp.xnet 5.3-STABLE-20050116-JPSNAP 
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE-20050116-JPSNAP #0: Sun Jan 16 01:31:07 UTC 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386"

consulting a local dnscache, part of djbdns, nameserver running under OpenBSD

dig mr-chips-.deviantart.com

; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> mr-chips-.deviantart.com
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27024
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;mr-chips-.deviantart.com.  IN  A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
mr-chips-.deviantart.com. 86400 IN  A   69.28.181.43

;; Query time: 293 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.222.10#53(192.168.222.10)
;; WHEN: Thu Mar 31 23:08:23 2005
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 58
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: sshd listening on more than one port.

2005-03-31 Thread Rob
Mick Walker wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am wanting to know if it is possible to enabled
> the sshd to listen on
> more than one port, without having to spawn another
> instance of the
> server itself.
> If it is possible does anyone have any idea how I
> could accomplish this.

In /etc/rc.conf, use:

sshd_enable="YES"
sshd_flags="-p 22 -p 1234"

and add more, if you like.
Then restart the ssh daemon.

Rob.



__ 
Yahoo! Messenger 
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. 
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


.xinitrc

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
How do you start two things ?

exec unclutter -root
exec enlightenment 

When i do this it only execute the first one
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: .xinitrc

2005-03-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:06:15 +0200
Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> How do you start two things ?
> 
> exec unclutter -root
> exec enlightenment 
> 
> When i do this it only execute the first one

exec unclutter -root &
exec enlightenment

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: .xinitrc

2005-03-31 Thread Charles Swiger
On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:06 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote:
How do you start two things ?
exec unclutter -root
exec enlightenment
Don't use exec, except possibly for the last command.  Use an "&" after 
the command name for earlier commands which do not exit immediately.

--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: How to find needed modules for rebuilding kernel

2005-03-31 Thread Danny Pansters
On Friday 01 April 2005 00:45, Pat Maddox wrote:
> Thanks for the info.  My terminology is off...apparently what I really
> meant is I'm wondering what drivers I need to compile into the kernel.
>  I've done what you've suggested - removed SCSI support, all of the
> NIC drivers besides the one I need, etc.  I'm just wondering how I can
> find out EXACTLY what I need in there, so I can have as little as
> possible.  It's a server, so it has a pretty narrow purpose, and I'd
> like to keep the kernel as small and fast as I can.

Surely it's not going to run out of memory or disk space any time soon with a 
few kB more or less for the kernel.

Like I said there _is_ documentation ranging from abundant to sparce to terse 
to the plain source. The latter is to be taken literally...  some things are 
only documented in the sources, if you're lucky in a line of normal text in a 
header file (e.g. with device drivers). Reading NOTES would be a start. 

But I'd like to caution you not to put too much efford in this. The point is 
you only need to go that far if really needed, and I'm quite sure it's not. 
It would hardly matter. If you want to do it the hard way, well then see the 
above for the hard way :)

You might be more interested in tuning(7) and the various device.hints to get 
the most out of your hardware. The "smallest size/footprint kernel" used to 
be a common issue when people had small drives, little RAM and had to use 
floppies. Also, if you want a server that runs well, invest some time into 
the configuration of your services. Things like maximum files, maximum forks, 
timeouts, ... Much more likely to appear as troublemakers than a somewhat 
overweight kernel.

Dan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: .xinitrc

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:10:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:06:15 +0200
> Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > How do you start two things ?
> >
> > exec unclutter -root
> > exec enlightenment
> >
> > When i do this it only execute the first one
> 
> exec unclutter -root &
> exec enlightenment
> 

thx ps what is the difference between exec and without exec
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: .xinitrc

2005-03-31 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:06:15 +0200
Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> How do you start two things ?
> 
> exec unclutter -root
> exec enlightenment 
> 
> When i do this it only execute the first one

Hello,

The 'exec' builtin (internal shell command) replaces the current process
image (the shell itself) by the program in the argument. Instead of
executing it as a children (separated) process, so when the process
finishes it returns back to the shell (like typing a command). So when
the shell replaces itself with 'unclutter', it is not the shell anymore,
so it never comes back to execute 'enlightenment'.

The solution can be to run the first command in the background
(apart from the shell) like this:

unclutter -root &
exec enlightenment

See sh(1) (section 'exec' and 'jobs').

Best Regards,
Ale
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: mksnap_ffs woes

2005-03-31 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Francisco Reyes wrote:
In my experience databases DO NOT like file system backups unless the 
database is NOT running. The more heavily you use the database the least 
it will play nice with file system backups.
Unfortunately we have no choice.

Is using the database backup routines an option?
Nope.

Does the database has any type of replication?
Nope again.

BTW, we have almost no room for changes on the client side :(
What is the client side?
Some *old* PCs (need ISA slots) running an old DOS [wannabe] application 
(actually a plethora of .BAT files and some .EXEs) on Windows 95 or 98 :(
Not even the firm who made that crap is willing to put their hands on it.
Replacing the software would mean replacing the hardware (not only the 
PCs, but the attached machines too) at multiple sites, which would mean 
a HUGE amount of money; that's behind my power and is to be considered 
out of question.


Given that you said it is in Samba is seems it's some type of windowd 
database. Is it a workgroup type of DB like Access or Foxpro? SQL server?
It's some bunch of DBFs with associated indexes and God only knows what 
else. Given the clients need to be up 24/7, I though of filesystem 
snapshots as the only solution.

I'll keep trying a bit more, since it seems doing them on a daily 
schedule doesn't do any harm. The problems so far have only arisen when 
I manually started a backup script (possibly interrupting it, cleaning 
up, and starting again).

 bye & Thanks
av.
P.S. The firm who sold that crap, also implemented the file server 
before mine; just without any RAID and/or backup facility. These data 
are vital to that business.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: .xinitrc

2005-03-31 Thread Charles Swiger
On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote:
thx ps what is the difference between exec and without exec
Read "man sh":
 exec [command [arg ...]]
 Unless command is omitted, the shell process is replaced 
with the
 specified program (which must be a real program, not a 
shell
 built-in command or function).  Any redirections on the 
exec com-
 mand are marked as permanent, so that they are not undone 
when
 the exec command finishes.

--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


i did it again

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
i putted mysqlsafe in my rc.local and found out ctrl + c doesnt work :) 
In single user mode i wanted to edit the file but joe crashed and vi
was very strange. it was like it only had one line to display the file
and the arrow keys where acting strange ? Any ideas how i can fix this
? I read somthing with missing /etc/termcap ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: violation copyright

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Jeays
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 04:20, Rod Sortons.Net wrote:
> Hi, I'm Rod
> 
> I'm working on a website + magazine in Rouen (France) about night : clubs, 
> pubs, concerts ...
> 
> look at this : http://bistrot.diablotins.free.fr
> 
> Regarding your copyright legal mention page, this pub uses your logo for 
> commercial reasons.
> 
> You can post at http://sortons.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2993 about this pub 
> : he abuses with
> a lot of things (musicians, free magazines ...) but uses your logo to promote 
> his events.
> 
> If your logo is not copyrighted, no problem. If yes, post on our website : we 
> plan to stop it with
> his several abuses.
> 
> You can post in english, we'll translate.
> 
> 
> Sincerly.
> 
> 
> 
> Rod
> http://www.sortons.net
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 

Thanks for pointing it out!  The image is copyrighted, and the copyright
is held by Marshall McKusick.  More information can be found at 
http://www.mckusick.com/beastie/index.htm

I don't know if he reads this list at the moment, so I will forward him
a copy.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: .xinitrc

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:26:44 -0500, Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > thx ps what is the difference between exec and without exec
> 
> Read "man sh":
> 
>   exec [command [arg ...]]
>   Unless command is omitted, the shell process is replaced
> with the
>   specified program (which must be a real program, not a
> shell
>   built-in command or function).  Any redirections on the
> exec com-
>   mand are marked as permanent, so that they are not undone
> when
>   the exec command finishes.
> 

ok thx
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


sendmail

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
i want to send a movie to a friend ? How do you do that with sendmail
? I know i know i read the man but its like this
[] long
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FW: dmesg -a lines' explanation? NEWBIE

2005-03-31 Thread David Armour
hello Roland,

On Wednesday, March 30, 2005: 07:54, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 06:45:10PM -0800, Andrew Heyn wrote:
> > plugging your recommendation onto the command line produced:
> >
> > /etc/devfs.conf:permxpt00666#permissions are set properly at
> > boot
> A couple of months ago I put up the things I learnt from configuring my
> FreeBSD box on a web page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/freebsd/

thank you for your reply. i had already bookmarked your web-page, and i credit 
it with a great portion of my still-limited understanding of what's going on 
inside this box of mine.

> > > I'm pretty sure that searching google a little bit can help you with
> > > UNIX basics.

i agree google's a terrific resource, as is the Handbook, of which i do have a 
copy.  i must be more of a visual need-to-watch-someone-else kinda learner, i 
guess, and which is a bit harder to do in isolation behind a computer screen. 
i still notice a big gap between what i can accomplish based on reading the 
Handbook, say, and what others here & elsewhere seem able to do/understand.

thanks again.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: sendmail

2005-03-31 Thread wizlayer
On Thursday 31 March 2005 07:47 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> i want to send a movie to a friend ? How do you do that with
> sendmail ? I know i know i read the man but its like this
> [] long

Well...  You could always break it up so it will be like this...

[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]

That way it seem so long.  :)

Just how big is this movie and are you sure his ISP's/private
mail server would even accept it?

WizLayer
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: sendmail

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:03:09 -0500, wizlayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 March 2005 07:47 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > i want to send a movie to a friend ? How do you do that with
> > sendmail ? I know i know i read the man but its like this
> > [] long
> 
> Well...  You could always break it up so it will be like this...
> 
> []
> []
> []
> []
> []
> []
> []
> []
> []
> 
> That way it seem so long.  :)
> 
> Just how big is this movie and are you sure his ISP's/private
> mail server would even accept it?
> 
> WizLayer
> 

Its 5.5mb and my gmail doesnt want to sent it :(

So how do you do that with the sendmail command ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ACPI

2005-03-31 Thread jason henson
Quinn Ellis wrote:
Hello list.
I am running FreeBSD 5.3 AMD64.  It however, won't boot when I leave 
ACPI installed. Is this a bios issue? (Epox 8kda3+ AMD64).

Thanks
Quinn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

I would say yes, but who could really say?  You haven't given alot of 
detail.  That said I have an epox(socket A nforce2) and it seems they 
use the microsoft acpi stuff, which sucks.  I have sent some problems 
reports to them, even one with a phatched asl I did myself.  I got no 
real response, they said we support windows, not linux.  Hold on, 
LINUX!  I told I run FreeBSD!  O well, I would recommend staying away 
from epox if you wnat to run a non-ms os. 

Have you tried the acpidump yet?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: mksnap_ffs woes

2005-03-31 Thread Francisco Reyes
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Replacing the software would mean replacing the hardware (not only the PCs, 
but the attached machines too) at multiple sites, which would mean a HUGE 
amount of money; that's behind my power and is to be considered out of 
question.
Not necessarily true. How about a web application?
This would mean that the machines would only need to be able to run a web 
browser. IF they are very old you could install FreeBSD on them. Even a 
200MHZ machine can run FreeBSD semi decently with X on it.

It's some bunch of DBFs with associated indexes

If you give me the extensions I can take a reasonable guess at what they 
are. You CAN copy them. You just need to write a simple program to open 
them and copy them. Should be near trivial once you have whatever they 
used.

Given the clients need to be up 24/7, I though of filesystem snapshots as the 
only solution.
With DBFs that won't work.
You will very likely have corrupted headers if you do a copy/sync/snapshot 
depending on how busy your system is and how often writes are done to it.

I'll keep trying a bit more, since it seems doing them on a daily schedule 
doesn't do any harm. The problems so far have only arisen when I manually 
started a backup script (possibly interrupting it, cleaning up, and starting 
again).
And you say this system is 24/7? DBFs are not exactly very good at this.. 
specially if you have many deletes. Is this mostly a read only or write 
once only type of system?

P.S. The firm who sold that crap, also implemented the file server before 
mine; just without any RAID and/or backup facility. These data are vital to 
that business.
Many times it's a matter of how much a client wants to pay. On the 
last server I setup given the option of getting a RAID controller (IDE) 
for under $200 the client said no. You can only educate and advice a 
client so much if they are not willing to listen. The cost of unforseen 
crashes is usually far off in a small business owner's mind.

--
http://stringsutils.com
Utility for developers. Compute length, MD5, CRC and more.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


can i delete /stand ?

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
It bugs me...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: i did it again

2005-03-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-04-01 01:29, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i putted mysqlsafe in my rc.local and found out ctrl + c doesnt work :)
> In single user mode i wanted to edit the file but joe crashed and vi
> was very strange. it was like it only had one line to display the file
> and the arrow keys where acting strange ?

Bring up all the file systems manually, and you should be set to edit
any file with TERM=cons25.  This should be something like:

1. Start in single-user mode.  When you enter the root shell of the
single user mode, there's only one filesystem (the root filesystem) and
this one is mounted read-only.

2. If your system clock is set to local time (and not UTC), run
adjkerntz.

# adjkerntz -i

3. Do minimal sanity checks for all file systems:

# fsck -p

4. Remount the root file system as read-write:

# mount -u /

5. Mount all the rest, and then set your TERM to cons25 (TERM should be
set IIRC only after termcap is available):

# mount -va
# TERM=cons25 ; export TERM

6. Edit your /etc/rc.local with any editor you prefer.

7. Exit the single user shell and let the system go on booting in
multi-user mode, as usual.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: sendmail

2005-03-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-04-01 02:47, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i want to send a movie to a friend ? How do you do that with sendmail
> ?

You don't.  Email messages are not a good medium for sending huge files.

Many mail servers limit the size of the messages they accept to something like
1 MB, so you'd have to split the movie in an extremely inconvenient, huge
number of short parts.

There are other ways to do file transfers.

FTP is, in fact, called ``File Transfer Protocol''.  You could always fire up
an ftpd in read-only, anonymous mode and invite your friend to download the
file from you.

> I know i know i read the man but its like this
> [] long

IMHO, the Handbook chapter on electronic email is more useful for Sendmail
beginners, but I doubt people read it these days; which is rather unfortunate,
given the amount of effort freebsd-doc people have put into writing it.

- Giorgos

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: i did it again

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:21:07 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-04-01 01:29, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i putted mysqlsafe in my rc.local and found out ctrl + c doesnt work :)
> > In single user mode i wanted to edit the file but joe crashed and vi
> > was very strange. it was like it only had one line to display the file
> > and the arrow keys where acting strange ?
> 
> Bring up all the file systems manually, and you should be set to edit
> any file with TERM=cons25.  This should be something like:
> 
> 1. Start in single-user mode.  When you enter the root shell of the
> single user mode, there's only one filesystem (the root filesystem) and
> this one is mounted read-only.
> 
> 2. If your system clock is set to local time (and not UTC), run
> adjkerntz.
> 
> # adjkerntz -i
> 
> 3. Do minimal sanity checks for all file systems:
> 
> # fsck -p
> 
> 4. Remount the root file system as read-write:
> 
> # mount -u /
> 
> 5. Mount all the rest, and then set your TERM to cons25 (TERM should be
> set IIRC only after termcap is available):
> 
> # mount -va
> # TERM=cons25 ; export TERM
> 
> 6. Edit your /etc/rc.local with any editor you prefer.
> 
> 7. Exit the single user shell and let the system go on booting in
> multi-user mode, as usual.
> 

what is IIRC ?
what is a termcap ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: i did it again

2005-03-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-04-01 03:31, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 5. Mount all the rest, and then set your TERM to cons25 (TERM should be
> > set IIRC only after termcap is available):
> >
> > # mount -va
> > # TERM=cons25 ; export TERM
>
> what is IIRC ?

``If I recall correctly''

> what is a termcap ?

There's a manpage for this one.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: i did it again

2005-03-31 Thread Gert Cuykens
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:42:55 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-04-01 03:31, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 5. Mount all the rest, and then set your TERM to cons25 (TERM should be
> > > set IIRC only after termcap is available):
> > >
> > > # mount -va
> > > # TERM=cons25 ; export TERM
> >
> > what is IIRC ?
> 
> ``If I recall correctly''
> 
> > what is a termcap ?
> 
> There's a manpage for this one.
> 

so termcap is like a x server but then for terminals ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


  1   2   >