Re: LICENSE questions
Hi, On Jun 15, 2010, at 01:10, Doug Barton wrote: > My vote would be that we add a "PERL" category, but maybe there is a reason > not to do this? I would like to second this vote. Unless somebody is already working on this(?) I will try and come up with a patch. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
p5- ports and LICENSE
Hi, I have prepared the patch below for adding the artistic license v1 + v2 along with GPLv1 to our ports license framework - for use in our perl p5- ports. Most p5- ports are licensed "under the same terms as Perl [5] itself", meaning dual licensed under Artistic License v1.0 and GPLv1 [1]. With the patch below, dual licensed p5- ports can define their license as follows: LICENSE_COMB= dual LICENSE=ART10 GPLv1 I have included the Artistic License v2.0 since this is what will be used by perl6. Feedback is most welcome. Index: bsd.licenses.db.mk === RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.5 bsd.licenses.db.mk --- bsd.licenses.db.mk 22 Jun 2010 19:50:04 - 1.5 +++ bsd.licenses.db.mk 1 Aug 2010 10:11:11 - @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ # _LICENSE_LIST_GROUPS - List of defined license groups # -_LICENSE_LIST= ASL BSD BSL CDDL EPL GFDL GPLv2 GPLv3 LGPL20 LGPL21 LGPL3 MIT MPL +_LICENSE_LIST= ART10 ART20 ASL BSD BSL CDDL EPL GFDL GPLv1 GPLv2 GPLv3 LGPL20 LGPL21 LGPL3 MIT MPL # List of groups (only names must be present) @@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ _LICENSE_PERMS_DEFAULT= dist-mirror dist # - General permissions from groups are added to each license, if not defined. # +_LICENSE_NAME_ART10= Artistic License version 1.0 +_LICENSE_GROUPS_ART10= OSI + +_LICENSE_NAME_ART20= Artistic License version 2.0 +_LICENSE_GROUPS_ART20= FSF GPL OSI + _LICENSE_NAME_ASL= Apache License _LICENSE_GROUPS_ASL= FSF OSI @@ -76,6 +82,9 @@ _LICENSE_GROUPS_EPL= FSF OSI _LICENSE_NAME_GFDL=GNU Free Documentation License _LICENSE_GROUPS_GFDL= FSF +_LICENSE_NAME_GPLv1= GNU General Public License version 1 +_LICENSE_GROUPS_GPLv1= FSF GPL OSI + _LICENSE_NAME_GPLv2= GNU General Public License version 2 _LICENSE_GROUPS_GPLv2= FSF GPL OSI [1]: http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ -- Henrik Brix Andersen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: p5- ports and LICENSE
On Aug 1, 2010, at 12:51, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > I have prepared the patch below for adding the artistic license v1 + v2 along > with GPLv1 to our ports license framework - for use in our perl p5- ports. > Most p5- ports are licensed "under the same terms as Perl [5] itself", > meaning dual licensed under Artistic License v1.0 and GPLv1 [1]. > > With the patch below, dual licensed p5- ports can define their license as > follows: > LICENSE_COMB= dual > LICENSE=ART10 GPLv1 > > I have included the Artistic License v2.0 since this is what will be used by > perl6. Feedback is most welcome. The mentioned patch has now been committed. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: irc/bitlbee skype support
Hi, On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:44, Любомир Григоров wrote: > I just realized it's in the devel version that this has been added. Is there > any chance of getting a -devel port with the skype support? I do not currently have any plans for a irc/bitlbee-devel port - I simply do not have the time to maintain it. Sorry. Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [Fwd: p5-openxpki-deployment-0.9.1386_1 failed on amd64 9] [devel/p5-Module-Runtime]
Hi Sergei, On Oct 13, 2011, at 17:42, Sergei Vyshenski wrote: > Reported error is due to a missing dependency in port > > devel/p5-Module-Runtime > > Its module Module::Runtime wants module Params::Classify. > But Makefile of devel/p5-Module-Runtime does not specify > dependency from port devel/p5-Params-Classify. > Hence the error. Sorry about that. I have just committed a fix. Thank you for reporting it. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: irc/bitlbee skype support
Hi Lyubomir, On Jan 16, 2012, at 08:14, Lyubomir Grigorov wrote: >> I do not currently have any plans for a irc/bitlbee-devel port - I simply do >> not have the time to maintain it. Sorry. > Skype protocol is included by default in 3.0.4. I don't think the port builds > it (and thus PC-BSD PBI also doesn't include it). All the source and scripts > are there. > > Brix, can you confirm this? I couldn't find the skype protocol or the skyped > python script if I build Bitlbee 3.0.4 from ports. That is correct. As noted in my commit message for 3.0.4: "Skype protocol support will be available at a later point in time, as it has few external dependencies not currently available in ports". Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: bump of PORTREVISION mandatory?
On Jan 27, 2011, at 18:47, Scot Hetzel wrote: > There is not need to bump PORTREVISION for simple changes. The only > time a PORTREVISION bump is required is when it fixes a security > problem, or when a library the port depends on changes. Not entirely true. Please see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Upgrading sshguard
Hi, On Jun 15, 2011, at 18:49, andrew clarke wrote: > A recent FreeBSD ports change upgrades sshguard to 1.5. I'm not sure > about other variants, but with sshguard-ipfw at least, from what I can > tell, installing the port erroneously comments-out the following > existing line from /etc/syslog.conf: > > auth.info;authpriv.info | exec > /usr/local/sbin/sshguard > > To get sshguard-ipfw to work again you need to uncomment the above > line and restart syslogd, eg. "sudo service syslogd restart". Yes, this happens with sshguard-pf and plain old sshguard as well. > Incidentally version 1.5 is somewhat more "noisy" than the previous > version, sending this to /var/log/messages once every few hours: > > Jun 16 01:00:00 blizzard sshguard[7655]: Got exit signal, flushing blocked > addresses and exiting... > Jun 16 01:00:00 blizzard sshguard[8080]: Started successfully [(a,p,s)=(40, > 420, 1200)], now ready to scan. > > (obviously a separate issue to the syslog.conf problem above) That's not new. As I noted on the in a reply to the commit mail, sshguard 1.5 also breaks the -b flag. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: what is gio-fam?
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:17:56PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > gio-fam-backend is a new piece of glib which provides a wrapper around > FAM to allow applications to monitor file objects using a glib API. But this is optional, right? Any reason for making gio-fam-backend an implicit dependency for all software, that depends on glib20? On my systems, this means I will get gio-fam-backend installed even though I don't have FAM installed at all. Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpcY6nxMCY4Y.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fprint (finger print sensor framework) port ready for testing
Hi, On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:07:40PM +0200, Simon Barner wrote: > I did a port [2] of the fprint finger print sensor framework [1] > and would like to receive some feedback before I commit it. > > It comes with a PAM module for finger print based authentication, a > graphical (fprint_demo) and a console (pam_fprint_enroll) application > for finger print enrollment. I have reviewed your ports - they look good to me :) > I did my tests with the UPEK sensor found in Lenovo's T61. I have tested the software using the UPEK TouchStrip found in my ThinkPad X60s, works like a charm. Now I just need to switch to an X display manager with PAM support ;) Thanks for working on this! Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpziRPG0b5Zq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Rubygems and trouble with rdoc node renumbering
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:59:33PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > I'm trying to update rubygem-rgl and the rdoc part is giving me a > headache, as the rdoc will obviously use readdir() only to walk the > directory tree *but* gives each of its HTML pages a unique number. > > The upshot is, that my pkg-plist is changing every time I install the > port. That's a big problem since the rdoc is also run on do-install and > I'm not sure I could generate the pkg-plist dynamically *after* that > step. Just out of curiousity - what type of filesystem is WRKDIRPREFIX pointed at? ZFS? Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpegvjqH6S9w.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: CrossOver Games port for PC-BSD / FreeBSD
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:18:36AM -0400, Kris Moore wrote: > I've been working with Jeremy White over at CodeWeavers, and he has now > gone ahead and created an unsupported build of CrossOver Games for PC / > FreeBSD. Great news - thanks for working on this :) > Also, before anybody asks, yes you can run the > install-crossover-pcbsdgames*.sh installer on vanilla FreeBSD. Since PC-BSD > isn't a fork, the only thing you need to ensure, is that if you are on > FreeBSD 6.3, you must apply the Wine patch at http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine. > Users on FreeBSD 7.0 or higher do not need this patch applied. The 'install-crossover-pcbsdgames-7.0.0.sh' package is compiled for FreeBSD 6, it seems. Do you know if there are any plans for a 7.x compatible build? Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpQDnuNI0CbI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: devel/gio-fam-backend build faild
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Correct, tbh it really should detect the updated requirement better than it
> does.
Meaning what?
For information, irc/bitlbee only depends on devel/gio-fam-backend due
to the following line in Mk/bsd.gnome.mk:
glib20_RUN_DEPENDS=
${LOCALBASE}/lib/gio/modules/libgiofam.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/gio-fam-backend
Since www/bitlbee depends on glib20, it automagically depends on
devel/gio-fam-backend as well.
Regards,
Brix
PS: Please avoid top posting.
> - Original Message - From: "Jyun-Yi Liou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> Thanks for this hint, Steve!
>> but I am confused why bitlbee depends on devel/gio-fam-backend
>> I can install bitlbee from source tarbal without gio-fam-backend (juust
>> ./configure, gmake, gmake install)
>>
>> because of "USE_GNOME= glib20" in irc/bitlbee/Makefile?
>
>
>
> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the
> person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the
> recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise
> disseminating it or any information contained in it.
> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please
> telephone +44 845 868 1337
> or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgphmwXaYjUnw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Odd issue with 'make extract' in a directory outside /usr/ports
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:40:50PM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote: > I have a folder outside /usr/ports that is not owned by root that I store > ports > I am making edits on, and whenever I use 'make extract' on any port within > that > folder while I am root, none of the permissions from the tarball it extracted > from are kept. For example, a configure script that is set to mode 0755 will > be > extracted as mode 0644, removing the execute flag. I don't recall when this > started happening, as it used to work. I saw nothing in the flags used to > extract that could be changed. Manually extracting by running the commands > myself fails as well. When I ran it manually, I tried to add -p to tar's > flags, > but that still resulted in the execute flag being removed. I'm not sure > what's > going on with this, but I do know it works fine within /usr/ports. Any help > on > the matter is appreciated. What type of file system are these ports on? What are mount parameters used to mount it? Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgprK9slAKJxL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [irc/bitlbee] security and new version 1.2.3
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:53:38PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote: > Changelog of bitlbee 1.2.2 to 1.2.3 > > Version 1.2.3 (released 2008-09-07) hilights: > * Fixed a security issue similar to the previous account > overwrite/hijack bug. > > My guess is that the port hasn't been updated due to the ports-freeze. > Should it be because there's a security fix? The update was delayed partly due to the Ports Freeze, partly due to me being busy at work. I have just committed an update to irc/bitlbee along with a vuxml entry. Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpMiX45IW2Qn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: net/rrdtool fails to build when ruby is installed?
Hi, On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote: > I'm running into an error (seen below) when attempting to build the > latest net/rrdtool when Ruby is installed. Others (including me) have encountered the exact same issue - see the ports/112412 PR. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgp3yR4KwTmAm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD Port: gpsd-2.32
Hi, On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:17:35PM +0400, Stanislav Silnitski wrote: > Please advise some GPS module for use with the subject under FreeBSD! I use a BU353 with gpsd under FreeBSD, see http://www.usglobalsat.com/item.asp?itemid=60 It is based on the Profilic PL-2303 chipset, which is supported by the uplcom(4) driver. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpCFCHVzQR7n.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: muCommander
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 04:27:05PM +0200, martinko wrote: > I've been trying to find a good Norton/Total Commander clone and have come > across muCommander <http://www.mucommander.com/>. It is Java based. Has > someone considered porting it to FreeBSD please ? Have you tried Midnight Commander? It is available in ports under misc/mc. ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpK4gOqv0XBX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xkeyboard-config-1.0 breaks modifiers?
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 07:18:37PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing broken modifier keys (specifically the Win key)
> with the new xkeyboard-config in ports, or is it just me?
It's not just you. I have posted the following patch to the
ports/114876 PR [1], which fixes the issue:
diff -urp /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile2007-07-24 16:11:49.0
+0200
+++ x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile 2007-07-26 15:19:29.0 +0200
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
PORTNAME= xkeyboard-config
PORTVERSION= 1.0
+PORTREVISION= 1
CATEGORIES=x11
MASTER_SITES= http://xlibs.freedesktop.org/xkbdesc/
DISTNAME= xkeyboard-config-${PORTVERSION}
@@ -31,5 +32,6 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-xkb-base=${PREFI
post-install:
${MKDIR} /var/lib/xkb
+ ${MKDIR} ${PREFIX}/share/X11/xkb/compiled
.include
diff -urp /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/pkg-plist
x11/xkeyboard-config/pkg-plist
--- /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/pkg-plist 2007-07-24 16:11:49.0
+0200
+++ x11/xkeyboard-config/pkg-plist 2007-07-26 15:28:57.0 +0200
@@ -289,7 +289,9 @@ share/X11/xkb/types/pc
share/X11/xkb/types/README
share/X11/xkb/xkbcomp
@exec mkdir -p /var/lib/xkb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mkdir -p %D/share/X11/xkb/compiled
@dirrm share/X11/xkb/compat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share/X11/xkb/compiled
@dirrm share/X11/xkb/geometry/digital_vndr
@dirrm share/X11/xkb/geometry/sgi_vndr
@dirrm share/X11/xkb/geometry
Regards,
Brix
[1]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=114876
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpZ7bsXapkek.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: xkeyboard-config-1.0 breaks modifiers?
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:00:35AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Could you test the fix from ports/114924 ? Looks like a cleaner fix to
> me.
Sure - that works as well. Here is an updated patch:
diff -urp /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile2007-07-24 16:11:49.0
+0200
+++ x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile 2007-07-27 10:58:51.0 +0200
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
PORTNAME= xkeyboard-config
PORTVERSION= 1.0
+PORTREVISION= 1
CATEGORIES=x11
MASTER_SITES= http://xlibs.freedesktop.org/xkbdesc/
DISTNAME= xkeyboard-config-${PORTVERSION}
@@ -31,5 +32,6 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-xkb-base=${PREFI
post-install:
${MKDIR} /var/lib/xkb
+ ${LN} -s /var/lib/xkb ${PREFIX}/share/X11/xkb/compiled
.include
diff -urp /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/pkg-plist
x11/xkeyboard-config/pkg-plist
--- /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/pkg-plist 2007-07-24 16:11:49.0
+0200
+++ x11/xkeyboard-config/pkg-plist 2007-07-27 11:04:44.0 +0200
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ share/X11/xkb/compat/pc98
share/X11/xkb/compat/xfree86
share/X11/xkb/compat/xtest
share/X11/xkb/compat/README
+share/X11/xkb/compiled
share/X11/xkb/geometry/digital_vndr/lk
share/X11/xkb/geometry/digital_vndr/pc
share/X11/xkb/geometry/digital_vndr/unix
Regards,
Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpP2CeQjGtop.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [HEADSUP] bsd.perl.mk import coming soon
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:33:42PM +, Mark Linimon wrote: > The main feature of the change will be to allow USE_PERL5= 5.8.0+ (and > similarly for USE_PERL5_RUN, USE_PERL5_BUILD, PERL_CONFIGURE and > PERL_MODBUILD). As a side-effect, the remaining few stragglers that > attempt to keep perl5.003 going will be dropped. (Other committers > have also been removing that code). Great! A big thank you to all who helped get this work done :) Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpOwEITwvSOi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: graphviz: stuck with "Undefined symbol" problem
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 04:01:17PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/graphviz/libgvplugin_gd.so.4: > Undefined symbol "gd_alternate_fontlist" > Problems running dot: exit code=1, command='dot', > arguments='"xxx__incl.dot" -Tpng -o "xxx__incl.png"' I'm seeing the same problem on one of my RELENG_6_2 machines here - but I can not reproduce it on my -CURRENT machine. I haven't been able to find the source of the problem yet... Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpyJn4GeRvJq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: graphviz: stuck with "Undefined symbol" problem
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:11:13PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 04:01:17PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/graphviz/libgvplugin_gd.so.4: > > Undefined symbol "gd_alternate_fontlist" > > Problems running dot: exit code=1, command='dot', > > arguments='"xxx__incl.dot" -Tpng -o "xxx__incl.png"' > > I'm seeing the same problem on one of my RELENG_6_2 machines here - > but I can not reproduce it on my -CURRENT machine. > > I haven't been able to find the source of the problem yet... FYI, graphviz-2.12_2 doesn't have this problem - graphviz-2.14.1 does. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgprX8XHpTDYM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6
The following reply was made to PR ports/11420; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:37:54 +0200
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:47:21AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:01:35PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : > Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : ...
> : > : [1]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D114200
> : >=20
> : > This patch is incorrect.
> : >=20
> : > +.if !defined(NO_INSTALLLIB)
> : >=20
> : > should be
> : >=20
> : > +.if ${MK_INSTALLIB} !=3D "no"
> :=20
> : Oh - thanks for catching this. I guess the same change should be done
> : in lib/ncurses/ncurses/Makefile, then?
>=20
> I belive so. I've CC'd ru@ to make sure.
Any updates on this? It would be nice to have this install problem fixed
before 7.0-RELEASE.
Regards,
Brix
--=20
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
Comment: GnuPG signed
iD8DBQFHE+vBv+Q4flTiePgRAnNRAJoCv66FAnzz41gRtJRO1Dxf+/3imwCgkad9
5AD37lBo8IF4kiTbwFcvR3o=
=E2ZK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:40:03PM +, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/11420; it has been noted by GNATS. Sorry, this should have gone to bin/114200. Note to self: don't trust Subject: lines when hitting reply :) Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpYdxAdSrwqZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/ruby-mysql Makefile
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:27:21PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > Is there anyone who can reproduce this build error? I couldn't > reproduce it on 4-STABLE nor on 6-STABLE. Yes, I can reproduce it here on two boxes, one 5.5-RELEASE-p3 and the other 5.4-RELEASE-p12 Haven't had time to dig into the problem yet. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpoRMWY4oMoc.pgp Description: PGP signature
