FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ editors/ghostwriter | 1.8.1 | 2.0.0 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by:portscout! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
bash: Undefined symbol "rl_filename_rewrite_hook" referenced from COPY re location in /usr/local/bin/bash
Hello, on a recently updated system I have this problem with shells/bash, it fails to start: ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol "rl_filename_rewrite_hook" referenced from COPY relocation in /usr/local/bin/bash I do not have this on similar systems, also recently updated, so any idea where this might coming from ? pkg install bash-static fixes it. With 'recently' I mean: the last 60minutes, from the same repo, which is very much up2date. It is really surprising... -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
pkg builders order of jobs
Hi, On the pkg builders the list of builds is ordered on git hash. http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/jail.html?mastername=main-amd64-default (NB: ipv6 only) This ordering is totally random to me. With svn the list was naturally ordered because of the incremental commit id. Is it possible to add the commit count to the job-name like sys/conf/newvers.sh in base? git_cnt=$($git_cmd rev-list --first-parent --count HEAD 2>/dev/null) Regards, Ronald. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkg builders order of jobs
Am 09.05.21 um 12:22 schrieb Ronald Klop: > Hi, > > On the pkg builders the list of builds is ordered on git hash. > http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/jail.html?mastername=main-amd64-default > (NB: ipv6 only) > > This ordering is totally random to me. With svn the list was naturally ordered > because of the incremental commit id. > > Is it possible to add the commit count to the job-name like > sys/conf/newvers.sh > in base? > git_cnt=$($git_cmd rev-list --first-parent --count HEAD 2>/dev/null) Adding the start-time of the build in ISO format would also be highly appreciated, at least by me ;-) The date should reflect the time of the last commit that has been considered. Such a time stamp would let me see with little effort whether a failure is due to a long running build job that did not catch-up with the latest fixes to a port, or whether there still is an issue with a port (especially for the "exotic" architectures that I do not test on my system and that often need a lot longer to complete a build job). Regards, STefan OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: bash: Undefined symbol "rl_filename_rewrite_hook" referenced from COPY re location in /usr/local/bin/bash
Run ldd against the bag binary and see if it's picking up /use/lib/ libreadline.8.so If it is and this is a FreeBSD 12.x system, then just delete (or rename) that file. Run ldd again, and it should pick up the readline library from /usr/local/lib. It seems freebsd-update doesn't remove that library when upgrading from 11.x to 12.x on some systems. I posted about this in the -stable mailing list a month or so ago. Cheers, Freddie Typos due to smartphone keyboard. On Sun., May 9, 2021, 1:54 a.m. Kurt Jaeger, wrote: > Hello, > > on a recently updated system I have this problem with shells/bash, > it fails to start: > > ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol "rl_filename_rewrite_hook" referenced from > COPY relocation in /usr/local/bin/bash > > I do not have this on similar systems, also recently updated, so > any idea where this might coming from ? pkg install bash-static fixes > it. > > With 'recently' I mean: the last 60minutes, from the same repo, > which is very much up2date. > > It is really surprising... > > -- > p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: bash: Undefined symbol "rl_filename_rewrite_hook" referenced from COPY re location in /usr/local/bin/bash
Hi! > Run ldd against the bag binary and see if it's picking up /use/lib/ > libreadline.8.so It shows /lib/libreadline.so.8, yes. > If it is a FreeBSD 12.x system, then just delete (or rename) > that file. Run ldd again, and it should pick up the readline library from > /usr/local/lib. Yes, that was the correct fix, works now! > It seems freebsd-update doesn't remove that library when upgrading from > 11.x to 12.x on some systems. I posted about this in the -stable mailing > list a month or so ago. Thanks for the info! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkg builders order of jobs
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 3:40 AM Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 09.05.21 um 12:22 schrieb Ronald Klop: > > Hi, > > > > On the pkg builders the list of builds is ordered on git hash. > > http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/jail.html?mastername=main-amd64-default > > (NB: ipv6 only) > > > > This ordering is totally random to me. With svn the list was naturally > ordered > > because of the incremental commit id. > > > > Is it possible to add the commit count to the job-name like > sys/conf/newvers.sh > > in base? > > git_cnt=$($git_cmd rev-list --first-parent --count HEAD 2>/dev/null) > > Adding the start-time of the build in ISO format would also be highly > appreciated, at least by me ;-) > > The date should reflect the time of the last commit that has been > considered. Such a time stamp would let me see with little effort > whether a failure is due to a long running build job that did not > catch-up with the latest fixes to a port, or whether there still is > an issue with a port (especially for the "exotic" architectures that > I do not test on my system and that often need a lot longer to complete > a build job). > > Regards, STefan > I would suggest doing some optimization. Too often a very time consuming build is started well into the process. I mean things that take over 24 hours to build like chromium or electron11. Otherwise on smaller builds, a lot of time can be wasted as one or two slots on the build machines finishing one of the big builds and the other 15 slots idle. This does not happen frequently, but it does happen. With many build cycles exceeding 90 hours, any optimization would be helpful. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Quarterly reports?
Did I somehow miss it or is the first quarter report MIA? I don't think I've ever seen it posted more than a month after the start of the new quarter. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Quarterly reports?
On Sun., May 9, 2021, 12:29 p.m. Kevin Oberman, wrote: > Did I somehow miss it or is the first quarter report MIA? I don't think > I've ever seen it posted more than a month after the start of the new > quarter. > It hit the mailing lists and website on May 5. Cheers, Freddie Typos due to smartphone keyboard. > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkg builders order of jobs
Ronald Klop ronald-lists at klop.ws wrote on Sun May 9 10:22:38 UTC 2021 : > On the pkg builders the list of builds is ordered on git hash. > > http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/jail.html?mastername=main-amd64-default > > (NB: ipv6 only) > > This ordering is totally random to me. With svn the list was naturally > ordered because of the incremental commit id. > > Is it possible to add the commit count to the job-name like > sys/conf/newvers.sh in base? > git_cnt=$($git_cmd rev-list --first-parent --count HEAD 2>/dev/null) Places like: https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-13/ have the same sort of problem, partially because the dates(/times) shown at the displayed level need not match what the files will have for date/time (when the files even exist). An example from my past was: https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-13/?C=M&O=D lists ac845558f7b626d9a31b8f6dab686c45d39dc5a0/ as having date/time 2021-Apr-10 18:43 . QUOTE https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-13/ac845558f7b626d9a31b8f6dab686c45d39dc5a0/?C=M&O=D lists: powerpc/ and arm/ as having date/times 2021-Apr-10 18:54 and 2021-Apr-10 18:50 yet lists... i386/ and arm64/ as having date/times 2021-Feb-19 19:00 and 2021-Feb-19 18:50 . But it gets worse: https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-13/ac845558f7b626d9a31b8f6dab686c45d39dc5a0/powerpc/?C=M&O=D shows an empty directory. Same for: https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-13/ac845558f7b626d9a31b8f6dab686c45d39dc5a0/arm/?C=M&O=D By contrast, https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-13/ac845558f7b626d9a31b8f6dab686c45d39dc5a0/i386/?C=M&O=D shows i386/ with date/time 2021-Apr-10 18:43 but https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-13/ac845558f7b626d9a31b8f6dab686c45d39dc5a0/i386/i386/?C=M&O=D shows all the file dates as 2021-Feb-19 19:00 . . . . END QUOTE https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/*/ has already accumulated a huge number of hash-only based naming subdirectories and trying to do a "no-rebuild approximate bisect" via artifact builds has become much more painful/impractical. (It has never helped that architecture is in a deeper layer but is also partial: only some architectures might build for the commit in question. One has had to inspect to find examples of the architecture of interest.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
