FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ audio/ncspot| 0.2.2 | v0.2.3 +-+ devel/spread-sheet-widget | 0.3 | 0.7 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by:portscout! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD Port: telegram-desktop-2.3.2 videocalls
Alex V. Petrov wrote: I am not developer. I am user only. I don't have account on bugzilla. Anyone can register: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/createaccount.cgi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: OpenJDK ports and 13-CURRENT
On 11 Oct 2020, at 08:57, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > > From: Yasuhiro KIMURA > Subject: Re: OpenJDK ports and 13-CURRENT > Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:35:39 +0900 (JST) > >>> Can you try the attached patch? I haven't yet looked at openjdk 13 and >>> up, but I assume they will need at least the XSynchronize fix, and maybe >>> the above ones, if the upstream branches were made after 2020-02-05. >> >> I tried your patch but it fails at patch phase as following. > > Sorry, I made a mistake. Your patch just works fine on 13-CURRENT > amd64 r366578. I submitted https://bugs.freebsd.org/250270, with patches for openjdk 12 through 15, and added a reference to https://bugs.freebsd.org/248756 which is the meta-bug for -fno-common issues. -Dimitry signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: [SOLVED] request for portmgr approval on bug 238170
I've already got feedback from portmgr, thanks! On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 04:11:12PM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > Hi, > > I suppose this kind of changes require portmgr's approval, right? > I'd appreciate if someone tell me the correct procedure to request > portmgr to approve such patches. > > Or tell me this change actually requires portmgr's approval or not. > > I'm sure this doesn't break anything. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238170 > > -- > meta -- meta ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
