Re: FreeBSD Port: mlton-20100608_3

2017-09-02 Thread beyert
Hi Mayuresh,

I've been meaning to update that port for a really long time (same with
lang/urweb).  I plan to update to the newest version and check to see if
the LLVM backend is mature, as well, to see if I can reduce
dependencies.  Let me know if there are any specific options that you
recommend to be enabled by default.

Regards,
Tim

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, at 07:32 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I wanted to work using SML under FreeBSD via MLton.
> The port is obsolete as per the URL; 
> https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=mlton&stype=all
> Also, there are too many dependencies as mentioned on that same page in 
> the "Requires" section.
> Could you please update the port to the lastest version as well as 
> reduce the dependencies to only GNU MP?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> ~Mayuresh
> 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


exec issue

2017-09-02 Thread Jochen Neumeister
Hey all,

i found this in my poudriere log for archivers/php-snappy:

==
===>  Building package for php-snappy-0.1.8
pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec
file sizes/checksums [8]: . done
packing files[8]: . done
packing directories  [0]: . done
===
=>> Recording filesystem state for preinst... done
===
===>  Installing for php-snappy-0.1.8
===>   php-snappy-0.1.8 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h 
- found
===>   php-snappy-0.1.8 depends on shared library: libsnappy.so - found 
(/usr/local/lib/libsnappy.so)
===>  Checking if php-snappy already installed
===>   Registering installation for php-snappy-0.1.8
pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec
[10amd64-ports-job-01] Installing php-snappy-0.1.8...

Someone here an idea?I found this:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-January/106935.html-but
that is not the solution either.


Cheers
Jochen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD Port: mlton-20100608_3

2017-09-02 Thread Mayuresh Kathe

Hi Tim,

That's great news.

I believe that the LLVM backend isn't ready for prime-time yet.
Also, it's good to have a complete SML system written mostly in SML 
itself.
Except for that dependency on GMP (which I intend to remedy soon-ish), I 
don't think there's anything external which can be categorized as 
necessary, unless the BASIS libraries and SMLNJ libraries are considered 
as external.


Looking forward to your update.

Thanks,

~Mayuresh

On 2017-09-02 02:49 PM, bey...@cs.ucr.edu wrote:

Hi Mayuresh,

I've been meaning to update that port for a really long time (same with
lang/urweb).  I plan to update to the newest version and check to see 
if

the LLVM backend is mature, as well, to see if I can reduce
dependencies.  Let me know if there are any specific options that you
recommend to be enabled by default.

Regards,
Tim

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, at 07:32 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:

Hi,

I wanted to work using SML under FreeBSD via MLton.
The port is obsolete as per the URL;
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=mlton&stype=all
Also, there are too many dependencies as mentioned on that same page 
in

the "Requires" section.
Could you please update the port to the lastest version as well as
reduce the dependencies to only GNU MP?

Thanks,

~Mayuresh



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: www/bluefish builds but fails to install

2017-09-02 Thread tech-lists
Hi,

On 01/09/2017 23:33, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> No, not really "aha". If you have most anything using freedesktop specs
> (which includes all "modern" desktops), you will have these files. You
> should also  have a similar set of system wide mime files. These are
> normally found in /usr/local/share/mime, but that can be altered and it
> looks like yours is in "/storage". If the prefix for local is changed,
> ports must be rebuilt as many ports assume that related ports use the same
> location for shared resources.

The OS was initially installed onto a SSD, then 3xsata disks were added
for a zfs array. This array is /storage and /usr is symlinked to
/storage/usr

> FWIW, I just installed bluefish on my system using default options with no
> errors. As a result, I suspect thee is an issue with your environment and
> that is why you are having issues.

I'm running portupgrade -af in the hope this fixes things, or if it
fails hopefully the errors will show where the problem is. It'll take a
while as nearly 1400 ports are installed, then again this desktop is
quick. At the same time, I spun up a newly created, small, bhyve
11.1-stable instance, installed ports and it's now building bluefish
with all its dependencies.

I expect that you're right, that there's something broken in the
environment. In which case I'll probably have to return the machine to a
more-or-less pristine state, delete .local and install what I currently
require. Maybe some cruft has built up over the years that's causing
problems now. It's been a freebsd desktop since v9.

thanks,
-- 
J.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Dynamips crashing and GNS3 v2

2017-09-02 Thread W Howard via freebsd-ports
Dear Group,
I managed to get GNS3 installed using python 3.5 and pip3.4 to the latest 
version (2.0.3).


The version in the ports tree is 0.8.

All works well but I can't get dynamips to run. It core dumps with an "Bus 
Error".

I have compiled and installed the latest version from github and the problem 
persists.

I am running 11.2 release.

What next steps can I take? 

Cheers!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted

2017-09-02 Thread Willem Jan Withagen (Nefos)
Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997

Has gone thru:
    portlint -A
    poudriere testport

Thanx,
--WjW

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

xpi- addons ports and WebExtensions / legacy?

2017-09-02 Thread Thierry Thomas
Hello,

Trying to upgrade www/xpi-ublock_origin to the latest release (1.14.4),
I'm facing a problem: the common targets for xpi- ports, located in
www/xpi-adblock/Makefile.xpi, relies upon install.rdf and
chrome.manifest. These two files exist for the legacy addons, but no
more for the new WebExtensions.

Is someone working on this? Or do you know how to register a
WebExtension addon for all users of a machine, as we do for the legacy
ports?

Thanks for any hint..
-- 
Th. Thomas.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted

2017-09-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997

I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted

2017-09-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> > Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
> > 
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997
> 
> I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings.

Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ?

Or should ceph-devel be renamed ? Or ... ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted

2017-09-02 Thread Willem Jan Withagen (Nefos)
On 2-9-2017 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997
>> I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings.
> Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ?
>
> Or should ceph-devel be renamed ? Or ... ?
>

Ah, that shows my lack of porting experience
I guess it would, since just about everything is equal and will be
conflicting.

I'll have to readup on this, and add it to both ports.

--WjW
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: exec issue

2017-09-02 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
On 09/02/17 05:46, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
> 
> i found this in my poudriere log for archivers/php-snappy:
> 
> ==
> ===>  Building package for php-snappy-0.1.8
> pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec

@exec is added to plist by Mk/Uses/php.mk

Given, than @exec is deprecated php.mk should be updated.

Probably @exec can be changed to @postexec and @unexec to @preunexec.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted

2017-09-02 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 2-9-2017 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>>> Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997
>>
>> I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings.
> 
> Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ?
> 
> Or should ceph-devel be renamed ? Or ... ?

Fixed the diff, and added a new one for ceph-devel as well.

--WjW

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


security/bruteforceblocker update to 1.2.4 failure

2017-09-02 Thread Michael Butler
The most recent update neglects the version number in the working 
subdirectory. The following, or something like this, fixes it:


imb@toshi:/usr/ports/security> svn diff
Index: bruteforceblocker/Makefile
===
--- bruteforceblocker/Makefile  (revision 449165)
+++ bruteforceblocker/Makefile  (working copy)
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@

 OPTIONS_DEFINE=DOCS

-WRKSRC=${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME}
+WRKSRC=${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
 SUB_FILES= pkg-message
 SHEBANG_FILES= ${PORTNAME}.pl

imb
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


What is the right way to make OPTIONS_DEFAULT depend on

2017-09-02 Thread Yuri

This doesn't work:


.include 

.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 110
OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= MYOPT
.endif

MYOPT isn't picked up


I tried with a regular expressions, witout .include:

SYSVERSION=${OPSYS}${OSVERSION}
OPTIONS_DEFAULT=HELP ${SYSVERSION:C/^FreeBSD1[1-9][0-9]{5}$/MYOPT/:MMYOPT}

MYOPT isn't picked up again.


Yuri

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"