Re: FreeBSD Port: mlton-20100608_3
Hi Mayuresh, I've been meaning to update that port for a really long time (same with lang/urweb). I plan to update to the newest version and check to see if the LLVM backend is mature, as well, to see if I can reduce dependencies. Let me know if there are any specific options that you recommend to be enabled by default. Regards, Tim On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, at 07:32 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to work using SML under FreeBSD via MLton. > The port is obsolete as per the URL; > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=mlton&stype=all > Also, there are too many dependencies as mentioned on that same page in > the "Requires" section. > Could you please update the port to the lastest version as well as > reduce the dependencies to only GNU MP? > > Thanks, > > ~Mayuresh > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
exec issue
Hey all, i found this in my poudriere log for archivers/php-snappy: == ===> Building package for php-snappy-0.1.8 pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec file sizes/checksums [8]: . done packing files[8]: . done packing directories [0]: . done === =>> Recording filesystem state for preinst... done === ===> Installing for php-snappy-0.1.8 ===> php-snappy-0.1.8 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> php-snappy-0.1.8 depends on shared library: libsnappy.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libsnappy.so) ===> Checking if php-snappy already installed ===> Registering installation for php-snappy-0.1.8 pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec [10amd64-ports-job-01] Installing php-snappy-0.1.8... Someone here an idea?I found this: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-January/106935.html-but that is not the solution either. Cheers Jochen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD Port: mlton-20100608_3
Hi Tim, That's great news. I believe that the LLVM backend isn't ready for prime-time yet. Also, it's good to have a complete SML system written mostly in SML itself. Except for that dependency on GMP (which I intend to remedy soon-ish), I don't think there's anything external which can be categorized as necessary, unless the BASIS libraries and SMLNJ libraries are considered as external. Looking forward to your update. Thanks, ~Mayuresh On 2017-09-02 02:49 PM, bey...@cs.ucr.edu wrote: Hi Mayuresh, I've been meaning to update that port for a really long time (same with lang/urweb). I plan to update to the newest version and check to see if the LLVM backend is mature, as well, to see if I can reduce dependencies. Let me know if there are any specific options that you recommend to be enabled by default. Regards, Tim On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, at 07:32 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: Hi, I wanted to work using SML under FreeBSD via MLton. The port is obsolete as per the URL; https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=mlton&stype=all Also, there are too many dependencies as mentioned on that same page in the "Requires" section. Could you please update the port to the lastest version as well as reduce the dependencies to only GNU MP? Thanks, ~Mayuresh ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: www/bluefish builds but fails to install
Hi, On 01/09/2017 23:33, Kevin Oberman wrote: > No, not really "aha". If you have most anything using freedesktop specs > (which includes all "modern" desktops), you will have these files. You > should also have a similar set of system wide mime files. These are > normally found in /usr/local/share/mime, but that can be altered and it > looks like yours is in "/storage". If the prefix for local is changed, > ports must be rebuilt as many ports assume that related ports use the same > location for shared resources. The OS was initially installed onto a SSD, then 3xsata disks were added for a zfs array. This array is /storage and /usr is symlinked to /storage/usr > FWIW, I just installed bluefish on my system using default options with no > errors. As a result, I suspect thee is an issue with your environment and > that is why you are having issues. I'm running portupgrade -af in the hope this fixes things, or if it fails hopefully the errors will show where the problem is. It'll take a while as nearly 1400 ports are installed, then again this desktop is quick. At the same time, I spun up a newly created, small, bhyve 11.1-stable instance, installed ports and it's now building bluefish with all its dependencies. I expect that you're right, that there's something broken in the environment. In which case I'll probably have to return the machine to a more-or-less pristine state, delete .local and install what I currently require. Maybe some cruft has built up over the years that's causing problems now. It's been a freebsd desktop since v9. thanks, -- J. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dynamips crashing and GNS3 v2
Dear Group, I managed to get GNS3 installed using python 3.5 and pip3.4 to the latest version (2.0.3). The version in the ports tree is 0.8. All works well but I can't get dynamips to run. It core dumps with an "Bus Error". I have compiled and installed the latest version from github and the problem persists. I am running 11.2 release. What next steps can I take? Cheers! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted
Could any of the interested submitters take a look at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997 Has gone thru: portlint -A poudriere testport Thanx, --WjW ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
xpi- addons ports and WebExtensions / legacy?
Hello, Trying to upgrade www/xpi-ublock_origin to the latest release (1.14.4), I'm facing a problem: the common targets for xpi- ports, located in www/xpi-adblock/Makefile.xpi, relies upon install.rdf and chrome.manifest. These two files exist for the legacy addons, but no more for the new WebExtensions. Is someone working on this? Or do you know how to register a WebExtension addon for all users of a machine, as we do for the legacy ports? Thanks for any hint.. -- Th. Thomas. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted
Hi! > Could any of the interested submitters take a look at: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997 I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted
Hi! > > Could any of the interested submitters take a look at: > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997 > > I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings. Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ? Or should ceph-devel be renamed ? Or ... ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted
On 2-9-2017 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>> Could any of the interested submitters take a look at: >>> >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997 >> I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings. > Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ? > > Or should ceph-devel be renamed ? Or ... ? > Ah, that shows my lack of porting experience I guess it would, since just about everything is equal and will be conflicting. I'll have to readup on this, and add it to both ports. --WjW ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: exec issue
On 09/02/17 05:46, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > > i found this in my poudriere log for archivers/php-snappy: > > == > ===> Building package for php-snappy-0.1.8 > pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec @exec is added to plist by Mk/Uses/php.mk Given, than @exec is deprecated php.mk should be updated. Probably @exec can be changed to @postexec and @unexec to @preunexec. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ceph Official version 12.2.0 port submitted
On 2-9-2017 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>> Could any of the interested submitters take a look at: >>> >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997 >> >> I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings. > > Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ? > > Or should ceph-devel be renamed ? Or ... ? Fixed the diff, and added a new one for ceph-devel as well. --WjW ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
security/bruteforceblocker update to 1.2.4 failure
The most recent update neglects the version number in the working subdirectory. The following, or something like this, fixes it: imb@toshi:/usr/ports/security> svn diff Index: bruteforceblocker/Makefile === --- bruteforceblocker/Makefile (revision 449165) +++ bruteforceblocker/Makefile (working copy) @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ OPTIONS_DEFINE=DOCS -WRKSRC=${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME} +WRKSRC=${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION} SUB_FILES= pkg-message SHEBANG_FILES= ${PORTNAME}.pl imb ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
What is the right way to make OPTIONS_DEFAULT depend on
This doesn't work: .include .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 110 OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= MYOPT .endif MYOPT isn't picked up I tried with a regular expressions, witout .include: SYSVERSION=${OPSYS}${OSVERSION} OPTIONS_DEFAULT=HELP ${SYSVERSION:C/^FreeBSD1[1-9][0-9]{5}$/MYOPT/:MMYOPT} MYOPT isn't picked up again. Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"