Re: latest rust fails to install

2017-02-27 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
On 25.02.2017 08:19, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:33 AM, tech-lists  wrote:
>> rust compiles but fails to install. Here's the last couple of pages of
>> output, from a machine at FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r313940 and ports
>> r434693. It's like the number after the filename is wrong, so we get
>> file not found errors.
> 
> There was a bug opened on this yesterday. Problem seems to be fairly well
> understood. Solution... not so much. I ended up installing the package.
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217309

Hi!

A patch to fix this error is being reviewed:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9816

Sorry for the breakage.

-- 
Jean-Sébastien Pédron



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-02-27 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
databases/pgpoolAdmin   | 3.3.1   | 3.6.0
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Facing issue after upgrading Firefox version in Free BSD 9.2 RELEASE not able to launch firefox

2017-02-27 Thread Uma Somasundaram
Hi ,

I have upgraded FF version from firefox-esr: 24.3.0_2,1 -> 45.6.0_3,1 in
Free BSD 9.2 version using below command in my BSD ,

"pkg install firefox-esr".

After the upgrade I am not able to launch the firefox . When I type firefox
below error message is displayed in my terminal ,


"XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so:
Shared object "libpixman-1.so.30" not found, required by
"libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0"
Couldn't load XPCOM. "

Please find the below outputs :

Output from 'uname -a' :

FreeBSD pod1201-client11.ibesa 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898:
Fri Sep 27 03:52:52 UTC 2013
r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 i386

Output from 'ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile' :

/usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile:
 $FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefile 433286 2017-02-04 07:56:59Z jbeich
$

Please do let me know what needs to be done for it to work. I am new to BSD
as well.


Thanks & Regards ,
Uma
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: New port gitsome

2017-02-27 Thread Danilo G. Baio (dbaio)
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:42:38PM +0100, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:48:17 -0300
> "Danilo G. Baio (dbaio)"  wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 07:48:05PM +0100, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> > > For py3-* ports, you can look at how audio/py-mutagen and 
> > > audio/py3-mutagen are build.
> > > 
> > > I don't think, you need to become maintainer of these ports (it's just 
> > > "copy of"). 
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Olivier.
> > 
> > I've withdrawn maintainer entry on the new py3-* ports. Patch updated.
> > 
> > And is ok, just one PR for all py3-* ports?
> 
> This question depends of commiter.
> 
> Personally I prefer new patch for each new port. Besides Bugzilla is clever, 
> you can add an ordered list of dependencies for a given port.
> 
> > 
> > Regards.
> > --
> > Danilo G. Baio (dbaio)
> 
> 
> -- 
> olivier


But like all py3-* new ports are just a 'copy of' and serves for the same 
purpose I thought that one patch and one commit will work.

I will wait a little longer and if no one agrees with this I will submit one PR 
for each new py3- port (17).

Thank you again.

Regards.
--
Danilo G. Baio (dbaio)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Facing issue after upgrading Firefox version in Free BSD 9.2 RELEASE not able to launch firefox

2017-02-27 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
Uma Somasundaram skrev:
> 
> Hi ,
> I have upgraded FF version from firefox-esr: 24.3.0_2,1 -> 45.6.0_3,1 in
> Free BSD 9.2 version using below command in my BSD ,
> 
> "pkg install firefox-esr".
> 
> After the upgrade I am not able to launch the firefox . When I type firefox
> below error message is displayed in my terminal ,
> 
> 
> "XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so:
> Shared object "libpixman-1.so.30" not found, required by
> "libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0"
> Couldn't load XPCOM. "
> 
> Please find the below outputs :
> 
> Output from 'uname -a' :
> 
> FreeBSD pod1201-client11.ibesa 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898:
> Fri Sep 27 03:52:52 UTC 2013
> r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>  i386

The FreeBSD version you are running is already EOL:

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2016-October/001754.html

Upgrade to 10.3 or 11.0 first and then try again.

--
Herbert
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Facing issue after upgrading Firefox version in Free BSD 9.2 RELEASE not able to launch firefox

2017-02-27 Thread mokhi
Hi,
However your FreeBSD is on EOL (consider migrating to a newer version,
at least for the sake of security updates), but I had similar problem
on 10.3, I guess the problem is Firefox is updated but some libs that
it depends on is not being updated (mine was libdbus, which Firefox
needed libdbus-1.so.3 after update, but it was -1.so.2 still).
Do a upgrade on your packages/ports, and it'll fix it.

--
Best regards, MMokhi.

On 2/27/17, Uma Somasundaram  wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have upgraded FF version from firefox-esr: 24.3.0_2,1 -> 45.6.0_3,1 in
> Free BSD 9.2 version using below command in my BSD ,
>
> "pkg install firefox-esr".
>
> After the upgrade I am not able to launch the firefox . When I type firefox
> below error message is displayed in my terminal ,
>
>
> "XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so:
> Shared object "libpixman-1.so.30" not found, required by
> "libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0"
> Couldn't load XPCOM. "
>
> Please find the below outputs :
>
> Output from 'uname -a' :
>
> FreeBSD pod1201-client11.ibesa 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898:
> Fri Sep 27 03:52:52 UTC 2013
> r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>  i386
>
> Output from 'ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile' :
>
> /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile:
>  $FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefile 433286 2017-02-04 07:56:59Z jbeich
> $
>
> Please do let me know what needs to be done for it to work. I am new to BSD
> as well.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Andrew Hotlab
Hi to all, I'm trying to make a port which installs only a couple of simple 
scripts (thus NO_BUILD, NO_ARCH, and void MASTER_SITES and DISTFILES...).

Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd like to 
know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older FreeBSD 
releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
regarding only ported app's source code:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html

TIA

Andrew
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 2017/02/27 14:37, Andrew Hotlab wrote:
> Hi to all, I'm trying to make a port which installs only a couple of
> simple scripts (thus NO_BUILD, NO_ARCH, and void MASTER_SITES and
> DISTFILES...).
> 
> Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer,
> I'd like to know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on
> older FreeBSD releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph,
> but it seems regarding only ported app's source code:
> 
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html

Well, given that the earliest supported version in ports is now
10.3-RELEASE, this problem appears to have fixed itself for your purposes.

In general, you can test against ${OSVERSION} in your port's Makefile to
detect what OS version the port is being built on, and mark the port as
broken where the OS version is not suitable.

Note however that binary packages are built on the oldest supported
version of the major branch, so by marking the port broken for the OSV,
you will prevent binary packages being available for that entire major
branch.  It's best to apply this sort of brokenness determination at the
level of the major version number, rather than anything finer grained.

Cheers,

Matthew





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Andrew Hotlab
> From: Andrew Hotlab 
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 3:37 PM
> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases
    
> Hi to all, I'm trying to make a port which installs only a couple of simple 
> scripts
> (thus NO_BUILD, NO_ARCH, and void MASTER_SITES and DISTFILES...).
> 
> Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd like to
> know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older FreeBSD
> releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
> regarding
> only ported app's source  code:
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html


Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the do-install 
section:

.include 
.if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
.endif
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 27 Feb, 2017, at 9:07, Andrew Hotlab  wrote:
> 
>> From: Andrew Hotlab 
>> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 3:37 PM
>> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
>> Subject: How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases
> 
>> Hi to all, I'm trying to make a port which installs only a couple of simple 
>> scripts
>> (thus NO_BUILD, NO_ARCH, and void MASTER_SITES and DISTFILES...).
>> 
>> Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd like 
>> to
>> know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older FreeBSD
>> releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
>> regarding
>> only ported app's source  code:
>> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html
> 
> 
> Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the do-install 
> section:
> 
> .include 
> .if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
> IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
> .endif

It's really not needed at all. Nothing below 10.3 is supported, and the ports 
system will complain already. Please don't include that block in your port.

# Adam


-- 
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Ernie Luzar

Andrew Hotlab wrote:

From: Andrew Hotlab 
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 3:37 PM
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases


Hi to all, I'm trying to make a port which installs only a couple of simple 
scripts
(thus NO_BUILD, NO_ARCH, and void MASTER_SITES and DISTFILES...).

Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd like to
know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older FreeBSD
releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
regarding
only ported app's source  code:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html



Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the do-install 
section:

.include 
.if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
.endif



IGNORE_FreeBSD_9= This version only for FreeBSD 10+
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Ernie Luzar

Adam Weinberger wrote:

On 27 Feb, 2017, at 9:07, Andrew Hotlab  wrote:


From: Andrew Hotlab 
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 3:37 PM
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases


Hi to all, I'm trying to make a port which installs only a couple of simple 
scripts
(thus NO_BUILD, NO_ARCH, and void MASTER_SITES and DISTFILES...).

Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd like to
know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older FreeBSD
releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
regarding
only ported app's source  code:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html


Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the do-install 
section:

.include 
.if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
.endif


It's really not needed at all. Nothing below 10.3 is supported, and the ports 
system will complain already. Please don't include that block in your port.

# Adam


Thats not true. I have port version just for 9.x and even today I still 
see the source file the port fetches still being downloaded.


It has
IGNORE_FreeBSD_10= and IGNORE_FreeBSD_11= in it's Makefile.
Best you have IGNORE_FreeBSD_9=  in your Makefile to be sure you get 
what you want.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Andrew Hotlab
> From: Adam Weinberger 
> 
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:30 PM
> To: Andrew Hotlab
> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases
>     
>> On 27 Feb, 2017, at 9:07, Andrew Hotlab  wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Andrew Hotlab 
>>> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 3:37 PM
>>> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
>>> Subject: How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases
>>>  
>>> Hi to all, I'm trying to make a port which installs only a couple of simple 
>>> scripts
>>> (thus NO_BUILD, NO_ARCH, and void MASTER_SITES and DISTFILES...).
>>> 
>>> Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd like 
>>> to
>>> know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older FreeBSD
>>> releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
>>> regarding
>>> only ported app's source  code:
>>>  https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the do-install 
>> section:
>> 
>> .include 
>> .if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
>> IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
>> .endif
> 
> It's really not needed at all. Nothing below 10.3 is supported, and the ports 
> system
> will complain already. Please don't include that block in your port.
> 
> # Adam

Thank you Adam, I wrote my previous post before reading Matthew's reply.

I removed that check from my port.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Andrew Hotlab
> From: Ernie Luzar 
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:43 PM
> To: Adam Weinberger
> Cc: Andrew Hotlab; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases
> 
 Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd 
 like to
 know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older FreeBSD
 releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
 regarding
 only ported app's source  code:
  
 https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html
>>>
>>> Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the do-install 
>>> section:
>>>
>>> .include 
>>> .if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
>>> IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
>>> .endif
>> 
>> It's really not needed at all. Nothing below 10.3 is supported, and the 
>> ports system will
>> complain already. Please don't include that block in your port.
>> 
>> # Adam
>> 
>> 
> Thats not true. I have port version just for 9.x and even today I still 
> see the source file the port fetches still being downloaded.
> 
> It has
> IGNORE_FreeBSD_10= and IGNORE_FreeBSD_11= in it's Makefile.
> Best you have IGNORE_FreeBSD_9=  in your Makefile to be sure you get 
> what you want.

Actually, it seems that Matthew and Adam are right, but I'm not able to 
understand if
it's a warn or a block action:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=431746
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 27 Feb, 2017, at 10:00, Andrew Hotlab  wrote:
> 
>> From: Ernie Luzar 
>> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:43 PM
>> To: Adam Weinberger
>> Cc: Andrew Hotlab; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases
>> 
> Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd 
> like to
> know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older 
> FreeBSD
> releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
> regarding
> only ported app's source  code:
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html
 
 Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the do-install 
 section:
 
 .include 
 .if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
 IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
 .endif
>>> 
>>> It's really not needed at all. Nothing below 10.3 is supported, and the 
>>> ports system will
>>> complain already. Please don't include that block in your port.
>>> 
>>> # Adam
>>> 
>>> 
>> Thats not true. I have port version just for 9.x and even today I still 
>> see the source file the port fetches still being downloaded.
>> 
>> It has
>> IGNORE_FreeBSD_10= and IGNORE_FreeBSD_11= in it's Makefile.
>> Best you have IGNORE_FreeBSD_9=  in your Makefile to be sure you get 
>> what you want.
> 
> Actually, it seems that Matthew and Adam are right, but I'm not able to 
> understand if
> it's a warn or a block action:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=431746

It's a block, but it's overridable.

# Adam


-- 
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Andrew Hotlab
> From: Adam Weinberger 
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 6:05 PM
> To: Andrew Hotlab
> Cc: Ernie Luzar; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases
> 
>> On 27 Feb, 2017, at 10:00, Andrew Hotlab  wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Ernie Luzar 
>>> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:43 PM
>>> To: Adam Weinberger
>>> Cc: Andrew Hotlab; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
>>> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD 
>>> releases
>>> 
>> Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd 
>> like to
>> know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on older 
>> FreeBSD
>> releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this paragraph, but it seems 
>> regarding
>> only ported app's source  code:
>>  
>> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html
> 
> Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the do-install 
> section:
> 
> .include 
> .if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
> IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
> .endif
 
 It's really not needed at all. Nothing below 10.3 is supported, and the 
 ports system will
 complain already. Please don't include that block in your port.
 
 # Adam
 
 
>>> Thats not true. I have port version just for 9.x and even today I still 
>>> see the source file the port fetches still being downloaded.
>>> 
>>> It has
>>> IGNORE_FreeBSD_10= and IGNORE_FreeBSD_11= in it's Makefile.
>>> Best you have IGNORE_FreeBSD_9=  in your Makefile to be sure you get 
>>> what you want.
>> 
>> Actually, it seems that Matthew and Adam are right, but I'm not able to 
>> understand if
>> it's a warn or a block action:
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=431746
> 
> It's a block, but it's overridable.
> 

Ok, I guess the better way is to let bsd.port.mk do the job for me! :)

Thanks to all you guys!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Kodi build fails /usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required

2017-02-27 Thread Dave
It seems Kodi requires  GLIBCXX_3.4.11 

/usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required by 
/usr/ports/multimedia/kodi/work/xbmc-c327c53/tools/depends/native/JsonSchemaBuilder/bin/JsonSchemaBuilder
 not found

I can't find anything in ports or packages which might install GLIBCXX_3.4.11

Anyone got any pointers for me?  Or is it broken?

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Change system configuration files with port install

2017-02-27 Thread Andrew Hotlab
Hi to all, I'm working to build a simple port which, after copying a couple of 
scripts under ${PREFIX}, leaves to the user the task to set a few variables in 
/boot/loader.conf and /etc/rc.conf.


I was wondering if there is a method and (first and foremost) if it's a sane 
idea, to make the port apply changes to these system configuration files.


At this time, I output with pkg-message the instructions to change these files.


Thanks.


Andrew
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Kodi build fails /usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required

2017-02-27 Thread Dave
On Monday 27 February 2017 18:54:56 you wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> You must deinstall misc/compat9x before install multimedia/kodi.
> 
> When the kodi installation is complete, you can install compat9x port again.

Yes, that fixed it.  Thanks!

I was almost at the solution myself when your email arrived.

I was being a bit blind in terms of the relevant file being in
the compat hierarchy and had just noticed that.  I'd not quite
got to the point of thinking of or trying a deinstall of compat9x
though.  I was just about to try a reinstall of compat9x

Doing a pgk delete of compat9x showed only archivers/rar as
a dependency.  Sadly, I need rar installed so need compat9 too.

Both reinstalled safely after the Kodi build/install though.

Thanks again.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD releases

2017-02-27 Thread Chris H
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:05:01 -0700 Adam Weinberger  wrote

> > On 27 Feb, 2017, at 10:00, Andrew Hotlab  wrote:
> > 
> >> From: Ernie Luzar 
> >> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:43 PM
> >> To: Adam Weinberger
> >> Cc: Andrew Hotlab; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> >> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] How to create a port only for specific FreeBSD
> >> releases 
> > Since these scripts are designed to run on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer, I'd
> > like to know if there is a way to prevent the port from installing on
> > older FreeBSD releases. In the Porter's Handbook I found this
> > paragraph, but it seems regarding only ported app's source  code:
> >
> >
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html
>  
>  Sorry, just found by myself. I included these lines before the
>  do-install section: 
>  .include 
>  .if ${OSVERSION} < 1000100
>  IGNORE= runs only on FreeBSD 10.0 and newer
>  .endif
> >>> 
> >>> It's really not needed at all. Nothing below 10.3 is supported, and the
> >>> ports system will complain already. Please don't include that block in
> >>> your port. 
> >>> # Adam
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> Thats not true. I have port version just for 9.x and even today I still 
> >> see the source file the port fetches still being downloaded.
> >> 
> >> It has
> >> IGNORE_FreeBSD_10= and IGNORE_FreeBSD_11= in it's Makefile.
> >> Best you have IGNORE_FreeBSD_9=  in your Makefile to be sure you get 
> >> what you want.
> > 
> > Actually, it seems that Matthew and Adam are right, but I'm not able to
> > understand if it's a warn or a block action:
> > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=431746
> 
> It's a block, but it's overridable.

A big thanks, for not making it /terminal/!

> 
> # Adam
> 

--chris


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Change system configuration files with port install

2017-02-27 Thread Chris H
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 19:44:05 + Andrew Hotlab 
wrote

> Hi to all, I'm working to build a simple port which, after copying a couple
> of scripts under ${PREFIX}, leaves to the user the task to set a few
> variables in /boot/loader.conf and /etc/rc.conf. 
>
> 
> I was wondering if there is a method and (first and foremost) if it's a sane
> idea, to make the port apply changes to these system configuration files.
> 
> 
> At this time, I output with pkg-message the instructions to change these
> files. 
>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Andrew
Aside from possibly adding filename.sample(s) with example entries.
You've already made the right choice. :-)

--Chris


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Kodi build fails /usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required

2017-02-27 Thread Dave
On Monday 27 February 2017 21:25:08 you wrote:
> > Enviar: lunes 27 de febrero de 2017 a las 21:12
> > De: Dave 
> > Para: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> > CC: "Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina" 
> > Asunto: Re: Kodi build fails /usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.6: version 
> > GLIBCXX_3.4.11 required
> >
> > On Monday 27 February 2017 18:54:56 you wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > > 
> > > You must deinstall misc/compat9x before install multimedia/kodi.
> > > 
> > > When the kodi installation is complete, you can install compat9x port 
> > > again.
> > 
> > Yes, that fixed it.  Thanks!
> > 
> > I was almost at the solution myself when your email arrived.
> > 
> > I was being a bit blind in terms of the relevant file being in
> > the compat hierarchy and had just noticed that.  I'd not quite
> > got to the point of thinking of or trying a deinstall of compat9x
> > though.  I was just about to try a reinstall of compat9x
> > 
> > Doing a pgk delete of compat9x showed only archivers/rar as
> > a dependency.  Sadly, I need rar installed so need compat9 too.
> > 
> > Both reinstalled safely after the Kodi build/install though.
> > 
> > Thanks again.
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately, build conflicts are not recorded in the resulting package.
> 
> % cd /usr/ports/multimedia/kodi && make -V CONFLICTS_BUILD
> compat9x
> 
> misc/compat9x is listed in CONFLICTS_BUILD [0]. So it's a good idea to 
> manually check the Makefile.
> 
> [0] 
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/conflicts.html

Thanks Carlos, I wasn't aware of that.  Added to my "fix it" armoury :-)
(Copied into ports@ list for completeness of solution)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: seamonkey port compiling error

2017-02-27 Thread Erdos New via freebsd-ports
thanks!

I end up just installing the package through 'pkg' instead of building through 
port.

 

 afterwards it works fine.
 

 



 

 

-Original Message-
From: Dimitry Andric 
To: Erdos New 
Cc: freebsd-ports 
Sent: Sun, Feb 26, 2017 2:06 pm
Subject: Re: seamonkey port compiling error

On 26 Feb 2017, at 19:55, Erdos New via freebsd-ports 
 wrote:
> 
> i tried to install 'seamonkey' to my freebsd10.1 32-bit system.  however, 
> encountered errors:
> root@oblivion:/usr/ports/www/seamonkey # make install
> 
> 
> install seamonky:
> llvm[6]: Compiling IndexBody.cpp for Release build (PIC)
> llvm[6]: Compiling IndexDecl.cpp for Release build (PIC)
> llvm[6]: Compiling IndexTypeSourceInfo.cpp for Release build (PIC)
> llvm[6]: Compiling Indexing.cpp for Release build (PIC)
> llvm[6]: Compiling IndexingContext.cpp for Release build (PIC)
> llvm[6]: Linking Release Shared Library libclang.so
> llvm[6]: Building Release Archive Library libclang.a
> gmake[6]: Leaving directory 
> '/usr/ports/lang/clang36/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/tools/libclang'
> gmake[6]: Entering directory 
> '/usr/ports/lang/clang36/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/tools/c-index-test'
> llvm[6]: Compiling c-index-test.c for Release build
> llvm[6]: Linking Release executable c-index-test (without symbols)
> /usr/ports/lang/clang36/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/Release/lib/libLLVM-3.6.so: 
> undefined reference to `futimens@FBSD_1.4'

Most likely, you installed a binary package for devel/llvm36.  Binary
packages are now built on FreeBSD 10.3, the most recent supported
version for ports, and this version has introduced a new syscall which
your system does not have.

The simplest solution is probably to delete the llvm36 port, and rebuild
it on your 10.1 system.  Then try to rebuild the Seamonkey port and its
dependent ports again.

Though it would be easiest if you upgraded the system to 10.3. :)

-Dimitry


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-02-27 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
graphics/blender| 2.78b   | 2.78c
+-+
lang/groovy | 2.4.8   | 2.4.9
+-+
multimedia/obs-studio   | 17.0.2  | 18.0.0
+-+
net-mgmt/mk-livestatus  | 1.2.8p15| 1.2.8p17
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"