Re: INDEX build failed for 9.x
From: Ports Index build
Subject: INDEX build failed for 9.x
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 06:09:47 GMT
> INDEX build failed with errors:
> Generating INDEX-9 - please wait.."/usr/share/mk/bsd.init.mk", line 12:
> Unknown directive
> Unknown modifier 'U'
>
> "/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 38: Malformed conditional
> (${MK_CCACHE_BUILD:Uno} == "yes" && !make(showconfig) &&
> (${CC:M*ccache/world/*} == "" || ${CXX:M*ccache/world/*} == ""))
> "/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 107: missing `in' in for
> X_ in CC $${_empty_var_} XCC X_
> "/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 108: Malformed conditional (${cc} ==
> "CC" || !empty(XCC))
> Unknown modifier 'h'
>
> Error expanding embedded variable.
> "Makefile", line 22: warning: "fmake -f
> "/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/www/tclhttpd/files/Makefile.lib" -V
> SHLIB_NAME" returned non-zero status
> Done.
> make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/editors/flim: no entry for
> /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/editors/apel-emacs25
>
> Committers on the hook:
> ashish
>
> Most recent SVN update was:
> Updating '.':
> UMk/bsd.emacs.mk
> Deditors/emacs/pkg-deinstall
> Ueditors/emacs/Makefile
> Ueditors/emacs/distinfo
> Deditors/emacs/files/pkg-install.in
> Deditors/emacs/files/patch-src_unexaix.c
> Deditors/emacs/files/patch-src_unexelf.c
> Deditors/emacs/files/patch-src_unexcoff.c
> Aeditors/emacs/files/extrapatch-lldb-gud.el
> Ueditors/emacs/pkg-plist
> Ueditors/emacs-devel/Makefile
> Ueditors/emacs-devel/distinfo
> Deditors/emacs-devel/files/patch-sources.el
> Aeditors/emacs-devel/files/sources.el.in
> Ueditors/emacs-devel/pkg-plist
> Ueditors/emacs-nox11/Makefile
> Updated to revision 423103.
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Attached patch should fix build failure.
---
Yasuhiro KIMURA
Index: editors/flim/Makefile
===
--- editors/flim/Makefile (revision 423103)
+++ editors/flim/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -50,12 +50,12 @@
.include
.if defined(EMACS_PORT_NAME)
-.if (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs23") || (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs24") ||
(${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs-devel")
+.if (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs25") || (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs-devel")
DEPPORT_SUFFIX=
.else
DEPPORT_SUFFIX=-${EMACS_PORT_NAME}
.endif
-.if (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs23") || (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs24") ||
(${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs-devel")
+.if (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs25") || (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs-devel")
PLIST= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-plist.emacs21
.endif
# depends on apel (case of xemacs-21.x or later)
Index: editors/semi/Makefile
===
--- editors/semi/Makefile (revision 423103)
+++ editors/semi/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -48,12 +48,12 @@
.include
.if defined(EMACS_PORT_NAME)
-.if (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs23") || (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs24") ||
(${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs-devel")
+.if (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs25") || (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs-devel")
DEPPORT_SUFFIX=
.else
DEPPORT_SUFFIX=-${EMACS_PORT_NAME}
.endif
-.if (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs23") || (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs24") ||
(${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs-devel")
+.if (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs25") || (${EMACS_PORT_NAME} == "emacs-devel")
PLIST= ${PKGDIR}/pkg-plist.emacs20
.endif
# depends on flim
Index: graphics/xface.el/Makefile
===
--- graphics/xface.el/Makefile (revision 423103)
+++ graphics/xface.el/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
MAINTAINER=po...@freebsd.org
COMMENT= X-Face encoder/decoder/viewer for Emacsen
-EMACS_PORT_NAME?= emacs24
+EMACS_PORT_NAME?= emacs25
RUN_DEPENDS= compface:mail/faces
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Seamonkey and QupZilla need update?
What is the status of www/seamonkey and prospect of updating from 2.39 to the current 2.40, which was released from upstream on March 14, 2016? What makes me nervous is my bank saber-rattling about needing a more current browser. Seamonkey 2.39 worked on this bank, now it blocks me with error message about my browser not being up-to-date; Seamonkey still works for other online financial services. I figure either the bank website doesn't like Seamonkey, though Firefox also appears in the user-agent string, or doesn't like FreeBSD, insisting on Windows or Mac. I also have www/qupzilla-qt4 1.8.9, see on qupzilla.com that current version is 2.0.1. I have used qupzilla-qt4 1.8.9, but it seems less robust that Seamonkey 2.39. Reason for my interest is the ability to fudge the user-agent string; I believe Xombrero and Midori also have this ability. If I have to build qupzilla anew, hopefully updated, I might switch to qupzilla-qt5. uname -a shows FreeBSD amelia 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #10 r294248: Mon Jan 18 11:28:40 UTC 2016 root@amelia:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY11NC amd64 I am getting ready to update both NetBSD and FreeBSD. Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ japanese/ddskk | 15.1| 16.1 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Seamonkey and QupZilla need update?
On Sun, 02 Oct 2016 08:00:03 + "Thomas Mueller" wrote: Hi Thomas, > What is the status of www/seamonkey and prospect of updating from 2.39 to the > current 2.40, which was released from upstream on March 14, 2016? > > What makes me nervous is my bank saber-rattling about needing a more current > browser. > > Seamonkey 2.39 worked on this bank, now it blocks me with error message about > my browser not being up-to-date; Seamonkey still works for other online > financial services. > > I figure either the bank website doesn't like Seamonkey, though Firefox also > appears in the user-agent string, or doesn't like FreeBSD, insisting on > Windows or Mac. > > I also have www/qupzilla-qt4 1.8.9, see on qupzilla.com that current version > is 2.0.1. I have used qupzilla-qt4 1.8.9, but it seems less robust that > Seamonkey 2.39. Reason for my interest is the ability to fudge the > user-agent string; I believe Xombrero and Midori also have this ability. > > If I have to build qupzilla anew, hopefully updated, I might switch to > qupzilla-qt5. For Seamonkey, I think the gecko@ team needs fresh blood. About update of Qupzilla (2.0.x), it depends of Qt 5.6, this update was pushed 2 weeks ago (revision r422306 [1]), unfortunately it also requires QtWebEngine not yet in ports tree (see comment log). Regards, [1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/?view=log&pathrev=422306 > > uname -a shows > > FreeBSD amelia 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #10 r294248: Mon Jan 18 > 11:28:40 UTC 2016 root@amelia:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY11NC amd64 > > I am getting ready to update both NetBSD and FreeBSD. > > Tom > > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- olivier ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
INDEX build failed for 9.x
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-9 - please wait.."/usr/share/mk/bsd.init.mk", line 12: Unknown
directive
Unknown modifier 'U'
"/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 38: Malformed conditional
(${MK_CCACHE_BUILD:Uno} == "yes" && !make(showconfig) &&
(${CC:M*ccache/world/*} == "" || ${CXX:M*ccache/world/*} == ""))
"/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 107: missing `in' in for
X_ in CC $${_empty_var_} XCC X_
"/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 108: Malformed conditional (${cc} == "CC"
|| !empty(XCC))
Unknown modifier 'h'
Error expanding embedded variable.
"Makefile", line 22: warning: "fmake -f
"/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/www/tclhttpd/files/Makefile.lib" -V SHLIB_NAME"
returned non-zero status
Done.
make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/editors/flim: no entry for
/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/editors/apel-emacs25
Committers on the hook:
ashish olivierd
Most recent SVN update was:
Updating '.':
Udevel/mercurial/Makefile
Udevel/mercurial/distinfo
Updated to revision 423104.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Seamonkey and QupZilla need update?
On Sunday 02 October 2016 08:00:03 Thomas Mueller wrote: > What is the status of www/seamonkey and prospect of updating from 2.39 to > the current 2.40, which was released from upstream on March 14, 2016? > > What makes me nervous is my bank saber-rattling about needing a more current > browser. > > Seamonkey 2.39 worked on this bank, now it blocks me with error message > about my browser not being up-to-date; Seamonkey still works for other > online financial services. > > I figure either the bank website doesn't like Seamonkey, though Firefox also > appears in the user-agent string, or doesn't like FreeBSD, insisting on > Windows or Mac. > > I also have www/qupzilla-qt4 1.8.9, see on qupzilla.com that current version > is 2.0.1. I have used qupzilla-qt4 1.8.9, but it seems less robust that > Seamonkey 2.39. Reason for my interest is the ability to fudge the > user-agent string; I believe Xombrero and Midori also have this ability. > > If I have to build qupzilla anew, hopefully updated, I might switch to > qupzilla-qt5. > Qupzill-qt5 is a much better choice than qupzilla-qt4 due to the newer webkit included in qt5, relative to qt4. That is version of webkit in qt5 (even 5.6) is quite dated. QupZilla 2.x is signiificantly different, re-written to use qtwebengine instead of qtwebkit. qtwebengine has not been ported since that is a task similar to Chromium and upstream (Google) does not accept patched for platforms they don't support, i.e. *BSD. QupZilla 2.x will be a separate port from QupZilla 1.x, but that will not come until qtwebengine. Meanwhile, there is a new effort to maintain qtwebkit upstream, and this is being tested. It is not yet feature complete, but there should be an updated qtwebkit sooner or later which works with QupZilla 1.x and other browsers. > uname -a shows > > FreeBSD amelia 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #10 r294248: Mon Jan 18 > 11:28:40 UTC 2016 root@amelia:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY11NC amd64 > > I am getting ready to update both NetBSD and FreeBSD. > > Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
INDEX build failed for 9.x
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-9 - please wait.."/usr/share/mk/bsd.init.mk", line 12: Unknown
directive
Unknown modifier 'U'
"/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 38: Malformed conditional
(${MK_CCACHE_BUILD:Uno} == "yes" && !make(showconfig) &&
(${CC:M*ccache/world/*} == "" || ${CXX:M*ccache/world/*} == ""))
"/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 107: missing `in' in for
X_ in CC $${_empty_var_} XCC X_
"/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 108: Malformed conditional (${cc} == "CC"
|| !empty(XCC))
Unknown modifier 'h'
Error expanding embedded variable.
"Makefile", line 22: warning: "fmake -f
"/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/www/tclhttpd/files/Makefile.lib" -V SHLIB_NAME"
returned non-zero status
Done.
make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/editors/flim: no entry for
/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/editors/apel-emacs25
Committers on the hook:
amdmi3 ashish brnrd ohauer olivierd pawel ume
Most recent SVN update was:
Updating '.':
Usecurity/openssl/Makefile
Usecurity/openssl/pkg-plist
Uwww/py-cachecontrol/Makefile
UU www/py-cachecontrol/distinfo
Uirc/riece/Makefile
Airc/riece/files
Airc/riece/files/patch-lisp_riece-highlight.el
Airc/riece/files/patch-lisp_riece-history.el
Airc/riece/files/patch-lisp_riece-unread.el
Ugraphics/lightzone/Makefile
Ugraphics/lightzone/distinfo
Udns/unbound/Makefile
Udns/unbound/distinfo
Udns/unbound/pkg-plist
UU mail/postfix/files/pkg-install.in
Umail/postfix/Makefile
Umail/postfix/distinfo
UU mail/postfix211/files/pkg-install.in
Utextproc/py-cloud_sptheme/Makefile
Updated to revision 423112.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: INDEX build failed for 9.x
On Sun, 02 Oct 2016 16:27:19 +0900 (JST), Yasuhiro KIMURA
said:
| From: Ports Index build
| Subject: INDEX build failed for 9.x
| Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 06:09:47 GMT
|| INDEX build failed with errors:
|| Generating INDEX-9 - please wait.."/usr/share/mk/bsd.init.mk", line 12:
Unknown directive
|| Unknown modifier 'U'
||
|| "/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 38: Malformed conditional
(${MK_CCACHE_BUILD:Uno} == "yes" && !make(showconfig) &&
(${CC:M*ccache/world/*} == "" || ${CXX:M*ccache/world/*} == ""))
|| "/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 107: missing `in' in for
|| X_ in CC $${_empty_var_} XCC X_
|| "/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk", line 108: Malformed conditional (${cc} ==
"CC" || !empty(XCC))
|| Unknown modifier 'h'
||
|| Error expanding embedded variable.
|| "Makefile", line 22: warning: "fmake -f
"/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/www/tclhttpd/files/Makefile.lib" -V SHLIB_NAME"
returned non-zero status
|| Done.
|| make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/editors/flim: no entry for
/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/editors/apel-emacs25
||
|| Committers on the hook:
|| ashish
||
|| Most recent SVN update was:
|| Updating '.':
|| UMk/bsd.emacs.mk
|| Deditors/emacs/pkg-deinstall
|| Ueditors/emacs/Makefile
|| Ueditors/emacs/distinfo
|| Deditors/emacs/files/pkg-install.in
|| Deditors/emacs/files/patch-src_unexaix.c
|| Deditors/emacs/files/patch-src_unexelf.c
|| Deditors/emacs/files/patch-src_unexcoff.c
|| Aeditors/emacs/files/extrapatch-lldb-gud.el
|| Ueditors/emacs/pkg-plist
|| Ueditors/emacs-devel/Makefile
|| Ueditors/emacs-devel/distinfo
|| Deditors/emacs-devel/files/patch-sources.el
|| Aeditors/emacs-devel/files/sources.el.in
|| Ueditors/emacs-devel/pkg-plist
|| Ueditors/emacs-nox11/Makefile
|| Updated to revision 423103.
|| ___
|| freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
|| https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
|| To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
| Attached patch should fix build failure.
Sorry for leaving it broken for so long.
Thanks for the fix, it's committed in r423116[1].
References:
[1] svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/423116
Thanks!
--
Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0
“Dying is a very dull, dreary affair. My advice to you is to have
nothing whatever to do with it.”
(W. Somerset Maugham, his last words)
Sent from my Emacs
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
editors/flim broken
Hey there, It looks like editors/flim may be broken, causing Poudriere to fail the calculating dependencies stage. editors/flim now depends on a non-existent emacs port, editors/apel-emacs25. Here's the exact error from Poudriere: Error: editors/flim depends on nonexistent origin 'editors/apel-emacs25'; Please contact maintainer of the port to fix this. Thanks, -- Shawn Webb Cofounder and Security Engineer HardenedBSD GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: editors/flim broken
From: Shawn Webb Subject: editors/flim broken Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 10:04:47 -0400 > It looks like editors/flim may be broken, causing Poudriere to fail the > calculating dependencies stage. editors/flim now depends on a > non-existent emacs port, editors/apel-emacs25. > > Here's the exact error from Poudriere: > > Error: editors/flim depends on nonexistent origin 'editors/apel-emacs25'; > Please contact maintainer of the port to fix this. > > Thanks, Pleae update port tree. It should be fixed in r423116. Regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
The best tool for automation marketing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
INDEX now builds successfully on 9.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
What is SONAME in port builds?
I am trying to build the port graphics/opendx, and at the qa stage it says: Error: /usr/local/dx/bin_freebsd/builder is linked to /usr/local/lib/libcdf.so which does not have a SONAME. science/cdf needs to be fixed. What does this mean, and how do I fix it? BTW I am maintainer of both ports. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Announcing Repology - compare package versions across multiple repositories
Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > Hello, fellow packagers/porters/maintainers! > > Just wanted to announce the project I've been working on. > > Repology analyzes multiple package/ports repositores (currently > supports FreeBSD ports, Debian packages, Gentoo portage, pkgsrc, > OpenBSD ports and Arch Linux packages) and compares package versions > across them. The project is supposed to be useful for package > maintainers (as another way to discover new software releases and > to improve communication between different packaging systems), > software authors (ability to track the state of their product > packaging) and users. > > The project is usable as both command line tool for generating > custom reports and a prototype static website generator which runs > on [1], where you can browse all known packages by maintainer and > by repository. > > Support for more repositories and features is planned. Source is > available on GitHub [2]. > > Feedback welcome! This is very cool! I really like it. Planing on creating a FreeBSD port for it? Emanuel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: What is SONAME in port builds?
On Sunday, 2 October 2016 17:29:05 CEST, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: I am trying to build the port graphics/opendx, and at the qa stage it says: Error: /usr/local/dx/bin_freebsd/builder is linked to /usr/local/lib/libcdf.so which does not have a SONAME. science/cdf needs to be fixed. What does this mean, and how do I fix it? BTW I am maintainer of both ports. I can see with Don Google for 'freebsd ports soname' how others fixed the same issue; the porters handbook has no match for SONAME -:( matthias -- Sent from my Ubuntu phone http://www.unixarea.de/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
LICENSE questions
So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in those ports? An even tougher one is math/octave-forge-optim, where each individual file has its own license. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: LICENSE questions
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen < step...@missouri.edu> wrote: > So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have > licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in > those ports? > > An even tougher one is math/octave-forge-optim, where each individual > file has its own license. > ___ > > In my local directories , I am appending license name to directory names , for example , .../A_BSD .../B_MIT .../C_BSD_or_LGPL .../D_BSD_see_Parts <-- This means it contains many different licensed files although primary license is BSD . Such directories require special care if ever any part is used from them . I think , it is possible to adopt such definition conventions for the ports . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: What is SONAME in port builds?
On 10/02/2016 10:29 AM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > I am trying to build the port graphics/opendx, and at the qa stage it says: > > Error: /usr/local/dx/bin_freebsd/builder is linked to > /usr/local/lib/libcdf.so which does not have a SONAME. > science/cdf needs to be fixed. > > What does this mean, and how do I fix it? I came up with "a" solution: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=423146 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: LICENSE questions
On Sun, 2 Oct 2016 18:44:43 +
"Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" wrote:
> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which
> have licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set
> LICENSE in those ports?
Like this example:
LICENSE=CPLV1
LICENSE_NAME= CPL V1.0 license
LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/CPLv1.0.txt
LICENSE_PERMS= dist-mirror dist-sell pkg-mirror pkg-sell auto-accept
Change LICENSE_PERMS as appropriate.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Seamonkey and QupZilla need update?
from Matthew Rezny: > Qupzill-qt5 is a much better choice than qupzilla-qt4 due to the newer webkit > included in qt5, relative to qt4. That is version of webkit in qt5 (even 5.6) > is quite dated. > QupZilla 2.x is signiificantly different, re-written to use qtwebengine > instead > of qtwebkit. qtwebengine has not been ported since that is a task similar to > Chromium and upstream (Google) does not accept patched for platforms they > don't support, i.e. *BSD. QupZilla 2.x will be a separate port from QupZilla > 1.x, but that will not come until qtwebengine. > Meanwhile, there is a new effort to maintain qtwebkit upstream, and this is > being tested. It is not yet feature complete, but there should be an updated > qtwebkit sooner or later which works with QupZilla 1.x and other browsers. Thanks to you and Olivier Duchateau for explanation regarding complications involved in updating QupZilla! I see Haikuports includes QupZilla only up to 1.8.7, and QupZilla is not in NetBSD pkgsrc but is in pkgsrc/wip (work in progress) at v1.8.6. I'd like to be able to switch fully from qt4 to qt5, but print/hplip is set up only for qt4; however print/hplip in pkgsrc offers the choice between qt4 and qt5, qt4 being regarded as legacy. Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: LICENSE questions
On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have > licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in > those ports? The other answers are correct. If the license is standard (listed here: https://spdx.org/licenses/) we should add it to the main database. > An even tougher one is math/octave-forge-optim, where each individual > file has its own license. A "custom" license that merely states to check the distfiles should be sufficient. -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
