Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-10-01 Thread Mel Pilgrim

On 2015-09-30 16:16, Lowell Gilbert wrote:

In short, there is nothing broken in pkg(8) per se. I am pretty sure
this problem does not come up if you do everything from quarterly or
everything from head; it's strictly an issue of conflicts between the
two.


More to the point, that using the default pkg settings in 10.2 and the 
default branch for the ports tree resulted a situation where the two 
were not compatible.  Delaying the bump to MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION until 
pkg-1.6.0 hit pkg.freebsd.org/*/quarterly would have avoided the issue. 
 If that wisdom reaches the right people among the FreeBSD committers, 
then this thread will have served its purpose, IMHO.  It sounds like it 
did, so yay us being useful with feedback.



Furthermore, I suspect that if the original poster had updated his
quarterly-branch version of pkg to the head version, he probably would
have been able to build the other port from the head tree.


Yes, if she had known there would at some point be a timing issue 
between repo updates and bumps to MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION, she would have 
deployed a non-default configuration a long time ago. ;)


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2015-10-01 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
databases/geoserver-mysql-plugin| 2.7.2   | 2.8.0
+-+
graphics/geoserver  | 2.7.2   | 2.8.0
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


ffmpeg0 (was: Re: ZoneMinder /zmu dies on FreeBSD 10.2)

2015-10-01 Thread Violet
Hi,

Looks like we need to update ffmpeg0 to some current version.

Looked at it and did not understand - there really is v.0.7.17 in use
while the modern is 2.8 or I miss something?

Please   point   me   to   a  right  source  and I will try to compile
those libraries.


You wrote at 2015-09-29, 20:12:41:

> Hi!

>> Trying to get run zoneminder-1.25.0_7 built from ports on
>> FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p3 #0 r288111 (AMD64)
>> 
>> The `zmu' routine permanently dies getting signal 11, no matter how started.
>> 
>> Could anybody point me where to dig?
>> 
>> As for now there is a stable release 1.28.1, as of February 14th, 2015
>> ( http://www.zoneminder.com/downloads ).
>> 
>> Is  it  worth  for  me  to try to update the port to that release and see
>> whether  it  still  fails,  or  it would be better to try to debug the
>> curent port?

> Please try 1.28.1, if it still happens, at least we debug in recent
> code 8-} 1.25 is from 2011...

> Please have a look at

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190268

> where someone already worked on an update.




-- 
Best regards,
 Violet  mailto:vio...@sm.msk.ru

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: ffmpeg0 (was: Re: ZoneMinder /zmu dies on FreeBSD 10.2)

2015-10-01 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> Looks like we need to update ffmpeg0 to some current version.

It looks like there's a dependency on ffmpeg0, but we also have
much newer ffmpeg's in the ports tree. So it's probably a
question of getting zoneminder to use the newer versions.

> Looked at it and did not understand - there really is v.0.7.17 in use
> while the modern is 2.8 or I miss something?

Yes. Because those multimedia libs are so complex, sometimes
it's difficult to get a new release to integrate.

> Please   point   me   to   a  right  source  and I will try to compile
> those libraries.

For ffmpeg, it's easy: multimedia/ffmpeg, which is already 2.8.1

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Ports are requesting perl 5.20.2 even if perl 5.22 is installed and set as default

2015-10-01 Thread Mattia Rossi

Hi all,

I can't seem to get the following issue fixed:

I've installed perl5.22 as default with the following in /etc/make.conf

WITH_OPENSSL_PORT="YES"
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.22

If I try to install OpenSSL (or any other port depending on perl5) they 
always want to install perl5.20, and, even more interesting perl 5.20.2, 
which is not in ports anymore (it's 5.20.3). The following error shows up:


 openssl-1.0.2_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.20.2 - not found
##

  This is *NOT* the DEFAULT perl version

It will *NOT* install /usr/local/bin/perl

It will *ONLY* install /usr/local/bin/perl5.20.3

The default Perl version currently is 5.22.

If you want to use this version as the default,
stop the build now, add this line to your
/etc/make.conf, and then restart the build.

DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.20

##

This tells me, that the DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable works well. So why are 
my ports looking for perl 5.20.2?
Obviously installing perl 5.20 doesn't help eitehr, as it installs 
5.20.3... so I'm locked in a loop, with the port failing after the perl 
install and on a rerun installing perl again.


Help?

Mat

Btw. I'm on HEAD, r288210, and I've deleted all installed packages and 
was trying to rebuild everything. I've recreated the ports tree 
(portsnap fetch extract), but the error persists.


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Ports are requesting perl 5.20.2 even if perl 5.22 is installed and set as default

2015-10-01 Thread Mattia Rossi

Problem seems solved now.
I've found a leftover file in /usr/local/etc: perl5_version
Have no idea which program put it there, but it screwed up everything. 
Deleting it fixed the issue.


Cheers,

Mat

Am 01.10.2015 um 14:48 schrieb Mattia Rossi:

Hi all,

I can't seem to get the following issue fixed:

I've installed perl5.22 as default with the following in /etc/make.conf

WITH_OPENSSL_PORT="YES"
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.22

If I try to install OpenSSL (or any other port depending on perl5) 
they always want to install perl5.20, and, even more interesting perl 
5.20.2, which is not in ports anymore (it's 5.20.3). The following 
error shows up:


 openssl-1.0.2_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.20.2 - not found
##

  This is *NOT* the DEFAULT perl version

It will *NOT* install /usr/local/bin/perl

It will *ONLY* install /usr/local/bin/perl5.20.3

The default Perl version currently is 5.22.

If you want to use this version as the default,
stop the build now, add this line to your
/etc/make.conf, and then restart the build.

DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.20

##

This tells me, that the DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable works well. So why 
are my ports looking for perl 5.20.2?
Obviously installing perl 5.20 doesn't help eitehr, as it installs 
5.20.3... so I'm locked in a loop, with the port failing after the 
perl install and on a rerun installing perl again.


Help?

Mat

Btw. I'm on HEAD, r288210, and I've deleted all installed packages and 
was trying to rebuild everything. I've recreated the ports tree 
(portsnap fetch extract), but the error persists.




___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: ffmpeg0 (was: Re: ZoneMinder /zmu dies on FreeBSD 10.2)

2015-10-01 Thread Violet
Hi Kurt,


OK. Really, there is the ffmpeg-2.8,1 port. So will try to move depends to that 
new library.


You wrote on 2015-10-01 г., 15:32:30:

> Hi!

>> Looks like we need to update ffmpeg0 to some current version.

> It looks like there's a dependency on ffmpeg0, but we also have
> much newer ffmpeg's in the ports tree. So it's probably a
> question of getting zoneminder to use the newer versions.

>> Looked at it and did not understand - there really is v.0.7.17 in use
>> while the modern is 2.8 or I miss something?

> Yes. Because those multimedia libs are so complex, sometimes
> it's difficult to get a new release to integrate.

>> Please   point   me   to   a  right  source  and I will try to compile
>> those libraries.

> For ffmpeg, it's easy: multimedia/ffmpeg, which is already 2.8.1




-- 
Best regards,
 Violet  mailto:vio...@sm.msk.ru

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Committer needed for PR201175: Update graphics/synfigstudio to 1.0.1

2015-10-01 Thread Ben Woods
Hi guys and gals,

Are there any ports committers that could take a look at this bug report please?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201175

It updates the following related ports with one patch:
devel/etl: Update from 0.04.18 to 0.04.19
devel/synfig: Update from 1.0 to 1.0.1
graphics/synfigstudio: Update from 1.0 to 1.0.1

It also implements some improvements to the above ports recommended by
user tkato...@yahoo.com

Thanks in advance!
-Ben

--
From: Benjamin Woods
woods...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Ports are requesting perl 5.20.2 even if perl 5.22 is installed and set as default

2015-10-01 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:00:55 +0200 Mattia Rossi
 wrote

> Problem seems solved now.
> I've found a leftover file in /usr/local/etc: perl5_version
> Have no idea which program put it there

Perl did.

Ironic, isn't it. :)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mat
> 
> Am 01.10.2015 um 14:48 schrieb Mattia Rossi:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I can't seem to get the following issue fixed:
> >
> > I've installed perl5.22 as default with the following in /etc/make.conf
> >
> > WITH_OPENSSL_PORT="YES"
> > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.22
> >
> > If I try to install OpenSSL (or any other port depending on perl5) 
> > they always want to install perl5.20, and, even more interesting perl 
> > 5.20.2, which is not in ports anymore (it's 5.20.3). The following 
> > error shows up:
> >
> >  openssl-1.0.2_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.20.2 - not found
> > ##
> >
> >   This is *NOT* the DEFAULT perl version
> >
> > It will *NOT* install /usr/local/bin/perl
> >
> > It will *ONLY* install /usr/local/bin/perl5.20.3
> >
> > The default Perl version currently is 5.22.
> >
> > If you want to use this version as the default,
> > stop the build now, add this line to your
> > /etc/make.conf, and then restart the build.
> >
> > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.20
> >
> > ##
> >
> > This tells me, that the DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable works well. So why 
> > are my ports looking for perl 5.20.2?
> > Obviously installing perl 5.20 doesn't help eitehr, as it installs 
> > 5.20.3... so I'm locked in a loop, with the port failing after the 
> > perl install and on a rerun installing perl again.
> >
> > Help?
> >
> > Mat
> >
> > Btw. I'm on HEAD, r288210, and I've deleted all installed packages and 
> > was trying to rebuild everything. I've recreated the ports tree 
> > (portsnap fetch extract), but the error persists.
> >
> 

--Chris


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


pkg-updating is buggy

2015-10-01 Thread rank1seeker
# pkg updating -d 20150914
Was supposed to show 4 entries, but has left out first and last one

# pkg updating -d 20150921
Won't show:

20150921:
  AFFECTS: users of mail/rspamd


But:
# pkg updating -d 20150921 rspamd
Will show it
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


perl modules building error (was: Re: ZoneMinder /zmu dies on FreeBSD 10.2)

2015-10-01 Thread Violet
Hi Kurt,


Trying  to  change  the  library. Binaries appear to get linked.
Got an error building perl modules: that's an infinite cycle.

Please help. No idea where to look.

The current version is available at the same place,

http://sm.msk.ru/files/zoneminder128.tar.bz2

-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  23847 Oct  1 21:07 zoneminder128.tar.bz2
orc# md5 zoneminder128.tar.bz2
MD5 (zoneminder128.tar.bz2) = 56f9dbe94630058b3c9a2039d6e1d85b




[ 94%] Built target zmstreamer
/usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_echo_color --switch= 
--progress-dir=/usr/ports/multimedia/zoneminder/work/ZoneMinder-1.28.1/CMakeFiles
 --progress-num=56,57 "Built target zmu"
[ 98%] Built target zmu
/usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_echo_color --switch= --blue --bold 
--progress-dir=/usr/ports/multimedia/zoneminder/work/ZoneMinder-1.28.1/CMakeFiles
 --progress-num=51 "Building ZoneMinder perl modules"
[100%] Building ZoneMinder perl modules
Generating a Unix-style MakefilePerl
Writing MakefilePerl for ZoneMinder
Writing MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json
/usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_echo_color --switch= --blue --bold 
--progress-dir=/usr/ports/multimedia/zoneminder/work/ZoneMinder-1.28.1/CMakeFiles
 --progress-num=51 "Building ZoneMinder perl modules"
[100%] Building ZoneMinder perl modules
Generating a Unix-style MakefilePerl
Writing MakefilePerl for ZoneMinder
Writing MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json
/usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_echo_color --switch= --blue --bold 
--progress-dir=/usr/ports/multimedia/zoneminder/work/ZoneMinder-1.28.1/CMakeFiles
 --progress-num=51 "Building ZoneMinder perl modules"
[100%] Building ZoneMinder perl modules
Generating a Unix-style MakefilePerl
Writing MakefilePerl for ZoneMinder
Writing MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json
/usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_echo_color --switch= --blue --bold 
--progress-dir=/usr/ports/multimedia/zoneminder/work/ZoneMinder-1.28.1/CMakeFiles
 --progress-num=51 "Building ZoneMinder perl modules"
[100%] Building ZoneMinder perl modules



And yes, the new `zmu' crashes just like the old one, looks I am doing
all correct.. ;)

orc# find . -name zmu
./work/ZoneMinder-1.28.1/src/zmu
orc# ./work/ZoneMinder-1.28.1/src/zmu
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
orc# gdb -c zmu.core ./work/ZoneMinder-1.28.1/src/zmu
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols 
found)...
Core was generated by `zmu'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.

...


Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
#0  0x in ?? ()
[New Thread 812c06400 (LWP 103135/)]
(gdb) bt
#0  0x in ?? ()
#1  0x00080468b8c8 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libstdc++.so.6
#2  0x0008049371c0 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libstdc++.so.6
#3  0x7fffda20 in ?? ()
#4  0x in ?? ()
(gdb)



You wrote on  2015-10-01, 15:32:30:

> Hi!

>> Looks like we need to update ffmpeg0 to some current version.

> It looks like there's a dependency on ffmpeg0, but we also have
> much newer ffmpeg's in the ports tree. So it's probably a
> question of getting zoneminder to use the newer versions.

>> Looked at it and did not understand - there really is v.0.7.17 in use
>> while the modern is 2.8 or I miss something?

> Yes. Because those multimedia libs are so complex, sometimes
> it's difficult to get a new release to integrate.

>> Please   point   me   to   a  right  source  and I will try to compile
>> those libraries.

> For ffmpeg, it's easy: multimedia/ffmpeg, which is already 2.8.1




-- 
Best regards,
 Violet  mailto:vio...@sm.msk.ru

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-10-01 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 10/1/2015 3:28 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2015-09-30 16:16, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> In short, there is nothing broken in pkg(8) per se. I am pretty sure
>> this problem does not come up if you do everything from quarterly or
>> everything from head; it's strictly an issue of conflicts between the
>> two.
> 
> More to the point, that using the default pkg settings in 10.2 and the
> default branch for the ports tree resulted a situation where the two
> were not compatible.  Delaying the bump to MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION until
> pkg-1.6.0 hit pkg.freebsd.org/*/quarterly would have avoided the issue.
>  If that wisdom reaches the right people among the FreeBSD committers,
> then this thread will have served its purpose, IMHO.  It sounds like it
> did, so yay us being useful with feedback.
> 
>> Furthermore, I suspect that if the original poster had updated his
>> quarterly-branch version of pkg to the head version, he probably would
>> have been able to build the other port from the head tree.
> 
> Yes, if she had known there would at some point be a timing issue
> between repo updates and bumps to MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION, she would have
> deployed a non-default configuration a long time ago. ;)
> 

I'm more bothered that the minimal version was immediately bumped on a
.0 release.  The last time the minimal version was bumped was hard
enough, and the issue with portmaster has been known and could have been
fixed had this change been discussed properly.

-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Uses/compiler.mk does not trigger under RBPi

2015-10-01 Thread José Pérez

Hi,
I've notice that Uses/compiler.mk is not triggered and as a consequence 
does to set COMPILER_TYPE.


me@raspberry-pi:~ % cat Makefile
all:
@${ECHO_CMD} ${LOCALBASE}
@${ECHO_CMD} ${COMPILER_TYPE}
.include 
me@raspberry-pi:~ % make
/usr/local

me@raspberry-pi:~ %

As a result building ports is a nightmare.

Note how in AMD64 it works:
me@amd64:~ % make
/usr/local
clang
me@amd64:~ %

As a workaround I set COMPILER_TYPE=clang in /etc/make.conf but this is 
just an ugly hack.


Can some expert trow a little light on this? Thank you.

Regards,

--
José Pérez
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Uses/compiler.mk does not trigger under RBPi

2015-10-01 Thread Michelle Sullivan
José Pérez wrote:
> Hi,
> I've notice that Uses/compiler.mk is not triggered and as a
> consequence does to set COMPILER_TYPE.
>
> me@raspberry-pi:~ % cat Makefile
> all:
> @${ECHO_CMD} ${LOCALBASE}
> @${ECHO_CMD} ${COMPILER_TYPE}
> .include 
> me@raspberry-pi:~ % make
> /usr/local
>
> me@raspberry-pi:~ %
>
> As a result building ports is a nightmare.
>
> Note how in AMD64 it works:
> me@amd64:~ % make
> /usr/local
> clang
> me@amd64:~ %
>
> As a workaround I set COMPILER_TYPE=clang in /etc/make.conf but this
> is just an ugly hack.
>
> Can some expert trow a little light on this? Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
Try adding:

USES+=   compiler

to the makefile first...

(and it still has some issues but that should solve the first)

-- 
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Committer needed for PR201175: Update graphics/synfigstudio to 1.0.1

2015-10-01 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> Are there any ports committers that could take a look at this bug
> report please?
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201175

I build-tested this on 11, 10.2a+1, 9.3a.

graphics/synfigstudio fails to build on 9.3-amd64, see the build-log at

http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/graphics__synfigstudio-93a-1443720936.txt

Everything else builds fine. Any quick fix ?

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Committer needed for PR201175: Update graphics/synfigstudio to 1.0.1

2015-10-01 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> graphics/synfigstudio fails to build on 9.3-amd64, see the build-log at
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/graphics__synfigstudio-93a-1443720936.txt
> 
> Everything else builds fine. Any quick fix ?

One quick fix: If you as maintainer declare it as broken on 9,
we can commit the update and work on the fix later.

Just sayin' 8-}

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"