Re: Merging GitHub Pull Requests into Subversion using git-svn
On 23 Apr 2015, at 00:12, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > While not as smooth as clicking a merge button in GitHub, > this is a valid way to accept patches submitted via GitHub pull requests, > and integrate them in our FreeBSD Subversion repo. The merge button on GitHub does the wrong thing anyway (merges without fast-forward, so you end up with a tangled history), so (after the initial setup) the steps that I use for merging pull requests from GitHub projects are very similar (locally pull the branch with fast-fordward, test, push). David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
sysutils/dmidecode periodic script
Dear colleagues, as anders@ temporarily stopped involving in a project some time ago, could someone please take a look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188941#c0 ? Thanks! -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: ma...@freebsd.org ] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- ma...@rinet.ru *** ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[offtopic] - for portmas...@bsdforge.com
Got your message via the webform, tried to reply and got: This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: Message-id: <553a7998.2090...@sorbs.net> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:12:56 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan To: portmas...@bsdforge.com Subject: Re: [Webform] I was told an email was sent, but... Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: Recipient address: portmas...@bsdforge.com Reason: Server rejected MAIL FROM address. Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.0.0 SPAM and BULK mail REJECTED Remote system: dns;mx01.ultimatedns.net (TCP|10.108.128.32|39504|209.180.214.225|25) Hoping that you read this here - I'm guessing there is something very wrong with your config and assuming that you have the ports list whitelisted... -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkg autoremove segfaulting
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, the wise Marco Beishuizen wrote: On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, the wise Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Can you send me the output of pkg -o DEBUG_LEVEL=4 autoremove? Best regards, Bapt DBG(3)[51642]> Pkg: add a new reverse dependency origin: x11-fm/pcmanfm, name: pcmanfm, version: 1.2.3 DBG(4)[51642]> Pkgdb: running 'SELECT k.annotation AS tag, v.annotation AS value FROM pkg_annotation p JOIN annotation k ON (p.tag_id = k.annotation_id) JOIN annotation v ON (p.value_id = v.annotation_id) WHERE p.package_id = ?1 ORDER BY tag, value' DBG(2)[51642]> universe: add new local pkg: libfm, (libfm-1.2.3:2$0$peie6yrf137wmsskg8dgprj5ajxshahs16ey63k16yrye9k936nb) Child process pid=51642 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault Pcmanfm seems to cause this. After I removed pcmanfm and libfm pkg autoremove works fine. Regards, Marco -- Hurewitz's Memory Principle: The chance of forgetting something is directly proportional to... to... uh. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
poudriere dying in ftp/curl configure
stable/10, amd64 ftp/curl failing has impressively large effects on the rest of the package collection (in an unhappy way). I run a poudriere bulk every night, updating the ports collection. I update the stable source around the beginning of each month, and things have been running smoothly for 6 months or so. Russell Output of the poudriere log: ===> Configuring for curl-7.42.0 configure: loading site script /usr/ports/Templates/config.site checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking whether to enable debug build options... no checking whether to enable compiler optimizer... (assumed) yes checking whether to enable strict compiler warnings... no checking whether to enable compiler warnings as errors... no checking whether to enable curl debug memory tracking... no checking whether to enable hiding of library internal symbols... yes checking whether to enable c-ares for DNS lookups... no checking for path separator... : checking for sed... (cached) /usr/bin/sed checking for grep... (cached) /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for ar... /usr/bin/ar configure: using CFLAGS: -I/usr/include -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing configure: CFLAGS note: CFLAGS should only be used to specify C compiler flags, not include directories. Use CPPFLAGS for: -I/usr/include configure: WARNING: Continuing even with errors mentioned immediately above this line. checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/wrkdirs/usr/ports/ftp/curl/work/curl-7.42.0': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to sunp...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/ftp/curl/work/curl-7.42.0/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). *** Error code 1 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
False (?) alarm from FreeBSD package build server with FreeBSD-current
Hi, FreeBSD package build server informs about build failure for my port devel/p5-B-C at FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64, OSVERSION: 1100070. (This port builds fine on all stable FreeBSD versions.) Poudriere log of FreeBSD package build server: http://beefy4.isc.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default/p384620_s281917/logs/p5-B-C-1.52_1.log The main problem there being that something "is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]". Looks that this error could be fixed by just adding the following line to the port's Makefile: CFLAGS+=-Wno-implicit-function-declaration *BUT!* I can not reproduce this error. Please look how this port builds ok with poudriere at nearly the same version of OS FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64, OSVERSION: 1100070 My Poudriere log: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2A9Va9VLT7MVDd6YmdvbktVTEk/view?usp=sharing Here I am using a fresh install of 11.0-CURRENT (svn revision as of yesterday), with default settings for everything, perl-5.18, pkg-1.5.1, poudriere-3.1.3 How this non-reproducibility can happen at all? Could it be that FreeBSD package build server deliberately sets more rigid CFLAGS than OS itself does? Please advice me what to do in this situation. Shall I blindly submit a patch about CFLAGS to make build server happy? Regards, Sergei ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: mDNSResponder-561.1.1_1
Hi, A new version is out: 567 could you please upgrade the port? Regards, Dutchman01 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
