databases/mongodb: how much RAM/swap needed for building?

2015-02-13 Thread Marko Cupać
Hi,

I am trying to build latest mongodb in poudriere.
With 2Gb RAM + 2Gb swap it failed:

Feb 13 11:34:42 pkg kernel: pid 1885 (ld), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space

I bumped RAM to 4Gb but it failed again.

Should I keep increasing RAM or is there some other solution to it?
-- 
Marko Cupać
https://www.mimar.rs
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: databases/mongodb: how much RAM/swap needed for building?

2015-02-13 Thread cpet

On 2015-02-13 04:50, Marko Cupać wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to build latest mongodb in poudriere.
With 2Gb RAM + 2Gb swap it failed:

Feb 13 11:34:42 pkg kernel: pid 1885 (ld), uid 0, was killed: out of 
swap space


I bumped RAM to 4Gb but it failed again.

Should I keep increasing RAM or is there some other solution to it?

Give it all the rams, when it keeps on bitching give it more...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

pkg: new warning - ap24-mod_perl2 has no direct installation candidates, change it to ap24-mod_perl2

2015-02-13 Thread Patrick Powell
I upgraded pkg to today to 1.4.10 and got the following new (and 
different) warning:


{142} # pkg upgrade
Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue...
FreeBSD repository is up-to-date.
All repositories are up-to-date.
Updating database digests format: 100%
Checking for upgrades (43 candidates):  97%
ap24-mod_perl2 has no direct installation candidates, change it to 
ap24-mod_perl2 has no direct installation candidates, change it to 
ap24-mod_perl2? [Y/n]:

Checking for upgrades (43 candidates): 100%
Processing candidates (43 candidates): 100%
Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
Your packages are up to date.

{144} # pkg -v
1.4.10
.
The ap24-mod_perl2 port is www/mod_perl2.  I use different options from 
the default,  so I need to compile the port.
I also lock it so that pkg does not try to modify it when I do 'pkg 
upgrade'.


This has worked fine until the latest version of pkg.  I now get the 'no 
direct installation candidates' message.


Question:  why is this message generated?
Question:  what can I do to suppress the message and still not have pkg 
update the port from the repository?


--
Patrick Powell Astart Technologies
papow...@astart.com1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X
Network and System San Diego, CA 92019
  Consulting   858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435
Web: www.astart.com

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


BZ 197388

2015-02-13 Thread Larry Rosenman

Can some committer look at:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197388

thanks!

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: BZ 197388

2015-02-13 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> Can some committer look at:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197388

Done, thanks!

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Different interpretation of PATH_KRB5_CONFIG between make and portmaster

2015-02-13 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
I'm a little perplexed.  I can build the new port security/kstart using
make, but not portmaster.  The latter seems to substitute the value for
PATH_KRB5_CONFIG.

I use port security/heimdal for all ports so I added to the Makefile file
PATH_KRB5_CONFIG=   /usr/local/bin/krb5-config

When I build a package using make, as follows:
rm -R /var/ports/usr/ports/* /usr/staging/*
cd /usr/ports/security/kstart && make -DBATCH clean deinstall package
the package is built and examining the log file, the build log  uses
krb5-config... /usr/local/bin/krb5-config

while
rm -R /var/ports/usr/ports/* /usr/staging/*
portmaster --no-term-title --no-confirm -H -K -D -g -G -B -v 
security/kstart
substitute's the Makefiles krb5-config path with
"checking for krb5-config... /usr/bin/krb5-config"
and fails.

However, being tenacious, this also succeeds in building a package
portmaster --no-term-title --no-confirm -H -K -D -g -G -B -v -m
PATH_KRB5_CONFIG=/usr/local/bin/krb5-config security/kstart

Can anyone advise the different interpretation by make &/or portmaster
of PATH_KRB5_CONFIG which I identified by kstart's
./configure --help

The system is a FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r278144M: Wed Feb  4 05:08:40
AEDT 2015 using i386

Regards, Dewayne
PS The arguments to portmaster is an extract from a larger configure
script. 

-- 
For the talkers: “The superior man acts before he speaks, and afterwards speaks 
according to his action.”
For everyone else: “Life is really simple, but we insist on making it 
complicated.”

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"