FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ graphics/GraphicsMagick | 1.3.19 | 1.3.20 +-+ net-mgmt/pandorafms_agent | 4.0.1 | 5.1-140817 +-+ net-mgmt/pandorafms_console | 4.0.1 | 5.1-140817 +-+ net-mgmt/pandorafms_server | 4.0.1 | 5.1-140817 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Proposal: further OptionsNG improvements
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:33:31AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> It just occurred to me that it seems we actually do not support something
> like OPTIONS_SINGLE_AUDIO_${ARCH}, which simplifies my work (please tell
> me if I'm wrong). So all I need is to remember about OPTIONS_EXCLUDE's in
> this case. Now it's possible (example for www/firefox/Makefile.options):
>
> OPTIONS_SINGLE_AUDIO= ALSA:on OSS!sparc64 PULSEAUDIO!powerpc,mips,i386
>
> New diff attached (also comes with some comments tweaks, and I've switched
> from ^ to ~ as regex delimiter: it looks nicer and there is no confusion
> with start-of-line marker). I hope now it can cover anything possible to
> achieve with current OptionsNG.
>
> But we need reviewers and testers!
I've finally listened to bapt@ and created a differential for it, please
join in: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D616 (we do need more eyes!).
./danfe
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: ports/191258
Hi! > Can anyone from perl@ can take care of ports/191258? Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Building interactive ports with poudriere
What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license? Example: # DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat sysutils/exfat-utils [snip] >> Building 2 packages using 2 builders >> Starting/Cloning builders >> Hit CTRL+t at any time to see build progress and stats >> [01] Starting build of sysutils/fusefs-exfat >> [02] Starting build of sysutils/exfat-utils >> [02] Finished build of sysutils/exfat-utils: Ignored: License Microsoft-exFAT needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined >> [01] Finished build of sysutils/fusefs-exfat: Ignored: License Microsoft-exFAT needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined >> Stopping 2 builders >> No package built, no need to update the repository [snip] Setting environment variables doesn't seem to work. -- Greg Rivers ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, I wrote: What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license? Example: # DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat sysutils/exfat-utils [snip] >> Building 2 packages using 2 builders >> Starting/Cloning builders >> Hit CTRL+t at any time to see build progress and stats >> [01] Starting build of sysutils/fusefs-exfat >> [02] Starting build of sysutils/exfat-utils >> [02] Finished build of sysutils/exfat-utils: Ignored: License Microsoft-exFAT needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined >> [01] Finished build of sysutils/fusefs-exfat: Ignored: License Microsoft-exFAT needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined >> Stopping 2 builders >> No package built, no need to update the repository [snip] Setting environment variables doesn't seem to work. Never mind; setting the variables in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf works. I should have thought of that sooner. -- Greg Rivers ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere
El día Sunday, August 17, 2014 a las 07:21:06PM -0500, Greg Rivers escribió: > What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license? > > Example: > # DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat > sysutils/exfat-utils > [snip] > >> Building 2 packages using 2 builders > >> Starting/Cloning builders > >> Hit CTRL+t at any time to see build progress and stats > >> [01] Starting build of sysutils/fusefs-exfat > >> [02] Starting build of sysutils/exfat-utils > >> [02] Finished build of sysutils/exfat-utils: Ignored: License > Microsoft-exFAT needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined > >> [01] Finished build of sysutils/fusefs-exfat: Ignored: License > Microsoft-exFAT needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined > >> Stopping 2 builders > >> No package built, no need to update the repository > [snip] > > Setting environment variables doesn't seem to work. I have set with success NO_IGNORE=yes in the make.conf file of the jail to build ports marked with IGNORE. Don't know if this helps in this case too. matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X- No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
