Re: [editors/libreoffice] missing dependencies for pkgng
2013/7/29 CeDeROM : > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:36 PM, David Demelier > wrote: >> 2013/7/29 CeDeROM : >>> # pkg upgrade >>> Updating repository catalogue >>> pkg: Missing dependency matching 'x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf' >>> pkg: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are >>> unresolved dependencies: >>> editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf, x11-fonts/gentium-basic >>> >> >> Can you please give more information? Which repository do you use? >> Also FreeBSD does not currently provide official repository for pkgng. >> -- >> Demelier David > > Hello David :-) Here goes some more information :-) > > # cat /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf > packagesite: http://mirror.exonetric.net/pub/pkgng/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest > > # uname -a > FreeBSD mercury.rd.tp.pl 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #2: Thu > Jul 18 16:48:34 CEST 2013 > r...@mercury.rd.tp.pl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CeDeROM_FreeBSD_9.1 amd64 > > Best regards :-) > Tomek > I don't know who is the maintainer of that mirror, perhaps you should CC him? Cheers ;-). -- Demelier David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [editors/libreoffice] missing dependencies for pkgng
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, David Demelier wrote: > 2013/7/29 CeDeROM : >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:36 PM, David Demelier >> wrote: >>> 2013/7/29 CeDeROM : # pkg upgrade Updating repository catalogue pkg: Missing dependency matching 'x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf' pkg: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are unresolved dependencies: editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf, x11-fonts/gentium-basic >>> >>> Can you please give more information? Which repository do you use? >>> Also FreeBSD does not currently provide official repository for pkgng. >>> -- >>> Demelier David >> >> Hello David :-) Here goes some more information :-) >> >> # cat /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf >> packagesite: http://mirror.exonetric.net/pub/pkgng/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest >> >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD mercury.rd.tp.pl 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #2: Thu >> Jul 18 16:48:34 CEST 2013 >> r...@mercury.rd.tp.pl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CeDeROM_FreeBSD_9.1 amd64 >> >> Best regards :-) >> Tomek >> > > I don't know who is the maintainer of that mirror, perhaps you should CC him? > > Cheers ;-). > > -- > Demelier David Done :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [editors/libreoffice] missing dependencies for pkgng
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:13:12PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote: > # pkg upgrade > Updating repository catalogue > pkg: Missing dependency matching 'x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf' > pkg: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are > unresolved dependencies: > editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf, x11-fonts/gentium-basic > > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" That is normal, both missing deps were declaring themself as restricted meaning that they are removed from repository before publishing, both has been fixed as it was a misusage of the license framework. Next update round should be ok. regards, Bapt pgpJrx1cqBWIF.pgp Description: PGP signature
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ finance/qhacc | 4.1 | 4.2 +-+ www/xpi-pentadactyl | 20130407| 20130730 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portsc...@freebsd.org Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [editors/libreoffice] missing dependencies for pkgng
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:13:12PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote: > > # pkg upgrade > > Updating repository catalogue > > pkg: Missing dependency matching 'x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf' > > pkg: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are > > unresolved dependencies: > > editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf, > > x11-fonts/gentium-basic > > > > That is normal, both missing deps were declaring themself as restricted > meaning > that they are removed from repository before publishing, both has been > fixed as > it was a misusage of the license framework. > Next update round should be ok. > regards, > Bapt Okay, good news :-) I admit this popped up after recent repository update, and this prevents "pkg upgrade". Some time ago I have installed those two dependency packages by hand and then installed libreoffice pkgng binary. To perform recent "pkg upgrade" I had to remove libreoffice. Nice it will be fixed in next update round, thank you! :-) Best regards! :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Portmaster is complaining about QT3 that
# portmaster -a ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates ===>>> The misc/kdehier port has been deleted: Has expired: Depends on QT3 ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Killing background jobs Terminated ===>>> Exiting I have kdehier4 installed with no problem. I can use portmaster for specific ports with no problem. I have no idea where to look except UPDATING. I have followed UPDATING and had done portmaster -x \*-4.10.5\* -r kdelibs-4\* all went well and now I am seeing the error in portmaster that I use to keep my ports up to date. My freebsd information follows: # uname -a FreeBSD home.encontacto.net 9.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p5 #542 r253796: Tue Jul 30 06:45:17 CDT 2013 r...@home.encontacto.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ENCONTACTO amd64 Any suggestions appreciated, ed ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Portmaster is complaining about QT3 that
On 30-07-2013 18:50, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: > # portmaster -a > ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports > > ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates > > ===>>> The misc/kdehier port has been deleted: Has expired: Depends on QT3 > ===>>> Aborting update > > ===>>> Killing background jobs > Terminated > ===>>> Exiting > > I have kdehier4 installed with no problem. I can use portmaster for > specific ports with no problem. I have no idea where to look except > UPDATING. > Sorry, I removed QT3/KDE3 a few days ago because they were expired (see the archives of this list), but did not yet add an entry to UPDATING (done now). The best would be to upgrade KDE3 to KDE4 (or maybe Xfce or even GNOME?), and remove any "duplicate" port (e.g. misc/kdehier is superseded by misc/kdehier4). > I have followed UPDATING and had done > > portmaster -x \*-4.10.5\* -r kdelibs-4\* > > all went well and now I am seeing the error in portmaster that I use to > keep my ports up to date. [...] > This is unrelated to KDE3 being removed. René ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Problem with portmaster and /or QT3
I've had this problem that portmaster shows. # portmaster -a ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates ===>>> The misc/kdehier port has been deleted: Has expired: Depends on QT3 ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Killing background jobs Terminated ===>>> Exiting because of this portmaster -a can't be used. Any suggestions appreciated. I have followed ports UPDATING by portmaster -r kdelibs-4\* It ran fine and I can't find anything else System Information: # uname -a FreeBSD home.encontacto.net 9.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p5 #542 r253796: Tue Jul 30 06:45:17 CDT 2013 r...@home.encontacto.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ENCONTACTO amd64 Thanks, ed ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [devel/openocd] who wants to takeover maintenance?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:17 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello :-) > > If there are any people that want to take over the devel/OpenOCD > project port, its free to take. I got some disagreement with OpenOCD > developers and started my own project, so if anyone has some time to > put into this port feel free to do so :-) > Hi Tomek- I just set the MAINTAINER to myself. Thanks for maintaing this port for the past couple of years. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ocaml ports needs love
Gabor Pali wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 2:53 PM, John Marino > wrote: >> Is not opam already in ports? >> http://www.freshports.org/devel/ocaml-opam/ > Yeah, but OPAM 1.0.0 may not be the best choice for FreeBSD... Due to > some trivial but annoying bugs OPAM will not work properly on FreeBSD. > I am currently using the git version > 83019d40090b7a44bd0e8a3b9ec4e55c4620df4d where those problems have > been fixed. Is it trivial to use the 1.0.0 port to build the version you are referring to? I would like to start using opam on FreeBSD to find out how it could be incorporated to ports system. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [devel/openocd] who wants to takeover maintenance?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:17 AM, CeDeROM wrote: >> >> Hello :-) >> >> If there are any people that want to take over the devel/OpenOCD >> project port, its free to take. I got some disagreement with OpenOCD >> developers and started my own project, so if anyone has some time to >> put into this port feel free to do so :-) > > > Hi Tomek- > > I just set the MAINTAINER to myself. Thanks for maintaing this port for > the past couple of years. Thank you Steven! :-) Please note, that you have a chance to update port to version 0.7.0. I am working on something totally new :-) Best regards! :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [devel/openocd] who wants to takeover maintenance?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:18 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Steven Kreuzer > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:17 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > >> > >> Hello :-) > >> > >> If there are any people that want to take over the devel/OpenOCD > >> project port, its free to take. I got some disagreement with OpenOCD > >> developers and started my own project, so if anyone has some time to > >> put into this port feel free to do so :-) > > > > > > Hi Tomek- > > > > I just set the MAINTAINER to myself. Thanks for maintaing this port for > > the past couple of years. > > Thank you Steven! :-) Please note, that you have a chance to update > port to version 0.7.0. I am working on something totally new :-) Yup. I saw that upstream has released a new version and I will look into updating the port in the very near future. Good luck on your new project and let me know when you have a release and I can add a port for it ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [devel/openocd] who wants to takeover maintenance?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > Yup. I saw that upstream has released a new version and I will look into > updating the port > in the very near future. Good luck on your new project and let me know when > you have a release > and I can add a port for it No problem I will add the port when its ready! :-) Regarding the OpenOCD 0.7.0 this may come handy..? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/180645 Best regards! :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
firefox won't build
Ports tree updated this morning and everything being built on amd64. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about c++ templates to see what's wrong. Anyone else seeing this? In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/gfx/2d/Blur.cp p:7: In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Blur.h:12: ../../dist/include/mozilla/CheckedInt.h:179:31: error: non-type template argument of type 'const bool' is not an integral constant expression static const bool value = IntegerType(-1) <= IntegerType(0); ^ ../../dist/include/mozilla/CheckedInt.h:343:28: note: while checking a default template argument used here return IsInRangeImpl::run(x); ~~^ ../../dist/include/mozilla/CheckedInt.h:578:18: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'mozilla::detail::IsInRange' requested here mIsValid(detail::IsInRange(value)) ^ /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/gfx/2d/Blur.cpp:404:37: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'mozilla::CheckedInt::CheckedInt' requested here CheckedInt minDataSize = CheckedInt<... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Port Build options
When one builds a port manually with make install clean or uses portmaster to build a port, does one typically select ALL of the compile options? Which also leads to another question, are the pre-built packages that are installed with pkg_add or pkgng compiled with ALL of the options? Stan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Port Build options
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Stan Gammons wrote: > When one builds a port manually with make install clean or uses > portmaster to build a port, does one typically select ALL of the compile > options? Which also leads to another question, are the pre-built > packages that are installed with pkg_add or pkgng compiled with ALL of > the options? > > > Stan > Most people install with the default options. If they have special requirements, they adjust their options accordingly. Most users don't really even understand what some options really are and, if they don't have a particular interest, they will not set them. Soem of the cases where options are commonly changed from default are when CPU specific optimizations are available. Obviously packages can't be built that way as they would not run on all systems. Another is selection of codecs on multimedia apps. There are many reasons to change defaults, but they should only be changed for a good reason. Packages are built with default options. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
graphics/impressive: trivial mistake in RUN_DEPENDS
Hello,
I found a trivial mistake in graphics/impressive/Makefile line 22
RUN_DEPENDS= ${PYGAME}
should be
RUN_DEPENDS+= ${PYGAME}
Regards,
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: firefox won't build
"Gary Aitken" writes: > Ports tree updated this morning and everything being built on amd64. > Unfortunately, I don't know enough about c++ templates to see what's wrong. > Anyone else seeing this? I'd try using lang/clang but FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE is EOL since April. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=40959 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
