Re: Quick status update on Squid 3.x ports

2012-10-17 Thread Любомир Григоров
Hello Thomas-Martin,

Just wanted to check in if there is more info on Squid 3.2 or if you
encountered a setback and are pushing the release further.

Cheers and keep up the good work!

-- 
Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov

Hi,

I got this whenever check any port with porlint -AC:

"""
[rm@smeshariki4 ~/py-pysha3]> portlint -AC
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
FATAL: breaks INDEX (make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk" line 348: 
warning: Couldn't read shell's output for 
"(/nonexistentlocal/bin/python2.7 -c 'import sys; 
print(sys.version.split()[0].replace("b",".b"))' 2> /dev/null) | 
/usr/bin/tail -1" make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: 
duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make: 
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script 
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: 
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make: 
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script 
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: 
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make: 
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script 
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: 
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make: 
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script 
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: 
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make: 
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script 
for "-depends" defined here).

1 fatal error and 0 warnings found.
"""

What is wrong here?

--
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov

Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 17.10.2012 11:59:

Hi,

I got this whenever check any port with porlint -AC:



root@smeshariki4:/usr/ports/devel/gitg # make install clean
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script 
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous 
script for "-depends" defined here

===>  gitg-0.0.8_1 USE_GETTEXT can be only one of build, run, or yes.

Does anybody expecting something like this?

--
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread John Marino

You're building with bmake and not make.
bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things.
It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors.
use the FreeBSD version of make instead.
John

On 10/17/2012 09:59, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:

Hi,

I got this whenever check any port with porlint -AC:

"""
[rm@smeshariki4 ~/py-pysha3]> portlint -AC
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
FATAL: breaks INDEX (make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk" line 348:
warning: Couldn't read shell's output for
"(/nonexistentlocal/bin/python2.7 -c 'import sys;
print(sys.version.split()[0].replace("b",".b"))' 2> /dev/null) |
/usr/bin/tail -1" make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning:
duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121:
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121:
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118:
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118:
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here).
1 fatal error and 0 warnings found.
"""

What is wrong here?


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov

John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52:

You're building with bmake and not make.
bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things.
It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors.
use the FreeBSD version of make instead.
John


Yes, you are right. I just remember that I decided to check WITH_BMAKE. 
Just rebuild usr.bin/make without this knob and everything now ok. Thanks.


--
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread John Marino

You're building with bmake and not make.
bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things.
It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors.
use the FreeBSD version of make instead.
John

On 10/17/2012 09:59, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:

Hi,

I got this whenever check any port with porlint -AC:

"""
[rm@smeshariki4 ~/py-pysha3]> portlint -AC
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script
for target "-depends" ignored
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous
script for "-depends" defined here
FATAL: breaks INDEX (make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk" line 348:
warning: Couldn't read shell's output for
"(/nonexistentlocal/bin/python2.7 -c 'import sys;
print(sys.version.split()[0].replace("b",".b"))' 2> /dev/null) |
/usr/bin/tail -1" make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning:
duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121:
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121:
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118:
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118:
warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script
for "-depends" defined here).
1 fatal error and 0 warnings found.
"""

What is wrong here?


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52:
> > You're building with bmake and not make.
> > bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things.
> > It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors.
> > use the FreeBSD version of make instead.
> > John
> 
> Yes, you are right. I just remember that I decided to check WITH_BMAKE. 
> Just rebuild usr.bin/make without this knob and everything now ok. Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Ruslan
> 
> Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

We will be able to switch the ports tree to bmake after 9.0 and 8.2 are EOLed

regards,
Bapt


pgpm40bY3HpSb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:55:37PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> > John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52:
> > > You're building with bmake and not make.
> > > bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things.
> > > It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors.
> > > use the FreeBSD version of make instead.
> > > John
> > 
> > Yes, you are right. I just remember that I decided to check WITH_BMAKE. 
> > Just rebuild usr.bin/make without this knob and everything now ok. Thanks.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Regards,
> > Ruslan
> > 
> > Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
> > ___
> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> 
> We will be able to switch the ports tree to bmake after 9.0 and 8.2 are EOLed
> 
> regards,
> Bapt


I meant 8.3 and 9.0 sorry
regards,
Bapt


pgpwXCXPRFgKJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:20:45 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin  wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:55:37PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> > > John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52:
> > > > You're building with bmake and not make.
> > > > bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other
> > > > things. It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors.
> > > > use the FreeBSD version of make instead.
> > > > John
> > > 
> > > Yes, you are right. I just remember that I decided to check
> > > WITH_BMAKE. Just rebuild usr.bin/make without this knob and
> > > everything now ok. Thanks.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Regards,
> > > Ruslan
> > > 
> > > Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
> > > ___
> > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> > 
> > We will be able to switch the ports tree to bmake after 9.0 and 8.2
> > are EOLed
> > 
> > regards,
> > Bapt
> 
> 
> I meant 8.3 and 9.0 sorry
> regards,
> Bapt

Is there any background information about this planned switch to bmake
(beyond http://wiki.freebsd.org/201110DevSummit/bmake).


-- 
Michael Gmelin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:25:38PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:20:45 +0200
> Baptiste Daroussin  wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:55:37PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> > > > John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52:
> > > > > You're building with bmake and not make.
> > > > > bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other
> > > > > things. It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors.
> > > > > use the FreeBSD version of make instead.
> > > > > John
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, you are right. I just remember that I decided to check
> > > > WITH_BMAKE. Just rebuild usr.bin/make without this knob and
> > > > everything now ok. Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ruslan
> > > > 
> > > > Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
> > > > ___
> > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> > > 
> > > We will be able to switch the ports tree to bmake after 9.0 and 8.2
> > > are EOLed
> > > 
> > > regards,
> > > Bapt
> > 
> > 
> > I meant 8.3 and 9.0 sorry
> > regards,
> > Bapt
> 
> Is there any background information about this planned switch to bmake
> (beyond http://wiki.freebsd.org/201110DevSummit/bmake).
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Gmelin

I don't know much about this, I just know that current is going to use bmake,
and the only incompatibility I have spotted so far from our make to bmake is the
:L becoming :tl and :U becoming :tu

Once 8.3 and 9.0 are EOLed all version of freebsd make support both syntax, so
the ports could safely use both bmake and make (once we change in the ports tree
all the :U and :L occurence.)

which means everything should just continue working ootb for everyone on
supported version of FreeBSD :)

regards,
Bapt


pgpWWXLxGiv7q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread John Marino

On 10/17/2012 14:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:


I don't know much about this, I just know that current is going to use bmake,
and the only incompatibility I have spotted so far from our make to bmake is the
:L becoming :tl and :U becoming :tu

Once 8.3 and 9.0 are EOLed all version of freebsd make support both syntax, so
the ports could safely use both bmake and make (once we change in the ports tree
all the :U and :L occurence.)

which means everything should just continue working ootb for everyone on
supported version of FreeBSD :)

regards,
Bapt


The incompatible "-V" switch causes problems too.  There is quite a few 
uses of -V in bsd.*.mk.


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


pkg install order dependency problem

2012-10-17 Thread Adam McDougall
Short version: If you make a pkg repo with poudriere that includes
java/diablo-jdk16 and tell pkg to install it, it knows pkgconf is a
dep of xproto but it installs it in the wrong order so it fails.
diablo-jdk16 is not on pkgbeta so I cannot test with that repo.
I realize there are other jdk choices but this issue is about why
pkg would get the install order wrong (it also seems to be missing
a newline on the error).  Please let me know if I can provide more
information or test something.  Thanks.

This is on a recent 9.x-amd64 test system with no packages old or new:

root@test:/root # env 
PACKAGESITE="http://my.local.server/pkg/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest"; pkg update
The package management tool is not yet installed on your system.
Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y
Bootstrapping pkg please wait
Installing pkg-1.0.1... done
If you are upgrading from the old package format, first run:

  # pkg2ng
Updating repository catalogue
repo.txz
   100%  792KB 791.5KB/s 791.5KB/s   
00:00
root@test:/root # pkg info
pkg-1.0.1  New generation package manager
root@test:/root # pkg install java/diablo-jdk16
Updating repository catalogue
Repository catalogue is up-to-date, no need to fetch fresh copy
The following packages will be installed:

Installing javavmwrapper: 2.4
Installing compat7x-amd64: 7.3.703000.201008_1
Installing xextproto: 7.2.0
Installing xproto: 7.0.22
Installing pkgconf: 0.8.9
Installing diablo-jdk: 1.6.0.07.02_20

The installation will require 166 MB more space

56 MB to be downloaded

Proceed with installing packages [y/N]: y
javavmwrapper-2.4.txz   
   100%   18KB  17.6KB/s  17.6KB/s   
00:00
compat7x-amd64-7.3.703000.201008_1.txz  
   100% 5010KB   4.9MB/s   4.9MB/s   
00:00
xextproto-7.2.0.txz 
   100%   23KB  22.7KB/s  22.7KB/s   
00:00
xproto-7.0.22.txz   
   100%   59KB  59.2KB/s  59.2KB/s   
00:00
pkgconf-0.8.9.txz   
   100%   22KB  21.9KB/s  21.9KB/s   
00:00
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_20.txz   
   100%   52MB  51.7MB/s  51.7MB/s   
00:00
Checking integrity... done
Installing javavmwrapper-2.4... done
Installing compat7x-amd64-7.3.703000.201008_1... done
Installing xextproto-7.2.0... done
Installing xproto-7.0.22...missing dependency pkgconf-0.8.9root@test:/root #
root@test:/root #
root@test:/root # pkg install java/diablo-jdk16
Updating repository catalogue
Repository catalogue is up-to-date, no need to fetch fresh copy
The following packages will be installed:

Installing xproto: 7.0.22
Installing pkgconf: 0.8.9
Installing diablo-jdk: 1.6.0.07.02_20

The installation will require 149 MB more space

0 B to be downloaded

Proceed with installing packages [y/N]: y
Checking integrity... done
Installing xproto-7.0.22...missing dependency pkgconf-0.8.9root@test:/root # 
root@test:/root # 
root@test:/root # 



If I go ahead and install pkgconf manually, xproto and thus diablo-jdk succeed.

Interestingly, if I only request to install xproto, it gets the order right:


root@test:/root # pkg install xproto
Updating repository catalogue
Repository catalogue is up-to-date, no need to fetch fresh copy
The following packages will be installed:

Installing pkgconf: 0.8.9
Installing xproto: 7.0.22

The installation will require 428 kB more space

0 B to be downloaded

Proceed with installing packages [y/N]: y
Checking integrity... done
Installing pkgconf-0.8.9... done
Installing xproto-7.0.22... done



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Portmaster/Portupgrade | pkg2ng

2012-10-17 Thread Jim Trigg
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 06:51:59PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 4:11 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> > Somewhat lost here; just read UPDATING in which is reported about an
> > additional function support of pkgng by portupgrade and portmaster:
> > 
> > PORTMASTER
> >   # make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster config build deinstall
> > install clean
> >   # echo 'WITH_PKGNG=yes' >> /etc/make.conf
> >   # pkg2ng*
> > 
> > PORTUPGRADE
> >   # echo 'WITH_PKGNG=yes' >> /etc/make.conf
> >   # pkg2ng*
> >   # pkgdb -fu
> > 
> > The only issue I have is that this pkg2ng command doesn't work as this
> > program* cannot be found so the command returns with a 'pkg2ng: Command
> > not found.'
> > Can someone tell me what I miss here?
> 
> make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean
> 
> Sorry for the confusion. I will add that in.

I think what's needed for portmaster is an explicit mention that the
PKGNGPATCH option needs to be selected.  That will cause pkg to be
installed automatically, and installing it manually just increases the
risk that portmaster won't have been built correctly to support it.

Jim
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Portmaster/Portupgrade | pkg2ng

2012-10-17 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 10/17/2012 8:18 AM, Jim Trigg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 06:51:59PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 10/16/2012 4:11 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
>>> Somewhat lost here; just read UPDATING in which is reported about an
>>> additional function support of pkgng by portupgrade and portmaster:
>>>
>>> PORTMASTER
>>>   # make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster config build deinstall
>>> install clean
>>>   # echo 'WITH_PKGNG=yes' >> /etc/make.conf
>>>   # pkg2ng*
>>>
>>> PORTUPGRADE
>>>   # echo 'WITH_PKGNG=yes' >> /etc/make.conf
>>>   # pkg2ng*
>>>   # pkgdb -fu
>>>
>>> The only issue I have is that this pkg2ng command doesn't work as this
>>> program* cannot be found so the command returns with a 'pkg2ng: Command
>>> not found.'
>>> Can someone tell me what I miss here?
>>
>> make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean
>>
>> Sorry for the confusion. I will add that in.
> 
> I think what's needed for portmaster is an explicit mention that the
> PKGNGPATCH option needs to be selected.  That will cause pkg to be
> installed automatically, and installing it manually just increases the
> risk that portmaster won't have been built correctly to support it.
> 

The patch will be fully merged upstream for 3.15, removing the patch option.

It will then work for both pkgng and pkg_install. The plan is to support
pkg_install until at least the last branch with pkg_install is EoL.
Currently that is 8.3 in April 2014 (www.freebsd.org/security)

> Jim
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> 


-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


problem building Vuze

2012-10-17 Thread Robert Huff

On:

FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Jul 24 08:55:46 EDT 2012 amd64 

with openjdk6-b26, attempting to build last night's vuze update
produces:

===>  Cleaning for vuze-4.7.2.0
===>  Found saved configuration for vuze-4.7.0.0_1
===>  Extracting for vuze-4.7.2.0
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for Vuze_4720_source.zip.
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/unzip - found
===>  Patching for vuze-4.7.2.0
===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for vuze-4.7.2.0
/bin/rm -rf /data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/org/eclipse
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/share/java/classes/log4j.jar - 
found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on file: 
/usr/local/share/java/classes/commons-cli.jar - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/share/java/classes/junit.jar - 
found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on file: 
/usr/local/share/java/classes/swt-devel.jar - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/openjdk6/bin/java - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ant - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on executable: gcc46 - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/as - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on executable: pkgconf - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on executable: gtk-update-icon-cache - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on shared library: atk-1.0.0 - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on shared library: gdk_pixbuf-2.0.0 - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on shared library: glib-2.0.0 - found
===>   vuze-4.7.2.0 depends on shared library: pango-1.0.0 - found
===>  Configuring for vuze-4.7.2.0
===>  Building for vuze-4.7.2.0
Buildfile: /data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/build.xml

init:
[mkdir] Created dir: /data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/build

compile:
[javac] /data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/build.xml:23: warning: 
'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to 
false for repeatable builds
[javac] Compiling 3279 source files to 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/build
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/dht/netcoords/vivaldi/ver1/impl/tests/VivaldiVisualTest.java:27:
 package org.eclipse.swt.layout does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.layout.FillLayout;
[javac]  ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/dht/netcoords/vivaldi/ver1/impl/tests/VivaldiVisualTest.java:28:
 package org.eclipse.swt.widgets does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/dht/netcoords/vivaldi/ver1/impl/tests/VivaldiVisualTest.java:29:
 package org.eclipse.swt.widgets does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Shell;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/metasearch/impl/ExternalLoginWindow.java:6:
 package org.eclipse.swt does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.SWT;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/metasearch/impl/ExternalLoginWindow.java:7:
 package org.eclipse.swt.browser does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.browser.Browser;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/metasearch/impl/ExternalLoginWindow.java:8:
 package org.eclipse.swt.browser does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.browser.ProgressEvent;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/metasearch/impl/ExternalLoginWindow.java:9:
 package org.eclipse.swt.browser does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.browser.ProgressListener;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/metasearch/impl/ExternalLoginWindow.java:10:
 package org.eclipse.swt.events does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.events.DisposeEvent;
[javac]  ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/metasearch/impl/ExternalLoginWindow.java:11:
 package org.eclipse.swt.events does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.events.DisposeListener;
[javac]  ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/metasearch/impl/ExternalLoginWindow.java:12:
 package org.eclipse.swt.layout does not exist
[javac] import org.eclipse.swt.layout.FormAttachment;
[javac]  ^
[javac] 
/data/port-work/usr/ports/net-p2p/vuze/work/com/aelitis/azureus/core/metasearch/impl/ExternalLoginWindow.java:13:
 package org.eclipse.swt.layout does not exist
[

Re: svn commit: r305926 - head/ports-mgmt/poudriere

2012-10-17 Thread Adam McDougall

I upgraded poudriere to 2.2 and started a build using:
poudriere bulk -D -f /root/pkg-webold -j 90amd64-webold

I noticed by the lack of "deleting stale"... and the high number of 
packages it was going to build that it was intending to rebuild all 
packages in the list.  I don't seem to have a full history of zfs create 
commands available to see if I had created /poudriere/data manually in 
the past (I probably did judging by the zfs path), but a new 
/poudriere/data was automatically created today which got mounted over 
top thus /poudriere/data/packages was empty:


2012-10-17.11:19:21 zfs create -p -o poudriere:type=data -o 
mountpoint=/poudriere/data rpool/poudriere/data


Filesystem   1K-blocks UsedAvail 
Capacity  Mounted on
rpool/data33772015  3924530 2984748412% 
   /poudriere/data
rpool/poudriere/data  2987362926144 29847484 0% 
   /poudriere/data


I'll move my packages into the new mount, but I wanted to give at least 
a heads up to others.


On 10/15/12 13:12, Bryan Drewery wrote:

Author: bdrewery
Date: Mon Oct 15 17:12:43 2012
New Revision: 305926
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/305926

Log:
   - Update to 2.2

   Changes:
 * Lots of bug fixes
 * Support JAILNAME-make.conf and PTNAME-make.conf
 * Updated ZSH completions
 * The 'pbi' subcommand has been removed
 * New "SET" feature. bulk, options, testport now all support
   a '-z SET' option that allows for extra customization of
   make.conf and options. See CUSTOMISATION section in
   poudriere(8) for more information.
 * Improved compatibility with older FreeBSD versions
 * Poudriere itself can be jailed, see website for more details.
 * Any ZFS dataset can now be used as a ports tree. Just set
   poudriere:type=ports and define poudriere:name to use as a ports tree.
 * ports:
  - No longer create port tress in ports/ subdirectory when using SVN or git
 * options:
  - Fix improperly using options-JAILNAME instead of JAILNAME-options
directory, resulting in options not being used.
  - Fix the specified ports tree not being used
 * bulk:
  - Support for building the entire ports tree with the -a option
  - Support for overriding WRKDIR_ARCHIVE_FORMAT, see new
poudriere.conf.sample
  - Summary output updates
  - SIGINFO improvements
  - Improved output during startup, explaining which files/directories
are being used for the build.
  - Fix skipped ports causing incorrect counts
  - Logs are now only cleared on -c again
  - New '-C' option that deletes any existing packages, but only for
the ones listed. This works well with '-t' for bulk testing.
 * jail:
  - Better version detection on new jails via newvers.sh
 * testport:
  - Lots of leftovers improvements
  - When using pkgng, DEVELOPER_MODE is now enabled by default, which
will run extra plist checks.

   Feature safe:yes

Modified:
   head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/Makefile
   head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/distinfo

Modified: head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/Makefile
==
--- head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/Makefile  Mon Oct 15 17:06:01 2012
(r305925)
+++ head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/Makefile  Mon Oct 15 17:12:43 2012
(r305926)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
  # $FreeBSD$

  PORTNAME= poudriere
-PORTVERSION=   2.1.2
+PORTVERSION=   2.2
  CATEGORIES=   ports-mgmt
  MASTER_SITES= http://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/tarball/
  DISTFILES=${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}${EXTRACT_SUFX}?uuid=${PORTVERSION}
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ PLIST_FILES=  etc/poudriere.conf.sample \
share/poudriere/common.sh \
share/poudriere/test_ports.sh \
share/poudriere/ports.sh \
-   share/poudriere/pbi.sh \
share/poudriere/jail.sh \
share/poudriere/bulk.sh \
share/poudriere/cron.sh \

Modified: head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/distinfo
==
--- head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/distinfo  Mon Oct 15 17:06:01 2012
(r305925)
+++ head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/distinfo  Mon Oct 15 17:12:43 2012
(r305926)
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (poudriere-2.1.2.tar.gz?uuid=2.1.2) = 
19a1d41463c8c04491b760df5aaf9caec348fac78538adf8276d397b41b239cd
-SIZE (poudriere-2.1.2.tar.gz?uuid=2.1.2) = 33476
+SHA256 (poudriere-2.2.tar.gz?uuid=2.2) = 
b557a9d6ffab5e050935bf2eaded25c23f3e0ff610ce1293d1123cee8354898f
+SIZE (poudriere-2.2.tar.gz?uuid=2.2) = 34481
___
svn-ports-...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-ports-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis

FreeBSD Port: sge-6.2.2.1_3

2012-10-17 Thread Shaddox, William
I'm looking into the SGE for my work and handling the scheduling of our 
automation processes.  The current setup works wonderfully but my boss and I 
are worried about the future since Oracle decided to not have an open source 
version.  I was wondering, what are your thoughts about the future of this port?

Also, I've been testing Open Grid Scheduler with FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE AMD64 and 
I've got it working but not the complete project.  I've had to remove qmon, add 
some libraries from my SGE install, and edit 
/usr/local/GE2011.11p1/source/scripts/distinst to get the install to complete 
but it's working.  Here's what I have so far.

./aimk -spool-classic -no-java -no-jni -no-gui-inst -no-secure -no-qtcsh 
-no-qmon -only-depend
./scripts/zerodepend
./aimk -spool-classic -no-java -no-jni -no-gui-inst -no-secure -no-qtcsh 
-no-qmon depend
./aimk -spool-classic -no-java -no-jni -no-gui-inst -no-secure -no-qtcsh 
-no-qmon -debug
./scripts/distinst -local -libs fbsd-amd64 -- man common sge_qmaster sge_execd 
sge_shadowd sge_shepherd sge_coshepherd qstat qsub qalter qconf qdel qacct qmod 
qsh utilbin jobs qhost qmake qping qloadsensor.exe sgepasswd qquota

I had to add libXltree.so to 
/usr/local/GE2011.11p1/source/3rdparty/qmon/FREEBSD_AMD64/ and qtcsh to 
/usr/local/ogs/bin/fbsd-amd64/ to get it to startup.

For the environmental variables:
setenv SGE_ROOT /usr/local/ogs
setenv SGE_QMASTER_PORT 6444
setenv SGE_EXECD_PORT 6445
setenv SGE_CELL TEST
setenv SGE_CLUSTER_NAME p6444
setenv SGE_DELAY_TIME 120
setenv SGE_GET_ACTIVE_INTERVAL 90
setenv CHECK_INTERVAL 60

And my updated path list:
set path = (/sbin /bin /usr/sbin /usr/bin /usr/games /usr/local/sbin 
/usr/local/bin $HOME/bin /usr/local/ogs/bin/fbsd-amd64/ 
/usr/local/ogs/utilbin/fbsd-amd64)

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


gettext or NLS changes ??

2012-10-17 Thread olli hauer
Hi,

was there a change in forcing port builds with gettext or NLS in last time?

I have many failing ports in tinderbox with an error similar to
the following message (haven't had this issue ~10 days before)

==> /tb/a/builds/8.3-amd64-pkgng/tmp/make.log <==


add_pkg gmake-3.82_1.txz libiconv-1.14.txz pkgconf-0.8.9.txz libxml2-2.7.8_5.txz
adding dependencies
pkg_add gmake-3.82_1.txz
Installing gmake-3.82_1...missing dependency gettext-0.18.1.1
Failed to install the following 1 package(s): gmake-3.82_1.txz
error in dependency gmake-3.82_1.txz, exiting


I have defined WITHOUT_NLS in the env/build.xx... files.

--
Regards,
olli
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: gettext or NLS changes ??

2012-10-17 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/17/12 3:49 PM, olli hauer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> was there a change in forcing port builds with gettext or NLS in
> last time?
> 
> I have many failing ports in tinderbox with an error similar to the
> following message (haven't had this issue ~10 days before)
> 
> ==> /tb/a/builds/8.3-amd64-pkgng/tmp/make.log <== 
>  
>  
> add_pkg gmake-3.82_1.txz libiconv-1.14.txz pkgconf-0.8.9.txz
> libxml2-2.7.8_5.txz adding dependencies pkg_add gmake-3.82_1.txz 
> Installing gmake-3.82_1...missing dependency gettext-0.18.1.1 
> Failed to install the following 1 package(s): gmake-3.82_1.txz 
> error in dependency gmake-3.82_1.txz, exiting
> 
> 
> I have defined WITHOUT_NLS in the env/build.xx... files.
> 
> -- Regards, olli

Hi olli,

NLS is set in bsd.options.mk unless you have WITHOUT_NLS defined, so
perhaps that option changed in your environment?  To get the build to
continue as-is, remove the gmake package and rebuild the parent package.

Hope that helps,
Greg
- -- 
Greg Larkin

http://www.FreeBSD.org/   - The Power To Serve
http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code.
http://twitter.com/cpucycle/  - Follow you, follow me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlB/GlYACgkQ0sRouByUApAgUwCeO+nhwTB+fQMhRmoJXmNmpPMK
hVMAnj3o14TspHvc1XuaDGTiSeremKg7
=apYi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: gettext or NLS changes ??

2012-10-17 Thread olli hauer
On 2012-10-17 22:51, Greg Larkin wrote:
> On 10/17/12 3:49 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>> Hi,
> 
>> was there a change in forcing port builds with gettext or NLS in
>> last time?
> 
>> I have many failing ports in tinderbox with an error similar to the
>> following message (haven't had this issue ~10 days before)
> 
>> ==> /tb/a/builds/8.3-amd64-pkgng/tmp/make.log <== 
>>  
>>  
>> add_pkg gmake-3.82_1.txz libiconv-1.14.txz pkgconf-0.8.9.txz
>> libxml2-2.7.8_5.txz adding dependencies pkg_add gmake-3.82_1.txz 
>> Installing gmake-3.82_1...missing dependency gettext-0.18.1.1 
>> Failed to install the following 1 package(s): gmake-3.82_1.txz 
>> error in dependency gmake-3.82_1.txz, exiting
> 
> 
>> I have defined WITHOUT_NLS in the env/build.xx... files.
> 
>> -- Regards, olli
> 
> Hi olli,
> 
> NLS is set in bsd.options.mk unless you have WITHOUT_NLS defined, so
> perhaps that option changed in your environment?  To get the build to
> continue as-is, remove the gmake package and rebuild the parent package.
> 

Hi Greg,

thanks for the hint!

G, this means rebuild of nearly 1200 ports in three different builds to get
rid of the silly NLS change.

Anyway I have to adjust some more settings, in p5-libwww the option "SSL" was 
changed to
"HTTPS" which breaks p5-Plack and other packages which are depending on 
p5-Crypt-SSLeay
(hell, https is defined as encrypted http on port 443 else the networker speaks 
from SSL ...)

--
Regards,
olli
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"