Re: Adding MySQL-5.6 to ports

2011-06-14 Thread Alex Dupre

Jerry ha scritto:

I was wondering if anyone was considering adding the development branch
MySQL-5.6 to the ports tree?


Yes, I'm waiting for the next release.

--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD Port: postgresql-server-8.4.8_1

2011-06-14 Thread Palle Girgensohn

13 jun 2011 kl. 20.07 skrev John Bleichert:

> creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1 ... child process 
> was terminated by signal 12: Bad system call
> initdb: removing contents of data directory "/usr/local/pgsql/data"
> $ exit
> boogie:/var/log uname -a
> FreeBSD boogie 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #1: Sat Apr 30 02:31:33 EDT 
> 2011 root@boogie:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BOOGIE  i386
> boogie:/var/log pkg_info | grep postgres
> postgresql-client-8.4.7 PostgreSQL database (client)
> postgresql-server-8.4.7 The most advanced open-source database available 
> anywhere

How did you install the binaries?

What is you sysctl -a kern.ipc settings?

$ cat /etc/sysctl.conf
kern.maxfiles=20
kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1
kern.ipc.shmmax=8586447872
kern.ipc.shmall=2096301

$ cat /boot/loader.conf 
kern.ipc.semmni="256"
kern.ipc.semmns="512"
kern.ipc.semume="40"
kern.ipc.semmnu="256"


Palle


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD Port: postgresql-server-8.4.8_1

2011-06-14 Thread Palle Girgensohn

14 jun 2011 kl. 06.34 skrev John Bleichert:

> 
> On Jun 13, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:07 PM, John Bleichert  wrote:
>> 
>>> Suggestions? Shall I hit the postgresql forums? I thought I'd ask here
>>> first.
>>> 
>> 
>> This is in a jail, right?
>> Try adding this to /etc/sysctl.conf:
>> security.jail.sysvipc_allowed=1
>> 
>> And/or run "sysctl security.jail.sysvipc_allowed=1 as root on the host.
>> 
>> -- 
>> chs,
> 
> 
> Thanks for getting back to me. 
> 
> No, it's not in a jail. I think there may be something missing in my kernel 
> config - I'm going to try it with the generic FreeBSD 8.2 kernel when I get 
> back to the terminal on Wednesday. For what it's worth I built Postgres 8.4 
> from source manually and got exactly the same result.

OK, then forget first question in previous mail, sorry for not readin the 
entire thread.

Could you perhaps have removed SYSV support in the kernel?

$ grep SYS /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory
options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues
options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores


Palle

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Mix & Match Southern Africa Holidays

2011-06-14 Thread South African Tours
Dear Holiday Fans
Herewith 12 great holiday ideas + a selfdrive tour of the Garden Route with 3 
optional adventure packages to choose from.  If you really want to explore 
Madagascar then the 12 day 650 km road, canal & sea tour is a must.
See below .

  




 
  


currency 
conversion

"A holiday used to be a luxury, however, in today's world, 
it has become a necessity"

We offer you Cape Town to Victoria Falls, Madagascar to Zanzibar.
"Pick & Mix" and build your Southern Africa HolidayUnable to see the images? 
Please click here.
 
A collection of 12 great holidays for every occasion, taste, budget and age 
catered for!
Plus 1 of 3 optional self drive Garden Route activity packages to choose from.

 

CAPE TOWN


Our price
R1376 pp

 Cape Town Lodge
4 nights B&B
Min. 2 people sharing

ADDO NAT. PARK


Our price
R1 280.00 pp

Zuurberg Mountain Inn
2 nights
Half Board

SWAZILAND


Our price
R1995.00 pp

Foresters Arms Hotel
3 nights
Half Board

VICTORIA FALLS 


Our price
R3 847.00 pp

The Kingdom Hotel
2 nights fly in package
Breakfast daily


BIG 5 SAFARI 

Our price
R3 870.00 pp

Kapama Buffalo Camp
2 nights
All inclusive

GORILLA
TREKKING

Our Price
R12 735.00 pp

Rwanda
3 nights fly in package
Inclusive

ZANZIBAR


Our price
R10 670.00 pp

Mapenzi Beach Club
7 nights fly in package
Fully Inclusive

MADAGASCAR
Ile Aux Nattes Beach

Our price
R6 999.00 pp

Le Petite Traversee
7 nights fly in package
Breakfast daily


MADAGASCAR
St Marie Beach Lodge

Our price
R7805.00 pp

Ravoraha Eco Lodge
7 nights fly in package
Half Board

MADAGASCAR  


Our price
R10603.00 pp

Vanila Hotel - Nosy Be
7 nights fly in package
Half Board + Excursions

MADAGASCAR


Our price
R13432.00 pp

Eden Lodge & L'Heure Bleue 
7 nights fly in package
Half Board

MADAGASCAR
12 Day adventure

Our price from
R13506.00 pp

Over 600 Km by Road, Canal Boat, & Sea, ending on St Marie Island



Your Decide - We Design


"LOCAL IS LEKKER"
How about a 2 week self drive holiday along the Garden Route - Cape Town to 
Port Elizabeth?
All organised for you with a choice 1 of 3 
inclusive activity packages 

13 day Self drive along South Africa's Garden Route - Stellenbosch, Oudtshoorn, 
Tsitsikamma, Addo National Park, Knysna, Cape Town.

Option 1 
1. White Shark Cage Diving
2. Tree Top Canopy Tour
3. Hop on & off bus tour of the Mother City
4. Cango Wildlife Ranch 

 
Option 2

1. Walk a Cheetah
2. Knysna Featherbed Trail & Cruise
3. Helicopter Flip over Cape Town
4. Robben Island Tour
5. Cango Wildlife Ranch
6. Monkeyland & Birds of Eden tour
Option 3 
1. Sunset cruise Knysna Lagoon
2. Table Mountain Cable Car
3. Robben Island 
4. Helicopter Flip over Cape Town
5. Walk a Cheetah
6. Cango Wildlife Ranch
7.Township tour in Knysna


   SUBSCRIBE
Be the first to know & stay up to date with all the 
Holiday Specials.

Please send me your Newsletter of Holiday Specials every two months - CLICK TO 
JOIN

Phone number:086 111 3946
SKYPE phone name:selftourscc
Enquiries :e...@selftours.co.za
Website :http://www.selftours.co.za
Unable to see 
the images?  Please click here.


 
SELFTOURS cc is a registered Closed Corporation under South African Law No. 
2002/050421/23
SELFTOURS is an accredited member of SATSA (South African Tourism Services 
Association),  affording you the knowledge and peace of mind that you are 
negotiating with a recognised and financially approved 
South African Tour Operator 
For further info click here
Contact us for the many other options that we offer including the Mystical 
Island of  Madagascar, the Spice Island of Zanzibar, the Paradise Island of 
Mauritius, Victoria Falls and Gorilla trekking in the Rwandan Mountains as well 
as tours of South Africa, all can be designed to meet your personal vacation 
requirements.
 
Selftours retains the right to change the itinerary without notice where and 
when necessary.  Subject to availability of flights, accommodation and 
prevailing exchange control rates at time of your booking Terms and conditions 
do apply.
If you are unable to see the above images, please click hereThis mail is sent 
to you as you have in the past contacted Selftours, or entered one of our 
competitions, are a travel agent, or have chosen to Opt-In and receive various 
holiday options up dates etc.

This is an honest circular to bring you news & updates regarding Holiday travel.

However, to change your email address or be de-listed from our holiday 
newsletter list  - please click here - and insert the email address we must 
change or remove
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Adding MySQL-5.6 to ports

2011-06-14 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:28:04 +0200
Alex Dupre  articulated:

> Jerry ha scritto:
> > I was wondering if anyone was considering adding the development
> > branch MySQL-5.6 to the ports tree?
> 
> Yes, I'm waiting for the next release.

Thanks }}:-)

-- 
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Mailman + postfix <-- which group have people selected?

2011-06-14 Thread Chris Rees
Hi all,

Before I say anything else, please _do not_ bother wxs@ on this
subject -- any problems to do with ownership/groups in mailman should
be sent to me-- it's my mess!

I fixed mailman recently to not touch PREFIX before the install phase,
which opened up a small can of worms in itself -- a fix is waiting for
approval.

The PR at [1] states that the value for MAIL_GROUP for using mailman
with Postfix should be nobody, but [2] talks about that being wrong.

Before I revert the MAIL_GID=nobody change (I have had private mail
explaining that it is in fact incorrect), does anyone have any more
information on which value is more correct, and why one is preferable?

In short (pseudocode):

.if defined(WITH_POSTFIX)
MAIL_GID= nobody
.endif

or

.if defined(WITH_POSTFIX)
MAIL_GID=mailman
.endif

? Comments please?

(I run mailman with sendmail, and I've found it difficult to ascertain
the Right Thing.)

Chris

[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/142000

[2] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-April/040293.html
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Mailman + postfix <-- which group have people selected?

2011-06-14 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2011-06-14 20:43, Chris Rees wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Before I say anything else, please _do not_ bother wxs@ on this
> subject -- any problems to do with ownership/groups in mailman should
> be sent to me-- it's my mess!
> 
> I fixed mailman recently to not touch PREFIX before the install phase,
> which opened up a small can of worms in itself -- a fix is waiting for
> approval.
> 
> The PR at [1] states that the value for MAIL_GROUP for using mailman
> with Postfix should be nobody, but [2] talks about that being wrong.
> 
> Before I revert the MAIL_GID=nobody change (I have had private mail
> explaining that it is in fact incorrect), does anyone have any more
> information on which value is more correct, and why one is preferable?
> 
> In short (pseudocode):
> 
> .if defined(WITH_POSTFIX)
> MAIL_GID= nobody
> .endif
> 
> or
> 
> .if defined(WITH_POSTFIX)
> MAIL_GID=mailman
> .endif
> 
> ? Comments please?
> 

Second one, GID=mailman

The group nobody is not really secure (even it is unprivileged). Mostly
the nobody group is chosen for daemons which do not write data at all.

Normally you try to protect the alias databases which is not given if
nobody has write access to them.


>From mailman-2.1.14/doc/mailman-install/postfix-integration.html

> When you configure Mailman, use the --with-mail-gid=mailman switch this
> will be the default if you configured Mailman after adding the mailman
> owner. Because the owner of the aliases.db file is mailman, Postfix will
> execute Mailman's wrapper program as uid and gid mailman.


>From mailman-2.1.14/doc/mailman-install/postfix-virtual.html

> As above with the data/aliases* files, you want to make sure that both
> data/virtual-mailman and data/virtual-mailman.db are user and group owned
> by mailman.


Other Sources:
http://www.seaglass.com/postfix/mailman-gid.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-April/040289.html


I think it is a good idea to revert the GID as soon as possible back to
mailman and additional instruct postfix users to make sure the group
of the alias / virtual-alias databases are set to mailman.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Mailman + postfix <-- which group have people selected?

2011-06-14 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> Before I revert the MAIL_GID=nobody change (I have had private mail
> explaining that it is in fact incorrect), does anyone have any more
> information on which value is more correct, and why one is preferable?


Basically, Postfix will deliver to the owner of Mailman's alias file.  So long 
as that is owned by mailman user, and so long as the mailman user has the 
mailman group as it's primary GID, then running with --with-mail-gid=mailman is 
correct.

You'll probably find Mailman's documentation helpful:

  
http://wiki.list.org/display/DOC/Understanding+group+mismatch+errors+-+how+mailman+implements+security
  http://www.seaglass.com/postfix/mailman-gid.html

Regards,
-- 
-Chuck

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Mailman + postfix <-- which group have people selected?

2011-06-14 Thread Chris Rees
On 14 June 2011 21:02, Olli Hauer  wrote:
> On 2011-06-14 20:43, Chris Rees wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Before I say anything else, please _do not_ bother wxs@ on this
>> subject -- any problems to do with ownership/groups in mailman should
>> be sent to me-- it's my mess!
>>
>> I fixed mailman recently to not touch PREFIX before the install phase,
>> which opened up a small can of worms in itself -- a fix is waiting for
>> approval.
>>
>> The PR at [1] states that the value for MAIL_GROUP for using mailman
>> with Postfix should be nobody, but [2] talks about that being wrong.
>>
>> Before I revert the MAIL_GID=nobody change (I have had private mail
>> explaining that it is in fact incorrect), does anyone have any more
>> information on which value is more correct, and why one is preferable?
>>
>> In short (pseudocode):
>>
>> .if defined(WITH_POSTFIX)
>> MAIL_GID= nobody
>> .endif
>>
>> or
>>
>> .if defined(WITH_POSTFIX)
>> MAIL_GID=mailman
>> .endif
>>
>> ? Comments please?
>>
>
> Second one, GID=mailman
>
> The group nobody is not really secure (even it is unprivileged). Mostly
> the nobody group is chosen for daemons which do not write data at all.
>
> Normally you try to protect the alias databases which is not given if
> nobody has write access to them.
>
>
> From mailman-2.1.14/doc/mailman-install/postfix-integration.html
>
>> When you configure Mailman, use the --with-mail-gid=mailman switch this
>> will be the default if you configured Mailman after adding the mailman
>> owner. Because the owner of the aliases.db file is mailman, Postfix will
>> execute Mailman's wrapper program as uid and gid mailman.
>
>
> From mailman-2.1.14/doc/mailman-install/postfix-virtual.html
>
>> As above with the data/aliases* files, you want to make sure that both
>> data/virtual-mailman and data/virtual-mailman.db are user and group owned
>> by mailman.
>
>
> Other Sources:
> http://www.seaglass.com/postfix/mailman-gid.html
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-April/040289.html
>
>
> I think it is a good idea to revert the GID as soon as possible back to
> mailman and additional instruct postfix users to make sure the group
> of the alias / virtual-alias databases are set to mailman.

Thank you. A patch to reverse the group change and fix the REINPLACE
is in my Tinderbox -- it should be ready by tomorrow.

Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


portinstall dependency calculation mishap

2011-06-14 Thread Matthew Pounsett

I've run into an odd problem where portinstall seems to want to double-install 
a package when portinstall is run from inside a bash script.  The case I ran 
into was trying to install the postgres84-server port.  In the dependencies is 
devel/pkg-config.  When run from inside a shell script, portinstall tries to 
install pkg-config a second time after the postgres install is complete.  If I 
run it outside a shell script (from my prompt) it works fine.  

I ran into this using my personal environment and sudo, but I've repeated it 
with a bare tcsh login as well as a direct login to root's account from the 
console, so I'm confident this isn't due to interference from something in my 
environment.

I can work around this by installing pkg-config directly before installing 
postgres, but thought this was odd enough to warrant an email to the list.

Repeatability is trivial on a freshly installed 8.0-RELEASE as well as on 
8.2-RELEASE-p2 system with an up-to-date ports tree.

> cat >> testscript < chmod a+x testscript
> sudo ./testscript

I've trimmed the config/cc/etc output from a log of my shell and included it 
below so that the order of operations can be seen.

[Updating the pkgdb  in /var/db/pkg ... - 22 packages found 
(-3 +0) (...) done]
[Gathering depends for databases/postgresql84-server ... done]
--->  Installing 'postgresql-client-8.4.8' from a port 
(databases/postgresql84-client)
--->  Building '/usr/ports/databases/postgresql84-client'
===>  Cleaning for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>  Cleaning for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>  Cleaning for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===>  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===>  Found saved configuration for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>  Extracting for postgresql-client-8.4.8
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for postgresql/postgresql-8.4.8.tar.bz2.
===>  Patching for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>   postgresql-client-8.4.8 depends on executable: gmake - found
===>   postgresql-client-8.4.8 depends on shared library: xml2.5 - not found
===>Verifying install for xml2.5 in /usr/ports/textproc/libxml2
===>  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===>  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===>  Extracting for libxml2-2.7.8_1
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.7.8.tar.gz.
===>  Patching for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>   libxml2-2.7.8_1 depends on executable: gmake - found
===>   libxml2-2.7.8_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - not found
===>Verifying install for pkg-config in /usr/ports/devel/pkg-config
===>  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===>  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===>  Extracting for pkg-config-0.25_1
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/pkg-config-0.25.tar.gz.
===>  Patching for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>   pkg-config-0.25_1 depends on executable: gmake - found
===>  Configuring for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>  Building for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>  Installing for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>   Generating temporary packing list
===>  Checking if devel/pkg-config already installed
===>   Compressing manual pages for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>   Registering installation for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>   Returning to build of libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>   libxml2-2.7.8_1 depends on shared library: iconv.3 - found
===>  Configuring for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>  Building for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>  Installing for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>   libxml2-2.7.8_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found
===>   Generating temporary packing list
===>  Checking if textproc/libxml2 already installed
===>   Compressing manual pages for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>   Running ldconfig
===>   Registering installation for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>   Returning to build of postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>   postgresql-client-8.4.8 depends on shared library: intl - found
===>  Configuring for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>  Building for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>  Installing for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>   postgresql-client-8.4.8 depends on shared library: xml2.5 - found
===>   postgresql-client-8.4.8 depends on shared library: intl - found
===>   Generating temporary packing list
===>  Checking if databases/postgresql84-client already installed
===>   Compressing manual pages for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>   Running ldconfig
===>   Registering installation for postgresql-client-8.4.8
===>  Cleaning for libxml2-2.7.8_1
===>  Cleaning for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>  Cleaning for postgresql-client-8.4.8
[Updating the pkgdb  in /var/db/pkg ... - 25 packages found 
(-0 +3) ... done]
--->  Installing 'pkg-config-0.25_1' from a port (devel/pkg-config)
--->  Building '/usr/ports/devel/pkg-config'
===>  Cleaning for pkg-config-0.25_1
===>  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===>  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===>  Ex