Re: Project Management ,PERT

2009-09-08 Thread CmdLnKid

On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 00:30 -, natarajsn wrote:


Hi

Is there any good PM software in the  ports? I am on 7.1-RELEASE. I
not quite comfortable with OpenPro. Need some tool to generated PERT
charts.


regards

Nataraj



I would recommend ( Planner from the Gnome project. ). This may be 
heavily based on Gnome but the project in it self uses this software. 
Not to mention its other integrations with evolution and the gnome 
desktop.


http://live.gnome.org/Planner/Screenshots

Another alternative may be using freemind. Even though this is not a 
project management software you certainly could use it to generate trees 
of a project and the paths you want to follow.


http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Screenshots


I see both of these as a useful tool-set.

Best regards.

--

 - (2^(N-1))
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: boost-python-libs and associated compile errors -SOLVED

2009-09-08 Thread David Southwell
> 2009/9/5 David Southwell :
> > I should have mentioned that openbabel & kdeedu4 also then compiled
> > without problem. I have no idea what caused the original failure or how
> > the cure could have been connected to the recompiling of gnome2-2.26.3.
> > However I can report that immediately before the recompile I again tried
> > to compile boost-python- libs and it then failed with errors identical to
> > those copied into this thread.
> >
> > David
> 
> It's nice to know that your issue is solved.
> However, I am not going to investigate into this right know since I'm
> busy with updating boost to 1.40.
> 
> Alexander,
> maintainer of devel/boost-*
Bearing in mind my ignorance on how things actually work I am wondering if the 
problem I experienced had anything to do with gnupg. Its Makefile lists  
devel/pth under LIB_DEPENDS. Could this mean that devel/pth was automagically 
installed when gnupg was installed? You will see below I have also included  
output from pkg_info -rR gnupg-2.0.13 which shows it listed as required by 
gnome2.

On my system I manually changed dependencies on pth to  libpthread-stubs-0.1.

When you get a chance maybe you could take a look and let me know.
David

**
# New ports collection makefile for:gnupg
# Date created: Sep 30, 1998
# Whom: kuriy...@freebsd.org
#
# $FreeBSD: ports/security/gnupg/Makefile,v 1.121 2009/09/05 15:22:50 kuriyama 
Exp $
#

PORTNAME=   gnupg
PORTVERSION=2.0.13
CATEGORIES= security
MASTER_SITES=   ${MASTER_SITE_GNUPG}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= gnupg
DISTFILES=  ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}.sig
EXTRACT_ONLY=   ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}

MAINTAINER= kuriy...@freebsd.org
COMMENT=The GNU Privacy Guard

BUILD_DEPENDS=  libassuan>=1.0.4:${PORTSDIR}/security/libassuan \
libksba>=1.0.2:${PORTSDIR}/security/libksba
LIB_DEPENDS=gcrypt.16:${PORTSDIR}/security/libgcrypt \
gpg-error:${PORTSDIR}/security/libgpg-error \
ksba.17:${PORTSDIR}/security/libksba \
pth.20:${PORTSDIR}/devel/pth

***
Then looking at gnome2
As you can see from the dependency list gnome2 requires gnupg.  Maybe this is 
the route??

When you get a chance maybe you could take a look.
 
dns1# pkg_info -rR gnupg-2.0.13
Information for gnupg-2.0.13:

Depends on:
Dependency: openssl-0.9.8k_3
Dependency: libssh2-1.2,2
Dependency: ca_root_nss-3.11.9_2
Dependency: libpthread-stubs-0.1
Dependency: pkg-config-0.23_1
Dependency: libiconv-1.13.1
Dependency: gettext-0.17_1
Dependency: libidn-1.14
Dependency: libgpg-error-1.7
Dependency: libksba-1.0.7
Dependency: libgcrypt-1.4.4
Dependency: curl-7.19.6_1
Required by:
gnome2-2.26.3
gpgme-1.2.0
kdeartwork-4.3.1
kdebase-4.3.1
kdebase-runtime-4.3.1
kdebase-workspace-4.3.1
kdenetwork-4.3.1
kdepim-4.3.1
kdepim-runtime-4.3.1
kdepimlibs-4.3.1
kdesdk-4.3.1
kdetoys-4.3.1
seahorse-2.26.2_2
seahorse-plugins-2.26.2_2
tin-1.8.3_4



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


{incorrect,unsafe} use of UNZIP_CMD

2009-09-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
d...@tim /usr/ports% find . -mindepth 3 -type f -name Makefile | xargs grep 
'DEPEND.*UNZIP' /dev/null
./audio/libamrnb/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS=
${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./audio/libamrwb/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS=
${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./databases/pgtcl/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS=   
${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./emulators/xgs/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=   
${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/pykawari/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./lang/f2c/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip

This will fail if the user redefines UNZIP_CMD to e.g. "unzip -v".

all of these should just set USE_ZIP:

d...@tim /usr/ports% find . -mindepth 3 -type f -name Makefile | xargs egrep 
'EXTRACT_DEPENDS.*(UNZIP|unzip)' /dev/null
./cad/leocad/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./deskutils/superkaramba-lwp/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=  
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./devel/tavrasm/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./emulators/xgs/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=   
${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./emulators/m2000/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./emulators/vmsbackup/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/cgoban2/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/openarena/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/pykawari/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/sdb/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/ezquake/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip \
./games/ufoai-data/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/quake-data/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=   
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/quake-extras/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= 
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/tremor/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/doomlegacy/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/uhexen/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/kmquake2/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./games/galaxyhack/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=   
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./hungarian/hunspell/Makefile:#EXTRACT_DEPENDS= 
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./japanese/edict-utf-8/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./japanese/tomoe/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= 
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./java/diablo-jdk15/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./java/diablo-jdk16/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./java/diablo-jre15/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./java/diablo-jre16/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./java/sun-wtk/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=   
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./lang/f2c/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./sysutils/memtest86/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=  
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./textproc/fop/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=   
unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
./www/mambo/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=   unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip

So should these:

d...@tim /usr/ports% find . -mindepth 3 -type f -name Makefile | xargs egrep 
'EXTRACT_CMD.*(UNZIP|unzip)' /dev/null
./deskutils/superkaramba-lwp/Makefile:EXTRACT_CMD=  ${UNZIP_CMD}
./games/pykawari/Makefile:EXTRACT_CMD=  ${UNZIP_CMD}
./misc/projectionlib/Makefile:EXTRACT_CMD=  unzip -a

java/jdk14 is just...  weird.  I won't paste the Makefile here.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [SPAM] Re: FreeBSD Port: bind96-9.6.1.1

2009-09-08 Thread Wout Decré
Thanks, I am currently running it with the patched source, and it is
working great (using $ instead of %). But would be nice if I can use the
port again :)

Have a nice holiday

Wout

On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 14:26 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Wout Decré wrote:
> > Hello
> > 
> > I am using the dns/bind96 port with DLZ_LDAP. There seems to be an
> > update of the OpenLDAP client library regarding the '%' sign. This sign
> > is used by DLZ_LDAP for building the LDAP search query, but is now
> > causing an invalid LDAP base. Causing named to not start.
> > 
> > More information:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server-bugs/2008-May/002163.html
> > 
> > Is it possible to apply a patch when installing this port to modify the
> > '%' sign (see link)?
> 
> I will look into this issue later this week. It's a long holiday
> weekend in the US right now.
> 
> 
> Doug
> 

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 6

2009-09-08 Thread Vincent Hoffman
Danny Braniss wrote:
> [...]
>   
 ok, so some time has passed, but virtualbox-2.2.51r20457.tar.gz is no
 longer available, there is a
 ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/virtualbox-2.2.51r20457.tar.bz2
 then again in ports/emulatores/virtualbox the version is 3.0.51r6,

 can someone please explain?
 
>
> hi, the above was my question, which was totally ignored, not nice.
> I will try and refrase it:
> the call for testing is for a version (2.2.51r20457) which is not available, 
> while
> the ports is 3.0.51r6, so while I managed to compile it, it complains 
> that COM
> is not running, all this under 8BETA-3, both under 32 and 64 bit.
> thnaks,
>   danny
>
>   
The call for testing went out on 11th june
(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-June/008061.html)  
I can only assume it was considered tested and working as the port was
committed on 15th june
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/emulators/virtualbox/Makefile?rev=1.1;content-type=text%2Fplain)

Since then there have been 4 updates to the port. The last of which
updated it to 3.0.51r6 on august 14th.

I would say the call for testing is no longer valid, please use the
version in ports.


Vince

> ___
> freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>   

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Status of security/openssl: Port marked as IGNORE: security/openssl is marked as broken: No patchset for 0.9.8

2009-09-08 Thread Raphael Becker
Hi everyone,

I wonder if there's no one since August 14th having trouble with the
security/openssl ports. Since some weeks I get 

# portupgrade -p security/openssl
** Port marked as IGNORE: security/openssl:
is marked as broken: No patchset for 0.9.8
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
- security/openssl (marked as IGNORE)



I have about 150 ports installed depending (direct and indirect) on this
port and therefore cannot be updated:

# pkg_info -R openssl\* | grep -- -  | xargs
Information for openssl-0.9.8k_2: alpine-2.00_1 apache-2.2.11_7
centericq-4.21.0_11 clamav-0.95.2 cm-super-0.3.4_1 curl-7.19.5_1
cyrus-sasl-2.1.23 dirmngr-1.0.3 dvipsk-tetex-5.95a_3 ejabberd-2.0.5_2
elinks-0.11.6 fetchmail-6.3.11 git-1.6.4 gnupg-2.0.12 gpgme-1.2.0
inn-2.4.6 irssi-0.8.14 irssi-scripts-20090810 krb5-1.6.3_6
latex2html-2002.2.1_7 lbdb-0.36 libssh2-1.1,2 libwww-5.4.0_4
lighttpd-1.4.23 links-2.2_1,1 lynx-2.8.6.5_5,1 mod_auth_mysql-1.10
mod_perl2-2.0.4_2,3 mod_python-3.3.1_2 mutt-1.4.2.3_3
mysql-client-5.0.84 mysql-scripts-5.0.84 mysql-server-5.0.84
nagios-plugins-1.4.13,1 neon28-0.28.4 net-snmp-5.4.2.1_5 nmap-5.00
openldap-client-2.4.17 otrs-2.3.4 p5-Apache-DBI-mp2-1.06_1
p5-Apache-Test-1.30_1 p5-DBD-mysql50-4.012 p5-GnuPG-Interface-0.36_2
p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.27 p5-Net-SSLeay-1.35_1 p5-libapreq2-2.12_1
p5-perl-ldap-0.39 p5-subversion-1.6.4 pear-1.8.1 pear-Auth-1.6.1_1
pear-Auth_RADIUS-1.0.6 pear-Cache-1.5.5 pear-Crypt_CHAP-1.0.1
pear-DB-1.7.13,1 pear-Date-1.4.7 pear-File-1.3.0,2
pear-File_Archive-1.5.4 pear-File_Passwd-1.1.7 pear-File_SMBPasswd-1.0.3
pear-HTTP_Request-1.4.4 pear-Log-1.11.5 pear-MDB-1.3.0
pear-MDB2-2.5.0.b2 pear-MIME_Type-1.2.0 pear-Mail-1.2.0.b2
pear-Mail_Mime-1.5.2,2 pear-Mail_mimeDecode-1.5.0 pear-Net_DIME-1.0.1,1
pear-Net_FTP-1.3.7 pear-Net_POP3-1.3.7 pear-Net_SMTP-1.3.2
pear-Net_Socket-1.0.9 pear-Net_URL-1.0.15 pear-SOAP-0.12.0_1
pear-Services_Weather-1.4.4 pear-XML_Parser-1.3.2
pear-XML_Serializer-0.20.0 pear-XML_Util-1.2.1 pecl-fileinfo-1.0.4
pecl-pdflib-2.1.6_1 pecl-perl-1.0.0 pecl-radius-1.2.5 php5-5.2.10
php5-bcmath-5.2.10 php5-bz2-5.2.10 php5-calendar-5.2.10
php5-ctype-5.2.10 php5-curl-5.2.10 php5-dba-5.2.10 php5-dom-5.2.10
php5-exif-5.2.10 php5-extensions-1.3 php5-filter-5.2.10 php5-ftp-5.2.10
php5-gd-5.2.10 php5-gettext-5.2.10 php5-gmp-5.2.10 php5-hash-5.2.10
php5-iconv-5.2.10 php5-imap-5.2.10 php5-json-5.2.10 php5-ldap-5.2.10
php5-mbstring-5.2.10 php5-mcrypt-5.2.10 php5-mhash-5.2.10
php5-mysql-5.2.10 php5-mysqli-5.2.10 php5-openssl-5.2.10
php5-pcntl-5.2.10 php5-pcre-5.2.10 php5-pdo-5.2.10 php5-pdo_mysql-5.2.10
php5-pdo_sqlite-5.2.10 php5-posix-5.2.10 php5-readline-5.2.10
php5-session-5.2.10 php5-simplexml-5.2.10 php5-soap-5.2.10
php5-sockets-5.2.10 php5-spl-5.2.10 php5-sqlite-5.2.10
php5-tokenizer-5.2.10 php5-wddx-5.2.10 php5-xml-5.2.10
php5-xmlreader-5.2.10 php5-xmlrpc-5.2.10 php5-xmlwriter-5.2.10
php5-xsl-5.2.10 php5-zip-5.2.10 php5-zlib-5.2.10 pl-ekg-1.7_1,2
pl-libgadu-1.8.2_1,1 portupgrade-devel-2.4.6 py-subversion-1.6.4
py26-openssl-0.8_1 rt-3.8.4_1 ruby-1.8.7.160_4,1 ruby18-bdb-0.6.5_1
slrn-0.9.9p1 stunnel-4.27 subversion-1.6.4 teTeX-3.0_2 teTeX-base-3.0_16
trac-0.11.4 vorbis-tools-1.2.0_5,3 w3m-0.5.2_3 wget-1.11.4
xdvik-tetex-22.84.10_3

- May I recompile everything using the base openssl? What port does
*require* the security/openssl instead of base-openssl?

It seems: if a single ports *requires* security/openssl it gets
installed and every subsequent port compiling will favor 
security/openssl over /usr/*/openssl/

- Am I right here?

- Is this a local problem with my ports (missing updates)?

- Any pieces of advise?

TIA
Raphael Becker

-- 
Raphael Beckerhttp://rabe.uugrn.org/
 https://www.xing.com/profile/Raphael_Becker
GnuPG:E7B2 1D66 3AF2 EDC7 9828  6D7A 9CDA 3E7B 10CA 9F2D
.|.|.|.|.|.|.|..


pgp0VrZV5KD6m.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Status of security/openssl: Port marked as IGNORE: security/openssl is marked as broken: No patchset for 0.9.8

2009-09-08 Thread Matthew Seaman
Raphael Becker wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I wonder if there's no one since August 14th having trouble with the
> security/openssl ports. Since some weeks I get 
> 
> # portupgrade -p security/openssl
> ** Port marked as IGNORE: security/openssl:
> is marked as broken: No patchset for 0.9.8
> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
> - security/openssl (marked as IGNORE)

This only affects the port when you have the WITH_SCTP option selected.
Turn that off, and it works fine.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   Flat 3
  7 Priory Courtyard
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
  Kent, CT11 9PW, UK



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: boost-python-libs and associated compile errors -SOLVED

2009-09-08 Thread Alexander Churanov
David,

Thank you for the information. From my point of view, it's likely that
issues of building boost-python-libs are related to devel/pth and
libpthread-stubs-0.1. I'll try to examine that when I have time.

Alexander Churanov,
maintainer of devel/boost-*


2009/9/8 David Southwell :
> Bearing in mind my ignorance on how things actually work I am wondering if the
> problem I experienced had anything to do with gnupg. Its Makefile lists
> devel/pth under LIB_DEPENDS. Could this mean that devel/pth was automagically
> installed when gnupg was installed? You will see below I have also included
> output from pkg_info -rR gnupg-2.0.13 which shows it listed as required by
> gnome2.
>
> On my system I manually changed dependencies on pth to  libpthread-stubs-0.1.
>
> When you get a chance maybe you could take a look and let me know.
> David
>
> **
> # New ports collection makefile for:    gnupg
> # Date created:         Sep 30, 1998
> # Whom:                 kuriy...@freebsd.org
> #
> # $FreeBSD: ports/security/gnupg/Makefile,v 1.121 2009/09/05 15:22:50 kuriyama
> Exp $
> #
>
> PORTNAME=       gnupg
> PORTVERSION=    2.0.13
> CATEGORIES=     security
> MASTER_SITES=   ${MASTER_SITE_GNUPG}
> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=     gnupg
> DISTFILES=      ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}.sig
> EXTRACT_ONLY=   ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}
>
> MAINTAINER=     kuriy...@freebsd.org
> COMMENT=        The GNU Privacy Guard
>
> BUILD_DEPENDS=  libassuan>=1.0.4:${PORTSDIR}/security/libassuan \
>                libksba>=1.0.2:${PORTSDIR}/security/libksba
> LIB_DEPENDS=    gcrypt.16:${PORTSDIR}/security/libgcrypt \
>                gpg-error:${PORTSDIR}/security/libgpg-error \
>                ksba.17:${PORTSDIR}/security/libksba \
>                pth.20:${PORTSDIR}/devel/pth
>
> ***
> Then looking at gnome2
> As you can see from the dependency list gnome2 requires gnupg.  Maybe this is
> the route??
>
> When you get a chance maybe you could take a look.
>
> dns1# pkg_info -rR gnupg-2.0.13
> Information for gnupg-2.0.13:
>
> Depends on:
> Dependency: openssl-0.9.8k_3
> Dependency: libssh2-1.2,2
> Dependency: ca_root_nss-3.11.9_2
> Dependency: libpthread-stubs-0.1
> Dependency: pkg-config-0.23_1
> Dependency: libiconv-1.13.1
> Dependency: gettext-0.17_1
> Dependency: libidn-1.14
> Dependency: libgpg-error-1.7
> Dependency: libksba-1.0.7
> Dependency: libgcrypt-1.4.4
> Dependency: curl-7.19.6_1
> Required by:
> gnome2-2.26.3
> gpgme-1.2.0
> kdeartwork-4.3.1
> kdebase-4.3.1
> kdebase-runtime-4.3.1
> kdebase-workspace-4.3.1
> kdenetwork-4.3.1
> kdepim-4.3.1
> kdepim-runtime-4.3.1
> kdepimlibs-4.3.1
> kdesdk-4.3.1
> kdetoys-4.3.1
> seahorse-2.26.2_2
> seahorse-plugins-2.26.2_2
> tin-1.8.3_4
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 6

2009-09-08 Thread Danny Braniss
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> > [...]
> >   
>  ok, so some time has passed, but virtualbox-2.2.51r20457.tar.gz is no
>  longer available, there is a
>  ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/virtualbox-2.2.51r20457.tar.bz2
>  then again in ports/emulatores/virtualbox the version is 3.0.51r6,
> 
>  can someone please explain?
>  
> >
> > hi, the above was my question, which was totally ignored, not nice.
> > I will try and refrase it:
> > the call for testing is for a version (2.2.51r20457) which is not 
> > available, while
> > the ports is 3.0.51r6, so while I managed to compile it, it complains 
> > that COM
> > is not running, all this under 8BETA-3, both under 32 and 64 bit.
> > thnaks,
> > danny
> >
> >   
> The call for testing went out on 11th june
> (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-June/008061.html)  
> I can only assume it was considered tested and working as the port was
> committed on 15th june
> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/emulators/virtualbox/Makefile?rev=1.1;content-type=text%2Fplain)
> 
> Since then there have been 4 updates to the port. The last of which
> updated it to 3.0.51r6 on august 14th.
> 
> I would say the call for testing is no longer valid, please use the
> version in ports.

thank you, and all those involved!
danny


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


x11-fm/xfe dependencies

2009-09-08 Thread Jim Brooks
Hi,

xfe doesn't depend on GNOME.
I tested removing this line from Makefile
and compiled/ran successfully without GNOME:

< USE_GNOME= gnomehack gnometarget
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: portmaster is not always recursive

2009-09-08 Thread Doug Barton
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> And now I have one problem on topic with recursive update.
> 
> There were about 50 available updates, but I want to update just p5
> modules for Amavis / SpamAssassin. In this case -a + -i is not so useful
> option nor +IGNOREME.

There was already a discussion earlier in this thread about the -t
option which I think would have done the job for you here. You could
also have done 'portmaster -i p5' which should also have done it with
a minimum of fuss.

> All in all, portmaster is the best ports management tool for me and this
> minor problems I have will not change it :)

Thank you again for the kind words. :)


Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


security/engine_pkcs11 unable to use it

2009-09-08 Thread Mel Flynn
Hi,

after installing security/engine_pkcs11, I'm unable to use it.

As per http://www.opensc-project.org/engine_pkcs11/wiki/QuickStart I've 
modified my /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf, yet:
% openssl req -config /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf -engine pkcs11 -new -key id_45 -
keyform engine -out req.pem -text -x509 -subj "/CN=Foo Bar"
invalid engine "pkcs11"
18730:error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared 
library:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dso/dso_dlfcn.c:162:filename(/usr/lib/engines/libpkcs11.so):
 
Cannot open "/usr/lib/engines/libpkcs11.so"
18730:error:25070067:DSO support routines:DSO_load:could not load the shared 
library:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dso/dso_lib.c:244:
18730:error:260B6084:engine routines:DYNAMIC_LOAD:dso not 
found:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/engine/eng_dyn.c:450:
18730:error:2606A074:engine routines:ENGINE_by_id:no such 
engine:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/engine/eng_list.c:415:id=pkcs11
18730:error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared 
library:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dso/dso_dlfcn.c:162:filename(libpkcs11.so):
 
Shared object "libpkcs11.so" not found, required by "openssl"
18730:error:25070067:DSO support routines:DSO_load:could not load the shared 
library:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dso/dso_lib.c:244:
18730:error:260B6084:engine routines:DYNAMIC_LOAD:dso not 
found:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/engine/eng_dyn.c:450:
no engine specified
unable to load Private Key

Also, the file referenced on the quickstart page opensc-pkcs11.so is not 
installed by the port.

Probably the weirdest thing is that I see no evidence of openssl understanding 
the configuration variables, meaning not looking in /usr/local/lib.

For completeness:
openssl.cnf changes:
engines = engine_section

[engine_section]
pkcs11  = pkcs11_section

[pkcs11_section]
engine_id   = pkcs11
dynamic_path= /usr/local/lib/engines/engine_pkcs11.so
init= 0

uname -a
FreeBSD smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net 8.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 8.0-BETA4 #14 
r196875M: Mon Sep  7 18:00:45 CEST 2009 m...@smoochies.rachie.is-a-
geek.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HPDV9000  i386

openssl version (base):
OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009

How would one get this engine recognized and working and could this 
information be added to a pkg-message?
-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: {incorrect,unsafe} use of UNZIP_CMD

2009-09-08 Thread Wesley Shields
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> d...@tim /usr/ports% find . -mindepth 3 -type f -name Makefile | xargs grep 
> 'DEPEND.*UNZIP' /dev/null
> ./audio/libamrnb/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS=
> ${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./audio/libamrwb/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS=
> ${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./databases/pgtcl/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS=   
> ${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./emulators/xgs/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=   
> ${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/pykawari/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./lang/f2c/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> 
> This will fail if the user redefines UNZIP_CMD to e.g. "unzip -v".

I just fixed these. Thanks for noticing. The rest of these are not fatal
errors but should eventually be cleaned up. If nobody gets to this
before me I will get to it in a week or two, or after the freeze if
necessary.

-- WXS

> all of these should just set USE_ZIP:
> 
> d...@tim /usr/ports% find . -mindepth 3 -type f -name Makefile | xargs egrep 
> 'EXTRACT_DEPENDS.*(UNZIP|unzip)' /dev/null
> ./cad/leocad/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./deskutils/superkaramba-lwp/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=  
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./devel/tavrasm/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./emulators/xgs/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=   
> ${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./emulators/m2000/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./emulators/vmsbackup/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/cgoban2/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/openarena/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/pykawari/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/sdb/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/ezquake/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip \
> ./games/ufoai-data/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/quake-data/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=   
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/quake-extras/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= 
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/tremor/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/doomlegacy/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/uhexen/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/kmquake2/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./games/galaxyhack/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=   
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./hungarian/hunspell/Makefile:#EXTRACT_DEPENDS= 
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./japanese/edict-utf-8/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./japanese/tomoe/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= 
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./java/diablo-jdk15/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./java/diablo-jdk16/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./java/diablo-jre15/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./java/diablo-jre16/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=  
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./java/sun-wtk/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=   
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./lang/f2c/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=${UNZIP_CMD}:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./sysutils/memtest86/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=  
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./textproc/fop/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=   
> unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> ./www/mambo/Makefile:EXTRACT_DEPENDS=   unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> 
> So should these:
> 
> d...@tim /usr/ports% find . -mindepth 3 -type f -name Makefile | xargs egrep 
> 'EXTRACT_CMD.*(UNZIP|unzip)' /dev/null
> ./deskutils/superkaramba-lwp/Makefile:EXTRACT_CMD=  ${UNZIP_CMD}
> ./games/pykawari/Makefile:EXTRACT_CMD=  ${UNZIP_CMD}
> ./misc/projectionlib/Makefile:EXTRACT_CMD=  unzip -a
> 
> java/jdk14 is just...  weird.  I won't paste the Makefile here.
> 
> DES
> -- 
> Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav - d...@des.no
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: x11-fm/xfe dependencies

2009-09-08 Thread Jeremy Messenger

On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:20:47 -0500, Jim Brooks  wrote:


Hi,

xfe doesn't depend on GNOME.
I tested removing this line from Makefile
and compiled/ran successfully without GNOME:


No... To have USE_GNOME does NOT means that it depends on GNOME. Explain  
us why you think so?


Cheers,
Mezz


< USE_GNOME= gnomehack gnometarget



--
me...@cox.net  -  m...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gn...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"