visit dhis baners
[1]Musicload [2]First Affair - Erotische Abenteuer & Seitensprünge [3]www.s-partnerclub.de [4]C-Date your casual dating site [5]Liebe.de - Die Datingplattform [6]Erotikabenteuer gesucht? Dann kommen sie zu LOVEPOINT.de [7]PARSHIP.de - Die Online Partneragentur [8]girls.parship.de [9]StayFriends - Die Freundesuchmaschine [10]Das groÃe iPhone Gewinnspiel [11]Hummer Gewinnspiel [12]Spanien Gewinnspiel References 1. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=3752&type=b74&bnb=74 2. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=3211&type=b8&bnb=8 3. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5615&type=b18&bnb=18 4. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5597&type=b16&bnb=16 5. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5704&type=b14&bnb=14 6. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=623&type=b50&bnb=50 7. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=3629&type=b1&bnb=1 8. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=4150&type=b9&bnb=9 9. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=3735&type=b33&bnb=33 10. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5671&type=b101&bnb=101 11. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5567&type=b10&bnb=10 12. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5566&type=b9&bnb=9 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
visit dhis baners
[1]Musicload [2]First Affair - Erotische Abenteuer & Seitensprünge [3]www.s-partnerclub.de [4]C-Date your casual dating site [5]Liebe.de - Die Datingplattform [6]Erotikabenteuer gesucht? Dann kommen sie zu LOVEPOINT.de [7]PARSHIP.de - Die Online Partneragentur [8]girls.parship.de [9]StayFriends - Die Freundesuchmaschine [10]Das groÃe iPhone Gewinnspiel [11]Hummer Gewinnspiel [12]Spanien Gewinnspiel References 1. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=3752&type=b74&bnb=74 2. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=3211&type=b8&bnb=8 3. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5615&type=b18&bnb=18 4. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5597&type=b16&bnb=16 5. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5704&type=b14&bnb=14 6. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=623&type=b50&bnb=50 7. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=3629&type=b1&bnb=1 8. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=4150&type=b9&bnb=9 9. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=3735&type=b33&bnb=33 10. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5671&type=b101&bnb=101 11. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5567&type=b10&bnb=10 12. http://partners.webmasterplan.com/click.asp?ref=480282&site=5566&type=b9&bnb=9 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: lang/gcc42 without gfortran
Even in newest version of lang/gcc42 from 03/11/09 'gfortran' is not
integrated any more. Is it possible to incorporate fortran again? Below
there are two diffs needed to patch for this.
Thanks, Rainer
diff -urBN Makefile_orig Makefile
--- Makefile_orig 2009-03-14 20:38:32.0 +0100
+++ Makefile2009-03-15 10:21:10.0 +0100
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=snapshots/${VERSIONSTRING}
DISTFILES= gcc-core-${VERSIONSTRING}${EXTRACT_SUFX} \
gcc-g++-${VERSIONSTRING}${EXTRACT_SUFX} \
+ gcc-fortran-${VERSIONSTRING}${EXTRACT_SUFX} \
gcc-objc-${VERSIONSTRING}${EXTRACT_SUFX}
MAINTAINER?= ger...@freebsd.org
@@ -68,12 +69,14 @@
MAN1= cpp${SUFFIX}.1 \
g++${SUFFIX}.1 \
gcc${SUFFIX}.1 \
+ gfortran${SUFFIX}.1 \
gcov${SUFFIX}.1
INFO= gcc${SUFFIX}/cpp \
gcc${SUFFIX}/cppinternals \
gcc${SUFFIX}/gcc \
gcc${SUFFIX}/gccinstall \
gcc${SUFFIX}/gccint \
+ gcc${SUFFIX}/gfortran \
gcc${SUFFIX}/libgomp
.if ! defined(WITHOUT_JAVA)
diff -urBN distinfo_orig distinfo
--- distinfo_orig 2009-03-14 20:38:32.0 +0100
+++ distinfo2009-03-15 10:25:38.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+MD5 (gcc-fortran-4.2-20090311.tar.bz2) = 28552b9ddca405ab9271227c432e73fa
+SHA256 (gcc-fortran-4.2-20090311.tar.bz2) =
34822036b6557bb14f40460bbe61b4247f51b8ea848e80a101310d58a2785c70
+SIZE (gcc-fortran-4.2-20090311.tar.bz2) = 911825
MD5 (gcc-core-4.2-20090311.tar.bz2) = 2eeed23822bd9c65b8107d0094b9572f
SHA256 (gcc-core-4.2-20090311.tar.bz2) =
991bdac20976c2043169c9aa117f900ad17efaf41d754ebeb7a202d37f19e5eb
SIZE (gcc-core-4.2-20090311.tar.bz2) = 16063055
On 22.02.2009 10:52 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote:
After upgrading to latest lang/gcc42 I found that there is no gfortran
any more.
Comparing the Makefiles of the ports lang/gcc42 and lang/gcc43 shows
that it had been removed. Was this intentional?
I need version 4.2.xx of gfortran for programs like math/R etc. Is it
possible to integrate it again in the port?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD Port: kde-lite-3.5.10_1
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:40:59 +0100, anonymous wrote: > Hi. > > AFAIK, kde-lite port aims to be free of KDE secondary stuff, providing > clean base KDE workaround. For today there is pretty stable KDE4 > workaround. Are there any plans to make KDE4 lite port? x11/kde4 meta port allows you to install what you want. For minimal kde4 installation just unset all optional dependencies. Max ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Songbird
Alexey Golodov wrote: > As you will have any free time, please, think about creation of port > for Songbird - Mozilla Audio Player. I have a Makefile ready for this but I'm waiting for Boris's update to the new linux-GTK. > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- Eitan Adler "Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave." -Jakob Nielsen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Songbird
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:01:03 -0400 Eitan Adler wrote: > Alexey Golodov wrote: > > As you will have any free time, please, think about creation of port > > for Songbird - Mozilla Audio Player. > I have a Makefile ready for this but I'm waiting for Boris's update to > the new linux-GTK. I opened a PR to do an exp-run with new linux ports infrastructure. There should be no changes to existing linux ports -- only should infrastructure change. But this infrastructure should give an opportunity to have both linux-fc4 and linux-f8 ports at the ports tree. As soon as those patches are exp-runned and committed I'm going to go further (introduce linux-f8 ports). Thanks for your patience. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: lang/gcc42 without gfortran
jdp has not been working in this area for quite some time. gerald and maho appear to be doing all the fortran support these days. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: lang/gcc42 without gfortran
I found out this for myself right after sending the mail to jdp and for that reason posted it offlist to gerald. Thank you for the hint, Rainer On 15.03.2009 23:05 (UTC+1), Mark Linimon wrote: jdp has not been working in this area for quite some time. gerald and maho appear to be doing all the fortran support these days. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Port Request: gluster
Hi, Paul! I'm working on it for quite a while, but still there are some rough edges. What is your user experience with it? With regards, Timur. On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Pathiakis, Paul wrote: > Hi to all! > > Has anything progressed on this? > > I'm actually building it by hand on a couple of 7.1 machines. I expect > it will be interesting. > > I still look forward to the port. :-) > > Thank you! > > Paul Pathiakis > UNIX/Linux Systems Engineer > Iron Mountain Digital > 120 Turnpike Rd. > Southborough, MA 01772 > > > Microsoft - Where do you want to go today? > Linux - Where do you want to go tomorrow? > FreeBSD - Will you guys come on already? > > > -Original Message- > From: Jim Riggs [mailto:po...@christianserving.org] > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:31 PM > To: David N > Cc: Pathiakis, Paul; po...@freebsd.org; Steven Kreuzer > Subject: Re: Port Request: gluster > > On 02/20/2009 11:40, David N wrote: >> 2009/2/21 Pathiakis, Paul: >>> Steven, >>> >>> I'm going to start testing it in a pre-production environment. It > seems >>> so straightforward, integrates with ZFS, it has simple configuration >>> files, all around, I'm hoping that it garners more >>> clustering/replication for FreeBSD. Many of the other solutions are >>> quite tedious and setup complexity is quite annoying. >>> >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Steven Kreuzer [mailto:ste...@hudson-trading.com] On Behalf Of >>> Steven Kreuzer >>> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:30 AM >>> To: Pathiakis, Paul >>> Cc: po...@freebsd.org >>> Subject: Re: Port Request: gluster >>> >>> >>> On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Pathiakis, Paul wrote: >>> Hi, I'd like to request that the gluster clustering/filesystem software > be ported and supported. This looks to be a very simple, > straightforward and viable clustering solution which FreeBSD has always lacked. >>> This looks like a very interesting project. I might be able to take >>> some time >>> over the weekend and create a port for this. >>> >>> Out of curiosity, have you been using it in production? If so, can > you >>> describe your setup >>> and your experience with it? >>> >>> Steven Kreuzer >>> http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer >>> >> Looks promising >> http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/GlusterFS_on_BSD > > > Several weeks ago I actually created a port for glusterfs as I was > hoping to implement it myself. I'll have to see if I saved any of my > work. I actually had a working port, but I may have dumped it. I will > be happy to submit it if I can find it. I just don't know that I will > be able to maintain it. > > A couple of notes from what I found: > > 1. It does not yet integrate with FreeBSD's implementation of ZFS (at > least not in 7.x) due to the lack of ACL support. You can use it with a > UFS partition or a UFS zvol. (Using a zvol requires a patch pjd@ > recommended for performance improvements.) > > 2. Performance in my setup was not very good over 2x1Gb LAGG. It might > be better over a faster, dedicated channel of some type. > > - Jim > > > The information contained in this email message and its attachments > is intended > only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named > above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission > of email over the Internet > is not a secure communications medium. If you are requesting or > have requested > the transmittal of personal data, as defined in applicable privacy > laws by means > of email or in an attachment to email you must select a more > secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your > obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this > message is not the intended recipient and/or you have received this > email in error, you must take no action based on the information in > this email and you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > misuse, copying, or disclosure of this communication is strictly > prohibited. If you have received > this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email > and delete the original message. > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: lang/gcc42 without gfortran
Hi Rainer (I'm not a maintainer of gcc ports...), We migrated to gcc43 so all ports will use gcc43 instead of gcc42. Now math/R uses gcc43 (via USE_FORTRAN=yes), I think we don't have a problem. If you have further questions please let us know. Best regards, From: Rainer Hurling Subject: Re: lang/gcc42 without gfortran Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:41:57 +0100 > On 22.02.2009 10:52 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote: >> After upgrading to latest lang/gcc42 I found that there is no gfortran >> any more. >> Comparing the Makefiles of the ports lang/gcc42 and lang/gcc43 shows >> that it had been removed. Was this intentional? >> I need version 4.2.xx of gfortran for programs like math/R etc. Is it >> possible to integrate it again in the port? -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/ Nakata Maho's PGP public keys: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt pgpwMWfTiUyFU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: lang/gcc42 without gfortran
> After upgrading to latest lang/gcc42 I found that there is no gfortran > any more. > > Comparing the Makefiles of the ports lang/gcc42 and lang/gcc43 shows > that it had been removed. Was this intentional? > > I need version 4.2.xx of gfortran for programs like math/R etc. Is it > possible to integrate it again in the port? There was some discussion of this at the time of the changes to bsd.gcc.mk, when WITH_FORTRAN was switched to use gfortran43 by default. gerald@'s point of view, as I understand it, was that it was better to only use the latest stable version of gfortran in ports, because that means he would have to spend less time maintaining all of the other versions, and for the majority of users the latest stable version would be an improvement upon the other versions. If you think that there is a compelling need to reintroduce one or more of the earlier versions, then maybe you can persuade him to do so, at least as an OPTION. Otherwise, I guess you're stuck using a locally modified ports tree, which isn't all that inconvenient for a few ports if you go about it in the right way. Regards, b. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
www / p5-HTML-Embperl
presently p5-HTML-Embperl in the ports is at 1.3.6_2 however it is marked as "will not compile". The main website for Embperl shows a much newer stable version (2.2.0) Is there any way someone (more clever than myself) could get this newer version to compile in the ports system? I would very much appreciate it. Thanks! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
