Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles
In , Garrett Cooper wrote: On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: It's not like your proposal is bad, ports instantaneously tracking upstream changes and not needing maintainers would really be cool, but unfortunately that's practically impossible. Some software projects are switching over to this kind of a model, like glibc. What kind of model ? You mean using repositories instead of release tarballs, hmm..? -- Ashish Shukla pgpWV5NKyVVmz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:09 AM, आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla wrote: > In , Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: >> >>> It's not like your proposal is bad, ports instantaneously tracking >>> upstream changes and not needing maintainers would really be cool, >>> but unfortunately that's practically impossible. >> >> Some software projects are switching over to this kind of a model, like >> glibc. > > What kind of model ? You mean using repositories instead of release > tarballs, hmm..? Exactly. -Garrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Possibly unbuildable ports reminder
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with build problems is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/po...@freebsd.org.html Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. Thanks for your help! Bill "annoying port email" Fenner ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Source-upgrading FreeBSD "breaks" postfix+dovecot?
Tonight I source-upgraded a FreeBSD system from i386 6.3p5 to i386 6.4-R. I have postfix 2.5.5 and dovecot 1.1.7 installed with postfix using dovecot for SASL and dovecot LDA for mailbox delivery. After installing 6.4-R, postfix refused to work until I recompiled and reinstalled both it and dovecot. Dovecot itself (i.e., the IMAP server) worked fine. Postfix worked fine if I set smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=no and defer_transports=dovecot, effectively preventing postfix from using any dovecot bits. Examples of the logged errors: Before reinstalling anything: postfix/pipe[36617]: fatal: get_service_attr: unknown group: vmail postfix/qmgr[36614]: warning: private/dovecot socket: malformed response private/dovecot is the socket dovecot creates for SMTP AUTH. After recompiling and reinstalling just postfix: postfix/pipe[36755]: warning: unexpected end-of-input from dovecot socket while reading input attribute name postfix/pipe[36755]: warning: deliver_request_get: error receiving common attributes postfix/smtpd[36771]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms This doesn't happen reliably so I've had little luck finding a cause. Searching on the error logs didn't yield any useful results. Does anyone else experience this? Does anyone know the cause? postconf -n and other configuration details available on request. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles
Dmitry Marakasov writes: > * Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल (wahjava...@gmail.com) wrote: >> > No. If there's DESTDIR, you don't need to log writes to it, as you >> > can just use `find` to see what's there after installation as in >> > quote below. The idea is that if we log all writes to the fulesystem >> > during port installation, we don't need intermediate directory at >> > all. >> >> Okay, so if we go with your approach, then can you tell me how do you >> plan to go about logging writes to filesystem with your .so which you're >> planning to preload as you mentioned in one of your mails in this thread ? > The idea is to redefine functions that execute syscalls which will > modify the filesystem add add loging there. Here's a test code > http://www.amdmi3.ru/files/ldpreload.c. Compile it into shared lib > and run `LD_PRELOAD=path_to_lib.so someapp`. Cool, this works great :) . > It turned out to be not the best solution as it relies on environment > heavily, and some apps may clear the environment (scons does this > by default), or call syscalls via syscall(), instead of libc wrapper, > thus it's not reliable enough. > Another way is ptrace, which should intercept syscalls without fail. So, we're going with ptrace way, lets hope this way is foolproof :) . Thanks -- Ashish Shukla pgp4YUYqe8cYg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Where are the java/jdk16 files?
hello, world\n i grabbed the latest ports.tar.gz and "make fetch" in java/jdk16 tells me [...] Please open http://download.java.net/jdk6/6u3/promoted/b05/index.html in a web browser. Download the Update 3 Source, jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar and the Source Binaries, jdk-6u3-fcs-bin-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar and the Mozilla Headers, jdk-6u3-fcs-mozilla_headers-b05-unix-24_sep_2007.jar . [...] I can't find these files on that page. I surfed around half of download.java.net to find them elsewhere. No joy. Please hit me with the clue bat. :-) No, I'm not in a country where the paragraph at the page bottom applies: "International Use Restrictions - Due to limited intellectual property protection and enforcement in certain countries, the JDK source code may only be distributed to an authorized list of countries. You will not be able to access the source code if you are downloading from a country that is not on this list. We are continuously reviewing this list for addition of other countries." Even from freefall the page looks the same... Regards, Jens -- Jens Schweikhardt http://www.schweikhardt.net/ SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Where are the java/jdk16 files?
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:38:31AM +1100, Some Dude wrote: # do a google search for the exact name of the first file, then click on # the cached page that'll show the sources and links Thanks, dude ;-) That was exactly what I a minuta after sending to the list. But still, it appears that someone messed up the download page with the wrong contents. It's all java binary packages when the page is supposed to contain src jars (as it is still the case for the google-cached page; man, I love the google cache!). I ended up on the very same page from other links saying "Source". My intention is to bring this to the port maintainer's attention (Cc'd). Maybe they know a contact at Sun to fix the page contents. Regards, Jens -- Jens Schweikhardt http://www.schweikhardt.net/ SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
APNG patch for graphics/png port
Hello,
I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works
pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable
using the system versions of a number of libraries, rather than relying
upon statically linking them into the project.
One thing that I noticed was the APNG patch from here:
* http://littlesvr.ca/apng/.
This seems to be expected by Thunderbird and is part of the latest
source tree. Mozilla has been maintaining a format spec here:
* https://wiki.mozilla.org/APNG_Specification
Sadly the patch has lagged behind the latest releases of libpng. I
merged the patch into the latest version (1.2.33) that we use, and have
made an appropriate change to the port files of graphics/png. I think
that APNG support from libpng may be useful in other software as well.
I am attaching the patch, to apply in /usr/ports, for anyone to test. So
far it doesn't seem to regress anything for me, and I can use
thunderbird 3 with --with-system-png=/usr/local in my .mozconfig. I'd
like to see some other testers, and get a comment from the graphics/png
maintainer.
--
Coleman Kane
--- graphics/png/Makefile
+++ graphics/png/Makefile
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
PORTNAME= png
PORTVERSION= 1.2.33
+PORTREVISION= 1
CATEGORIES= graphics
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= lib${PORTNAME}
@@ -34,8 +35,15 @@ MAN3= libpng.3 libpngpf.3
MAN5= png.5
MANCOMPRESSED= maybe
+OPTIONS= APNG "Enable APNG Support" on
+
.include
+.if defined(WITH_APNG)
+PATCH_SITES= http://people.FreeBSD.org/~cokane/patches/
+PATCHFILES+= libpng-apng.patch
+.endif
+
post-extract:
# Please don't delete the following line - this link used by ghostscript* ports
@${LN} -sf ${WRKSRC} ${WRKDIR}/libpng
--- graphics/png/distinfo
+++ graphics/png/distinfo
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
MD5 (libpng-1.2.33.tar.bz2) = 0532c28ba1b17ee2095ad50731c2c75c
SHA256 (libpng-1.2.33.tar.bz2) = af3a8150fedaf3ea561c10c59fa828f71f732ade06e3f3d13fa453629c470800
SIZE (libpng-1.2.33.tar.bz2) = 651555
+MD5 (libpng-apng.patch) = fb1696d9e16d7813a1e7410ad1649612
+SHA256 (libpng-apng.patch) = f406d7899aeac2d3e634b14b98dbb53f2b671265d711f564eaf380ae37048fbc
+SIZE (libpng-apng.patch) = 54713
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Where are the java/jdk16 files?
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 05:36:08PM +0100, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:38:31AM +1100, Some Dude wrote: > # do a google search for the exact name of the first file, then click on > # the cached page that'll show the sources and links > > Thanks, dude ;-) > > That was exactly what I a minuta after sending to the list. But still, > it appears that someone messed up the download page with the wrong > contents. It's all java binary packages when the page is supposed to > contain src jars (as it is still the case for the google-cached page; > man, I love the google cache!). I ended up on the very same page from > other links saying "Source". My intention is to bring this to the port > maintainer's attention (Cc'd). Maybe they know a contact at Sun to fix > the page contents. > > Regards, > > Jens just a footnote: after _years_ of poking around sun's links, i finally tried google. and YES. "god bless mommy and daddy, godbless google-cache... ." -g > -- > Jens Schweikhardt http://www.schweikhardt.net/ > SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped) > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 2.12a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: APNG patch for graphics/png port
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 01:22:34PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote: > One thing that I noticed was the APNG patch from here: > * http://littlesvr.ca/apng/. > This seems to be expected by Thunderbird and is part of the latest > source tree. Mozilla has been maintaining a format spec here: > * https://wiki.mozilla.org/APNG_Specification It should be either accepted by libpng developers (and this way appears in the png port automatically) or separate slave apng port should be made. Porter is poor replacement for developer, especially considering lots of security holes libpng long history. -- http://ache.pp.ru/ pgpWPG1erfVMt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Problem using GNU autotools
Hi, I'm in trouble updating a port. The configuration / compilation and install manually from the console works fine. When I try to integrate it in a port Makefile, some "configure" scripts fail whit this message : [...] configure: warning: build_alias=amd64-portbld-freebsd6.3: invalid host type configure: error: can only configure for one host and one target at a time [...] As I can see this is caused by configuration scrpts generated by 2 versions of autoconf (2.13 and 2.61), who doesn't handle the same options. Looking inside the subdirectories I discover few Makefine.am or config.ac, but not all are in. So I can't use the alternative way to generate the makefiles... It looks weird, but how can I handle this properly ? - I remember you ./configure without options works fine - Cheers, Rodrigo OSORIO ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: APNG patch for graphics/png port
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 02:28 +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 01:22:34PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote: > > One thing that I noticed was the APNG patch from here: > > * http://littlesvr.ca/apng/. > > This seems to be expected by Thunderbird and is part of the latest > > source tree. Mozilla has been maintaining a format spec here: > > * https://wiki.mozilla.org/APNG_Specification > > It should be either accepted by libpng developers (and this way appears in > the png port automatically) or separate slave apng port should be made. > Porter is poor replacement for developer, especially considering lots of > security holes libpng long history. > That is a good point, though the author of libpng suggests the MNG format for animated graphics (and JNG as a jpeg version). This leads me to believe that he's probably uninterested in actually incorporating the APNG patch into libpng. Honestly, I don't understand why the mozilla people have decided to push this APNG standard now. Maybe I'll just go and post into that mozilla issue a complain about wasting development time on an unfinished spec that seems like a reimplementation of MNG. I'll write to Greg (author) and see what he says. This is one of those annoying points in software evolution where big entity A begins spreading around a patched version of Author B's software, which may end up rivaling Author B's implementation of the patch's functionality. -- Coleman Kane signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Most Pager
FreeBSD home19.hsd1.in.comcast.net 7.0-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p6 #0: Mon Nov 24 06:43:33 UTC 2008 r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Hello everyone. My most pager stopped working properly a few minutes ago. I do not recall changing any settings. The problem is occurring with how it renders colors; I have specified in my mostrc that text be highlighted in green; however, most renders everything in black and white. Does anyone know how to remedy this; it was working fine a few hours ago. -- -- Best, David Karapetyan http://davidkarapetyan.homeunix.com University of Notre Dame Department of Mathematics 255 Hurley Hall Notre Dame, IN 46556-4618 Phone: 574-631-5706 Cell: 202-460-5173 Fax: 574-631-6579 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Most Pager
On Monday 15 December 2008 04:58:11 David Karapetyan wrote: > FreeBSD home19.hsd1.in.comcast.net 7.0-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD > 7.0-RELEASE-p6 #0: Mon Nov 24 06:43:33 UTC 2008 > r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > Hello everyone. My most pager stopped working properly a few minutes > ago. I do not recall changing any settings. The problem is occurring > with how it renders colors; I have specified in my mostrc that text be > highlighted in green; however, most renders everything in black and > white. Does anyone know how to remedy this; it was working fine a few > hours ago. Is your TERMCAP environment set (correctly)? -- /"\ Best regards, | mla...@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mla...@efnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: APNG patch for graphics/png port
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane wrote: Hello, I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable using the system versions of a number of libraries, rather than relying upon statically linking them into the project. We should keep compile static link, because PNG folks disapprove Mozilla's APNG patch. It's what we did with Firefox 3. Cheers, Mezz One thing that I noticed was the APNG patch from here: * http://littlesvr.ca/apng/. This seems to be expected by Thunderbird and is part of the latest source tree. Mozilla has been maintaining a format spec here: * https://wiki.mozilla.org/APNG_Specification Sadly the patch has lagged behind the latest releases of libpng. I merged the patch into the latest version (1.2.33) that we use, and have made an appropriate change to the port files of graphics/png. I think that APNG support from libpng may be useful in other software as well. I am attaching the patch, to apply in /usr/ports, for anyone to test. So far it doesn't seem to regress anything for me, and I can use thunderbird 3 with --with-system-png=/usr/local in my .mozconfig. I'd like to see some other testers, and get a comment from the graphics/png maintainer. -- me...@cox.net - m...@freebsd.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
