Re: CFT: astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced update
2008/11/17 Rene Ladan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Rene Ladan schreef: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a patch[1] ready for the astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced port to >> update it to 6.03 (which is the same as 5.27 but with the science and >> graphics code separated), and to add astropulse 4.28 (same as 4.35, but >> the version number never got updated in SVN) to it. >> >> To test it, download the patch and replace the contents of >> /usr/ports/astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced with the contents of the >> patch. >> >> It builds on my 7.0-RELEASE amd64 box, but the resulting astropulse >> binary crashes at startup. This might have something to do with a >> polluted source directory for the setiathome part, as the source code >> for astropulse borrows from the setiathome source code. I have an >> astropulse test work unit available. >> >> The port fails to build on a 7.1-BETA2 i386 box at work. At some point >> during the configuration of astropulse, configure complains about a bad >> fd number (gurus around?). This happens both with the regenerated >> configure script and with the original one (remove './_autosetup' from >> line 78 of the Makefile). >> >> Thanks for any ideas, >> Rene >> >> [1] : ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/boinc-setiathome-enhanced.tar.bz2 > > The source tarballs have been updated to SVN revision 358, the new > metadata for [1] is: > > SIZE : 2741 > MD5 : 265e353910a82678caf6a908f793cfdb In this version astropulse also crashes at runtime (the binary remained the same as before) on my 7.0R amd64 box, the build still crashes during configure on the 7.1-BETA2 i386 box at work. Rene -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: INDEX has lower version of ports than installed ones
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:59:47AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > When you update your ports via csup (not sure about portsnap), the INDEX > file **is not** updated. portsnap does update the index. -- Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
games/traindirector: Help reproduce problem on AMD
Hi! QAT reported me a problem with my port on AMD64. here is the report: http://t64.tecnik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/traindirector-3.5.log I tried it on my machines but I can't see any problem on i386, it looks like and AMD64 problem. Could someone with some amd64 hardware help me a little? I'd like to know, if you have wxgtk installed, what it is installing exactly, could someone send me the +CONTENTS file for the wxgtk2-unicode-* package? I have the required lib here on i386, perhaps amd64 is naming it differently or something. Thanks in advance for any help. -- Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not.
How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
Makefile:
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
@${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/doc/cmucl/* ${DOCSDIR}
.endif
pkg-plist:
%%DOCSDIR%%/README
%%DOCSDIR%%/release-19c.txt
Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200:
> Hi,
>
>
> The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
> 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
> and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
> following vars set:
> NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_PACKAGE=yes.
>
> The build of this port was tried 6 times since last BotMail
> (probably while trying to build ports that depend on it).
>
> Excerpt from http://T64.TecNik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/cmucl-19c.log :
>
>
> building cmucl-19c in directory /var/tinderbox/7-STABLE-FTP
> maintained by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> building for: 7.0-STABLE amd64
> port directory: /usr/ports/lang/cmucl
> Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/lang/cmucl/Makefile,v 1.31 2007/10/04
> 01:25:15 edwin Exp $
> prefixes: LOCALBASE=usr/local X11BASE=usr/local
> NO* env vars: NOPORTDOCS=yes NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes NOPORTDATA=yes
> build started at Sun Nov 16 04:52:37 UTC 2008
>
> ...
>
>
> ===> cmucl-19c depends on shared library: c.4 - found
> ===> Configuring for cmucl-19c
>
>
> make: don't know how to make regression-test(continuing)
>
>
> add_pkg localedata-5.4.tbz compat4x-i386-5.3_9.tbz
> adding dependencies
> pkg_add localedata-5.4.tbz
> skipping localedata-5.4, already added
> pkg_add compat4x-i386-5.3_9.tbz
> skipping compat4x-i386-5.3_9, already added
> ===> Installing for cmucl-19c
> ===> cmucl-19c depends on shared library: c.4 - found
> ===> Generating temporary packing list
> ===> Checking if lang/cmucl already installed
> install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 /work/a/ports/lang/cmucl/work/bin/lisp
> /usr/local/bin
> cd /work/a/ports/lang/cmucl/work && /usr/bin/find lib | /usr/bin/cpio -pdm
> -L -R root:wheel /usr/local
> 48081 blocks
> install -o root -g wheel -m 444
> /work/a/ports/lang/cmucl/work/man/man1/cmucl.1 /usr/local/man/man1
> install -o root -g wheel -m 444
> /work/a/ports/lang/cmucl/work/man/man1/lisp.1 /usr/local/man/man1
> ===> Compressing manual pages for cmucl-19c
> ===> Registering installation for cmucl-19c
>
>
> ===> Building package for cmucl-19c
> tar: share/doc/cmucl/README: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
> tar: share/doc/cmucl/release-19c.txt: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
> tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.
> pkg_create: make_dist: tar command failed with code 256
> Creating package /tmp/packages/All/cmucl-19c.tbz
> Registering depends: compat4x-i386-5.3_9 localedata-5.4.
> Creating bzip'd tar ball in '/tmp/packages/All/cmucl-19c.tbz'
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /a/ports/lang/cmucl.
>
> build of /usr/ports/lang/cmucl ended at Sun Nov 16 04:52:55 UTC 2008
>
>
> A description of the testing process can be found here:
> http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/
>
>
> Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better,
>
> --
> IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
> "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
> FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
--
%%%
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:05:28AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
>
> The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not.
>
> How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
>
> Makefile:
> .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
> @${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}
> ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/doc/cmucl/* ${DOCSDIR}
> .endif
>
> pkg-plist:
> %%DOCSDIR%%/README
> %%DOCSDIR%%/release-19c.txt
You use %%PORTDOCS%%.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/install.html#INSTALL-DOCUMENTATION
-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
>
> The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist
> does not.
>
> How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
>
> Makefile:
> .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
> @${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}
> ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/doc/cmucl/* ${DOCSDIR}
> .endif
>
> pkg-plist:
> %%DOCSDIR%%/README
> %%DOCSDIR%%/release-19c.txt
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/lang/cmucl/pkg-plist.diff?r1=1.12;r2=1.13
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: games/traindirector: Help reproduce problem on AMD
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:39:04 +0100 Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > QAT reported me a problem with my port on AMD64. > > here is the report: > > http://t64.tecnik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/traindirector-3.5.log > > I tried it on my machines but I can't see any problem on i386, it > looks like and AMD64 problem. > > Could someone with some amd64 hardware help me a little? > > I'd like to know, if you have wxgtk installed, what it is installing > exactly, could someone send me the +CONTENTS file for the > wxgtk2-unicode-* package? Grab the packages from here: http://t64.tecnik93.com/packages/7-STABLE-FTP/ -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500 Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes [ .. ] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200: > > Hi, BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least): From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:45:17 +0300 (EEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:06:07 +0300 (EEST) Did you received those emails ? Thanks, -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500 > Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes > > [ .. ] > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200: > > > Hi, > > BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least): > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error > Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:45:17 +0300 (EEST) > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:06:07 +0300 (EEST) > > Did you received those emails ? I thought somebody else messed with my port and waited for him/her to fix it :-) Sorry. Which is kind of true, I didn't put these lines into pkg-plist. But it seems to have been a multi-port sweep. While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/ The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version? Martin -- %%% Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500 Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500 > > Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes > > > > [ .. ] > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200: > > > > Hi, > > > > BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least): > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error > > Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:45:17 +0300 (EEST) > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error > > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:06:07 +0300 (EEST) > > > > Did you received those emails ? > > I thought somebody else messed with my port and waited for him/her to > fix it :-) Sorry. My QAT Cc's the maintainer on commit-triggered BotMails. And sends mail only to maintainer for QA-triggered or dependency-triggered BotMails. Anyway, waiting some months for someone to fix your port might be a little to much ;-) More about the way QAT works here: http://t32.tecnik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/ > Which is kind of true, I didn't put these lines into pkg-plist. But > it seems to have been a multi-port sweep. Might be, I didn't check. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500 Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this > problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for > FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x > http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/ > > The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want > me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version? If they bother to release different native binaries for our supported OS versions let encourage them to keep doing that ;-) -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500 > Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this > > problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for > > FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x > > http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/ > > > > The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want > > me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version? > > If they bother to release different native binaries for our supported > OS versions let encourage them to keep doing that ;-) "They" == kind of me, although I didn't build these particular binaries. Is there prior art in ports about how to do this? What do I do with oddball version numbers? Martin -- %%% Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:35:45 -0500
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
> > Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
> > > problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
> > > FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
> > > http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
> > >
> > > The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you
> > > want me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version?
> >
> > If they bother to release different native binaries for our
> > supported OS versions let encourage them to keep doing that ;-)
>
> "They" == kind of me, although I didn't build these particular
> binaries.
Please feel very encouraged then :-)
> Is there prior art in ports about how to do this? What do I do with
> oddball version numbers?
...
.include
.if ${OSVERSION} > 630
DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}-x86-freebsd6.3
.elif ${OSVERSION} > 70
DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}-x86-freebsd7.0
.elif ${OSVERSION} > 80
DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}-x86-freebsd8.0
.endif
...
.. or something like.
HTH,
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Cracauer wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200: >> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500 >> Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for >>> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x >>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/ >>> >>> The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want >>> me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version? >> If they bother to release different native binaries for our supported >> OS versions let encourage them to keep doing that ;-) > > "They" == kind of me, although I didn't build these particular > binaries. > > Is there prior art in ports about how to do this? What do I do with > oddball version numbers? > > Martin Hi Martin, Perhaps you can conditionalize the DISTNAME based on the FreeBSD version number, as shown on this page: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html? If you do that, just make sure that the distinfo file has an entry for each possible DISTNAME value, so the checksum verification will work on any FreeBSD version. Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJIwAJ0sRouByUApARApa9AKDEIoM+DOHgmd5jmLmdecjUhGK/pgCeKNlv AFjNngsUN6CxwYN2FSN4lEM= =W/bT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS
> >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this > >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for > >>> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x > >>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/ > >>> > >>> The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want > >>> me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version? > >> If they bother to release different native binaries for our supported > >> OS versions let encourage them to keep doing that ;-) > > > > "They" == kind of me, although I didn't build these particular > > binaries. > > > > Is there prior art in ports about how to do this? What do I do with > > oddball version numbers? > > Perhaps you can conditionalize the DISTNAME based on the FreeBSD version > number, as shown on this page: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html? > > If you do that, just make sure that the distinfo file has an entry for > each possible DISTNAME value, so the checksum verification will work on > any FreeBSD version. So what happens when a user runs FreeBSD-6, installs such a port, then upgrades to FreeBSD-7. Would the port for the installed package come up with the wrong plist and whatnot? Martin -- %%% Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this > > >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for > > >>> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x > > >>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/ > > >>> > > >>> The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want > > >>> me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version? > > >> If they bother to release different native binaries for our supported > > >> OS versions let encourage them to keep doing that ;-) > > > > > > "They" == kind of me, although I didn't build these particular > > > binaries. > > > > > > Is there prior art in ports about how to do this? What do I do with > > > oddball version numbers? > > > > Perhaps you can conditionalize the DISTNAME based on the FreeBSD version > > number, as shown on this page: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html? > > > > If you do that, just make sure that the distinfo file has an entry for > > each possible DISTNAME value, so the checksum verification will work on > > any FreeBSD version. > > So what happens when a user runs FreeBSD-6, installs such a port, > then upgrades to FreeBSD-7. > > Would the port for the installed package come up with the wrong plist > and whatnot? Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're asking but if the port installs different files based upon the version it's being installed on it should use PLIST_SUB accordingly. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist.html -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS
Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this > > > >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for > > > >>> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x > > > >>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/ > > > >>> > > > >>> The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want > > > >>> me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version? > > > >> If they bother to release different native binaries for our supported > > > >> OS versions let encourage them to keep doing that ;-) > > > > > > > > "They" == kind of me, although I didn't build these particular > > > > binaries. > > > > > > > > Is there prior art in ports about how to do this? What do I do with > > > > oddball version numbers? > > > > > > Perhaps you can conditionalize the DISTNAME based on the FreeBSD version > > > number, as shown on this page: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html? > > > > > > If you do that, just make sure that the distinfo file has an entry for > > > each possible DISTNAME value, so the checksum verification will work on > > > any FreeBSD version. > > > > So what happens when a user runs FreeBSD-6, installs such a port, > > then upgrades to FreeBSD-7. > > > > Would the port for the installed package come up with the wrong plist > > and whatnot? > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're asking but if the port installs > different files based upon the version it's being installed on it should > use PLIST_SUB accordingly. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist.html But you'd have the wrong one installed. Your freebsd-7 would have the freebsd-6 package installed and the installed files don't match. On second thought, I don't think it matters since it's not different from having /usr/ports/lang/cmucl/* updated to something new. Never mind. Martin -- %%% Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:38:52PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > > >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this > > > > >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for > > > > >>> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x > > > > >>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/ > > > > >>> > > > > >>> The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you > > > > >>> want > > > > >>> me to conditionalize on FreeBSD version? > > > > >> If they bother to release different native binaries for our supported > > > > >> OS versions let encourage them to keep doing that ;-) > > > > > > > > > > "They" == kind of me, although I didn't build these particular > > > > > binaries. > > > > > > > > > > Is there prior art in ports about how to do this? What do I do with > > > > > oddball version numbers? > > > > > > > > Perhaps you can conditionalize the DISTNAME based on the FreeBSD version > > > > number, as shown on this page: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html? > > > > > > > > If you do that, just make sure that the distinfo file has an entry for > > > > each possible DISTNAME value, so the checksum verification will work on > > > > any FreeBSD version. > > > > > > So what happens when a user runs FreeBSD-6, installs such a port, > > > then upgrades to FreeBSD-7. > > > > > > Would the port for the installed package come up with the wrong plist > > > and whatnot? > > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're asking but if the port installs > > different files based upon the version it's being installed on it should > > use PLIST_SUB accordingly. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist.html > > But you'd have the wrong one installed. Your freebsd-7 would have the > freebsd-6 package installed and the installed files don't match. Yes, but the plist would still be correct. The installed files would match the plist. You would want to update the port though so that you get the updated files, which would cause the plist to be registered again ensuring that things remain consistently correct. > On second thought, I don't think it matters since it's not different > from having /usr/ports/lang/cmucl/* updated to something new. Never mind. Yes, I don't see this as a problem at all. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
porting jdownloader to freebsd
Hi, does anyone port Jdownloader (java app) to freebsd yet?? thanks!! TFC ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: jakarta-tomcat v.s. tomcat
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:44:17 +0100 Gábor Kövesdán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yoshihiro Ota escribió: > > Hello, forks. > > > > There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following. > > > > % ls -d */*tomcat* > > java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41 > > www/jakarta-tomcat4 www/tomcat55 > > www/jakarta-tomcat5 www/tomcat6 > > www/tomcat-native > > > > When I diffed ver. 5 dirs, they looked similar except versions. > > Does anyone know the differences between jakarta-tomcat and tomcat under > > the ports? > > > Afaik, it used to be known as Jakarta-Tomcat, but its new name is > Tomcat. If you observe it well www/tomcat41 and www/tomcat55 are much > newer version than www/jakarta-tomcat4 and www/jakarta-tomcat5 and there > isn't even www/jakarta-tomcat6. I suggest you should just use > www/tomcat6. I'm also planning to use it and I succeeded to install it > without problems and I can reach it through the port 8180. Indeed, that is one of the answer I had expected. So, if www/tomcat* are the new ones, why don't we remove www/jakarta-tomcat*? Hiro ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: porting jdownloader to freebsd
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:13:24 -0500 "Tsu-Fan Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, >does anyone port Jdownloader (java app) to freebsd yet?? Is there some specific problem with Jdownloader, which should be platform independent, or are asking about a FreeBSD port (as in /usr/ports)? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
