Re: Numerous unpleasant surprises in latest portupgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have noticed it doesn't chase *any* dependencies that need upgrading if the base port specified doesn't need updating. For example, if pcre is outdated and I do "portupgrade -Rrv postfix" it will do nothing unless postfix itself needs updating too, even though it is a dependency. This is very un-useful behavior. try portupgrade -Na and it tries to upgrade portsI never installed... That's strange behaviour... Jack -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959 iD8DBQFHseqdPh5RwW/NzC4RAne4AJ0cCFur9ZUfe/Bp0SUyB/UWviNl1wCgwxai Qkg7XEvBOz3B2HE0JoTv8a0= =jZ/f -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
How is this possible?
I'm working on a new port (as is my custom any time I want to try out some new
software), and I've run into an inexplicable problem.
Error: shared library "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pcapy.so" does
not exist
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/rishi.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -lsa /usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pcapy.so
22 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 22110 Feb 12 16:03
/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pcapy.so
The Makefile has:
LIB_DEPENDS+= ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/pcapy.so:${PORTSDIR}/net/py-pcapy
How is it possible to get "the file doesn't exist" when the file does in fact
exist? Very weird.
--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: pdflib-7.0.2
Hello. Attempted to install this however this bombs out on pdflib-lite with the following error : fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/PDFlib-Lite-7.0.0p3.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) Can you please help me with this? -- Brett Davidson Systems Engineer -- Net24 Limited Web: www.net24.co.nz Phone: 0800 5000 24 | DDI: +64 3 962 9518 -- // web hosting / email hosting / data backup // our reputation for reliability precedes us This transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential information. If you have received this transmission in error, please delete it and notify the sender. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
musicpd ioctl sign-extension on amd64
Hello Ports- I have installed musicpd-0.13.0_1 from ports on my FreeBSD universe.stevenschlansker.is-a-geek.org 7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #2: Fri Jan 11 15:39:39 PST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNIVERSE amd64 box. It repeatedly emits the following error messages in dmesg: WARNING pid 949 (mpd): ioctl sign-extension ioctl c0045005 WARNING pid 949 (mpd): ioctl sign-extension ioctl c0045006 WARNING pid 949 (mpd): ioctl sign-extension ioctl c0045002 I have googled around a bit and it looks like this is an issue with an int being passed in to ioctl() when a long is appropriate on amd64. It seems like it should be an easy fix, but I think it's in a shared library - I looked over the musicpd source code and the only ioctl I saw seemed ok. Either way I couldn't find it myself and don't have my box properly set up to debug this sort of problem. I'm not subscribed to the ports@ mailing list, so if any replies could be CCed to me that would be wonderful! Hopefully someone else is annoyed enough by this as well to be pushed to fix it :) Thanks! Steven Schlansker ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How is this possible?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:38:31PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>
> The Makefile has:
> LIB_DEPENDS+= ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/pcapy.so:${PORTSDIR}/net/py-pcapy
>
> How is it possible to get "the file doesn't exist" when the file does in
> fact exist? Very weird.
>
LIB_DEPENDS expects a library name/version. The dependency is checked
with ldconfig; although the error message is misleading in this case.
--
Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin
of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
pgpe6ffjSbN4n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
Miroslav Lachman wrote: Hi, I am using portupgrade-2.4.3_2,2. I have installed gnupg-1.4.8 and if I tried to install Spamassassin and Amavisd-new with commands: portinstall p5-Mail-SpamAssassin portinstall amavisd-new they both are trying to install CURL and openldap-client. Spamassassin and Amavisd-new do not depend on it, so I think it is dependency for GnuPG-2 (but I am using GnuPG-1). If I try cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin && make install clean or cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new/ && make install clean the whole installation is successfuly done without installing CURL and openldap-client. (it is expected result for me) ...or em I wrong and I must add 'security/gnupg' => 'security/gnupg1' in to ALT_PKGDEP in pkgtools.conf? OK. Just another strange behavior - `portinstall postfix` shown an OPTIONS dialog, where I checked SASL which will install cyrus-sasl2 during postfix installation. Cyrus-sasl2 is installed as dependency before postfix compilation - with default options (an OPTIONS dialog for cyrus-sasl2 did not appeared). After successful instalation of postfix with confirming all the questions about adding new user, activation in mailer.cf etc., portupgrade shown an OPTIONS dialog for cyrus-sasl2 and then start compilation of cyrus-sasl2 which was installed before postfix compilation by portinstall itself! So second istallation failed: ---> Installing the new version via the port with make flags: WITH_BDB=true WITHOUT_MYSQL=true WITHOUT_PGSQL=true WITHOUT_SQLITE=true WITHOUT_DEV_URANDOM=true WITHOUT_ALWAYSTRUE=true WITHOUT_KEEP_DB_OPEN=true WITHOUT_AUTHDAEMOND=true WITH_LOGIN=true WITH_PLAIN=true WITH_CRAM=true WITH_DIGEST=true WITHOUT_OTP=true WITHOUT_NTLM=true ===> Installing for cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 ===> cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 depends on shared library: mysqlclient.15 - found ===> cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 depends on shared library: db41.1 - found *** Updated user `cyrus'. ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if security/cyrus-sasl2 already installed ===> cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of security/cyrus-sasl2 without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall.7043.1 env make WITH_BDB=true WITHOUT_MYSQL=true WITHOUT_PGSQL=true WITHOUT_SQLITE=true WITHOUT_DEV_URANDOM=true WITHOUT_ALWAYSTRUE=true WITHOUT_KEEP_DB_OPEN=true WITHOUT_AUTHDAEMOND=true WITH_LOGIN=true WITH_PLAIN=true WITH_CRAM=true WITH_DIGEST=true WITHOUT_OTP=true WITHOUT_NTLM=true DEPENDS_TARGET=package reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ---> ** Install tasks 2: 1 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! security/cyrus-sasl2 (install error) Why is portinstall installing cyrus-sasl2 twice? Why portinstall did not shown an OPTIONS dialog for the first time? (this is on a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 without previous versions of a mentioned ports) Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: pdflib-7.0.2
Brett Davidson wrote: Hello. Attempted to install this however this bombs out on pdflib-lite with the following error : fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/PDFlib-Lite-7.0.0p3.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) Can you please help me with this? Is the port misnamed? It's called pdflib-7.0.2, but it's trying to download 7.0.0p3. Either way, try a wget from ftp://ftp.ovh.net/made-in-ovh/maj-ovh/PDFlib-Lite-7.0.0p3.tar.gz and put the resultant file in /usr/ports/distfiles then try to make the port again. Assuming the file's kosher, it should pass the checksum and bob's your mother's brother. James ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
Le Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:18:56 +0800, "Rong-en Fan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new/ && make install clean > > the whole installation is successfuly done without installing CURL > > and openldap-client. (it is expected result for me) > > > > ...or em I wrong and I must add 'security/gnupg' => > > 'security/gnupg1' in to ALT_PKGDEP in pkgtools.conf? > > Yes, according to /usr/ports/UPDATING. Is there a way or a tool to know the alternate dependencies ? I've got 720 ports installed on my box... Thanks, regards. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
xfce4.4.2 upgrade patches
Hi Oliver,
I just upgraded my xfce desktop to 4.4.2 and found two minor problems:
* deskutils/orage/Makefile required ical.0 which should be ical.27 because
libical changed its name
* (self) a PORTREVISION bump for multimedia/xfce4-media to pick up the new
libexo version
I've attached a patch for both.
Regards,
Rene
--
http://www.rene-ladan.nl/
GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6
(subkeys.pgp.net)
--- Makefile.bogus 2008-02-12 22:31:40.0 +0100
+++ Makefile2008-02-12 22:31:55.0 +0100
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
.endif
.if defined(WITH_ICAL)
-LIB_DEPENDS+= ical.0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libical
+LIB_DEPENDS+= ical.27:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libical
.endif
post-patch:
--- Makefile.old2008-02-12 23:06:51.0 +0100
+++ Makefile2008-02-12 23:07:29.0 +0100
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
PORTNAME= xfce4-media
PORTVERSION= 0.9.2
-PORTREVISION= 5
+PORTREVISION= 6
CATEGORIES=multimedia xfce
MASTER_SITES= http://spuriousinterrupt.org/files/xfmedia/
DISTNAME= xfmedia-${PORTVERSION}
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@
MAINTAINER=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
COMMENT= Lightweight media player for Xfce4 based on the xine engine
-LIB_DEPENDS= xine.1:${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/libxine \
- exo-0.3:${PORTSDIR}/x11/libexo
+LIB_DEPENDS= xine.1:${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/libxine
GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
INSTALLS_ICONS=yes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: TrueCrypt 5.0 - Built, short test result: Ok.
On Feb 10, 2008 2:27 PM, Michael Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 10.02.2008, 20:05 Uhr, schrieb Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > You should patch the file to include ucontext.h > > But even if it'll be build, nobody guarantee it works. > > Done. Builds. On 7.0-PRERELEASE, by the way. Builds fine on 7.0-RC2 too. [snip] > > Maybe someone would download > http://www.triplefork.net/test.tc (64K) > and try with password "test" on a different platform. > I've noticed what looks like a problem when creating a file-based volume (could be for all volume types - I haven't tried creating a device volume). If I select password AND keyfile during the volume creation, the creation process finishes without throwing any errors, but the volume that is created does not require the keyfile to open/mount. In fact, it fails to open/mount if I try to use the keyfile and password use during creation, but works fine if I just use the password. Anyone else seeing this behavior? I will attempt to reproduce on the Linux-build of this version as well to check and see if it has the same problem. > Michael ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How is this possible?
--On February 13, 2008 1:00:50 AM + Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:38:31PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
The Makefile has:
LIB_DEPENDS+= ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/pcapy.so:${PORTSDIR}/net/py-pcapy
How is it possible to get "the file doesn't exist" when the file does
in fact exist? Very weird.
LIB_DEPENDS expects a library name/version. The dependency is checked
with ldconfig; although the error message is misleading in this case.
Thanks, Shaun. So it should be RUN_DEPENDS?
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: deskutils/sunbird
Hallo, I've just tried to run deskutils/sunbird and it crashed with "Bus error" and exited on signal 10. Anyway, there's been version 0.7 out for a couple of months while port is stuck at v.0.5. Could someone pls update the port ? Cheers, Martin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Numerous unpleasant surprises in latest portupgrade
On Feb 12, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: The latest portupgrade suddenly seems to have become *very* unintuitive, and extremely quirky/buggy. Some of the error/info messages no longer make any sense at all to me, either! I have noticed it doesn't chase *any* dependencies that need upgrading if the base port specified doesn't need updating. For example, if pcre is outdated and I do "portupgrade -Rrv postfix" it will do nothing unless postfix itself needs updating too, even though it is a dependency. This is very un-useful behavior. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
javavmwrapper doesn't respects jdk1.6.0
Hello,
the wrapperscript /usr/local/bin/java should get updated.
beyond the lines 513 it should get expanded with " 1.6" and an
new case "1.6+)..."
---8<---snip---8<---
for version in ${JAVA_VERSION}; do
case "${version}" in
1.1+)
_JAVAVM_VERSION="${_JAVAVM_VERSION} 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
1.6"
;;
1.2+)
_JAVAVM_VERSION="${_JAVAVM_VERSION} 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6"
;;
1.3+)
_JAVAVM_VERSION="${_JAVAVM_VERSION} 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6"
;;
1.4+)
_JAVAVM_VERSION="${_JAVAVM_VERSION} 1.4 1.5 1.6"
;;
1.5+)
_JAVAVM_VERSION="${_JAVAVM_VERSION} 1.5 1.6"
;;
1.6+)
_JAVAVM_VERSION="${_JAVAVM_VERSION} 1.6"
;;
*)
_JAVAVM_VERSION="${_JAVAVM_VERSION} ${version}"
;;
--->8---snap--->8---
best regards
michael
--
=== m i c h a e l - s c h u h . n e t ===
Michael Schuh
Postfach 10 21 52
66021 Saarbrücken
phone: 0681/8319664
mobil: 0177/9738644
@: m i c h a e l . s c h u h @ g m a i l . c o m
=== Ust-ID: DE251072318 ===
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Le Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:18:56 +0800, > "Rong-en Fan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > >>> cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new/ && make install clean >>> the whole installation is successfuly done without installing CURL >>> and openldap-client. (it is expected result for me) >>> >>> ...or em I wrong and I must add 'security/gnupg' => >>> 'security/gnupg1' in to ALT_PKGDEP in pkgtools.conf? >> Yes, according to /usr/ports/UPDATING. > > Is there a way or a tool to know the alternate dependencies ? I've got > 720 ports installed on my box... The alternate dependencies set in ALT_PKGDEP are only accessible to portupgrade and friends. For a more general solution, you can set various variables in /etc/make.conf or via the blue and grey OPTIONS screens -- these will have effect on anything that uses the ports system. You can't make arbitrary substitutions in what depends on what via /etc/make.conf -- the port needs to provide some machinery for selecting alternative dependencies. That stipulation does however cover most of the popularly used software in the ports tree. In order to see what the dependency changes are, you can't rely on the default INDEX file as obtained by 'make fetchindex' or by use of portsnap. Either you have to ignore the INDEX completely or you have to build your own INDEX. It is entirely possible to use the ports without any sort of INDEX: portmaster (as I understand it) does exactly that, and simple 'cd some/port ; make all install' similarly ignores anything to do with the INDEX. portupgrade on the other hand does make use of the INDEX. Building your own INDEX is easy (just type 'make index' in /usr/ports) but very time consuming -- probably 45 minutes or so on a typical desktop box, and you'ld need to do that every time you cvsup'd. Or you can use my ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex tools to incrementally update your INDEX, which is a lot faster overall. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHspHd8Mjk52CukIwRCEdqAJ0bKzsGgTvzEIlbIWBMiGZRzgC/UgCglNbZ 81Nw/PCbL8/JbCsweyHPUu0= =jpcB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
apache-ant port could corrupt
Hi @list, i would install the port devel/apache-ant. Durinbg the installation from sourcecode it would install a lot of unnecessary ports like gnome2/accerciser, py25-gnome and so on. A lot of undesired ports. Is there a configuration error or at the cvs. I have synced the portstree at this day from cvsup.uk.freebsd.org. thanks for all best regards michael -- === m i c h a e l - s c h u h . n e t === Michael Schuh Postfach 10 21 52 66021 Saarbrücken phone: 0681/8319664 mobil: 0177/9738644 @: m i c h a e l . s c h u h @ g m a i l . c o m === Ust-ID: DE251072318 === ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: curl-7.16.3
Great news, Thank you for the time you have put in. Regards Ben On 12 Feb 2008, at 13:10, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:30PM +, Ben Suffolk wrote: Hi, I was just wondering if there was a roadmap for updating curl to the latest version in ports? I've been working on it (reviewing the changes, testing on various architectures and options, etc) on and off for the past couple of weeks. It ought to be done in at most another week. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 I've heard that this sentence is a rumor. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: TrueCrypt 5.0 - Built, short test result: Ok.
Am 12.02.2008, 22:01 Uhr, schrieb Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I've noticed what looks like a problem when creating a file-based volume (could be for all volume types - I haven't tried creating a device volume). If I select password AND keyfile during the volume creation, the creation process finishes without throwing any errors, but the volume that is created does not require the keyfile to open/mount. In fact, it fails to open/mount if I try to use the keyfile and password use during creation, but works fine if I just use the password. I tried and confirm this. In fact, if I create a volume with keyfile but without password, truecrypt throws ParameterIncorrect at TrueCrypt::Pkcs5Kdf::ValidateParameters:64 at me. Michael ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: bftpd-2.1 (Broken port: Segmantation Fault)
Bftpd port seems broken. It builds ok but when trying to run it using either -d or -D it exits with "Segmentation Fault" error. (FreeBSD 6.3 rel) Regards, Athan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Numerous unpleasant surprises in latest portupgrade
The latest portupgrade suddenly seems to have become *very* unintuitive, and extremely quirky/buggy. Some of the error/info messages no longer make any sense at all to me, either! For instance, I've always used the following options in pkgtools.conf: PORTUPGRADE_ARGS = ENV['PORTUPGRADE'] || \ '--distclean ' + \ '--new' + \ '--uninstall-shlibs' But now, it seems that the "--new" switch disables portupgrade entirely, even if the "-f" switch is used! I've had to remove it to get anything done at all. For instance (with --new enabled): # portupgrade -fOv TekNap ---> Reading default options: --distclean --uninstall-shlibs ---> Session started at: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:03:50 -0600 ** None has been installed or upgraded. ---> Session ended at: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:03:50 -0600 (consumed 00:00:00) Huh? What is that supposed to even mean??? In addition, there seem to be some parsing errors going on re: MAKE_ARGS. I've had the following defined for TekNap for quite some time now and never had any trouble before (ignore wrap): 'net-p2p/teknap' => 'CONFIGURE_ARGS+="--with-default-server=foo-bar.org::user:pass --with-pthread"', (note the embedded hyphen in the server name; perhaps the culprit?). This now causes the following output from portupgrade -akO and similar multi-package commands: # portupgrade -akO ** Makefile possibly broken: net-p2p/teknap: make: illegal option -- - usage: make [-BPSXeiknqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable] [-d flags] [-E variable] [-f makefile] [-I directory] [-j max_jobs] [-m directory] [-V variable] [variable=value] [target ...] /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1433:in `get_pkgname': Makefile broken (MakefileBrok enError) from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:622:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:613:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:613:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:588:in `catch' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:588:in `main' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1303:in `call' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1303:in `parse_in_order' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1299:in `catch' ... 6 levels... from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:785:in `initialize' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:229:in `new' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:229:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2173 In addition, after upgrading icu, I decided to try upgrading all the packages that required it as well, with: #pkg_info -qR icu|xargs portupgrade --batch -fkOv (to avoid any of the bugginess seen with some of the recursive stuff) This seems to trigger a near-endless cycle of information fetching of the type: 97401 p0 S+ 0:00.01 sh -c cd /usr/ports/deskutils/alacarte && env make -V PKGNAME -V IGNORE -V NO_IGNORE 2>&1 97402 p0 R+ 0:00.00 make -V PKGNAME -V IGNORE -V NO_IGNORE What in the world happened? And when will it be back to normal? -- I turned to speak to God, About the world's despair, But to make bad matters worse, I found God wasn't there. -- Robert Frost, American poet ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: curl-7.16.3
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:30PM +, Ben Suffolk wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wondering if there was a roadmap for updating curl to the latest > version in ports? I've been working on it (reviewing the changes, testing on various architectures and options, etc) on and off for the past couple of weeks. It ought to be done in at most another week. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 I've heard that this sentence is a rumor. pgpLWmxG8jcju.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
On Feb 12, 2008 8:50 PM, Miroslav Lachman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using portupgrade-2.4.3_2,2. I have installed gnupg-1.4.8 and if I > tried to install Spamassassin and Amavisd-new with commands: > portinstall p5-Mail-SpamAssassin > portinstall amavisd-new > they both are trying to install CURL and openldap-client. Spamassassin > and Amavisd-new do not depend on it, so I think it is dependency for > GnuPG-2 (but I am using GnuPG-1). > If I try cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin && make install clean > or > cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new/ && make install clean > the whole installation is successfuly done without installing CURL and > openldap-client. (it is expected result for me) > > ...or em I wrong and I must add 'security/gnupg' => 'security/gnupg1' in > to ALT_PKGDEP in pkgtools.conf? Yes, according to /usr/ports/UPDATING. Regards, Rong-En Fan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
Hi, I am using portupgrade-2.4.3_2,2. I have installed gnupg-1.4.8 and if I tried to install Spamassassin and Amavisd-new with commands: portinstall p5-Mail-SpamAssassin portinstall amavisd-new they both are trying to install CURL and openldap-client. Spamassassin and Amavisd-new do not depend on it, so I think it is dependency for GnuPG-2 (but I am using GnuPG-1). If I try cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin && make install clean or cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new/ && make install clean the whole installation is successfuly done without installing CURL and openldap-client. (it is expected result for me) ...or em I wrong and I must add 'security/gnupg' => 'security/gnupg1' in to ALT_PKGDEP in pkgtools.conf? Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cannot start linux-seamonkey
hi I have freeBSD 6.3 and linux-seamonkey-1.1.8 installed. I've deleted /root/.mozilla directoy and now cannot start linux-seamonkey. every time if I try to start the linux-seamonkey, the user profile manager will be opened and asking for a new profile. I create a new one, click on Don't ask at startup, but it doesnt work. next time if I try to open it again, I'm getting the error: this profile is it in use. howto solve this problem ? ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: curl-7.16.3
Hi, I was just wondering if there was a roadmap for updating curl to the latest version in ports? Regards Ben ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: TrueCrypt 5.0 - Built, short test result: Ok.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:02:08AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote: > In fact, if I create a volume with keyfile but without password, > truecrypt throws > ParameterIncorrect at TrueCrypt::Pkcs5Kdf::ValidateParameters:64 > at me. BTW, 5.0a is already out. -- http://ache.pp.ru/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
spamd port
I am trying to get the port mail/spamd to work on FreeBSD 6.2. There is not a lot of information on actually using spamd. So far I have figured out that I have to kldload pf and then a pfctl -e before attempting to start spamd. However, spamd-setup actually does nothing. pfctl -s rules shows an error message: No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled I have no idea what ALTQ is (or if its even required) since I can find no references to it in the kernel config files or kld modules. There is a page on setting up spamd at http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/spamd.setup.html but it doesn't address this issue or have any extra steps that need to be done. Any ideas what is going on here? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
