Sylpheed2 pgp signing problem
Hi! I've updated Sylpheed2 to the latest version (2.2.9_1), and I'm experiencing rather strange problem. It fails to sign outgoing messages with gpg, i.e. it doesn't report any errors, but the signature is bad (incorrect). Removing .sylpheed-2.0 and reconfiguring doesn't help. Sylpheed 2.2.6 works well. Have you any ideas? Thanks! -- Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[[Россия, Москва]] PGP id: 0xEB269581 http://people.freebsd.org/~stas/stas.key.asc pgpXuNQsWNmLh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Unfetchable distfiles reminder
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile problems, which currently has 206 bad ports, is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. In addition, the list of all ports with any unfetchable distfile is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/bad.html if you don't mind coordinating your fixes with the port MAINTAINER. Thanks for your help! Bill "distfiles" Fenner ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: webmin-1.300_1
On Friday 06 October 2006 19:46, Michael Wilson wrote: > The makefile for the latest webmin port points to > www.webmin.com/updates for additional wbm downloads. However, the > file is actually located at download.webmin.com/updates > > The webmin.com server is configured for a 302 redirect, but fetch > does not obey 302's, so doing a "make" of webmin from the latest > port fails when attempting to download additional wbm archives. > > Changing www.webmin.com in the Makefile to download.webmin.com > fixes this problem. Probably complete overkill but since the ports freeze is only days away I submitted this as a pr and cc'd the maintainer. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104094 -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mplayer can´t install win32 codecs?
On Saturday 07 October 2006 02:56, Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez wrote: > 2006/10/6, andres chavez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-codecs > > ===> win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 is forbidden: Remote code execution: > > What to do? im using 6.1 release, and i have the ports tree updated > Please update your port tree and try again, I made some modifications > to multimedia/win32-codecs. It could work now > Have the vulnerabilities been fixed, or have some of the codecs been removed? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Unfetchable distfiles reminder
On Saturday 07 October 2006 05:02, Bill Fenner wrote: > Dear porters, > > This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of > unfetchable distfiles at > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . In particular, the > list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile problems, which > currently has 206 bad ports, is > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get > fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. > > In addition, the list of all ports with any unfetchable distfile > is > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/bad.html > > if you don't mind coordinating your fixes with the port MAINTAINER. > > Thanks for your help! > > Bill "distfiles" Fenner > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Fun stuff to track down. :) I didn't know anything about your site but it seems to me that it would be a fairly easy thing for a 'junior-hacker' looking to contribute to work on. Maybe it should be linked on the how-to-contribute page? Anyways, I've started taking a look at some of these. So far I've discovered that in some cases the mastersites no longer exist and there is either no email address for the port's author or the email address doesn't work. If this is the case should the ports be recommended for delettion or should the mastersite be changed to ftp.freebsd.org? This also raises the question of how long freebsd.org will retain the distfiles it hasindefintely? -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mplayer can´t install win32 codecs?
RW píše v so 07. 10. 2006 v 12:49 +0100: > On Saturday 07 October 2006 02:56, Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez wrote: > > 2006/10/6, andres chavez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-codecs > > > ===> win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 is forbidden: Remote code execution: > > > What to do? im using 6.1 release, and i have the ports tree updated > > > Please update your port tree and try again, I made some modifications > > to multimedia/win32-codecs. It could work now > > > > Have the vulnerabilities been fixed, or have some of the codecs been removed? The problematic codecs were disabled by default. -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Ragtime" contained about forty-five seconds of Elizabeth McGovern completely topless, but it got a "PG" in 1980. I have no idea why that did, or "Titanic" got PG-13, yet "Merchant of Venice" gets tagged with an "R". The MPAA is an intellectual and aesthetic embarassment. -- comment from IMDb board on US movie rating system signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: Unfetchable distfiles reminder
Josh Paetzel píše v so 07. 10. 2006 v 07:01 -0500: > Anyways, I've started taking a look at some of these. So far I've > discovered that in some cases the mastersites no longer exist and > there is either no email address for the port's author or the email > address doesn't work. If this is the case should the ports be > recommended for delettion or should the mastersite be changed to > ftp.freebsd.org? This also raises the question of how long > freebsd.org will retain the distfiles it hasindefintely? Take a damn hard try to locate the new website of the software. Often the software resurfaces elsewhere, very silently. If you can't find it anywhere, suggested action is to mark the port DEPRECATED and delete it after two months, unless someone steps in and salvage the port by hosting the distfile on his webspace and taking the responsibility for that port. -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The use of the lavatory is restricted to the train's cat. signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
DISTNAME question
I need to set a DISTNAME to get a file from some sort of automatic cvs thing. No matter what I try a .tar.gz is prepended to it. IEI need to get ruby-cvs.tar.gz?only_with_tag=ruby-cvs-0_2&view=tar but I can't seem to stop the port from looking for: ruby-cvs.tar.gz?only_with_tag=ruby-cvs-0_2&view=tar.tar.gz Can anyone help me with the Makefile magic needed here? -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: DISTNAME question
Josh Paetzel píše v so 07. 10. 2006 v 08:07 -0500:
> I need to set a DISTNAME to get a file from some sort of automatic cvs
> thing. No matter what I try a .tar.gz is prepended to it.
>
> IEI need to get
> ruby-cvs.tar.gz?only_with_tag=ruby-cvs-0_2&view=tar
> but I can't seem to stop the port from looking for:
> ruby-cvs.tar.gz?only_with_tag=ruby-cvs-0_2&view=tar.tar.gz
>
> Can anyone help me with the Makefile magic needed here?
Consider writing your own do-fetch: target, something like this
do-fetch:
.if !exists(${DISTDIR}/${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX})
${SETENV} ${FETCH_ENV} ${FETCH_CMD} -o ruby-cvs.tar.gz
http://.../ruby-cvs.tar.gz?only_with_tag=ruby-cvs-0_2&view=tar.tar.gz
.endif
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Eat when you are hungry, sleep when you are tired.
Chase butterflies when you want some fun.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
fluxbox-devel is obsolete
== fluxbox-devel == /usr/ports/x11-wm/fluxbox-devel is obsolete! greetz army.of.root ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
portupgrade say 7x Makefile broken
Hello, i have a problem, my portupgrade say 7 x Makefile is broken. ! lang/ruby18 (ruby-1.8.5,1)(Makefile broken) ! net/openldap23-client (openldap-client-2.3.27(Makefile broken) ! ftp/curl (curl-7.15.4)(Makefile broken) ! ftp/wget (wget-1.10.2)(Makefile broken) ! irc/irssi (irssi-0.8.10_3)(Makefile broken) ! www/neon (neon-0.25.5)(Makefile broken) ! www/links (links-2.1.p21,1) (Makefile broken) My System: uname -a FreeBSD reddevil.homeunix.org 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Oct 7 14:51:56 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTMASTER i386 This is my listing from portupgrade. http://bluebyte.homeunix.org/~downloads/docs/textfiles/logs/upgrade.txt I hope anyone can help me. Thanks, Carsten ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade say 7x Makefile broken
Hello again, is this problem is in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk? I make a portupgrade lang/ruby18 with following results reddevil# portupgrade lang/ruby18 ** Makefile possibly broken: lang/ruby18: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk", line 131: warning: "grep "^lib/libssl.so." "/var/db/pkg/compat5x-i386-5.4.0.8_7/+CONTENTS"" returned non-zero status ruby-1.8.5_1,1 ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! lang/ruby18 (ruby-1.8.5,1)(Makefile broken) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed reddevil# portupgrade net/openldap23-client same problem reddevil# portupgrade net/openldap23-client ** Makefile possibly broken: net/openldap23-client: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk", line 131: warning: "grep "^lib/libssl.so." "/var/db/pkg/compat5x-i386-5.4.0.8_7/+CONTENTS"" returned non-zero status openldap-client-2.3.27 ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! net/openldap23-client (openldap-client-2.3.27) (Makefile broken) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed reddevil# I hope anyone can help me. Thanks, Carsten P.S. Sorry for my bad english. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mail/postfix21 missing tarball
Shaun Amott wrote: On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:37:52AM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: mail/postfix21 won't update as the tarball for pfixtls can't be found. I've been trying for a couple of weeks now but still the problem persists. Is something out of date in my ports tree (I use portsnap regularly)? It looks like the file has vanished - I managed to find it for you, and I've mirrored it: http://mirror.inerd.com/FreeBSD/distfiles/postfix21/pfixtls-0.8.18-2.1.3-0.9.7d.tar.gz Fixed. Thanks -- Marcus Alves Grando marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br | Grupos Internet S/A mnag(at)FreeBSD.org | FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
http://www.freewebtown.com/bustar00t/Musliman%20Vs%20Christian.exe
Hey look at that funny video.You will have damn fun.hahahaha.Musliman Kicking christians ass. http://www.freewebtown.com/bustar00t/Musliman%20Vs%20Christian.exe ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: games/nwnusers
Hi. I'll correct it as soon as possible. (This weekend) Andreas > -Original Message- > From: Bill "distfiles" Fenner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 12:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: games/nwnusers > > Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port > whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could > you please visit > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with > a problem is games/nwnusers. > > If you have already corrected the problems and submitted a > PR, please accept my thanks and apologies for the delay in getting > the fixes into the tree. This reminder is created automatically > and does not (yet) have a way to know if a PR fixing the problem > has been submitted. Please do *NOT* send your response to me > directly; I do not necessarily have time to commit your fix; please > instead submit a PR via 'send-pr' so it doesn't get lost. > > Problems are usually of two types: > 1. The software package has been upgraded and the version in the > port has been removed. The best solution to this problem is to > upgrade the port to the most current version of the software package. > If you are a FreeBSD committer, then you can just upgrade the port > directly. If not, you should create the updated port on your > own machine, > test it (and maybe even run "portlint" on it), and then use "send-pr" > to submit a "diff -uNr old-port updated-port". If you added > or deleted > any files, please make an explicit note of it. > > 2. The mirror site being used no longer contains the software package > in question, or no longer exists. Solutions include: > a) If there are other mirror sites, just remove the bad site > from the list. (Make sure that what appears to be a bad site > isn't actually a problem of type 1, upgrade) > b) If the README or other support files in the software > documentation mention where to get the software package, > use one of those sites. > c) Use a search engine to find another place to get the original > DISTFILES. Make sure that you don't pick a FreeBSD distfiles > mirror -- if you can't find any other places where the file > exists, it can be a LOCAL_PORT or you can simply comment out > the MASTER_SITES= line, with a comment explaining why. > Once you have a solution, use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -u" of the > Makefile. > > Note that this isn't an urgent issue, as people who try to > build the port now will just fall back to the FreeBSD > distfiles mirror. > Please just put it on your list to do and get to it when you > have time. > These messages will continue to arrive twice a month until the fix is > committed, as a reminder. > > Thanks, > Bill "distfiles" Fenner. > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: http://www.freewebtown.com/bustar00t/Musliman%20Vs%20Christian.exe
George W bush wrote: Hey look at that funny video.You will have damn fun.hahahaha.Musliman Kicking christians ass. Surely even dubya knows that his last name starts with a capital letter. Also, this .exe won't run in fbsd 6.1 ... am I missing some files? Do I need to install wine? Thanks. Pee Esss, what's a Musliman? -- Spadge "Intoccabile" www.fromley.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD port: sysutils/tct: shared "bin/file" issue
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:28:41AM +0300, Sulev-Madis Silber wrote: > > I've found that both file-4.17 and tct-1.16 ports share the same file > "bin/file". Please check. > Thanks for pointing this out. I'll register some conflicts. -- Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson pgplrZwvqcZ9K.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Ethereal not listed
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:32:03PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 21:25 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> > Florent Thoumie wrote:
> >
> > I think teaching ${PORTSDIR}/Makefile about how to do 'make search=' on
> > MOVED as well might be good idea, though :-)
>
> Maybe, I don't use 'make search'. Patches welcome, as usual :-)
I also prefer 'make quicksearch' ;-)
Attached is a patch for Mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk that allows to 'make
search' in MOVED as well (activated by default) if one uses 'name='.
To disable searching in MOVED use 'make PORTSEARCH_MOVED=0 search'.
Sample output:
# make search name=ethereal
Port: net/ethereal
Moved: net/wireshark
Date: 2006-07-17
Reason: Project name has changed
Port: net/ethereal-lite
Moved: net/wireshark-lite
Date: 2006-07-17
Reason: Project name has changed
[...]
Any comments are welcome.
-Lars
--- bsd.port.subdir.mk.orig Sun Oct 8 01:18:03 2006
+++ bsd.port.subdir.mk Sun Oct 8 04:21:28 2006
@@ -271,6 +271,8 @@
.else
INDEXFILE?=INDEX
.endif
+MOVEDDIR?= ${PORTSDIR}
+MOVEDFILE?=MOVED
HTMLIFY= sed -e 's/&/\&/g' -e 's/>/\>/g' -e 's/
pgpv6Gu3HnoPG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
