Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org

2010-06-28 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).

The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.


S Tracker  Resp.  Description

o kern/147789  pf [pf] Firewall PF no longer drops connections by sendin
o kern/146832  pf [pf] "(self)" not always matching all local IPv6 addre
o kern/144311  pf [pf] [icmp] massive ICMP storm on lo0 occurs when usin
o kern/143543  pf [pf] [panic] PF route-to causes kernel panic
o bin/143504   pf [patch] outgoing states are not killed by authpf(8)
o conf/142961  pf [pf] No way to adjust pidfile in pflogd
o conf/142817  pf [patch] etc/rc.d/pf: silence pfctl
o kern/141905  pf [pf] [panic] pf kernel panic on 7.2-RELEASE with empty
o kern/140697  pf [pf] pf behaviour changes - must be documented
o kern/137982  pf [pf] when pf can hit state limits, random IP failures 
o kern/136781  pf [pf] Packets appear to drop with pf scrub and if_bridg
o kern/135948  pf [pf] [gre] pf not natting gre protocol
o kern/135162  pf [pfsync] pfsync(4) not usable with GENERIC kernel
o kern/134996  pf [pf] Anchor tables not included when pfctl(8) is run w
o kern/133732  pf [pf] max-src-conn issue
o kern/132769  pf [pf] [lor] 2 LOR's with pf task mtx / ifnet and  rtent
f kern/132176  pf [pf] pf stalls connection when using route-to [regress
o conf/130381  pf [rc.d] [pf] [ip6] ipv6 not fully configured when pf st
o kern/129861  pf [pf] [patch] Argument names reversed in pf_table.c:_co
o kern/127920  pf [pf] ipv6 and synproxy don't play well together
o conf/127814  pf [pf] The flush in pf_reload in /etc/rc.d/pf does not w
o kern/127439  pf [pf] deadlock in pf
f kern/127345  pf [pf] Problem with PF on FreeBSD7.0 [regression]
o kern/127121  pf [pf] [patch] pf incorrect log priority
o kern/127042  pf [pf] [patch] pf recursion panic if interface group is 
o kern/125467  pf [pf] pf keep state bug while handling sessions between
s kern/124933  pf [pf] [ip6] pf does not support (drops) IPv6 fragmented
o kern/124364  pf [pf] [panic] Kernel panic with pf + bridge
o kern/122773  pf [pf] pf doesn't log uid or pid when configured to
o kern/122014  pf [pf] [panic] FreeBSD 6.2 panic in pf
o kern/121704  pf [pf] PF mangles loopback packets
o kern/120281  pf [pf] [request] lost returning packets to PF for a rdr 
o kern/120057  pf [pf] [patch] Allow proper settings of ALTQ_HFSC. The c
o bin/118355   pf [pf] [patch] pfctl(8) help message options order false
o kern/114567  pf [pf] [lor] pf_ioctl.c + if.c
o kern/114095  pf [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
o kern/111220  pf [pf] repeatable hangs while manipulating pf tables
s conf/110838  pf [pf] tagged parameter on nat not working on FreeBSD 5.
o kern/103283  pf pfsync fails to sucessfully transfer some sessions
o kern/103281  pf pfsync reports bulk update failures
o kern/93825   pf [pf] pf reply-to doesn't work
o sparc/93530  pf [pf] Incorrect checksums when using pf's route-to on s
o kern/92949   pf [pf] PF + ALTQ problems with latency
o bin/86635pf [patch] pfctl(8): allow new page character (^L) in pf.
o kern/82271   pf [pf] cbq scheduler cause bad latency

45 problems total.

___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


rdr + reply-to, some solution ?

2010-06-28 Thread Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
Hi all.

I know there is a problem in using rdr with the reply-to, I usually
use some software to "rdr", as the rinetd, but it's not a pretty
solution.

Is there any alternative?

Below is an example of what I'm talking about.

# Nat section
rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 -> 192.168.1.100
# Rules section
pass in $if_ext2 reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to
200.x.x.x port 80

the "reply-to" not working with rdr rule.

Thanks

-- 
Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD)
*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+
mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre
http://www.mundounix.com.br
ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br
Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594
Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


rdr + reply-to, some solution ?

2010-06-28 Thread Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
Hi all.

I know there is a problem in using rdr with the reply-to, I usually
use some software to "rdr", as the rinetd, but it's not a pretty
solution.

Is there any alternative?

Below is an example of what I'm talking about.

# Nat section
rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 -> 192.168.1.100
# Rules section
pass in $if_ext2 reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to
200.x.x.x port 80

the "reply-to" not working with rdr rule.

Thanks

--
Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD)
*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+
mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre
http://www.mundounix.com.br
ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br
Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594
Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: rdr + reply-to, some solution ?

2010-06-28 Thread Chris Buechler
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
 wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I know there is a problem in using rdr with the reply-to, I usually
> use some software to "rdr", as the rinetd, but it's not a pretty
> solution.
>
> Is there any alternative?
>
> Below is an example of what I'm talking about.
>
> # Nat section
> rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 -> 192.168.1.100
> # Rules section
> pass in $if_ext2 reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to
> 200.x.x.x port 80
>

That rule won't match traffic from that rdr. The dest has to be the
192.168.1.100 IP.
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: rdr + reply-to, some solution ?

2010-06-28 Thread Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
hi Chris ! how are you?

as it says here in Brazil: "I eat ball" :).

pass in $if_int reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to
192.168.1.100 port 80

but still, the combination does not work

thanks


2010/6/28 Chris Buechler :
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
>  wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I know there is a problem in using rdr with the reply-to, I usually
>> use some software to "rdr", as the rinetd, but it's not a pretty
>> solution.
>>
>> Is there any alternative?
>>
>> Below is an example of what I'm talking about.
>>
>> # Nat section
>> rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 -> 192.168.1.100
>> # Rules section
>> pass in $if_ext2 reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to
>> 200.x.x.x port 80
>>
>
> That rule won't match traffic from that rdr. The dest has to be the
> 192.168.1.100 IP.
>



-- 
Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD)
*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+
mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre
http://www.mundounix.com.br
ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br
Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594
Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: rdr + reply-to, some solution ?

2010-06-28 Thread Chris Buechler
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
 wrote:
> hi Chris ! how are you?
>
> as it says here in Brazil: "I eat ball" :).
>
> pass in $if_int reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to
> 192.168.1.100 port 80
>
> but still, the combination does not work
>

Then that's not the rule that's matching the traffic. Presuming it
worked previously when that rule wouldn't match the traffic, there
must be some other rule matching. You may need 'quick' there as well
depending on the rest of your ruleset and your intent.
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: rdr + reply-to, some solution ?

2010-06-28 Thread Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
PERFECT !

This is it ! (tribute to MJ)

worked perfectly, had not really thought about using tag, perfect.

thank you (valeu !)

goodbye rinetd/redir !

2010/6/28 Gabriel Fonseca :
> 2010/6/28 Luiz Gustavo S. Costa 
>>
>> hi Chris ! how are you?
>>
>> as it says here in Brazil: "I eat ball" :).
>>
>> pass in $if_int reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to
>> 192.168.1.100 port 80
>>
>> but still, the combination does not work
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> 2010/6/28 Chris Buechler :
>> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
>> >  wrote:
>> >> Hi all.
>> >>
>> >> I know there is a problem in using rdr with the reply-to, I usually
>> >> use some software to "rdr", as the rinetd, but it's not a pretty
>> >> solution.
>> >>
>> >> Is there any alternative?
>> >>
>> >> Below is an example of what I'm talking about.
>> >>
>> >> # Nat section
>> >> rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 ->
>> >> 192.168.1.100
>> >> # Rules section
>> >> pass in $if_ext2 reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to
>> >> 200.x.x.x port 80
>> >>
>> >
>> > That rule won't match traffic from that rdr. The dest has to be the
>> > 192.168.1.100 IP.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD)
>> *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+
>> mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre
>> http://www.mundounix.com.br
>> ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br
>> Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594
>> Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br
>> ___
>> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
>
> Hi, Luiz "gugaBSD" Gustavo.
> I don't exactly what your need, but I'll try help.
>
> Try this:
> rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 tag LINK2 ->
> 192.168.1.100
> pass in quick on $if_ext2 reply-to ( $if_ext2 $gw_ext2  ) tagged LINK2
>
> I hope that helps.
>
> Gabriel "ethX" Fonseca
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD)
*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+
mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre
http://www.mundounix.com.br
ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br
Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594
Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"