[Bug 272073] Kernel Panic in IPFW when using Radix Tables for Captive portal

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272073

--- Comment #3 from Alfa  ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #2)
Yes, Thank you. I applied your sysctl tunable and captive portal worked as
expected since 18 hours.
may i know is that a final solution? and can it cause an another problem?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 272073] Kernel Panic in IPFW when using Radix Tables for Captive portal

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272073

Andrey V. Elsukov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
   ||gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2713
   ||93

--- Comment #4 from Andrey V. Elsukov  ---
(In reply to Alfa from comment #3)

This is temporary workaround, it is not yet fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 272073] Kernel Panic in IPFW when using Radix Tables for Captive portal

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272073

Andrey V. Elsukov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
   ||gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2714
   ||09

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 262093] ixl(4): RX packet errors on Intel X710 after 12.2 to 12.3-RELEASE upgrade

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262093

wooyu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ezm...@gmail.com

--- Comment #13 from wooyu  ---
I solved it by updating my x710's firmware to 12. 
Perhaps your x710 firmware is outdated

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 213751] bfe(4) link state goes down and up when big transfers start over socket to geom volume or ZFS pool

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213751

Ed Maste  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ema...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #4 from Ed Maste  ---
I've suggested adding a deprecation notice to bfe.4 in
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40625, as I suspect these issues will not be fixed
and this NIC is essentially obsolete.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 262093] ixl(4): RX packet errors on Intel X710 after 12.2 to 12.3-RELEASE upgrade

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262093

--- Comment #14 from Cristian Cardoso  ---
(In reply to wooyu from comment #13)
Hi wooyu, at the time I reported this bug there was no firmware update
available for this intel card, so I didn't have much to do other than file a
bug report. I had the bug occurring until version 13.0 and then the equipment
where I ran baremetal FreeBSD was discontinued, so I no longer have a way to
validate what you said.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 272094] pfilctl IPFW hook order not works with PF route-to

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272094

Mina Galić  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||free...@igalic.co
 Status|New |Open
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 213751] bfe(4) link state goes down and up when big transfers start over socket to geom volume or ZFS pool

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213751

--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:

URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=4bc148c30effe0fc1c21b6bbaee366f239353ac1

commit 4bc148c30effe0fc1c21b6bbaee366f239353ac1
Author: Ed Maste 
AuthorDate: 2023-06-20 12:44:22 +
Commit: Ed Maste 
CommitDate: 2023-06-20 20:42:34 +

bfe: add unmaintained / deprecation notice

The bfe (Broadcom BCM4401 10/100 Ethernet) driver has known bugs and no
active maintenance.  There have been no changes other than sweeping tree
changes, typo corrections etc. since 2008 a far as I can tell.  Add a
note in the man page so that users expectations are correctly set, and
indicate that it may be removed in the future.

I did not add a gone_in() call in the driver itself as there is no
specific target version for removal, and this driver has evidence of
recent use (dmesg, PRs).

PR: 201947, 213751
Reviewed by:brooks
Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40625

 share/man/man4/bfe.4 | 7 +++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 201947] Panics in if_bfe under certain loads types (reproducible with rtorrent)

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201947

--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:

URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=4bc148c30effe0fc1c21b6bbaee366f239353ac1

commit 4bc148c30effe0fc1c21b6bbaee366f239353ac1
Author: Ed Maste 
AuthorDate: 2023-06-20 12:44:22 +
Commit: Ed Maste 
CommitDate: 2023-06-20 20:42:34 +

bfe: add unmaintained / deprecation notice

The bfe (Broadcom BCM4401 10/100 Ethernet) driver has known bugs and no
active maintenance.  There have been no changes other than sweeping tree
changes, typo corrections etc. since 2008 a far as I can tell.  Add a
note in the man page so that users expectations are correctly set, and
indicate that it may be removed in the future.

I did not add a gone_in() call in the driver itself as there is no
specific target version for removal, and this driver has evidence of
recent use (dmesg, PRs).

PR: 201947, 213751
Reviewed by:brooks
Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40625

 share/man/man4/bfe.4 | 7 +++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 272124] The socket option "SCTP_DELAYED_ACK_TIME" is not available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Graham Perrin  has asked freebsd-net (Nobody)
 for maintainer-feedback:
Bug 272124: The socket option "SCTP_DELAYED_ACK_TIME" is not available
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272124



[Bug 272124] The socket option "SCTP_DELAYED_ACK_TIME" is not available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272124

Graham Perrin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||n...@freebsd.org
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
   Keywords||needs-patch
  Flags||maintainer-feedback?(net@Fr
   ||eeBSD.org)
   Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People
 Status|New |Open

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 272124] The socket option "SCTP_DELAYED_ACK_TIME" is not available

2023-06-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272124

Michael Tuexen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |tue...@freebsd.org
 CC||tue...@freebsd.org
 Status|Open|In Progress

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.