[Bug 231045] ipv6 fragment reassembly broken
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231045 --- Comment #6 from Kurt Jaeger --- EN was published: https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-18:09.ip.asc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 231659] 12-ALPHA7 r338900 crashes with IPsec on network load
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||crash Status|New |Open CC||r...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 230845] VIMAGE regression: breaks netfront suspend/resume
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230845 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||x...@freebsd.org Keywords|panic |crash Assignee|x...@freebsd.org |k...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230996 Lev A. Serebryakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Lev A. Serebryakov --- I have very similar problem: igb/I210, FreeBSD 12-ALPHA8 (r339009). When I enable "vlanhwtag" on server, clients on this VLAN receive UDP with broken checksums. For example, client can not obtain address via DHCP from server with enabled "vlanhwtag", because DHCP client doesn't seen answers, because they are dropped by kernel due to invalid checksum: tcpdump sees DHCPOFFER on cleint's interface but dhclient doesn't receive anything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230996 --- Comment #2 from Sean Bruno --- I'm unclear if this is related to PR231416 or not. There needs to be a bit more clarification in what the vlanhwtag needs to do or if setting this flag somehow breaks what the udp stack is expecting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 230996] em/igb: Intel i210/i350: ifconfig: enabling "vlanhwtag" renders VLAN on i210/i350 NICs unusable
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230996 --- Comment #3 from Lev A. Serebryakov --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #2) My case is PR231416 for sure. Looks like TCP works with tis capability enabled, for example. I'm not sure about non-bpf originated UDP, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 231416] dhcp / dhclient: bad udp checksums if running on a vlan on a Intel I211 / Broadcom interfaces
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231416 Lev A. Serebryakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@freebsd.org --- Comment #4 from Lev A. Serebryakov --- I have same problem on r339012 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
why rtsold ?
Dear Colleagues, When running FreeBSD as an IPv6 host im SLAAC mode, is "rtsold_enable=YES" really necessary? I did not enable rtsold and IPv6 still works fine only with fconfig_re0="" ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" What would be the point of enabling rtsold then? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: why rtsold ?
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 8:20 PM Victor Sudakov wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > When running FreeBSD as an IPv6 host im SLAAC mode, is > "rtsold_enable=YES" really necessary? I did not enable rtsold and IPv6 > still works fine only with > > fconfig_re0="" > ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" > > What would be the point of enabling rtsold then? > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ > The router may send a router advertisement whenever it wants. That's why your machine seems to work even without rtsold. However, SLAAC addresses expire after a certain amount of time. rtsold will ask the router for a new advertisement before your address expires. You aren't guaranteed to have problems if you don't run rtsold, but you aren't guaranteed not to have problems if you don't. Best to let it run. -Alan ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: why rtsold ?
Alan Somers wrote: > > > > When running FreeBSD as an IPv6 host im SLAAC mode, is > > "rtsold_enable=YES" really necessary? I did not enable rtsold and IPv6 > > still works fine only with > > > > fconfig_re0="" > > ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" > > > > What would be the point of enabling rtsold then? > > The router may send a router advertisement whenever it wants. That's why > your machine seems to work even without rtsold. However, SLAAC addresses > expire after a certain amount of time. rtsold will ask the router for a > new advertisement before your address expires. You aren't guaranteed to > have problems if you don't run rtsold, but you aren't guaranteed not to > have problems if you don't. Best to let it run. I see the point but who on earth sent the initial router solicitation on boot if I never enabled rtsold? I have not found rtsold in /etc/rc.d/netif or similar startup script. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
