Sounds good.
Best,
George
On 1 May 2015, at 1:21, Karlis Laivins wrote:
Hello George,
Thank you for the tip! I have set up a virtual test environment with
IMUNES
(interesting tool, by the way) and now I am running validation tests,
to
see, if the results there are at least similar to those that can be
achieved on a physical testbed.
I will let you know if and when the implementation will be done as I
will
certainly need objective feedback.
BR,
Karlis
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:06 AM, George Neville-Neil
wrote:
If you want to run some experiments, though, you could look at
running PTPd
on 3 servers (master, and two slaves) which will get you decent
synchronization
among the three. Where decent is less than the typical RTT of a TCP
packet on a
1Gbps LAN.
Best,
George
On 30 Apr 2015, at 14:48, Karlis Laivins wrote:
Yes, you are correct, I meant to write "relative OWD". As David Hayes
put
it - "Relative OWD measurements are easier, and clock drift is not
usually
a problem over the time it takes to send and receive an ACK".
Thank you for the correction!
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Eggert, Lars
wrote:
On 2015-4-30, at 15:04, Karlis Laivins
wrote:
I have yet to solve the issue of
how to get the One Way Delay for the ACK message (the time it
takes ACK
to
arrive from receiver of the ACK'ed data sender) correctly.
That won't work without synchronized clocks, which you can't really
assume
to be present.
Lars
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
