Re: kern/140712: [fxp] fxp driver starts with rxcsum on

2009-11-20 Thread yongari
Synopsis: [fxp] fxp driver starts with rxcsum on

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 20 22:03:13 UTC 2009
State-Changed-Why: 
I belive the fix was committed to HEAD(r197586) and MFCed to
stable/8 and stable7 but it didn't make it into 8.0-RELEASE.
To workaound the issue you can disable Rx checksum offload of fxp0.
#ifconfig fxp0 -rxcsum
Or download patch from the following URL.
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c?r1=197586&r2=197575&view=patch



Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->yongari
Responsible-Changed-By: yongari
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 20 22:03:13 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Track.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=140712
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: kern/140728: [em] [patch] Fast irq registration in em driver

2009-11-20 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: Fast irq registration in em driver
New Synopsis: [em] [patch] Fast irq registration in em driver

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 20 23:09:35 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Over to maintainer(s).

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=140728
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


RE: bce(4) BCM5907 CTX write errors on 7.2 driver

2009-11-20 Thread David Christensen
> > For the record we also have not been able to reproduce the issue on 
> > the R710 only the R610.
> 
> I got hold of an R610 system and I now understand why the 
> issue was difficult to replicate on R710.  The R610 ships 
> without Enterprise iDRAC while the R710 ship with the add-in 
> Enterprise iDRAC module.  When the module is present the 
> system is managed through the additional RJ45 port but when 
> the module is absent iDRAC traffic will flow through the 
> on-board 5709 adpaters.
> The error will only occur when management firmware is loaded 
> on the 5709 AND when NC-SI management functionality is enabled.
> 
> You should be able to confirm this by adding or removing the 
> Enterprise iDRAC module on your systems.  Now that I have a 
> failure again I have some ideas to test which might help.
> Stay tuned.

Does the attached patch make a difference for you?

FYI, I'll be out next week on vacation.

Dave

if_bce.diff
Description: if_bce.diff
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

ipfw not blocking inter jail ip traffic

2009-11-20 Thread Peter
iH,

Have 2 jails and I don't want them to be able to reach other.

gulag:#ifconfig em0
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=9b
ether 08:00:27:03:18:ea
inet 172.20.6.50 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.20.6.255
inet 172.20.6.209 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.20.6.255
inet 172.20.6.211 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.20.6.255

gulag:#ipfw list
00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
1 deny ip from 172.20.6.209 to 172.20.6.211
10001 deny ip from 172.20.6.211 to 172.20.6.209
4 deny ip from 172.20.6.209 to any
65000 allow ip from any to any
65535 deny ip from any to any


The two jails [.209 and .211] can still ping each other.
Even with rule 4, the .209 jail can ping/ssh to the .211 jail, but of
course cannot ping the gateway...
If I remove rule '100' from the list, jails are no longer able to ping
each other - Although the IPs are on em0, why is the rule with lo0 letting
them pass?  Does lo0 mean ALL ips assigned to server? or does it mean
loopback interface:

gulag:#ifconfig lo0
lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
options=3
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00

]Peter[

___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"