Re: ng_pptpgre problems: tcp connections reset unexpectedly
On Monday 29 January 2007 20:25, Alexander Motin wrote: > It is released now. And if you will have there any problems, they must > be fixed before next release. So inform me. The problem I had is gone. mpd4 cannot be compared to mpd3. It is by far superior, both usability-wise and networking-ability-wise. thanks. > > To complicate things a bit more sftp over the same the link works reliably > > (different sockopts?). http fails, ftp fails but sftp works as usual. > > > > Eventually a read(2) fails: > > 1794 fetchCALL read(0x3,0x8057730,0xd0) > > 1794 fetchRET read -1 errno 60 Operation timed out > > Strange result IMHO for reading from TCP socket. I will try to > investigate this. > > > It seems to work with disabled windowing. If you are interested in > > tracking down this, I would be glad to help. > > I will try to look into it. If you will have some more interesting > results send them to me. > I can provide you a pptp peer to connect to. I can reproduce it easily from home, I am opening a pptp tunnel over the pppoe connection and it happens frequently. Nikos ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Support for 3C996-SX? Or 3C985(b)-SX?
On Jan 30, 2007, at 01:34 , Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:00:06PM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote: Hi I'm about to buy a PCI 1000-SX network card, looking on eBay I've found both 3C996-SX and 3C985(b)-SX cards. Looking at http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/hardware- i386.html#ETHERNET I can find "3Com 3c996-T (10/100/1000baseTX)", but not the SX? However, on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/hardware- i386.html#ETHERNET I can see "3Com 3c996-SX, 3c996-T". So, has the -SX support been removed or something? From the if_bge.c changelog (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c) I found this: If my memory serve me right bge(4) supports 3Com 996SX. I think I've used the 996SX to make bge(4) work on sparc64. Goodie :) I got a private mail from wpaul too confirming this. Commit message by wpaul Lastly, teach the driver how to recognize a 3c996B-SX by checking the hardware config word in the EEPROM in order to detect the media. We attach 5701 fiber cards correctly now, but I haven't verified that they send/receive packets yet since I don't have a second fiber interface at home. (I know that fiber 5700 cards work, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed.) But this is from 4 years ago so.. not pretty recent and no followup in the log. So, is it supported or not? :) Also i found some 3c985(b) cards on eBay, a bit more expensive ($10 or so..), but this uses the ti driver instead of bge. And from what I can see this driver does not support ALTQ. However, im not quite sure I'm not sure Max Laier(mlaier@) already made a ALTQ patch for ti(4). If you can test ti(4) on your box I can write a ALTQ patch for ti(4). Okay :) I'll see what card I get, but as I understand it it shouldnt make much difference.. Thanks for your help! :) Johan Ström Stromnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stromnet.se/ ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Support for 3C996-SX? Or 3C985(b)-SX?
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:09:15AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2007, at 01:34 , Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > >On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:00:06PM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote: > >>Hi > >> > >>I'm about to buy a PCI 1000-SX network card, looking on eBay I've > >>found both 3C996-SX and 3C985(b)-SX cards. > >>Looking at http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/hardware- > >>i386.html#ETHERNET I can find "3Com 3c996-T (10/100/1000baseTX)", but > >>not the SX? > >>However, on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/hardware- > >>i386.html#ETHERNET I can see "3Com 3c996-SX, 3c996-T". > >>So, has the -SX support been removed or something? > >>From the if_bge.c changelog (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ > >>src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c) I found this: > >> > > > >If my memory serve me right bge(4) supports 3Com 996SX. > >I think I've used the 996SX to make bge(4) work on sparc64. > > Goodie :) I got a private mail from wpaul too confirming this. > Thanks, I have added this card to the bge(4) hardware list, so it'll show up as supported for the next release. - Christian -- Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D pgpuFZYxjGsGP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ng_pptpgre problems: tcp connections reset unexpectedly. TCP guru needed!
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: It seems to work with disabled windowing. If you are interested in tracking down this, I would be glad to help. I will try to look into it. If you will have some more interesting results send them to me. I can provide you a pptp peer to connect to. I can reproduce it easily from home, I am opening a pptp tunnel over the pppoe connection and it happens frequently. Last night I was thinking of it and I was able to reproduce this sometimes, but it was not predictable. For this moment I have no idea about reason of this problem. There is one problem with windowing in ng_pptpgre and I am now working on it, but it can only results in packet losses, but not in connection reset. I think we need some TCP guru to understand this. -- Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Optima Telecom ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: kern/108542: [bce]: Huge network latencies with 6.2-RELEASE / STABLE
Old Synopsis: Huge network latencies with 6.2-RELEASE / STABLE New Synopsis: [bce]: Huge network latencies with 6.2-RELEASE / STABLE Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 30 13:32:00 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: This seems like a networking issue, assign it to the networking team. Submitter: Please be informed that there had been discussion on the bce driver recently (I cannot recall whether that went about performance issues though), if you are not aware of that please review the mailinglist archives of -net (as far as i can recall) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108542 ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
s
-- from x86.natgmail.com Best regards, ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
