[Bug 206012] jail(8): Cannot assign link-local IPv6 address to a jail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206012 Jamie Gritton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open --- Comment #3 from Jamie Gritton --- It wouldn't be too hard to automate the transition between fe80:ifnum::dead:beef and fe80::dead:beef%ifname. Jail uses inet_pton and inet_ntop which aren't aware of this, but it looks like it could use getaddrinfo and getameinfo which use the scope ID, or if_nametoindex and if_indextoname which give me the number directly. I would have to move this scope ID to/from the second and third octets in the inet6 address, which is rather non-standard but I assume a long-standing FreeBSD way of doing things. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 208001] After turning off the jail does not remove network routes
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001 Jamie Gritton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ja...@freebsd.org Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #3 from Jamie Gritton --- I suspect the problem lies in the "/24" of "re0|10.0.0.22/24". Jail aliases are almost always going to use the /32 netmask, which is the default if one isn't specified. From what I see of your netstat output, your primary address is on the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet. The only time you'd want a non-/32 subnet on a jail is if your set aside a separate subnet used only for that jail. Note this instruction from the "alias" section of ifconfig(8): "If the address is on the same subnet as the first network address for this interface, a non-conflicting netmask must be given. Usually 0x is most appropriate." In any case, I was unable to reproduce this behavior. I don't know all the parameters of your setup, but it looks like you should just remove those netmasks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 208001] After turning off the jail does not remove network routes
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001 Vladislav V. Prodan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Closed |Open Resolution|Works As Intended |--- --- Comment #4 from Vladislav V. Prodan --- The problem is not the creation of an IP address, network mask, other than /32. I can give some examples of network topology, when the IP jail need to assign a subnet mask for the correct operation of the network protocols. For example, a DHCP-server or Samba services (nmbd and winbindd) The problem is in the removal of a route to this IP when you turn off the jail. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 208001] After turning off the jail does not remove network routes
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001 --- Comment #5 from Jamie Gritton --- Yes, of course there are cases where something besides a /32 is appropriate - that is why jail(8) allows that. However, as I mentioned it did appear that you had violated the specification that an alias should be on a non-conflicting netmask. The fact remains that I am unable to reproduce your problem. Perhaps I could if I had your entire configuration - all jails, all other network setup. jail(8) simply calls ifconfig(8) with "alias" to add IP addresses, and with "-alias" to remove them - see the output of "jail -vc" and "jail -vr". The jail will not be removed if the "ifconfig ... -alias" command fails, which implies that the command is succeeding. Unless of course there actually is a bug in the way jail(8) is running this program. My guess is the command is succeeding, but isn't removing some arp entry because the alias when incorrectly specified when it was created. If it's clear (from "jail -v") that the correct ifconfig commands are being run, then this might be considered an ifconfig bug. If the correct commands aren't being run, then it could be a jail bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [Bug 208001] After turning off the jail does not remove network routes
On 2016-05-28 20:30, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001 > > --- Comment #5 from Jamie Gritton --- > Yes, of course there are cases where something besides a /32 is appropriate - > that is why jail(8) allows that. However, as I mentioned it did appear that > you had violated the specification that an alias should be on a > non-conflicting > netmask. > > The fact remains that I am unable to reproduce your problem. Perhaps I could > if I had your entire configuration - all jails, all other network setup. > > jail(8) simply calls ifconfig(8) with "alias" to add IP addresses, and with > "-alias" to remove them - see the output of "jail -vc" and "jail -vr". The > jail will not be removed if the "ifconfig ... -alias" command fails, which > implies that the command is succeeding. Unless of course there actually is a > bug in the way jail(8) is running this program. My guess is the command is > succeeding, but isn't removing some arp entry because the alias when > incorrectly specified when it was created. > > If it's clear (from "jail -v") that the correct ifconfig commands are being > run, then this might be considered an ifconfig bug. If the correct commands > aren't being run, then it could be a jail bug. > I think that is actually the problem ifconfig -alias only accepts the IP address, not with the CIDR. #ifconfig lo0 alias 10.0.0.1/24 #ifconfig lo0 -alias 10.0.0.1/24 ifconfig: 10.0.0.1/24: bad value you want to do just: #ifconfig lo0 -alias 10.0.0.1 So jail(8) needs to strip the /24 off when passing it to ifconfig -alias -- Allan Jude ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
