Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: > > It's not fixed anywhere yet - it sometimes works in current, and > sometimes doesn't. I've been meaning to patch it up, but it the problem > is what I think it is, the patching up is a pretty big operation. > > It doesn't mean you can't use jails with devfs in 9.1, just that you > can't use them with jail.conf. The old jail rc file that's all > shell-based is still the official jail startup method, and that one > still works. So existing systems will still work as expected, hence no > errata. Shouldn't we warn the user about that in the manpage though? -- Jeremie Le Hen Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons. They forgot to mention Morons. ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?
On 05/09/13 03:17, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: It's not fixed anywhere yet - it sometimes works in current, and sometimes doesn't. I've been meaning to patch it up, but it the problem is what I think it is, the patching up is a pretty big operation. It doesn't mean you can't use jails with devfs in 9.1, just that you can't use them with jail.conf. The old jail rc file that's all shell-based is still the official jail startup method, and that one still works. So existing systems will still work as expected, hence no errata. Shouldn't we warn the user about that in the manpage though? Well really we ought to fix it. I guess the man page could have something in the meantime, about an assumption that when you specify a devfs ruleset, that the ruleset in question must actually exist at the time. - Jamie ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
RE: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?
An ugly workaround to complete the jail closure, when relying on jail.conf, is to: jail -r $JAILNAME umount /$LOCATION_OF_JAILS/$JAILNAME/dev || true Regards, Dewayne. ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
