On 2013-06-13, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Can we introduce a new syntax while keeping the old behaviour?
>
> path zvol/* hide-r
> path zvol/* unhide-r
>
> I think this will be more accepted than changing existing behaviour!
IMHO, the old behavior is so confusing and unintuitive that we should
not maintain it. Can you clarify how "hide-r" and "unhide-r" would
differ from plain "hide" and "unhide". The current syntax already uses
pattern matching via fnmatch(9).
> Is this stack element really needed?
>
> + char specname[SPECNAMELEN + 1];
Need to check if M_WAITOK malloc is possible here.
--
Jaakko
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
