Re: Interrupts issues
Volker wrote: On 12/23/-58 20:59, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Benjie Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi FreeBSD hackers: I have two Dell workstations that I recently added FreeBSD 6.2 on. One is a Precision T3400, one is an Inspiron 530. Nothing fancy. Installed FBsd. Everything else is fine except both machines have interrupt storm issues: one core (both dual core) is 100% servicing interrupts. On the Precision, it's irq20 atapci, on Inspiron it's irq19 uhci. The other core is fine and both machines run well otherwise. I saw several recent posts on the net about some of these issues and did not find a resolution. It seems unlikely that it's just a ata or usb issue since both machines happen to have the same problem. Any thoughts? Please provide the output of "dmesg" after a boot in verbose mode. This may help the maintainers to understand your problem and give you additional instructions. Do you have any special reason to use FreeBSD 6.2? It is a rather old version, ... 6.2 has already been EOL'd in May. ___ I need to join the club, my machine starts doing interrupt storms after an uptime of ${random} on the IRQ19 (atapci0) thingy. Next time I'll boot the machine I'll try to make it a verbose boot. It's a production machine which cannot restart on demand ofcourse :) Note: First the problems occured much more, this was because the usb interfaces on the machine co-existed with the atapci0 interface, after disabling usb on the system, it took a lot longer to trigger the interrupt storm (50 days if I recall correctly). Cheers remko Regular dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #7: Thu Sep 18 09:53:16 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/x Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+ (2799.99-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40f33 Stepping = 3 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x2001 AMD Features=0xea500800 AMD Features2=0x1f Cores per package: 2 usable memory = 2103840768 (2006 MB) avail memory = 2028867584 (1934 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 This module (opensolaris) contains code covered by the Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL) see http://opensolaris.org/os/licensing/opensolaris_license/ ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 10, 7df0 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem 0xfc00-0xfdff,0xfe9f-0xfe9f,0xfe80-0xfe8f irq 18 at device 5.0 on pci1 pci1: at device 5.2 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 7.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 re0: Ethernet> port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xfeaff000-0xfeaf irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2 re0: turning off MSI enable bit. re0: Chip rev. 0x3800 re0: MAC rev. 0x miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: 00:1d:92:b1:a3:2f re0: [FILTER] atapci0: port 0xb000-0xb007,0xa000-0xa003,0x9000-0x9007,0x8000-0x8003,0x7000-0x700f mem 0xfe7ff800-0xfe7ffbff irq 22 at device 18.0 on pci0 atapci0: [ITHREAD] atapci0: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 4 ports detected ata2: on atapci0 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci0 ata3: [ITHREAD] ata4: on atapci0 ata4: [ITHREAD] ata5: on atapci0 ata5: [ITHREAD] pci0: at device 19.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 19.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 19.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 19.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 19.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 19.5 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 20.0 (no driver attached) atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xff00-0xff0f at device 20.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata0: [ITHREAD] isab0: at device 20.3 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pcib3: at device 20.4 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 acpi_button0: on acpi0 sio0: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio0: [FILTER] atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [I
smbus & i2c: why i2c is not enabled on ich?
Any reason why i2c mode in not enable in ichsmb? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:31:3:class=0x0c0500 card=0x82d81043 chip=0x266a8086 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801FB (ICH6) SMBus Controller' class = serial bus subclass = SMBus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo pciconf -rb pci0:0:31:3: 0x40 01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo ./scan_smbus res: 0 slave = 0x44 data = res: 0 slave = 0x50 data = res: 0 slave = 0x69 data = res: 0 slave = 0xC4 data = res: 0 slave = 0xD0 data = res: 0 slave = 0xE9 data = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo pciconf -wb pci0:0:31:3: 0x40 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo pciconf -rb pci0:0:31:3: 0x40 05 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo ./scan_smbus res: 0 slave = 0x44 data = FF FF FF FF res: 0 slave = 0x50 data = 0A 60 40 00 05 30 45 00 82 08 00 00 0C 04 res: 0 slave = 0x69 data = FF F7 00 00 01 0F 07 E0 18 46 1B 24 D8 63 00 res: 0 slave = 0xC4 data = FF FF FF FF res: 0 slave = 0xD0 data = 0A 60 40 00 05 30 45 00 82 08 00 00 0C 04 res: 0 slave = 0xE9 data = FF F7 00 00 01 0F 07 E0 18 46 1B 24 D8 63 00 FYI this is on an asus eeepc. -- bye, P. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: kgdb's add-kld broken on amd64
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >On Wednesday 17 September 2008 03:51:02 pm Navdeep Parhar wrote: >> Hello John, >> >> The patch did NOT fix the problem. Read on for more >> >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:31 AM, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Tuesday 16 September 2008 04:07:46 pm Navdeep Parhar wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> >> >> The add-kld command in kgdb does not work as expected on amd64 >> >> (I'm using a recent HEAD, problem may affect others too). It uses >> >> the same address for all sections: >> >> >> >> (kgdb) add-kld if_cxgb.ko >> >> add symbol table from file "/boot/kernel/if_cxgb.ko" at >> >> .text_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> .rodata_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> .rodata.str1.8_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> .rodata.str1.1_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> set_modmetadata_set_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> set_sysctl_set_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> set_sysinit_set_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> set_sysuninit_set_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> .data_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> .bss_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> (y or n) >> >> >> >> This is not correct. The .text section's address is OK but the >> >> others are not. >> >> >> >> The problem seems to be that all amd64 kernel objects have VMA set >> >> to 0 for all sections. add_section() in gnu/usr.bin/gdb/kgdb/kld.c >> >> uses this VMA to adjust the address of the section: >> >> >> >> address = asi->base_addr + bfd_get_section_vma(bfd, sect); >> >> >> >> objdump -h shows that the userland objects on amd64 and all >> >> objects (kernel + userland) on i386 set VMA. It is only the >> >> kernel objects on amd64 that have VMA = 0. (sample output from >> >> amd64 and i386 machines appended at the end) >> >> >> >> For the time being I've patched kgdb to consider the file offset >> >> and not the VMA while calculating the section address. It seems >> >> to work but is probably not the right way to fix the problem. >> >> >> >> Any thoughts? >> > >> > Hmm, I wonder if this is because on amd64 modules are .o's rather >than .so's. >> > It is. File offset isn't quite right. Instead, the way >> > sys/kern/link_elf_obj.c works is that it just loads the PROGBITS (text, >code, >> > etc.) and NOBITS (bss) sections in the order they are in the file and >> > concatenates them. So, the relocation logic in kgdb will need to be >updated >> > to recognize a .o vs .so and apply that algorithm for .o files. >> > >> > Actually, what I've done is to replace the home-rolled section relocation >> > stuff with the gdb primitives that the solib code in gdb uses. It works >here >> > on i386, and hopefully this will fix this as this is how the sharedlibrary >> > kld stuff is doing the relocations: >> >> I had to modify the patch a bit as add-kld -> build_section_table() -> >xfree() >> was a bad free and led to bus errors or segv: >> >> - struct section_table *sections, *sections_end, *s; >> + struct section_table *sections = NULL, *sections_end = NULL, *s; >> >> After fixing that, add-kld still wouldn't pick up the correct >> addresses: >> >> (kgdb) add-kld if_cxgb.ko >> add symbol table from file "/boot/kernel/if_cxgb.ko" at >> .text_addr = 0x81022000 >> .rodata_addr = 0x81022000 >> .rodata.str1.8_addr = 0x81022000 >> .rodata.str1.1_addr = 0x81022000 >> set_modmetadata_set_addr = 0x81022000 >> set_sysctl_set_addr = 0x81022000 >> set_sysinit_set_addr = 0x81022000 >> set_sysuninit_set_addr = 0x81022000 >> .data_addr = 0x81022000 >> .bss_addr = 0x81022000 >> >> With the patch the section relocation is still taking place based >> on the VMA (which is 0 for amd64 modules as I pointed out >> earlier). So the behaviour is no different than before. If I >> read the code right, each section's addr is calculated as: >> >> load_kld -> build_section_table -> add_to_section_table >> >> This sets it to bfd_section_vma(abfd, asect), which is no good >> for amd64 kernel modules. > >Well, this means gdb can't handle loading .o's, though I guess that is to be >expected. :( Even if I fix add-kld there's probably no way I can easily fix >the sharedlibrary stuff w/o ripping gdb itself up a bunch. I haven't looked at what the gdb patch exactly does, but I was able to load klds the old way on amd64 using a patched asf(8) as posted here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/2008-May/011062.html Better than nothing I guess... :) Juergen ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: smbus & i2c: why i2c is not enabled on ich?
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > Any reason why i2c mode in not enable in ichsmb? Because the controller is a SMB controller and not a I2C one. SMB is more specific than I2C in that it defines complete I2C sequences. With SMB you don't have the individual control over all I2C phases. You can do SMB with an I2C controller, but you can't do raw I2C with an SMB controller. Use SMB to address your devices - SMB is good enough to handle most I2C cases. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:31:3:class=0x0c0500 card=0x82d81043 chip=0x266a8086 > rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801FB (ICH6) SMBus Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = SMBus > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo pciconf -rb pci0:0:31:3: 0x40 > 01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo ./scan_smbus > res: 0 slave = 0x44 data = > res: 0 slave = 0x50 data = > res: 0 slave = 0x69 data = > res: 0 slave = 0xC4 data = > res: 0 slave = 0xD0 data = > res: 0 slave = 0xE9 data = > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo pciconf -wb pci0:0:31:3: 0x40 5 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo pciconf -rb pci0:0:31:3: 0x40 > 05 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/eeebsd >sudo ./scan_smbus > res: 0 slave = 0x44 data = FF FF FF FF > res: 0 slave = 0x50 data = 0A 60 40 00 05 30 45 00 82 08 00 00 0C 04 > res: 0 slave = 0x69 data = FF F7 00 00 01 0F 07 E0 18 46 1B 24 D8 63 00 > res: 0 slave = 0xC4 data = FF FF FF FF > res: 0 slave = 0xD0 data = 0A 60 40 00 05 30 45 00 82 08 00 00 0C 04 > res: 0 slave = 0xE9 data = FF F7 00 00 01 0F 07 E0 18 46 1B 24 D8 63 00 > > FYI this is on an asus eeepc. > -- > bye, > P. > ___ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- B.Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"