msdosfs/darwin
I found the sources, thanks anyway ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
munmap.2 inconsistency ?
hi, browsing through the munmap() page, it says Munmap() will fail if: [EINVAL] The addr parameter was not page aligned, the len ... now, i have verified that munmap works fine with any address returned by mmap, even if not aligned, at least on a recent -STABLE. As i assume that passing munmap() the same address returned by mmap() is common behaviour, should we rephrase the manpage ? cheers luigi ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
natd + ipfw, multiple public address routing...
Dear all, hello! As my first post I would like to seek some help :) I'm currently installing a bsd firewall to replace a cisco router for the filtering and NAT. Our network is composed of several server having a public IP each on the net. Ihave managed with natd to make the entries from internet on the machines' public IP to work, but theses machines cannot access internet. Here are my config files: /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter="157..x.x.193" gateway_enable="YES" hostname="firewall" ifconfig_rl0="inet 157.xxx.xxx.194 netmask 255.255.xxx.xxx" ifconfig_xl0="inet 10.1.0.2 netmask 255.255.0.0" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/etc/firewall.sh" natd_enable="YES" natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" /etc/natd.conf alias_address 157.x.x.194 same_ports yes use_sockets yes redirect_address 10.1.2.2 157.x.x.195 /etc/firewall.sh ipfw add 100 divert 8668 all from any to any via rl0 ipfw add 110 allow all from any to any via rl0 established ipfw add 120 allow all from any to any out xmit rl0 setup ipfw add 130 allow all from 10.1.0.0:255.255.0.0 to any ipfw add 140 allow all from any to 10.1.0.0:255.255.0.0 ipfw add 150 allow all from any to 10.1.2.2 http https ipfw add 160 allow all from 10.1.2.2 http https to any ipfw add 65000 deny all from any to any A machine with 10.1.0.18 ip address can acces internet with no problem. The machine 10.1.2.2 can be ping from internet, but cannot access internet. Knowinf that I have a could of other machine that I'll have to configure a translation for, can someone say me what to modify to have this working properly? Thanks! :) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: munmap.2 inconsistency ?
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:03:23PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > hi, > browsing through the munmap() page, it says > Munmap() will fail if: > > [EINVAL] The addr parameter was not page aligned, the len > ... > > now, i have verified that munmap works fine with any address returned > by mmap, even if not aligned, at least on a recent -STABLE. > > As i assume that passing munmap() the same address returned by mmap() > is common behaviour, should we rephrase the manpage ? This could have slipped in from POSIX, which requires page-aligned addresses and lengths to mmap() & friends. I believe SVR4 also requires this. But yes, the manual pages should be corrected. Tim ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Kernel Threads
Sridhar, > I heard that even Interrupts run under kernel threads context See ithread(9). > How can a kernel thread yield CPU when it detects it is idle? kthread_suspend(), or yield(). See kthread(9), mi_switch(9). Let me also answer your questions(s) at another level: I have found information about the kernel in the following places: 1. The section 9 manual pages 2. The FreeBSD Arch Handbook 3. The FreeBSD Handbook 4. The sources -- use 'glimpse' on a checked out -CURRENT tree. 5. Under /usr/share/doc/papers/ If you find some documentation to be missing, and you had to figure out something non-obvious, please file a PR with sample text. Regards, Koshy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Call for Help: patching if_bfe against FreeBSD -stable (4.8, 4.9)
In Reference To: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2003-September/003151.html the above specifies a patch to include the bfe driver into a 4.8 kernel. How do I proceed with this? Pardon my ignorance, but I am not familiar with kernel's patches, hence the reason I am asking for some guidance or pointers. Any help towards this will be greatly appreciated. Been actively trying to solve the Broadcom 4401 NIC on my Dell 8500, and the above link seems to be the closest I can get to. I cant afford to upgrade to -CURRENT as my notebook is almost the mirror to all the production servers I have . Responses are much appreciated! Thanks -- Feisal ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Call for Help: patching if_bfe against FreeBSD -stable (4.8, 4.9)
From: "Al-Afu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 6:44 AM > In Reference To: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2003-September/003151.html > > the above specifies a patch to include the bfe driver into a 4.8 kernel. How > do I proceed with this? > > Pardon my ignorance, but I am not familiar with kernel's patches, hence the > reason I am asking for some guidance or pointers. > > Any help towards this will be greatly appreciated. Been actively trying to > solve the Broadcom 4401 NIC on my Dell 8500, and the above link seems to be > the closest I can get to. I cant afford to upgrade to -CURRENT as my > notebook is almost the mirror to all the production servers I have . There are another set of patches that "Pavel" prepared a couple of weeks ago. I need to get 4.9 on my laptop and giv e them a whirl and then commit them. I may be able to this over the weekend. I will put the patches up on a web site somewhere when I get home from work tonight. Duncan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Call for Help: patching if_bfe against FreeBSD -stable (4.8, 4.9)
I've put Pavel's patches at http://people.freebsd.org/~dmlb/bfe-4.8.tar.gz Duncan - Original Message - From: "Al-Afu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 6:44 AM Subject: Call for Help: patching if_bfe against FreeBSD -stable (4.8, 4.9) > In Reference To: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2003-September/003151.html > > the above specifies a patch to include the bfe driver into a 4.8 kernel. How > do I proceed with this? > > Pardon my ignorance, but I am not familiar with kernel's patches, hence the > reason I am asking for some guidance or pointers. > > Any help towards this will be greatly appreciated. Been actively trying to > solve the Broadcom 4401 NIC on my Dell 8500, and the above link seems to be > the closest I can get to. I cant afford to upgrade to -CURRENT as my > notebook is almost the mirror to all the production servers I have . > > Responses are much appreciated! Thanks > > -- > Feisal > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
