[Bug 219912] emulators/linux_base-c6: lacks a package manager
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219912 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||x...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Johannes Jost Meixner --- This is intentional. Using yum you have no guarantee over what's installed to /compat/linux (FreeBSD does not use yum) and would not be able to use pkg to cleanly delete packages. If you have a need for a particular package you should file a PR for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 208434] emulators/linux_base-c6 compat.linux.osrelease info out of date for FreeBSD 10.3 RC3?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208434 Remko Lodder changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-...@freebsd.org |re...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 208434] emulators/linux_base-c6 compat.linux.osrelease info out of date for FreeBSD 10.3 RC3?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208434 --- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: remko Date: Thu Jun 15 09:08:36 UTC 2017 New revision: 50370 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/50370 Log: Remove two lines that are no longer needed. PR: 208434 Submitted by: papow...@astart.com, xmj Changes: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu/chapter.xml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 220006] www/linux-flashplayer: update to 26.0.0.126
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220006 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||merge-quarterly? CC||x...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 219912] emulators/linux_base-c6: lacks a package manager
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219912 --- Comment #2 from John Smith --- > Using yum you have no guarantee over what's installed to /compat/linux > (FreeBSD does not use yum) Could you expand on this? IMO, it's yum's job to guarantee what's getting installed into /compat/linux (if it works properly on FreeBSD's linuxulator). Does it fail to guarantee that? Or did you mean that if I install something using yum - pkg will not know about that (IMO, that'd be absolutely logical and absolutely acceptable). > If you have a need for a particular package you should file a PR for this. So linux packages should get installed like all other ones? using pkg (or building from ports)? If so - then the pkg/ports repository now has a lot of linux packets, right? Then how to distinguish them from FreeBSD packets? Is there some naming convention maybe? I might be asking very newbie questions, but man page of linux_base-c6 doesn't cover that and folks on the IRC channel were not absolutely sure of how the system works. If there's either some FAQ/wiki somewhere - please link it, otherwise - please, describe all that stuff in a man page. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 220006] www/linux-flashplayer: update to 26.0.0.126
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220006 Bug ID: 220006 Summary: www/linux-flashplayer: update to 26.0.0.126 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: emulat...@freebsd.org Reporter: x...@freebsd.org Assignee: emulat...@freebsd.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(emulat...@freebsd.org) Created attachment 183492 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=183492&action=edit security update According to Adobe's security bulletin APSB17-17 [1] our flashplayer version 25.0.0.171 is (once more) vulnerable. Patch attached addresses that. I have not been able to successfully test it (my setup currently involves firefox and linux c7, that's something that remains to be done. [1] https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb17-17.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 220006] www/linux-flashplayer: update to 26.0.0.126
Johannes Jost Meixner has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to emulat...@freebsd.org: Bug 220006: www/linux-flashplayer: update to 26.0.0.126 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220006 --- Description --- Created attachment 183492 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=183492&action=edit security update According to Adobe's security bulletin APSB17-17 [1] our flashplayer version 25.0.0.171 is (once more) vulnerable. Patch attached addresses that. I have not been able to successfully test it (my setup currently involves firefox and linux c7, that's something that remains to be done. [1] https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb17-17.html ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 208434] emulators/linux_base-c6 compat.linux.osrelease info out of date for FreeBSD 10.3 RC3?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208434 Remko Lodder changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Remko Lodder --- I have fixed this in r50370. Thanks for the submission and your time to help us improve the documentation. It is greatly appreciated! Remko -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 219912] emulators/linux_base-c6: lacks a package manager
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219912 --- Comment #3 from Johannes Jost Meixner --- So, currently the way to install stuff into /compat/linux is using the readily available linux-c6- / linux-c7- modules. They're handled by pkg and libarchive: We take the rpm, extract it, install things to [port]/work/stage/compat/linux, hash files, package it, ship it as .txz. Now the obvious problem with the status quo is that at no point does it involve yum, so any yum database would have *no idea* which base packages are installed. So if we shipped yum with linux_base-[c6/c7/whatever] this'd require: 1. integration of yum and pkg to a degree that doesn't exist nor is currently planned on the pkg side [afair] 2. a rework of the current linux infrastructure to use pkg-yum glue instead of libarchive. That aside, some documentation can be found in the handbook: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/linuxemu.html#linuxemu-synopsis And we do have metapackages "linux-c6" / "linux-c7" that will pull in any possible linux package that is available, and (most likely) contains what you're looking for. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 219994] VirtualBox crashes 11.1-BETA1
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219994 Jung-uk Kim changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|v...@freebsd.org|j...@freebsd.org Status|New |Closed --- Comment #9 from Jung-uk Kim --- It should be fixed now (r319963). Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 220003] emulators/virtualbox-ose: crashes on recent 12.0-CURRENT
Johannes Jost Meixner has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to v...@freebsd.org: Bug 220003: emulators/virtualbox-ose: crashes on recent 12.0-CURRENT https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220003 --- Description --- I can start VMs through GUI or command line, but the moment I add port forwarding from guest to host (e.g. to expose the guest's SSH port on my local computer) I see a kernel panic like this (camera-taken) screenshot: http://imgur.com/NgP6KXL ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 220003] emulators/virtualbox-ose: crashes on recent 12.0-CURRENT
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220003 Bug ID: 220003 Summary: emulators/virtualbox-ose: crashes on recent 12.0-CURRENT Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: v...@freebsd.org Reporter: x...@freebsd.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(v...@freebsd.org) Assignee: v...@freebsd.org I can start VMs through GUI or command line, but the moment I add port forwarding from guest to host (e.g. to expose the guest's SSH port on my local computer) I see a kernel panic like this (camera-taken) screenshot: http://imgur.com/NgP6KXL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: VBox 5 getting window height wrong
[ add cc of v...@freebsd.org which is a better list for this I think ] Hi, Updating to the correct Guest Additions doesn't fix the issue. Whether GA is installed or not doesn't seem to make much difference to this problem I've also changed from QT4 (which I was using) to QT5 with no change Thanks, Gary On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:08:20PM +0200, Daniel Tihanyi wrote: > Hi, > > Do you have the right version of Guest Additions installed on your > guests? I also have Windows 10 as a VM in VirtualBox (though it's > FreeBSD 11), but it works for me without any problems. > > Daniel Tihanyi > > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 11:54 +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Ever since upgrading from vbox 4 (which had occasional window placement > > or size issues, but nothing serious), vbox 5 has consistently had a problem > > where on starting a VM the window height is always reset to a fraction of > > what it should be. If I size the window properly by hand, and then select > > View -> Adjust Window Size it goes back to the wrong size again. > > > > Anyone else seen this? > > > > With Win10 it's worse - unless I maximise the window it keeps getting reset > > to the wrong height, I think by communication with the additions installed > > in the client. > > > > virtualbox-ose-5.1.22_1General-purpose full virtualizer for x86 > > hardware > > virtualbox-ose-kmod-5.1.22 VirtualBox kernel module for FreeBSD > > > > 10.3-RELEASE-p18 > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gary > > > > P.S. Please keep me on CC as I am not subscribed to this list > > ___ > > freebsd-virtualizat...@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 220006] www/linux-flashplayer: update to 26.0.0.126
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220006 --- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: jkim Date: Thu Jun 15 18:09:49 UTC 2017 New revision: 443622 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/443622 Log: Update to 26.0.0.126. https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb17-17.html PR: 220006 MFH: 2017Q2 Changes: head/www/linux-flashplayer/Makefile head/www/linux-flashplayer/distinfo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 220006] www/linux-flashplayer: update to 26.0.0.126
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220006 Jung-uk Kim changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@freebsd.org Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Jung-uk Kim --- Committed, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 219912] emulators/linux_base-c6: lacks a package manager
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219912 --- Comment #4 from John Smith --- (In reply to Johannes Jost Meixner from comment #3) > currently the way to install stuff into /compat/linux is using the readily > available linux-c6- / linux-c7- modules. > Now the obvious problem with the status quo is that at no point does it > involve yum, so any yum database would have *no idea* which base packages are > installed. What if I don't install any linux packages using linux-c6-* pkgs but instead use ONLY yum to manage linux packets? Wouldn't that solve all the problems? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
