NFS over IPv6 is a reason????

2001-03-26 Thread Mike O';Dell 


gee - being like SysV is more comprehensible than worrying about IPv6

-mo

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

"Argument by Authority"

1999-01-27 Thread Mike O';Dell 

just for a calibration,
i asked Dennis Ritchie his opinion of "the right behavior"

his comment about posix might be the trump card, although
i'd like to see chapter and verse if that's the case.

for what it's worth.

-mo


--- Forwarded Message

MessageName: (Message 47)
From:d...@plan9.bell-labs.com
Date:Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:30:59 -0500
To:  m...@servo.ccr.org

Well the research systems from v7 (just looked) through Brazil
produce no diagnostic.  So much for "should."

Irix complains, suppressible with -f.  I wonder if it's in posix?

Dennis

--- End of Forwarded Message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: "Argument by Authority"

1999-01-27 Thread Mike O';Dell 

i asked his notion of the right behavior of "rm"

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

a nit, however....

1999-01-31 Thread Mike O';Dell 

any reason why the kernel "config" program shouldn't
be changed to dramatically reduce the requirement for
the silling quoting of option values???  if an option
needs embedded whitespace, but other than that,
is there any reason other than historical for
the silliness about nubmers, etc??

-mo

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: a nit, however....

1999-01-31 Thread Mike O';Dell 

actually, i was there when Sam Leffler first wrote "config"
and that was never the intention, and that proposed fix would be
astoundingly silly

-mo

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message