[Bug 284130] vt console driver KMS: system console is not working

2025-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284130

--- Comment #2 from Artem Kim  ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #1)
excuse me. It's really important. vt worked well with the previous version of
the port drm-kmod-20220907_3 

drm] Radeon Display Connectors
[drm] Connector 0:
[drm]   DP-1
[drm]   HPD5
[drm]   DDC: 0x6430 0x6430 0x6434 0x6434 0x6438 0x6438 0x643c 0x643c
[drm]   Encoders:
[drm] DFP1: INTERNAL_UNIPHY2
[drm] Connector 1:
[drm]   DP-2
[drm]   HPD4
[drm]   DDC: 0x6440 0x6440 0x6444 0x6444 0x6448 0x6448 0x644c 0x644c
[drm]   Encoders:
[drm] DFP2: INTERNAL_UNIPHY2
[drm] Connector 2:
[drm]   HDMI-A-1
[drm]   HPD6
[drm]   DDC: 0x6460 0x6460 0x6464 0x6464 0x6468 0x6468 0x646c 0x646c
[drm]   Encoders:
[drm] DFP3: INTERNAL_UNIPHY1
[drm] Connector 3:
[drm]   DVI-D-1
[drm]   HPD1
[drm]   DDC: 0x6450 0x6450 0x6454 0x6454 0x6458 0x6458 0x645c 0x645c
[drm]   Encoders:
[drm] DFP4: INTERNAL_UNIPHY1
[drm] Connector 4:
[drm]   DVI-I-1
[drm]   HPD3
[drm]   DDC: 0x6470 0x6470 0x6474 0x6474 0x6478 0x6478 0x647c 0x647c
[drm]   Encoders:
[drm] DFP5: INTERNAL_UNIPHY
[drm] CRT1: INTERNAL_KLDSCP_DAC1
[drm] fb mappable at 0xD0371000
[drm] vram apper at 0xD000
[drm] size 5242880
[drm] fb depth is 24
[drm]pitch is 5120
VT: Driver priority 0 too low. Current 100
 fbd0: not attached to vt(4) console; another device has precedence (err=17)
[drm] Initialized radeon 2.50.0 20080528 for drmn0 on minor 0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 285129] netinet(6)/route: uninitialized access of ifp->if_data in ip6_tryforward() with PPPoE/ng interface

2025-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285129

Bug ID: 285129
   Summary: netinet(6)/route: uninitialized access of ifp->if_data
in ip6_tryforward() with PPPoE/ng interface
   Product: Base System
   Version: 14.2-STABLE
  Hardware: Any
   URL: https://github.com/opnsense/src/issues/207
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: fra...@opnsense.org

Hi,

Looking at a panic in ip6_tryforward() related to PPPoE, for details see the
downstream bug report. Backtrace is:

--- trap 0xc, rip = 0x80ddb5d7, rsp = 0xfe0038bd6840, rbp =
0xfe0038bd6970 ---
ip6_forward() at ip6_forward+0x2a7/frame 0xfe0038bd6970
ip6_input() at ip6_input+0x11f/frame 0xfe0038bd6a50
netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0x9e/frame 0xfe0038bd6aa0
ether_demux() at ether_demux+0x149/frame 0xfe0038bd6ad0
ether_nh_input() at ether_nh_input+0x36a/frame 0xfe0038bd6b30
netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0x9e/frame 0xfe0038bd6b80
ether_input() at ether_input+0x56/frame 0xfe0038bd6bd0
ether_demux() at ether_demux+0x97/frame 0xfe0038bd6c00
ether_nh_input() at ether_nh_input+0x36a/frame 0xfe0038bd6c60
netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0x9e/frame 0xfe0038bd6cb0
ether_input() at ether_input+0x56/frame 0xfe0038bd6d00
iflib_rxeof() at iflib_rxeof+0xc0e/frame 0xfe0038bd6e00
_task_fn_rx() at _task_fn_rx+0x72/frame 0xfe0038bd6e40
gtaskqueue_run_locked() at gtaskqueue_run_locked+0x14e/frame 0xfe0038bd6ec0
gtaskqueue_thread_loop() at gtaskqueue_thread_loop+0xc2/frame
0xfe0038bd6ef0
fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x7f/frame 0xfe0038bd6f30
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfe0038bd6f30
--- trap 0x9d9d3e64, rip = 0xb414471ee4b2474b, rsp = 0x3113c21961b5c24c, rbp =
0x5647a54d06e1a518 ---

Got a debug core and here is what it says:

(kgdb) frame 17
#17 0x80e0f6fc in ip6_tryforward (m=0xf80053520d00) at
/usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_fastfwd.c:194
194 mtu = IN6_LINKMTU(nifp);
(kgdb) p nifp->if_xname
$1 = "pppoe0\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"
(kgdb) p nifp->if_afdata
$2 = {0x0 }
(kgdb) p nifp->if_afdata_initialized
$3 = 0

Yes, the code is slightly modified, but it's 100% not self-inflicted. You can
also find a similar panic here:

https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15640

To unpack, IN6_LINKMTU() uses if_getifdata() which reaches for if_afdata but
that is not yet initialized (or maybe it's about to be teared down).

I'll put up a review for discussion in a bit. Fixing this one instance seems
trivial but the issue reaching for if_afdata unconditionally seems to be all
over the stack.


Cheers,
Franco

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 285094] handbook/x11/#x-configuration-intel

2025-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285094

ni...@protonmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Closed
 Resolution|--- |Works As Intended

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 285129] netinet(6)/route: uninitialized access of ifp->if_data in ip6_tryforward() with PPPoE/ng interface

2025-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285129

--- Comment #1 from Franco Fichtner  ---
Added a review here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D49212

It's a POC for discussion, but I can imagine there are a few strong opinions on
this approach so please let them be known.


Cheers,
Franco

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 273997] truncate 1 EXAMPLE incorrect description

2025-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273997

Maxim Konovalov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ma...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #2 from Maxim Konovalov  ---
Created attachment 258146
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=258146&action=edit
refactored patch

Hello,

I re-did the patch.  Now it addresses the following issues in the Examples
section:

- spells "Megabytes" as "megabytes" consistently

- removes a stray * from the /boot/kernel/kernel listing

- avoids using a shell prompt in the examples consistently

- fixes the size parameter

- adds an example how to increase the file size

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 162860] [zfs] Cannot share ZFS filesystem to hosts with a hyphen in hostname

2025-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162860

m...@valentine.me.uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m...@valentine.me.uk

--- Comment #4 from m...@valentine.me.uk ---
I just hit this old bug too.

As a hack workaround, you can script edit /etc/zfs/exports to fix up any known
munged hyphens and send SIGHUP to mountd.

I'm guessing you'd have to hack /etc/rc.d/zfs to re-apply the edit in
zfs_start_main() too, since zfs share will keep generating a bogus exports
file.

I'm sticking with sharenfs=on for now since it's just my home network...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 162860] [zfs] Cannot share ZFS filesystem to hosts with a hyphen in hostname

2025-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162860

--- Comment #5 from m...@valentine.me.uk ---
Can anyone confirm this is fixed in -CURRENT?  I only have 14.2 running ZFS at
the moment.

https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/sys/contrib/openzfs/lib/libshare/os/freebsd/nfs.c?id=7a7741af18d6c8a804cc643cb7ecda9d730c6aa6

#16529 29c9e6c32 Fix handling of DNS names with '-' in them for sharenfs

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 285148] [autofs] special_media logger facility should be higher than 'info'

2025-03-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285148

Bug ID: 285148
   Summary: [autofs] special_media logger facility should be
higher than 'info'
   Product: Base System
   Version: 14.2-RELEASE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Some People
  Priority: ---
 Component: bin
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: parakl...@darkreality.org

If the relevant fusefs modules are not installed autofs exits with an error
after logging to the 'info' facility.  Unfortunately those log messages are
never delivered anywhere so the reason for the failure is unclear.

This should be at least 'notice' so that it appears in `/var/log/messages`, but
is probably better if it is 'error'.  The `exit 1` from the `special_media`
script causes an error log (on console and dmesg) from automountd so the
explanatory text might as well appear there as well.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.