[Bug 283783] ipfw parser does not handle src-port keyword

2025-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283783

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 283785] Keyboard/Trackpad on HP OMEN Transcend Laptop 16-u0057nr (7K931UA) not working.

2025-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283785

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|multime...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 165059] vtnet(4): Networking breaks with a router using virtio net driver on KVM host

2025-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165059

--- Comment #39 from John Nielsen  ---
(In reply to John Nielsen from comment #36)
I was mistaken, my KVM-hosted router does suffer from this issue. So even more
happy to test patches than previously stated.

What needs to happen in terms of fixing (or ignoring) the bad checksums for the
NAT case and where? In the firewall/NAT code? vtnet driver? Somewhere else?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 283783] ipfw parser does not handle src-port keyword

2025-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283783

Bug ID: 283783
   Summary: ipfw parser does not handle src-port keyword
   Product: Base System
   Version: Unspecified
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Many People
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: j...@jimby.name

While the ipfw parser does handle the "dst-port" keyword, it seems it does not
handle the "src-port" keyword.

Steps to reproduce:

# kldload ipfw
# ipfw -q flush
# ipfw add 1000 allow tcp from 203.0.113.10 to me dst-port 22
01000 allow tcp from 203.0.113.10 to me 22
#
# ipfw add 1000 allow tcp from 203.0.113.10 src-port 3030 to me
ipfw: missing ``to''


(Apologies if this is a known bug.  I did not find it during a prior search.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 283785] Keyboard/Trackpad on HP OMEN Transcend Laptop 16-u0057nr (7K931UA) not working.

2025-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283785

--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Kondratyev  ---
Try to add following line to /boot/loader.conf:
hw.usb.usbhid.enable=1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 283528] I need an alias for the symbol getaddrinfo

2025-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283528

Konstantin Belousov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||k...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Belousov  ---
If you have an object a.so that interposes symbol A, the usual way to access
the symbol A from beneath a.so is using dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "A").

To get guaranteed results for symbols exported from libc, like "getaddrinfo",
ensure that your interposer is linked to libc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 275086] Old i386 boot: CPU0: local APIC error 0x4 – Cannot boot any longer

2025-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275086

b...@desync.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||b...@desync.com

--- Comment #3 from b...@desync.com ---
Created attachment 256313
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=256313&action=edit
fix

The offending commit appears to be 279cd05b7e4d.

0x4 in the ECR is apparently:

> Bit 2: Send Accept Error.
> Set when the local APIC detects that a message it sent was not accepted by 
> any > APIC on the APIC bus. Used only on P6 family and Pentium processors.

I guess pre-P4 systems don't like IPIs fired off into oblivion.  Attached patch
adds a check for multiple CPUs to match the one in
smp_targeted_tlb_shootdown(), which seems to be the only other caller.  Tested
on single-CPU 440BX and multiprocessor i840.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.