Публикации 2020 года

2020-12-28 Thread Интерактив плюс


___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 252225] won't accept flash drive: "got CAM status 0x50" for Kingston DataTraveler G3

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252225

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|kern|usb
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|u...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 251906] autofs: automounter always only adds to /var/db/mounttab but never clears it

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251906

Robert Wing  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||r...@freebsd.org
URL||https://reviews.freebsd.org
   ||/D27801

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 251906] autofs: automounter always only adds to /var/db/mounttab but never clears it

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251906

--- Comment #1 from Martin Birgmeier  ---
It seems there is also a similar issue with /var/db/mountdtab: On the NFS
server, entries only accumulate in that file but are never cleared.

-- Martin

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 244878] Kernel panic due to spin lock held too long

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244878

--- Comment #12 from Mark Johnston  ---
(In reply to Adam Jimerson from comment #11)
Could you try enabling compression on the core dump?  Add -Z to the dumpon(8)
invocation, e.g., by adding dumpon_flags="-Z" to /etc/rc.conf.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 244878] Kernel panic due to spin lock held too long

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244878

--- Comment #13 from Adam Jimerson  ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #12)

I certainly can enable that and see if that helps.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 251906] autofs: automounter always only adds to /var/db/mounttab but never clears it

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251906

--- Comment #2 from Robert Wing  ---
(In reply to Martin Birgmeier from comment #1)

Hey Martin,

This patch should also fix that.

With this patch, `automount -u` will try to use umount(8) when unmounting
filesystems.

umount(8) does some additional work such as notifying the mountd server that a
NFS mount has been unmounted, which will remove the /var/db/mountdtab entry on
the mountd server. If the notification to the mountd server is successful, the
/var/db/mounttab entry will also be removed.

-Rob

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 252240] "zfs send -R -I | zfs receive -F" not destroying snapshots that don't exist on the sending side

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252240

Bug ID: 252240
   Summary: "zfs send -R -I | zfs receive -F" not destroying
snapshots that don't exist on the sending side
   Product: Base System
   Version: 12.2-RELEASE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: l...@perftech.com

This is similar to 169964, but that was due to lack of the -R option, so I'm
submitting this as a new bug.

This appears to be new to 12.2-RELEASE. If the receiving side is running 12.1
or 12.0, everything works properly, but if the receiving side is running 12.2,
then snapshots that don't exist on the sending side are not destroyed on the
receiving side.

The version of the sending side doesn't appear to make any difference, the
problem appears to be strictly on the receive side, and consistently fails with
12.2 and withs with 12.1 or prior. In fact, on a given system, running
freebsd-update to upgrade from 12.1 to 12.2 causes the problem to appear, and
reverting back to 12.1, the problem disappears.

Sample commands:

zfs create ds/test
zfs snapshot ds/test@1
zfs snapshot ds/test@2
zfs snapshot ds/test@3
zfs snapshot ds/test@4
zfs snapshot ds/test@5
zfs send -R ds/test@5 | ssh desthost zfs receive -F ds/test

desthost now has the filesystem and all snapshots.

zfs snapshot ds/test@6
zfs send -R -I ds/test@5 ds/test@6 | ssh desthost zfs receive -F ds/test

desthost now has the test@6 snapshot

zfs destroy ds/test@2
zfs destroy ds/test@3
zfs send -R -I ds/test@5 ds/test@6 | ssh desthost zfs receive -F ds/test

If desthost is running 12.2, then test@2 and test@3 remain. If desthost is
running 12.1 or 12.0, then test@2 and test@3 are destroyed.

And it doesn't matter whether the snapshot has previously synced or not, for
example:

zfs snapshot ds/test@7
zfs send -R -I ds/test@6 ds/test@7 | ssh desthost zfs receive -F ds/test

still doesn't cause @2 and @3 to get destroyed.  However,

zfs send -R -I ds/test@1 ds/test@7 | ssh desthost zfs receive -F ds/test

does cause @2 and @3 to get destroyed.  But that's not an acceptable
work-around, and this appears to be a regression from prior versions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 252240] "zfs send -R -I | zfs receive -F" not destroying snapshots that don't exist on the sending side

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252240

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|f...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 252241] MacBook Pro 8,3 17" black screen after suspend/resume

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252241

Bug ID: 252241
   Summary: MacBook Pro 8,3 17" black screen after suspend/resume
   Product: Base System
   Version: 12.2-RELEASE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: j...@freebsd.org

System suspends and seems to resume fine except for the screen.  I can ssh in
after resume, but the console is unresponsive and I cannot switch to a vt.

The system has two GPUs:

vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = '2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics
Controller'
class  = display
--
vendor = 'Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]'
device = 'Whistler [Radeon HD 6630M/6650M/6750M/7670M/7690M]'
class  = display

Both work fine in general.  Running auto-gpu-setup (called from
desktop-installer), I first selected the modesetting driver + drm-kmod and got
a full-functional desktop.

1.. For most modern Intel GPUs, use the modesetting driver which is part of
the FreeBSD base.

pkg install -y drm-kmod
Add kld_list="/boot/modules/i915kms.ko" to /etc/rc.conf

[snip]

After testing the Intel GPU setup, ran auto-gpu-setup again and selected option
2, ati driver + drm0kmod:

1.. For recent AMD GPUs, you can try

pkg install -y drm-kmod xf86-video-amdgpu
Add "kld_list=amdgpu" to /etc/rc.conf

2.. For older AMD GPUs, you can try

pkg install -y drm-kmod xf86-video-ati
Add "kld_list=/boot/modules/radeonkms.ko" to /etc/rc.conf

[snip]

System booted into a working desktop, but using scfb rather than radeon.

Adding the following got Xorg to use the radeon driver:

<<>> /home/bacon 107 # cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/radeon.conf 
Section "Device"
Identifier  "Card0"
Driver  "radeon"
BusID   "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection

However, behavior after suspend/resume is the same with either modesetting or
radeon.

I reduced the system to nothing but generic kernel + ATP driver for the
touchpad and this did not help.

There are quite a few drivers auto-loaded, though.  Seems doubtful to me that
any of them are causing the issue since everything seems to work after resume
except the screen.

kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
 1  101 0x8020  227ad00 kernel
 21 0x8247b000 9080 atp.ko
 31 0x82fdb000 1a20 fdescfs.ko
 41 0x82fdd000103f0 fuse.ko
 51 0x82fee000   152fd0 radeonkms.ko
 62 0x8314100076570 drm.ko
 75 0x831b800012d30 linuxkpi.ko
 84 0x831cb00012f30 linuxkpi_gplv2.ko
 92 0x831de000  6d0 debugfs.ko
101 0x831df000 f181 ttm.ko
111 0x831ef00033ee0 if_bwn.ko
12   14 0x8322300037e48 bhnd.ko
132 0x8325b000 3408 gpiobus.ko
144 0x8325f000 a1f0 bhndb.ko
151 0x8326a000 3c50 bhndb_pci.ko
161 0x8326e000 1a58 bhnd_pci_hostb.ko
172 0x8327 1b64 bhnd_pci.ko
181 0x83272000  598 bcma_bhndb.ko
191 0x83273000 4818 bcma.ko
201 0x83278000  ad4 siba_bhndb.ko
211 0x83279000 4ea8 siba.ko
221 0x8327e000 a160 if_lagg.ko
231 0x83289000 1860 uhid.ko
241 0x8328b000 1a40 wmt.ko
251 0x8328d000 2908 ums.ko
261 0x8329 4260 ng_ubt.ko
276 0x83295000 9bd0 netgraph.ko
282 0x8329f000 9128 ng_hci.ko
293 0x832a9000  9b0 ng_bluetooth.ko
301 0x832aa000 29e0 wsp.ko
311 0x832ad000 caf0 ng_l2cap.ko
321 0x832ba0001af20 ng_btsocket.ko
331 0x832d5000 2150 ng_socket.ko
341 0x832d8000 46f0 autofs.ko
351 0x832dd000  acf mac_ntpd.ko

On the whole, this is a perfectly usable FreeBSD laptop for my purposes.  I
don't personally care about suspend/resume on this machine since I don't take
it anywhere (I prefer to carry a smaller one), but I'm happy to help diagnose
and fix this issue if possible.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 252253] Intel vmd NVMe controller not detected on 13-CURRENT

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252253

Bug ID: 252253
   Summary: Intel vmd NVMe controller not detected on 13-CURRENT
   Product: Base System
   Version: CURRENT
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Many People
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: n...@neelc.org

I recently got a HP Spectre x360 13-aw200, and am relegating my existing x360
13-ap0053dx for running RELEASE. Going forward, I will talk about the 13-aw200

I do not see any NVMe controller.

These set of patches show the Linux implementation:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/b07f1c8a3089f0b4aa43004ccf9131f407b63a7d.ca...@intel.com/T/#ma2e8cc45f20403aaf76a2a3fa26725e196ceadc1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 252253] Intel vmd NVMe controller not detected on 13-CURRENT

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252253

--- Comment #1 from Neel Chauhan  ---
Pictures of the non-detection is here: https://imgur.com/a/ighTwHQ

A patch like this:

--- a/sys/dev/vmd/vmd.c
+++ b/sys/dev/vmd/vmd.c
@@ -66,13 +66,20 @@ struct vmd_type {
 #define INTEL_VENDOR_ID0x8086
 #define INTEL_DEVICE_ID_VMD0x201d
 #define INTEL_DEVICE_ID_VMD2   0x28c0
+#define INTEL_DEVICE_ID_VMD3   0x9a0b

 static struct vmd_type vmd_devs[] = {
 { INTEL_VENDOR_ID, INTEL_DEVICE_ID_VMD,  "Intel Volume Management
Device" },
 { INTEL_VENDOR_ID, INTEL_DEVICE_ID_VMD2, "Intel Volume Management
Device" },
+{ INTEL_VENDOR_ID, INTEL_DEVICE_ID_VMD3, "Intel Volume Management
Device" },
 { 0, 0, NULL }


gave a kernel panic, showing more needs to be done to support NVMe.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"