[Bug 244640] [Patch][Lua loader] Implement missing "read-conf" 4th command

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244640

Olivier Certner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246309] r360637 kern.evdev.rcpt_mask=12 by default breaks doubletap on Thinkpad T400 synaptic touchpad

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246309

--- Comment #5 from Andriy Gapon  ---
I am using an additional conf file to customize my touchpad's behavior.
I named the file /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/90-touchpad.conf
Here is what it has:
Section "InputClass"
Identifier  "The touchpad"
MatchDriver "libinput"
MatchIsTouchpad "on"

Option  "Tapping" "on"
Option  "TappingDrag" "on"
Option  "TappingDragLock" "on"
Option  "ClickMethod" "clickfinger"
Option  "ScrollMethod" "twofinger"
Option  "NaturalScrolling" "off"
Option  "DisableWhileTyping" "on"
EndSection
Maybe you can use a similar method to configure features that you want.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246323] [bsnmpd] crashes after upgrade to 12-STABLE

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246323

Bug ID: 246323
   Summary: [bsnmpd] crashes after upgrade to 12-STABLE
   Product: Base System
   Version: 12.1-STABLE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: bin
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: zarych...@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl

The daemon starts fine, but after some time it exits on signal 11, probably
when remotely polled.

Here is the backtrace

(lldb) target create --core "bsnmpd.76367.core"
Core file '/tmp/bsnmpd.76367.core' (x86_64) was loaded.
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, name = 'bsnmpd', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV
* frame #0: 0x00220f22
frame #1: 0x7ffe28a0
(lldb) up
frame #1: 0x7ffe28a0
-> 0x7ffe28a0: jo 0x7ffe2865

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246323] [bsnmpd] crashes after upgrade to 12-STABLE

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246323

Marek Zarychta  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Hardware|Any |amd64

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246327] Invalid partition table after all-default installation of 13.0-CURRENT

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246327

Bug ID: 246327
   Summary: Invalid partition table after all-default installation
of 13.0-CURRENT
   Product: Base System
   Version: CURRENT
  Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: andrewponomare...@yandex.ru

Default installation of 13.0-CURRENT (with Zfs) to Dell E6530 fails to boot
with the error:

Invalid partition table

All is OK if select non-default Ufs in the installer.

SATA controller: 8086:1e03
Drive: WD5000BPVT-24HXZT3
Motherboard: 024YM1

Tested on:

FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200430-r360479-memstick.img
FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200507-r360723-memstick.img

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246323] [bsnmpd] crashes after upgrade to 12-STABLE

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246323

--- Comment #1 from Marek Zarychta  ---
Created attachment 214307
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=214307&action=edit
backtrace

Thanks to guidance from kaktus@ I am able to submit a better report.

The issue occurred just after the transition from 11.4-STABLE to 12.1-STABLE.
So far all upgraded systems are affected.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246323] [bsnmpd] crashes after upgrade to 12-STABLE

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246323

Pawel Biernacki  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kak...@freebsd.org
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|ha...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #2 from Pawel Biernacki  ---
Assign to maintainer.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246215] [rtld] fails for i386 on amd64 if auxv does not contain PAGESIZES

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246215

--- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: kib
Date: Sat May  9 13:00:39 UTC 2020
New revision: 360845
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/360845

Log:
  Avoid spurious ENOMEMs from sysctl hw.pagesizes.

  Reported by:  Paul Floyd 
  PR:   246215
  Reviewed by:  emaste
  Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
  MFC after:1 week
  Differential revision:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24737

Changes:
  head/sys/kern/kern_mib.c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246119] ahci: MFC of r359499 in 12.1-STABLE r359972 breaks cd device detection on JMicron JMB362

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246119

--- Comment #2 from rk  ---
Created attachment 214310
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=214310&action=edit
Patch adds AHCI_Q_NOFORCE quirk to JMB362

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246119] ahci: MFC of r359499 in 12.1-STABLE r359972 breaks cd device detection on JMicron JMB362

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246119

--- Comment #3 from rk  ---
The following change from r359970 appears to be the culprit:

--- stable/12/sys/dev/ahci/ahci_pci.c   (revision 359969)
+++ stable/12/sys/dev/ahci/ahci_pci.c   (revision 359970)
@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@
{0x2365197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB365",AHCI_Q_NOFORCE},
{0x2366197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB366",AHCI_Q_NOFORCE},
{0x2368197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB368",AHCI_Q_NOFORCE},
+   {0x0585197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB58x",0},
{0x61ab, 0x00, "Marvell 88SE6111",  AHCI_Q_NOFORCE | AHCI_Q_NOPMP |
AHCI_Q_1CH | AHCI_Q_EDGEIS},
{0x612111ab, 0x00, "Marvell 88SE6121",  AHCI_Q_NOFORCE | AHCI_Q_NOPMP |
@@ -399,6 +400,7 @@
 !(ahci_ids[i].quirks & AHCI_Q_NOFORCE {
/* Do not attach JMicrons with single PCI function. */
if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == 0x197b &&
+   (ahci_ids[i].quirks & AHCI_Q_NOFORCE) &&
(pci_read_config(dev, 0xdf, 1) & 0x40) == 0)
return (ENXIO);
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s AHCI SATA controller",


This breaks JMB362. I've added the AHCI_Q_NOFORCE quirk to JMB362 and with
that change it works again. Tested on r360840 with the following patch:

Index: sys/dev/ahci/ahci_pci.c
===
--- sys/dev/ahci/ahci_pci.c (revision 360840)
+++ sys/dev/ahci/ahci_pci.c (working copy)
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@
{0x23238086, 0x00, "Intel DH89xxCC",0},
{0x2360197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB360",0},
{0x2361197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB361",AHCI_Q_NOFORCE | AHCI_Q_1CH},
-   {0x2362197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB362",0},
+   {0x2362197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB362",AHCI_Q_NOFORCE},
{0x2363197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB363",AHCI_Q_NOFORCE},
{0x2365197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB365",AHCI_Q_NOFORCE},
{0x2366197b, 0x00, "JMicron JMB366",AHCI_Q_NOFORCE},

Now JMB362 works again (and cd0 is detected). I don't know if this is by
accident due to the code from r359970 or if JMB362 really needs AHCI_Q_NOFORCE.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246119] ahci: MFC of r359499 in 12.1-STABLE r359970 breaks JMicron JMB362

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246119

rk  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|ahci: MFC of r359499 in |ahci: MFC of r359499 in
   |12.1-STABLE r359972 breaks  |12.1-STABLE r359970 breaks
   |cd device detection on  |JMicron JMB362
   |JMicron JMB362  |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] cam / ciss driver unable to see more than 48(?) physical drives per controller

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

Peter Eriksson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #214289|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #4 from Peter Eriksson  ---
Created attachment 214315
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=214315&action=edit
Output from "cciss_vol_status"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] cam / ciss driver unable to see more than 48(?) physical drives per controller

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

--- Comment #5 from Peter Eriksson  ---
Ok, with some bits of printf-debugging I found some suspect code in
sys/dev/ciss/ciss.c:ciss_cam_action() at the "case XPT_PATH_INQ" section:

  cpi->max_target = sc->ciss_cfg->max_logical_supported;

Notice the "max logical logical volumes: 64" below?

ciss0: PERFORMANT Transport
ciss0:   0 logical drives configured
ciss0:   firmware 5.04
ciss0:   1 SCSI channels
ciss0:   signature 'CISS'
ciss0:   valence 3
ciss0:   supported I/O methods 0x7e000147
ciss0:   active I/O method 0x5
ciss0:   4G page base 0x
ciss0:   interrupt coalesce delay 0us
ciss0:   interrupt coalesce count 16
ciss0:   max outstanding commands 1024
ciss0:   bus types 0x20
ciss0:   server name 'CZ3729EX3D'
ciss0:   heartbeat 0xc0
ciss0:   max logical logical volumes: 64
ciss0:   max physical disks supported: 384
ciss0:   max physical disks per logical volume: 128
ciss0:   JBOD Support is Available
ciss0:   JBOD Mode is Enabled
ciss0: 72 physical devices

(72 is 2 too many, but I guess the two extra are the storage drawers)

If I change that line to:

  cpi->max_target = sc->ciss_cfg->max_physical_supported;

then "camcontrol devlist" now show 69 of 70 drives... Better but not 100%
there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246311] [patch] procstat can't view current working directory (affects xfce4-terminal, linprocfs, ...)

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246311

Conrad Meyer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@freebsd.org
Version|12.1-STABLE |CURRENT

--- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer  ---
Why is PGET_CANDEBUG a problem?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] cam / ciss driver unable to see more than 48(?) physical drives per controller

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

--- Comment #6 from Peter Eriksson  ---
It now probes targets up to around 373 (but it takes a looong time) or so, and
also detects the SES devices that have been hidden before since it only probed
up to target 63...

ses0 at ciss0 bus 33 scbus2 target 119 lun 0
ses0:  Fixed Enclosure Services SPC-4 SCSI device   
ses0: Serial Number 7CE952P06X  
ses0: 135.168MB/s transfers 
ses0: SES Device

ses1 at ciss0 bus 33 scbus2 target 121 lun 0
ses1:  Fixed Enclosure Services SPC-4 SCSI device   
ses1: Serial Number 7CE952P06X  
ses1: 135.168MB/s transfers 
ses1: SES Device  

Due to the probing taking a loong time I also see timeouts:

> run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 300 seconds for xpt_config
>  

and SCSI errors:

(probe0:ciss1:33:351:0): REPORT LUNS. CDB: a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00
(probe0:ciss1:33:351:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error
(probe0:ciss1:33:351:0): Retrying command, 4 more tries remain
(probe0:ciss1:33:351:0): REPORT LUNS. CDB: a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00
(probe0:ciss1:33:351:0): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error
(probe0:ciss1:33:351:0): Retrying command, 3 more tries remain

This code feels... broken :-)

Ah well, I'll see if I can modify the driver code to be a bit smarter on how
many targets to probe. It really doesn't have to check all since it knows how
many target there are (72 in my case) - it could stop after having detected
that many... 

(No wonder the Linux folks have replaced their cciss driver with a rewritten
one called hpsa).

- Peter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246339] [Patch] SIGSEGV of linux java packaged with ADVA NMS

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246339

Bug ID: 246339
   Summary: [Patch] SIGSEGV of linux java packaged with ADVA NMS
   Product: Base System
   Version: 12.1-RELEASE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: j...@sanren.ac.za

Created attachment 214321
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=214321&action=edit
patch to add LINUX_SYS_linux_getcpu to linux_vsyscall

The linux java packaged with the ADVA NMS SIGSEGV:

# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xff600800, pid=12763, tid=101256
#
# JRE version:  (11.0.4+11) (build )
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (11.0.4+11, mixed mode, aot, sharing,
tiered, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# C  0xff600800

That is when it is trying to execute the vsyscall linux_getcpu.

Just by adding it, even though it is not implemented, allow their java to
continue and the NMS is working.

The patch is simple:

--- sys/amd64/linux/linux_sysvec.c.orig 2019-11-01 02:01:48.0 +0200
+++ sys/amd64/linux/linux_sysvec.c  2020-05-09 20:43:42.01051 +0200
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@
 const unsigned long linux_vsyscall_vector[] = {
LINUX_SYS_gettimeofday,
LINUX_SYS_linux_time,
-   /* getcpu not implemented */
+   LINUX_SYS_linux_getcpu, /* getcpu not implemented */
 };

 static int

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] cam / ciss driver unable to see more than 48(?) physical drives per controller

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

--- Comment #7 from Peter Eriksson  ---
The current code probably works reasonable well for cases where the controller
is being used in RAID mode (where it works with logical LUNs). 

Well, except that it probably fails to detect the SES devices on the D6020
cabinets.

But when used as "dumb" HBA with more physical drives than a certain controller
handles logical devices (64 in my case for the H241 controller) it will always
do the wrong thing. 

And since it starts numbering physical targets 16 (probably since the
controller signals "0" as supported logical luns - since it's a HBA!) and then
the driver code uses a compile-time-default of 16 (intended for really old
controllers) things become strange... So 64-16 = 48.

Okidoki. Time for some code hacking :-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] ciss driver unable to present more than 48(?) physical drives per controller to the CAM layer

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

Peter Eriksson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|cam / ciss driver unable to |ciss driver unable to
   |see more than 48(?) |present more than 48(?)
   |physical drives per |physical drives per
   |controller  |controller to the CAM layer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] ciss driver unable to present more than 48(?) physical drives per controller to the CAM layer

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

--- Comment #8 from Peter Eriksson  ---
Created attachment 214328
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=214328&action=edit
Patch to fix support for more than 48 drives in HBA mode

The attached patch will fix a couple of bugs in the current ciss driver code
where it incorrectly enumerates physical drives if the controller is in JBOD
mode.

There are two bugs/problems:

1. If you attach more physical drives to a controller than how many logical
volumes the controller supports (yes, really - totally wrong logic here) the
additional drives will not be available because the driver sets the max_target
limit to the number of logical volumes, but the enumeration of hardware drives
starts at 16. So for a controller that support say 64 logical volumes, only the
first (64-16) drives will
be detected.

2. The code also sets the initiator_id to same max logical volume number so any
physical drive that happens to have the same target number will silently be
skipped...

The patch also enables a little more verbosity.

This patch has been tested with HP H241 controllers in JBOD mode with 70 drives
connected to a HP D6020 external SAS enclosure on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p3. 

This patch has not been tested with controllers in "RAID" mode but the patch
should be compatible...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] [patch] ciss driver unable to present more than 48(?) physical drives per controller to the CAM layer

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

Peter Eriksson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|ciss driver unable to   |[patch] ciss driver unable
   |present more than 48(?) |to present more than 48(?)
   |physical drives per |physical drives per
   |controller to the CAM layer |controller to the CAM layer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] [patch] ciss driver unable to present more than 48(?) physical drives per controller to the CAM layer

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

--- Comment #9 from Peter Eriksson  ---
This part:

"but the enumeration of hardware drives starts at 16. So for a controller that
support say 64 logical volumes, only the first (64-16) drives will be
detected."

should probably read:

Depending on how disk enclosures enumerate drive the exact number of drives
allowed might differ. For HP D6020 enclosures they seem to start enumeration at
16, and with a HP H241 controller that supports 64 logical volumes only the
first (64-16) drives will be detected. And none of the SES "targets" (one per
drawer in the D6020 enclosure) either since they are listed last...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246279] ciss driver unable to present more than 48(?) physical drives per controller to the CAM layer

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246279

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||patch
Summary|[patch] ciss driver unable  |ciss driver unable to
   |to present more than 48(?)  |present more than 48(?)
   |physical drives per |physical drives per
   |controller to the CAM layer |controller to the CAM layer

--- Comment #10 from Mark Linimon  ---
Convert to modern way to indicate "patch".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 246339] fix SIGSEGV of linux java packaged with ADVA NMS

2020-05-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246339

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|emulat...@freebsd.org
Summary|[Patch] SIGSEGV of linux|fix SIGSEGV of linux java
   |java packaged with ADVA NMS |packaged with ADVA NMS
   Keywords||patch

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"