[Bug 229745] ahcich: CAM status: Command timeout
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229745 --- Comment #30 from Rick --- (In reply to Rick from comment #29) Please forget this Remark. It lasted only for a few days :S -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 202420] Unmount Of Swap Files At Reboot Fails
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202420 martha simons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marthasimons9...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from martha simons --- Created attachment 206191 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=206191&action=edit 202420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 195829] Update 9.2 to 9.3 make crash with using FIFOs and logger. mbuf(9)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195829 Gleb Popov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arr...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Gleb Popov --- I tried reproduction steps on both 11.2 and 12.0. Everything seems to be working and mbuf values stay pretty low during the process. I don't see those huge > 188371/5759/194130 mbufs in use The only thing to mention is that # cat sample.txt | logger -t 'named' command takes visibly longer time to complete on 12.0, than on 11.2. Can this PR can be closed, then? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 229046] [meta] GNU objdump removal tracking PR
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229046 --- Comment #21 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: emaste Date: Thu Aug 1 17:02:59 UTC 2019 New revision: 350506 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/350506 Log: remove obsolete kernel debugging script For quite some time kgdb has been internally handling FreeBSD kernel module state; add-on scripts and tools are not needed. asf(8) served a similar purpose to this script and was removed in r335222. PR: 229046 Reported by: jhb Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Changes: head/tools/debugscripts/kld_deb.py -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233611] [meta] base system migration from obsolete GNU as 2.17.50
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233611 --- Comment #4 from Ed Maste --- skein_block_asm.s modified to assemble with LLVM IAS in review D18758 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18758 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233611] [meta] base system migration from obsolete GNU as 2.17.50
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233611 --- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: emaste Date: Thu Aug 1 19:01:28 UTC 2019 New revision: 350518 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/350518 Log: as: add deprecation notice to the man page In the future FreeBSD will ship without GNU binutils 2.17.50. Add a note advising users who require GNU as to install the binutils port or package. Note that on armv7, arm64, amd64, i386 we currently ship only two binutils tools (as and objdump). A deprecation notice was added to objdump's man page some time ago. PR: 233611 Discussed with: jhb MFC after:1 week Relnotes: Yes Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Changes: head/contrib/binutils/gas/doc/as.texinfo head/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as/as.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233611] [meta] base system migration from obsolete GNU as 2.17.50
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233611 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||205250 Blocks|205250 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205250 [Bug 205250] [exp-run] removal of /usr/bin/as (evaluate ports impact) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 235589] sh(1): LINENO is unset in shell arithmetic
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235589 m...@pacopascal.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@pacopascal.com --- Comment #1 from m...@pacopascal.com --- Created attachment 206211 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=206211&action=edit A potential fix This is my first attempt at submitting a patch to FreeBSD. I'm not sure if it's good practice to submit a potential patch directly to the bug report or to first have it reviewed elsewhere such as the mailing lists. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 239492] freebsd-update mismatch with recompile from svn releng
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239492 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ema...@freebsd.org --- Comment #2 from Ed Maste --- Can you compare the installed-by-freebsd-update mqueuefs.ko and the one you built from svn, either with with something like (zsh/bash shell assumed for the example): # diff -u3 <(hexdump -Cv freebsd-update/mqueuefs.ko) <(hexdump -Cv svn-build/mqueuefs.ko) or (better) by installing the py36-diffoscope port and using it to perform the comparison, then put the results here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 239590] ipfw rule doesn't forward TCP connections made through the host's LAN address
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239590 Bug ID: 239590 Summary: ipfw rule doesn't forward TCP connections made through the host's LAN address Product: Base System Version: 11.2-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: b...@freebsd.org Reporter: y...@freebsd.org I need to forward incoming TCP connections made to my host 192.168.5.3 on the port 3100 to the IP address 10.0.0.101 port 3000 connected through another interface. These rules work when connection is made from a remote host: > ipfw -q nat 19001 config redirect_port tcp 10.0.0.101:3000 192.168.5.3:3100 > ipfw -q add 19001 nat 19001 tcp from any to 192.168.5.3 3100 in recv sk0 > ipfw -q add 19001 nat 19001 tcp from 10.0.0.101 3000 to any out xmit sk0 The problem: A similar firewall rule for connections from the host's LAN IP address (that pass through lo0) doesn't work: > ipfw -q add 19001 nat 19001 tcp from 192.168.5.3 to 192.168.5.3 3100 in recv > lo0 Wireshark shows that the incoming connection is from 192.168.5.3 to 192.168.5.3 on 3100 but it gets immediately rejected instead of being forwarded. This rule looks very similar to the second rule above, just the interface is different. Why doesn't it work? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
