[Bug 236710] zfs: clone + resize = dataset is busy

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236710

Bug ID: 236710
   Summary: zfs: clone + resize = dataset is busy
   Product: Base System
   Version: CURRENT
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Many People
  Priority: ---
 Component: bin
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: olev...@olevole.ru

( copy of the problem published in freebsd-fs@ )

I see the following problem on FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT
r345087M amd64, zpool version 28, zfs version 5

If you create a ZVOL, fill in specific data, take a snapshot, clone
and resize, you will get a blocked pool (device busy for : export -f,
destroy -f ..)---

what i found:

a) the problem only appears on clone/snapshot, there is no problem on
a simple zvol resize;

b) the nature of the data affects the problem:

  - when zvol no data, problem is missing
  - If you try to fill zvol with random data, for example: dd
if=/dev/random of= there are also no problems. But problem exist
if I try to fill in with cloud images data (
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/VM-IMAGES/12.0-RELEASE/amd64/Latest/
, http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/xenial/current/
) - in fact, these are raw images of the installed OS.

c) The problem only occurs when creating zvol + resizing (in two
commands). If you try to do atomically and simultaneously:

 /sbin/zfs clone -o volsize= ...

there is no problem, but with this:

/sbin/zfs clone ..
/sbin/zfs set volsize=

problem exist.

Maybe this is not a ZFS problem and GEOM-related ?

Step-by-step how to reproduce (where z01 - active ZFS pool):
---
% wget
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/VM-IMAGES/12.0-RELEASE/amd64/Latest/FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64.raw.xz

% xz -d FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64.raw.xz

> ( /usr/bin/stat -f "%z" FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64.raw  -- get size)
>  33286062080

% /sbin/zfs create -sV 33286062080 -o volmode=dev z01/test1

% dd bs=1m if=FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64.raw of=/dev/zvol/z01/test1
>  31744+1 records in
>  31744+1 records out
>  33286062080 bytes transferred in 127.530635 secs (261004441 bytes/sec)

% /sbin/zfs snapshot z01/test1 at snap

% /sbin/zfs clone z01/test1 at snap

> ( resizing. For example, double up  )
>  bc -e '33286062080 * 2'
>  66572124160

% /sbin/zfs set volsize=66572124160 z01/test2

% /sbin/zfs destroy z01/test2
> cannot destroy 'z01/test2': dataset is busy

% zpool export -f z01
> cannot export 'z01': pool is busy
---

with truss i can see:

..
ioctl(3,0xc0185a15 { IORW 0x5a('Z'), 21, 24 },0x7fffcd78) ERR#3
'No such process'
ioctl(3,0xc0185a15 { IORW 0x5a('Z'), 21, 24 },0x7fffcd78) ERR#3
'No such process'
ioctl(6,0xc0185a18 { IORW 0x5a('Z'), 24, 24 },0x7fffcdb8) ERR#16
'Device busy'

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236710] zfs: clone + resize = dataset is busy

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236710

--- Comment #1 from Andriy Gapon  ---
This could be a ZFS<->GEOM interaction indeed.
Maybe related to bug 228384, maybe not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236475] [ZFS] Invalid VOP_FSYNC options in vdev_file_io_start

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236475

--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: avg
Date: Fri Mar 22 09:11:46 UTC 2019
New revision: 345410
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345410

Log:
  ZFS vdev_file: use correct value for waitfor parameter of VOP_FSYNC

  PR:   236475
  Reported by:  asomers
  MFC after:2 weeks

Changes:
  head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/vdev_file.c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236714] Clang problem with rctl(8)

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714

Bug ID: 236714
   Summary: Clang problem with rctl(8)
   Product: Base System
   Version: CURRENT
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: bin
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: tr...@freebsd.org

I've stumbled upon something that seems to me to be a miscompilation issue in
rctl(8).  Basically, this code in usr.bin/rctl/rctl.c:

racct_enable_len = sizeof(racct_enable);
error = sysctlbyname("kern.racct.enable",
&racct_enable, &racct_enable_len, NULL, 0);

if (error != 0) {
if (errno == ENOENT)
errx(1, "RACCT/RCTL support not present in kernel; see
rctl(8) for details");

err(1, "sysctlbyname");
}

if (racct_enable == 0)
errx(1, "RACCT/RCTL present, but disabled; enable using
kern.racct.enable=1 tunable");

Doesn't work as expected unless the racct_enable is initialized before calling
sysctlbyname(3).  Without this change:

% doas rctl
rctl: failed to show rules for '::': Function not implemented

With the change:

% doas rctl
rctl: RACCT/RCTL present, but disabled; enable using kern.racct.enable=1
tunable

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236559] Error in the pwd man page

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559

--- Comment #2 from verma...@interia.pl ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #1)
So shell builtin (ZSH) behaves correctly with POSIX standards.

IMHO FreeBSD should also be correct with POSIX standards so option -L should be
assumed in FreeBSD's pwd.

I am not gonna 'fight' for this - you will do what you want - but that is my
opinion.

Regards,
vermaden

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236714] Clang problem with rctl(8)

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|toolch...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236710] zfs: clone + resize = dataset is busy

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236710

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|f...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236559] Error in the pwd man page

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559

--- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston  ---
(In reply to vermaden from comment #2)
It's mostly a question of whether changing the default will break existing 
scripts.  sh, bash and zsh use a builtin implementation for pwd, but tcsh in
the base system does not, so I expect that such a change would cause a fair
amount of pain.

We should update the pwd(1) man page to note that we are not compliant with the
standard.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236475] [ZFS] Invalid VOP_FSYNC options in vdev_file_io_start

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236475

Andriy Gapon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|a...@freebsd.org
 Status|New |In Progress

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236718] system panics with message: vm_fault_hold: fault on nofault entry, addr: 0

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718

Bug ID: 236718
   Summary: system panics with message: vm_fault_hold: fault on
nofault entry, addr: 0
   Product: Base System
   Version: 12.0-STABLE
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Many People
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: lenzi.ser...@gmail.com

the sysem panics when using several ppp (tunx) tunnels using ppp over tcp. 
the crash files are on http://www.k1.com.br/crash

the trace can be found on: http://www.k1.com.br/crash/core.txt.8

seems that a problem on detach the ppp interface... if I stop all the ppp
process, the system does not panics 
This machine is a pppoi server that holds serveral ppp connections

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236718] system panics with message: vm_fault_hold: fault on nofault entry, addr: 0

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718

lenzi.ser...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Hardware|Any |i386

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236718] system panics with message: vm_fault_hold: fault on nofault entry, addr: 0

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||panic

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 235944] jedec_dimm(4) does not attach to KFA2 (aka Galax) Hall of Fame DDR4 sticks

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235944

--- Comment #29 from Ravi Pokala  ---
> Thanks Greg! I'll massage it as needed and commit it for you sometime in the 
> next few days.

For some very large definitions of "few"... :-/

I've finally circled back around to this, and have a patch in Phabricator:

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19681

Greg, could you apply that patch and confirm that it works for you?

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236513] Different power states (C1/C2/...) per CPU core

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513

--- Comment #5 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Finally I got time to retest everything with 12.0-RELEASE.

Situation is the same. Only the first CPU can go to C2 state. All other cores
only show up with cx_lowest = C1.

Only difference this time: It is the successor CPU AMD RX-427BB.

Btw. The hardware in my tests is:

First Time: HP Thin client T620 PLUS
Second Time: HP Thin client T730

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236513] Different power states (C1/C2/...) per CPU core

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513

--- Comment #6 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Created attachment 203049
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=203049&action=edit
Screenshot dmesg

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236513] Different power states (C1/C2/...) per CPU core

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513

--- Comment #7 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Just fired up a Fedora 29 on the HP T730. 

Running a cpu intensive task and looking at the powertop output I would say
that C2 states are core independent. 

Conclusion: Linux kernel detects C2 states per core. So at least BIOS should
not be broken.

Screenshot attached.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236513] Different power states (C1/C2/...) per CPU core

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513

--- Comment #8 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Created attachment 203050
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=203050&action=edit
Fedora powertop

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236513] Different power states (C1/C2/...) per CPU core

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513

--- Comment #9 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Bug https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189267 shows other
occurences of CPUs where c states for the first core is C1+C2 while all other
cores are C1 only.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236724] igbX interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724

Bug ID: 236724
   Summary: igbX interfaces fail to switch active to inactive
state
   Product: Base System
   Version: 12.0-STABLE
  Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Many People
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: ncrog...@gmail.com

Since upgrading to 12.0-RELEASE / iflib I've noticed that my igbX interfaces
no longer go from status "active" to "inactive" (as reported by ifconfig)
when the Ethernet port is unplugged and loses link. The status lights on the
physical interface go out but ifconfig still reports active +
autoselect/1000baseT. An "ifconfig down" followed by "up", while its
unplugged, forces the link to recognize the "inactive" state. After the
down/up dance plugging the cable in again returns it to "active".

I have replicated this problem with a clean install of the latest 12-STABLE
snapshot as of today. The only configuration I've made was the usual
timezone, root password, etc. during install. The interfaces in this test
case have no IP address configurations.

This is possibly a duplicate of bug #228556, however I am unsure because the
description is confusing and I am not using a virtualization layer.

I've noticed this on multiple systems with the following Intel devices (as
reported by pciconf "device"):

I210 Gigabit Network Connection
I211 Gigabit Network Connection
Ethernet Connection I354

uname -a:
FreeBSD test.local 12.0-STABLE FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE r345358 GENERIC  amd64

ifconfig when igb2 is actually connected and active:
igb2: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
   
options=e507bb
ether 00:90:0b:78:13:5a
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT )
status: active
nd6 options=29

ifconfig when igb2 is disconnected (identical to above):
igb2: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
   
options=e507bb
ether 00:90:0b:78:13:5a
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT )
status: active
nd6 options=29

Relevant pciconf -lcv:
igb2@pci0:0:20:0:   class=0x02 card=0x1f418086 chip=0x1f418086 rev=0x03
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'Ethernet Connection I354'
class  = network
subclass   = ethernet
cap 01[40] = powerspec 3  supports D0 D3  current D0
cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit, vector masks 
cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages, enabled
 Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x2000]
cap 10[a0] = PCI-Express 2 root endpoint max data 512(512) FLR NS
ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected
ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 00900b78135a
ecap 0017[1a0] = TPH Requester 1
ecap 000d[1d0] = ACS 1
igb3@pci0:0:20:1:   class=0x02 card=0x1f418086 chip=0x1f418086 rev=0x03
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'Ethernet Connection I354'
class  = network
subclass   = ethernet
cap 01[40] = powerspec 3  supports D0 D3  current D0
cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit, vector masks 
cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages, enabled
 Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x2000]
cap 10[a0] = PCI-Express 2 root endpoint max data 512(512) FLR NS
ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected
ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 00900b78135a
ecap 0017[1a0] = TPH Requester 1
ecap 000d[1d0] = ACS 1
igb4@pci0:0:20:2:   class=0x02 card=0x1f418086 chip=0x1f418086 rev=0x03
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'Ethernet Connection I354'
class  = network
subclass   = ethernet
cap 01[40] = powerspec 3  supports D0 D3  current D0
cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit, vector masks 
cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages, enabled
 Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x2000]
cap 10[a0] = PCI-Express 2 root endpoint max data 512(512) FLR NS
ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected
ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 00900b78135a
ecap 0017[1a0] = TPH Requester 1
ecap 000d[1d0] = ACS 1
igb5@pci0:0:20:3:   class=0x02 card=0x1f418086 chip=0x1f418086 rev=0x03
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'Ethernet Connection I354'
class  = network
subclass   = ethernet
cap 01[40] = powerspec 3  supports D0 D3  current D0
cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit, vector masks 
cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages, enabled
 Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x2000]
cap 10[a0] = PCI-Express 2 root endpoint max data 512(512) FLR NS
ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected
ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 00900b78135a
ecap 0017[1a0] = TPH Requester 1
ecap 000d[1d0] = ACS 1
ehci0@pci0:0:22:0:  class

[Bug 236724] igbX interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||IntelNetworking, regression
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 199934] [FUSEFS] kernel module fails with filesystems without .create support

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199934

--- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: asomers
Date: Sat Mar 23 00:22:30 UTC 2019
New revision: 345429
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345429

Log:
  fusefs: fallback to MKNOD/OPEN if a filesystem doesn't support CREATE

  If a FUSE filesystem returns ENOSYS for FUSE_CREATE, then fallback to
  FUSE_MKNOD/FUSE_OPEN.

  Also, fix a memory leak in the error path of fuse_vnop_create.  And do a
  little cleanup in fuse_vnop_open.

  PR:   199934
  Reported by:  s...@os2.kiev.ua
  Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

Changes:
  projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_vnops.c
  projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/create.cc
  projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/mockfs.cc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 199934] [FUSEFS] kernel module fails with filesystems without .create support

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199934

Alan Somers  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |In Progress

--- Comment #5 from Alan Somers  ---
Ok, this bug should be fixed now (though it's not yet merged to head).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236718] system panics with message: vm_fault_hold: fault on nofault entry, addr: 0

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718

Kubilay Kocak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||mfc-stable11?,
   ||mfc-stable12?
 Status|New |Open
   Keywords|panic   |crash, needs-qa
   Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Some People

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 236718] system panics with message: vm_fault_hold: fault on nofault entry, addr: 0

2019-03-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718

--- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak  ---
Created attachment 203059
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=203059&action=edit
backtrace

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"