[Bug 233430] OpenSSL 1.1.1a SIGSEGV
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233430 Bug ID: 233430 Summary: OpenSSL 1.1.1a SIGSEGV Product: Base System Version: 12.0-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: bin Assignee: b...@freebsd.org Reporter: lbartole...@tuxfamily.org Hi, I have a problem since upgrading from openssl to version 1.1.1a. I'm working on graphics/QGIS 3 and at startup I have a crash with this error. Thread 1 received signal SIGSEGV. Segmentation fault. ssl3_release_write_buffer (s=0x0) at /usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/record/ssl3_buffer.c:159 I suspect that the module calling openssl is qca-qt5 with the openssl plugins. This works very well with version 1.1.1.1 (svn rev 340700 for example) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233430] OpenSSL 1.1.1a SIGSEGV
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233430 lbartoletti changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People Blocks||231931 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231931 [Bug 231931] [exp-run] OpenSSL 1.1.1 in base -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233431] [bsnmpd] regression on 12-STABLE: crash on start
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233431
Bug ID: 233431
Summary: [bsnmpd] regression on 12-STABLE: crash on start
Product: Base System
Version: 12.0-STABLE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Some People
Priority: ---
Component: bin
Assignee: b...@freebsd.org
Reporter: e...@norma.perm.ru
bsnmpd crashes right after start, was working on 11.x, regression happened
after upgrade to 12.x. 100% reproducible, multiple instances:
FreeBSD san01.bsh-ru.playkey.net 12.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-PRERELEASE
r340754 GENERIC amd64
FreeBSD san01.boston.playkey.net 12.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-PRERELEASE
r340673 GENERIC amd6
Backtrace:
# gdb /usr/sbin/bsnmpd bsnmpd.core
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...
Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/bsnmpd -p /var/run/snmpd.pid'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug//lib/libbegemot.so.4.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/libwrap.so.6.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug//lib/libc.so.7.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.111...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug//lib/libcrypto.so.111.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.111
Reading symbols from /lib/libthr.so.3...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug//lib/libthr.so.3.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libthr.so.3
Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug//libexec/ld-elf.so.1.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
#0 strlen (str=0x801062223 ) at
/usr/src/lib/libc/string/strlen.c:101
101 va = (*lp - mask01);
[New Thread 8009e5000 (LWP 110269/)]
(gdb) bt
#0 strlen (str=0x801062223 ) at
/usr/src/lib/libc/string/strlen.c:101
#1 0x0008003d95a9 in __vfprintf (fp=,
locale=0x80044a4e8, fmt0=,
ap=) at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c:854
#2 0x0008003d71b4 in vfprintf_l (fp=0x80067bec0, locale=, fmt0=0x80028e62f "%s %d - - ",
ap=0x7fffb5b0) at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c:285
#3 0x0008003deedb in fprintf (fp=0x80067bec0, fmt=0x80028e62f "%s %d - -
")
at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/fprintf.c:57
#4 0x00080041e16b in vsyslog (pri=, fmt=0x200963
"error in config file", ap=0x7fffc510)
at /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/syslog.c:210
#5 0x00080041de8d in syslog (pri=, fmt=)
at /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/syslog.c:129
#6 0x00213bb1 in main (argc=0, argv=)
Current language: auto; currently minimal
(gdb) bt full
#0 strlen (str=0x801062223 ) at
/usr/src/lib/libc/string/strlen.c:101
p = 0x801062223
lp = (const long unsigned int *) 0x801062220
va =
vb =
#1 0x0008003d95a9 in __vfprintf (fp=,
locale=0x80044a4e8, fmt0=,
ap=) at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c:854
mbs = {__mbstate8 = 0x7fffb3c0 "\230\177", _mbstateL =
140737488335768}
mbseqlen =
xdigs_lower = 0x80029b7e0 "0123456789abcdef0123456789ABCDEF", ' '
, '0' , "��\023"
xdigs_upper = 0x80029b7f0 "0123456789ABCDEF", ' ' ,
'0' , "��\023"
expstr = 0x7fffb3b8 "p"
buf = 0x7fffb300 ""
ox = 0x7fffb258 ""
statargtable = 0x7fffb280
orgap = 0x7fffb260
fmt =
nextarg =
saved_errno = 2
ret = 0
decimal_point = 0x80028c072 "."
decpt_len = 1
cp = 0x801062223
dtoaresult =
realsz = 24
size =
flags = 17179171
ch =
n =
dprec = Cannot access memory at address 0x0
(gdb)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233436] rm -rf fails when the number of subfolders of a folder in a tree is too high
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233436 Bug ID: 233436 Summary: rm -rf fails when the number of subfolders of a folder in a tree is too high Product: Base System Version: 11.2-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: bin Assignee: b...@freebsd.org Reporter: lied...@punkt.de Hi, I stumbled over something, which I think should not happen: A customer asked me to delete some releases of theirs, which their deployment tool did not clean up properly. so I tried to rm -rf , which gave me the following result. rm -rf rm: /foo/bar/5a4b9dcdc0385d3e9d0827907f0e5f10792a8e7f: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/f98dba83270209e862dbe2295bd078702bb9fa21: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/48c4b74bceb996f66faec0e21aa97fb8d0607516: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/415a52f0bd4ccbea7aadc1a15193b06da3366c37: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/e475e6ed6fa28e141979cae142ef3a2faf6d9726: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/dd7c1138264e4e8f3cebcbc16b00fac10fa629b5: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/76789f907156f96e34f442785dfa7915c8c785ed: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/7ecf83bcb737a84d8de66e7365b91ce27f778ea4: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/b601d1dd9812e1b57e50d46edd2a891969b353f3: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar/0dd0c3382236ba9f2d6b3828dc305c2a01f45e87: Operation not permitted rm: /foo/bar: Directory not empty rm: /foo: Directory not empty rm: : Directory not empty So I went into /foo/bar and did an ls, which showed me a big number of subdirectories like this: ls -la /foo/bar drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:44 ffc6821a8591392ebe03779270c8ec6e843a2b96 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:44 ffc927f8cc14ce68abdefcbea8f01542c892aea6 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:42 ffcaabb22cd01c67eb90dc8ee90f488427e987c3 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:43 ffcafbcd303e3ed81789be0930ba3b8999827443 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:42 ffcc53a0a31a38f18065861c42d0de0636140067 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:44 ffccb4ae42018024a90d0cdb7e635f714daef3d6 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:44 ffcd2c48e4171f25b96587da22a262f11c3123b8 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:43 ffcd73a168063217dab0ebf35a9ba16b5843c9f1 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:44 ffd0a1faba88fef9e2dec753ecfcbf2391f44f66 drwxrwxrwx 2 proserver proserver 3 Jun 7 10:43 ffd28f6ecac48500499e4803aef1a0b1f904129b counting the number of subdirectories gave me this: ls -la | wc -l 51550 in other release-directories this could be even 8+ trying to delete them in /foo/bar: rm -rf * su: /bin/rm: Argument list too long which was expected, but not with rm -rf I was able to delete them with find in the end but I thought rm -rf would do the trick. Am I wrong here or is it a bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233436] rm -rf fails when the number of subfolders of a folder in a tree is too high
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233436 Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open CC||0...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 229046] [meta] objdump removal tracking PR
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229046 --- Comment #20 from Ed Maste --- Proposal to install llvm-objdump as /usr/bin/objdump on Clang-using architectures: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18307 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233437] llvm-objdump requires a man page
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233437 Bug ID: 233437 Summary: llvm-objdump requires a man page Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: bin Assignee: b...@freebsd.org Reporter: ema...@freebsd.org I've proposed installing llvm-objdump as objdump in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18307, but llvm-objdump does not currently have a man page. This will need to be resolved in order to make the switch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233437] llvm-objdump requires a man page
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233437 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||229046 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229046 [Bug 229046] [meta] GNU objdump removal tracking PR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233437] llvm-objdump requires a man page
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233437 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||233094 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233094 [Bug 233094] [meta] Base system tool chain modernization tracking -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 229046] [meta] GNU objdump removal tracking PR
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229046 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[meta] objdump removal |[meta] GNU objdump removal |tracking PR |tracking PR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 229046] [meta] GNU objdump removal tracking PR
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229046 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||233437 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233437 [Bug 233437] llvm-objdump requires a man page -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233094] [meta] Base system tool chain modernization tracking
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233094 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||233437 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233437 [Bug 233437] llvm-objdump requires a man page -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233437] llvm-objdump requires a man page
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233437 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://reviews.freebsd.org ||/D18309 --- Comment #1 from Ed Maste --- Initial man page in D18309 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233437] llvm-objdump requires a man page
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233437 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|ema...@freebsd.org --- Comment #2 from Ed Maste --- Upstream submission at http://reviews.llvm.org/D54864 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233450] HV_KVP[2093]: Operation failed OP = 4, error = 0x16
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233450 Bug ID: 233450 Summary: HV_KVP[2093]: Operation failed OP = 4, error = 0x16 Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: b...@freebsd.org Reporter: michael@gmail.com /var/log/messages - Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2018 The FreeBSD Project. Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #0 8b2e2bba54f(master)-dirty: Fri Nov 23 19:54:26 EET 2018 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: r...@f12rw.local.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG amd64 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: FreeBSD clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final 335540) (based on LLVM 6.0.1) Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x3f000 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x10 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x100 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x200 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x400 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x800 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x9e800 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x88 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x180 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x300 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0x600 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: SRAT: Ignoring memory at addr 0xc00 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: VT(efifb): resolution 1024x768 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Hyper-V Version: 10.0.17763 [SP0] Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Features=0x2e7f Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: PM Features=0x0 [C2] Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Features3=0xbed7b2 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Timecounter "Hyper-V" frequency 1000 Hz quality 2000 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: module_register: cannot register pci/ixv from kernel; already loaded from if_ixv.ko Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Module pci/ixv failed to register: 17 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (2597.00-MHz K8-class CPU) Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Origin="GenuineIntel" Id=0x306f2 Family=0x6 Model=0x3f Stepping=2 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Features=0x1f83fbff Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Features2=0xfeda3203 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: AMD Features=0x2c100800 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: AMD Features2=0x21 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Structured Extended Features=0x27a9 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Structured Extended Features3=0xbc00 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: XSAVE Features=0x1 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: IA32_ARCH_CAPS=0x4 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Hypervisor: Origin = "Microsoft Hv" Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: real memory = 16777216000 (16000 MB) Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: avail memory = 16249954304 (15497 MB) Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Event timer "LAPIC" quality 100 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: ACPI APIC Table: Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 8 CPUs Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 hardware threads Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: random: unblocking device. Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Launching APs: 5 6 7 2 3 1 4 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: Timecounter "Hyper-V-TSC" frequency 1000 Hz quality 3000 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: random: entropy device external interface Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: kbd0 at kbdmux0 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vesa, 0x811df190, 0) error 19 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: random: registering fast source Intel Secure Key RNG Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: random: fast provider: "Intel Secure Key RNG" Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: netmap: loaded module Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: [ath_hal] loaded Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: nexus0 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: efirtc0: on motherboard Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: efirtc0: registered as a time-of-day clock, resolution 1.00s Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: cryptosoft0: on motherboard Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: acpi0: on motherboard Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 irq 8 on acpi0 Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw kernel: atrtc0: registered as a time-of-day clock, resolution 1.00s Nov 23 20:07:32 f12rw ker
[Bug 228858] panic when delivering knote to a process who has opened a kqueue() is dying
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228858 Mark Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|ma...@freebsd.org Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #2 from Mark Johnston --- The process closing the kqueue should drain all of the kqueue's notes; this happens in kqueue_drain(). Unfortunately, we have a few races: - kqueue_register() doesn't check for KQ_CLOSING, so it may add knotes to the fdtable or hash table after we've started draining. This can be triggered by knote_fork(). - The locking in knote_fork() is wrong: at the end of the loop we should be acquiring the list lock before the kqueue lock. Otherwise there's a window where the knote is unlocked and not in flux, and thus may be freed. To fix this I believe it's sufficient to just reorder the locking; the list lock comes before the kqueue lock in the lock order. The in-flux state of the knote is sufficient to prevent it from being removed, I believe, so we don't need a marker knote to hold our place in the list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 225450] 11.1-* panics on AMD Opteron 2k due to EARLY_AP_STARTUP
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225450 --- Comment #22 from m...@rubenvos.com --- Hi, Just to follow up: 12.0 RC-1 boots perfectly on our Opteron cpu's. I upgraded from 11.0 to 12.0 RC-1 , haven't tried 11.2. Ruben ---<>--- Copyright (c) 1992-2018 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 12.0-RC1 r340470 GENERIC amd64 FreeBSD clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final 335540) (based on LLVM 6.0.1) VT(vga): resolution 640x480 CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2356 (2300.14-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin="AuthenticAMD" Id=0x100f23 Family=0x10 Model=0x2 Stepping=3 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x802009 AMD Features=0xee500800 AMD Features2=0x7ff SVM: NP,NAsids=64 TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 25769803776 (24576 MB) avail memory = 25003937792 (23845 MB) Event timer "LAPIC" quality 100 ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 8 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s) random: unblocking device. ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard Launching APs: 4 5 2 6 3 7 1 Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1150069463 Hz quality 800 random: entropy device external interface kbd1 at kbdmux0 netmap: loaded module [ath_hal] loaded module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vesa, 0x810f8690, 0) error 19 nexus0 vtvga0: on motherboard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 131626] [patch] dump(8) "recommended" cache option confusing
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131626 Guangyuan Yang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y...@freebsd.org Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|y...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233397] llvm-objdump doesn't work with statically linked binary: "index past the end of the symbol table"
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233397 --- Comment #3 from Li-Wen Hsu --- r340608 fixes this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 233431] [bsnmpd] regression on 12-STABLE: crash on start
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233431 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 115631] [libc] [request] make dlclose(3) atexit-aware
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115631 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[libc] [patch] [request]|[libc] [request] make |make dlclose(3) |dlclose(3) atexit-aware |atexit-aware| Keywords||patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
