[Bug 224426] fetch -i runs in an endless loop

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224426

--- Comment #2 from Wolfram Schneider  ---
(In reply to Zak from comment #1)

The manpage says: HTTP only

If this is still try, then I expect a fatal error: HTTPS not supported for -i

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224426] fetch -i runs in an endless loop

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224426

Wolfram Schneider  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Open

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224426] fetch -i runs in an endless loop

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224426

--- Comment #3 from Wolfram Schneider  ---
(In reply to Wolfram Schneider from comment #2)

s/try/true/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224426] fetch -i runs in an endless loop

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224426

--- Comment #4 from Wolfram Schneider  ---
It is a little bit more complicated than I thought. Some websites run in an
endless loop, others not:

endless loop:

fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://www.nytimes.com
fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://www.washingtonpost.com
fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://www.freebsd.org
fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://www.fsf.org/
fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://www.openbsd.org

no endless loop:

fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://www.apple.com
fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://duckduckgo.com
fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://www.google.com
fetch -a -o index.html -i index.html https://www.theguardian.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224426] fetch -i runs in an endless loop

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224426

--- Comment #5 from Zak  ---
(In reply to Wolfram Schneider from comment #4)
Is the inconsistent looping behaviour present with my patch applied? I'm not at
a proper computer so I can't check right now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224529] The talk protocol depends on struct osockaddr which should be kernel-only

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224529

Bug ID: 224529
   Summary: The talk protocol depends on struct osockaddr which
should be kernel-only
   Product: Base System
   Version: CURRENT
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Keywords: easy
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: bin
  Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
  Reporter: bro...@freebsd.org

The talkd protocol defined in include/protocols/talkd.h uses the struct
osockaddr definition from sys/socket.h.  It should define it's own type so
struct osockaddr can be removed from non-kernel use.  The support for systems
where sockaddr is the same as osockaddr in the talk program should also be
removed since we don't need our tools to run on 4.3BSD.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224426] fetch -i runs in an endless loop

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224426

Heqing Yan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||scottie...@gmail.com

--- Comment #6 from Heqing Yan  ---
(In reply to Wolfram Schneider from comment #4)
(In reply to Zak from comment #5)
I applied Zak's patch and cannot reproduce it. Did you test Zak's patch?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224532] Remove resident count from procfs map

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224532

Bug ID: 224532
   Summary: Remove resident count from procfs map
   Product: Base System
   Version: 11.1-RELEASE
  Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Some People
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
  Reporter: glenn.weinb...@intel.com
CC: ema...@freebsd.org, k...@freebsd.org

procfs_map does a very naive resident count, which for huge unbacked virtual
spaces takes essentially forever. Instead of trying to fix this (see bug
188911), the resident count field should be deprecated and always be set to 0.
Linux procfs does not return resident counts.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224536] FLUSHCACHE48 AHCI Timeouts on SMR Drives

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224536

Bug ID: 224536
   Summary: FLUSHCACHE48 AHCI Timeouts on SMR Drives
   Product: Base System
   Version: 11.1-STABLE
  Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: kern
  Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
  Reporter: ilge...@yahoo.it

Hi!
Starting from this thread:

https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/a-long-journey-to-solve-cam-status-command-timeout-issues.59549/

I had hard times troubleshooting this issue on FreeNAS with 4 x ST8000AS0002
Drives.
It seems that drives increase latency over time and exceed the AHCI
(hardcoded?) 31000 msec timeout.
It will be great if FreeBSD could support these new SMR drives without
disabling cache flushing on ZFS.

Thanks,
Fabio

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


[Bug 224536] FLUSHCACHE48 AHCI Timeouts on SMR Drives

2017-12-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224536

fabiob  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||https://forums.freenas.org/
   ||index.php?threads/a-long-jo
   ||urney-to-solve-cam-status-c
   ||ommand-timeout-issues.59549
   ||/#post-422291

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"