Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for -X

2010-03-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
The following reply was made to PR bin/144411; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garrett Cooper 
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, gcoo...@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for 
-X
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:21:58 -0700

 Hi,
 I'm not 100% satisfied with this patch now. Looking back it fails
 the following case:
 
  -PDo not follow symbolic links in the file hierarchy, instead con-
sider the symbolic link itself in any comparisons.  This is the
default.
 
 I need to add a check for this option to the patch, use stat if
 the `follow links' state is true, otherwise use lstat.
 Thanks,
 -Garrett
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


bin/145194: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6

2010-03-30 Thread Fedor Dikarev

>Number: 145194
>Category:   bin
>Synopsis:   Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:   non-critical
>Priority:   low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State:  open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:   
>Date-Required:
>Class:  sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Mar 30 08:50:03 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Fedor Dikarev
>Release:6.x, 7.x and 8.x
>Organization:
Rambler
>Environment:
FreeBSD net.park.rambler.ru 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #1: Tue Jun  2 
10:49:29 MSD 2009 r...@net.park.rambler.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MNGMT  amd64

>Description:
It's very hard to distinguish where local address and port ends and foreign 
address and port starts from sockstat output when using IPv6 addressess.
One space between is enough as I think.

>How-To-Repeat:
root:net{R}[125] sockstat$ sockstat -6
www  nginx  58211 9  tcp6   
2a02:6b0:1:0:21a:92ff:fe80:f032:802a02:6b0:16:0:10cb:d0b0:7274:4cde:1145
.. and more such lines
>Fix:
Just add one space after local address and port. And get output like this:

root:net{R}[135] sockstat$ sockstat -6
www  nginx  58211 12 tcp6   2a02:6b0:1:0:21a:92ff:fe80:f032:80 
2a02:6b0:16:0:10cb:d0b0:7274:4cde:1170

Patch attached with submission follows:

--- sockstat.c  2010-03-30 12:37:25.0 +0400
+++ sockstat.c.orig 2010-03-30 12:22:06.0 +0400
@@ -609,7 +609,6 @@
case AF_INET:
case AF_INET6:
pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->laddr);
-   if((AF_INET6 == s->family) && (pos>=58)) { xprintf(" 
"); }
while (pos < 58)
pos += xprintf(" ");
pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->faddr);


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/145194: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6

2010-03-30 Thread Maxim Konovalov
The following reply was made to PR bin/145194; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Maxim Konovalov 
To: Fedor Dikarev 
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/145194: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:33:48 +0400 (MSD)

 This one looks more correct, doesn't it?
 
 Index: sockstat.c
 ===
 --- sockstat.c (revision 205577)
 +++ sockstat.c (working copy)
 @@ -621,6 +621,8 @@
case AF_INET:
case AF_INET6:
pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->laddr);
 +  if ((AF_INET6 == s->family) && (pos >= 58))
 +  pos += xprintf(" ");
while (pos < 58)
pos += xprintf(" ");
pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->faddr);
 
 %%%
 
 -- 
 Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/145194: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6

2010-03-30 Thread maxim
Synopsis: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6

State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: maxim
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 09:58:35 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why: 
Committed to HEAD.  Thanks!

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=145194
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/145194: commit references a PR

2010-03-30 Thread dfilter service
The following reply was made to PR bin/145194; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/145194: commit references a PR
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:58:35 + (UTC)

 Author: maxim
 Date: Tue Mar 30 09:58:21 2010
 New Revision: 205874
 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205874
 
 Log:
   o Make sockstat -6 output more readable for long ipv6
   addresses (most of them apart from ::1): put a whitespace
   between local and remote address:port pairs.
   
   PR:  bin/145194
   Submitted by:Fedor Dikarev
   MFC after:   2 weeks
 
 Modified:
   head/usr.bin/sockstat/sockstat.c
 
 Modified: head/usr.bin/sockstat/sockstat.c
 ==
 --- head/usr.bin/sockstat/sockstat.c   Tue Mar 30 09:22:33 2010
(r205873)
 +++ head/usr.bin/sockstat/sockstat.c   Tue Mar 30 09:58:21 2010
(r205874)
 @@ -621,6 +621,8 @@ display(void)
case AF_INET:
case AF_INET6:
pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->laddr);
 +  if (s->family == AF_INET6 && pos >= 58)
 +  pos += xprintf(" ");
while (pos < 58)
pos += xprintf(" ");
pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->faddr);
 ___
 svn-src-...@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
 
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/145194: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6

2010-03-30 Thread Fedor Dikarev
The following reply was made to PR bin/145194; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Fedor Dikarev 
To: Maxim Konovalov 
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/145194: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:38:51 +0400

 30.03.2010 13:33, Maxim Konovalov пишет:
 > This one looks more correct, doesn't it?
 > 
 > Index: sockstat.c
 > ===
 > --- sockstat.c   (revision 205577)
 > +++ sockstat.c   (working copy)
 > @@ -621,6 +621,8 @@
 >  case AF_INET:
 >  case AF_INET6:
 >  pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->laddr);
 > +if ((AF_INET6 == s->family) && (pos >= 58))
 > +pos += xprintf(" ");
 >  while (pos < 58)
 >  pos += xprintf(" ");
 >  pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->faddr);
 > 
 > %%%
 > 
 
 Yes, it'll be better -- I just hurry and made mistake through lack of
 attention.
 
 -- 
 Fedor Dikarev
 Rambler Internet Holding
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/144644: [patch] Fix *alloc cornercases with config(1)

2010-03-30 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
The following reply was made to PR bin/144644; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ruslan Ermilov 
To: Garrett Cooper 
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/144644: [patch] Fix *alloc cornercases with config(1)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:34:26 +0400

 On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:58:18AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
 > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Garrett Cooper  wrote:
 > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Garrett Cooper  
 > > wrote:
 > >>    The attached patch addresses the non-style(9) conformity with my
 > >> previous patch as pointed out by several folks on curr...@.
 > >
 > > Sorry -- missed a spot...
 > 
 > The following patch incorporates a logical change from errx(3) to
 > err(3) made by ru@ in an informal review. I also picked up a few other
 > logical messages that were originally errx(EXIT_ERR, ...) and
 > converted them to err(EXIT_ERR, ...) in a similar fashion.
 
 Part of the changes are invalid (shouldn't have been converted from
 errx() to err()).
 
 : Index: main.c
 : ===
 : --- main.c   (revision 205872)
 : +++ main.c   (working copy)
 : @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
 :  if (*destdir == '\0')
 :  strlcpy(destdir, optarg, sizeof(destdir));
 :  else
 : -errx(2, "directory already set");
 : +err(EXIT_FAILURE, "directory already set");
 :  break;
 :  case 'g':
 :  debugging++;
 : @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
 :  if (mkdir(p, 0777))
 :  err(2, "%s", p);
 :  } else if (!S_ISDIR(buf.st_mode))
 : -errx(2, "%s isn't a directory", p);
 : +err(EXIT_FAILURE, "%s isn't a directory", p);
 :  
 :  SLIST_INIT(&cputype);
 :  SLIST_INIT(&mkopt);
 : @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
 :   */
 :  p = strstr(kernconfstr, KERNCONFTAG);
 :  if (p == NULL)
 : -errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Something went terribly wrong!");
 : +err(EXIT_FAILURE, "Something went terribly wrong!");
 :  *p = '\0';
 :  fprintf(fo, "%s", kernconfstr);
 :  fprintf(fo, "%s", sbuf_data(sb));
 : @@ -671,19 +673,19 @@
 : [...]
 :  if (S_ISDIR(st.st_mode))
 : -errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "'%s' is a directory", file);
 : +err(EXIT_FAILURE, "'%s' is a directory", file);
 :  fp = fdopen(r, "r");
 : [...]
 :  pp = popen(cmd, "r");
 :  if (pp == NULL)
 : -errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "popen() failed");
 : +err(EXIT_FAILURE, "popen() failed");
 
 This is questionable; see the popen(3) manpage for details,
 section ERRORS.
 
 : Index: lang.l
 : ===
 : --- lang.l   (revision 205872)
 : +++ lang.l   (working copy)
 : @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 :   * $FreeBSD$
 :   */
 :  
 : +#include 
 
 Misplaced include.
 
 :  #include 
 :  #include 
 :  #include 
 
 
 Cheers,
 -- 
 Ruslan Ermilov
 r...@freebsd.org
 FreeBSD committer
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/144644: [patch] Fix *alloc cornercases with config(1)

2010-03-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
The following reply was made to PR bin/144644; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garrett Cooper 
To: Ruslan Ermilov 
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/144644: [patch] Fix *alloc cornercases with config(1)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:46:28 -0700

 --0016363105b72177dc0483032ec9
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Ruslan Ermilov  wrote:
 > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:58:18AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
 >> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Garrett Cooper  w=
 rote:
 >> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Garrett Cooper  =
 wrote:
 >> >> =A0 =A0The attached patch addresses the non-style(9) conformity with =
 my
 >> >> previous patch as pointed out by several folks on curr...@.
 >> >
 >> > Sorry -- missed a spot...
 >>
 >> =A0 =A0 The following patch incorporates a logical change from errx(3) t=
 o
 >> err(3) made by ru@ in an informal review. I also picked up a few other
 >> logical messages that were originally errx(EXIT_ERR, ...) and
 >> converted them to err(EXIT_ERR, ...) in a similar fashion.
 >
 > Part of the changes are invalid (shouldn't have been converted from
 > errx() to err()).
 >
 > : Index: main.c
 > : =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
 > : --- main.c =A0 =A0(revision 205872)
 > : +++ main.c =A0 =A0(working copy)
 > : @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (*destdir =3D=3D '\0')
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 strlcpy(des=
 tdir, optarg, sizeof(destdir));
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 else
 > : - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 errx(2, "dire=
 ctory already set");
 > : + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 err(EXIT_FAIL=
 URE, "directory already set");
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 break;
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 case 'g':
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 debugging++;
 > : @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (mkdir(p, 0777))
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 err(2, "%s", p);
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 } else if (!S_ISDIR(buf.st_mode))
 > : - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 errx(2, "%s isn't a directory", p);
 > : + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 err(EXIT_FAILURE, "%s isn't a directory", p);
 > :
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 SLIST_INIT(&cputype);
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 SLIST_INIT(&mkopt);
 > : @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0*/
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 p =3D strstr(kernconfstr, KERNCONFTAG);
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 if (p =3D=3D NULL)
 > : - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Something went terribly w=
 rong!");
 > : + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 err(EXIT_FAILURE, "Something went terribly wr=
 ong!");
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 *p =3D '\0';
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 fprintf(fo, "%s", kernconfstr);
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 fprintf(fo, "%s", sbuf_data(sb));
 > : @@ -671,19 +673,19 @@
 > : [...]
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 if (S_ISDIR(st.st_mode))
 > : - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "'%s' is a directory", fil=
 e);
 > : + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 err(EXIT_FAILURE, "'%s' is a directory", file=
 );
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 fp =3D fdopen(r, "r");
 > : [...]
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 pp =3D popen(cmd, "r");
 > : =A0 =A0 =A0 if (pp =3D=3D NULL)
 > : - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "popen() failed");
 > : + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 err(EXIT_FAILURE, "popen() failed");
 >
 > This is questionable; see the popen(3) manpage for details,
 > section ERRORS.
 >
 > : Index: lang.l
 > : =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
 > : --- lang.l =A0 =A0(revision 205872)
 > : +++ lang.l =A0 =A0(working copy)
 > : @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 > : =A0 * $FreeBSD$
 > : =A0 */
 > :
 > : +#include 
 >
 > Misplaced include.
 >
 > : =A0#include 
 > : =A0#include 
 > : =A0#include 
 
 Hi Ruslan!
 Thanks for the review! This should resolve all of the issues you
 spotted before, as well as fixes a typo in a comment near one of the
 changes that I spotted before.
 Cheers,
 -Garrett
 
 --0016363105b72177dc0483032ec9
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; 
name="config-failure-corner-cases.diff.txt"
 Content-Disposition: attachment; 
filename="config-failure-corner-cases.diff.txt"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 X-Attachment-Id: f_g7en65jh0
 
 SW5kZXg6IG1rb3B0aW9ucy5jCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09
 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KLS0tIG1rb3B0aW9ucy5jCShyZXZpc2lvbiAy
 MDU4NzEpCisrKyBta29wdGlvbnMuYwkod29ya2luZyBjb3B5KQpAQCAtNzAsNiArNzAsOCBAQAog
 CS8qIEZha2UgdGhlIGNwdSB0eXBlcyBhcyBvcHRpb25zLiAqLwogCVNMSVNUX0ZPUkVBQ0goY3As
 ICZjcHV0eXBlLCBjcHVfbmV4dCkgewogCQlvcCA9IChzdHJ1Y3Qgb3B0ICopY2FsbG9jKDEsIHNp
 emVvZigqb3ApKTsKKwkJaWYgKG9wI

Re: bin/144644: [patch] Fix *alloc cornercases with config(1)

2010-03-30 Thread ru
Synopsis: [patch] Fix *alloc cornercases with config(1)

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: ru
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 13:47:55 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why: 
Patch committed to HEAD.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144644
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/144644: commit references a PR

2010-03-30 Thread dfilter service
The following reply was made to PR bin/144644; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/144644: commit references a PR
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:46:51 + (UTC)

 Author: ru
 Date: Tue Mar 30 13:46:40 2010
 New Revision: 205880
 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205880
 
 Log:
   - Handle calloc() allocation failures.
   - Fixed a comment.
   - 2 -> EXIT_FAILURE in some places.
   - errx() -> err() where appropriate.
   
   PR:  144644
   Submitted by:Garrett Cooper
 
 Modified:
   head/usr.sbin/config/config.y
   head/usr.sbin/config/lang.l
   head/usr.sbin/config/main.c
   head/usr.sbin/config/mkmakefile.c
   head/usr.sbin/config/mkoptions.c
 
 Modified: head/usr.sbin/config/config.y
 ==
 --- head/usr.sbin/config/config.y  Tue Mar 30 12:08:00 2010
(r205879)
 +++ head/usr.sbin/config/config.y  Tue Mar 30 13:46:40 2010
(r205880)
 @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ Config_spec:
CPU Save_id {
struct cputype *cp =
(struct cputype *)calloc(1, sizeof (struct cputype));
 +  if (cp == NULL)
 +  err(EXIT_FAILURE, "calloc");
cp->cpu_name = $2;
SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&cputype, cp, cpu_next);
  } |
 @@ -197,6 +199,8 @@ Config_spec:
struct hint *hint;
  
hint = (struct hint *)calloc(1, sizeof (struct hint));
 +  if (hint == NULL)
 +  err(EXIT_FAILURE, "calloc");
hint->hint_name = $2;
STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&hints, hint, hint_next);
hintmode = 1;
 @@ -331,6 +335,8 @@ newfile(char *name)
struct files_name *nl;

nl = (struct files_name *) calloc(1, sizeof *nl);
 +  if (nl == NULL)
 +  err(EXIT_FAILURE, "calloc");
nl->f_name = name;
STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&fntab, nl, f_next);
  }
 @@ -364,6 +370,8 @@ newdev(char *name)
}
  
np = (struct device *) calloc(1, sizeof *np);
 +  if (np == NULL)
 +  err(EXIT_FAILURE, "calloc");
np->d_name = name;
STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&dtab, np, d_next);
  }
 @@ -422,6 +430,8 @@ newopt(struct opt_head *list, char *name
}
  
op = (struct opt *)calloc(1, sizeof (struct opt));
 +  if (op == NULL)
 +  err(EXIT_FAILURE, "calloc");
op->op_name = name;
op->op_ownfile = 0;
op->op_value = value;
 
 Modified: head/usr.sbin/config/lang.l
 ==
 --- head/usr.sbin/config/lang.lTue Mar 30 12:08:00 2010
(r205879)
 +++ head/usr.sbin/config/lang.lTue Mar 30 13:46:40 2010
(r205880)
 @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
  
  #include 
  #include 
 +#include 
  #include 
  #include "y.tab.h"
  #include "config.h"
 @@ -220,6 +221,8 @@ cfgfile_add(const char *fname)
struct cfgfile *cf;
  
cf = calloc(1, sizeof(*cf));
 +  if (cf == NULL)
 +  err(EXIT_FAILURE, "calloc");
assert(cf != NULL);
asprintf(&cf->cfg_path, "%s", fname);
STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&cfgfiles, cf, cfg_next);
 
 Modified: head/usr.sbin/config/main.c
 ==
 --- head/usr.sbin/config/main.cTue Mar 30 12:08:00 2010
(r205879)
 +++ head/usr.sbin/config/main.cTue Mar 30 13:46:40 2010
(r205880)
 @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
if (*destdir == '\0')
strlcpy(destdir, optarg, sizeof(destdir));
else
 -  errx(2, "directory already set");
 +  errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "directory already set");
break;
case 'g':
debugging++;
 @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
if (mkdir(p, 0777))
err(2, "%s", p);
} else if (!S_ISDIR(buf.st_mode))
 -  errx(2, "%s isn't a directory", p);
 +  errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "%s isn't a directory", p);
  
SLIST_INIT(&cputype);
SLIST_INIT(&mkopt);
 @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ get_srcdir(void)
int i;
  
if (realpath("../..", srcdir) == NULL)
 -  errx(2, "Unable to find root of source tree");
 +  err(EXIT_FAILURE, "Unable to find root of source tree");
if ((pwd = getenv("PWD")) != NULL && *pwd == '/' &&
(pwd = strdup(pwd)) != NULL) {
/* Remove the last two path components. */
 @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ configfile(void)
}
sbuf_finish(sb);
/* 
 -   * We print first part of the tamplate, replace our tag with
 +   * We print first part of the template, repl

Re: bin/145063: [patch] powerd(8): Add -m and -M (minimum and maximum frequency) options to powerd

2010-03-30 Thread linimon
Synopsis: [patch] powerd(8): Add -m and -M (minimum and maximum frequency) 
options to powerd

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-acpi
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 13:52:32 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Submitter has requested review from acpi group.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=145063
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


misc/145205: UFOAI fails to compile due to jpeg error

2010-03-30 Thread Rusty Nejdl

>Number: 145205
>Category:   misc
>Synopsis:   UFOAI fails to compile due to jpeg error
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:   non-critical
>Priority:   low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State:  open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:   
>Date-Required:
>Class:  sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Mar 30 14:10:05 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Rusty Nejdl
>Release:8-STABLE AMD64
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD tethys.ringofsaturn.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Fri Mar 12 
10:39:31 CST 2010 r...@tethys.ringofsaturn.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SATURN  
amd64

>Description:
UFOAI fails to compile with the following error:

src/renderer/r_image.c:283: warning: 'width' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:633)   

src/renderer/r_image.c:283: warning: 'height' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:634)   
   
src/renderer/r_image.c:284: warning: 'height' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:634)   
   
src/renderer/r_image.c:285: warning: 'rowbytes' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:637)
src/renderer/r_image.c:285: warning: 'channels' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:658)
src/renderer/r_image.c:286: warning: 'channels' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:658)
src/renderer/r_image.c:293: warning: 'width' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:633)
src/renderer/r_image.c:295: warning: 'height' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:634)
src/renderer/r_image.c:296: warning: 'channels' is deprecated (declared at 
/usr/local/include/png.h:658)
src/renderer/r_image.c: At top level:
src/renderer/r_image.c:655: error: conflicting types for 'jpeg_mem_src'
/usr/local/include/jpeglib.h:959: error: previous declaration of 'jpeg_mem_src' 
was here
gmake: *** [release-freebsd-unknown/client/renderer/r_image.o] Error 1
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/games/ufoai.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/games/ufoai.
Exit 1

>How-To-Repeat:
Try to compile ufoai.
>Fix:
Some work has been started for netbsd:

http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-bugs/2010/01/30/msg035807.html

But that is not the complete fix.

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: ports/145205: games/ufoai fails to compile due to jpeg error

2010-03-30 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: UFOAI fails to compile due to jpeg error
New Synopsis: games/ufoai fails to compile due to jpeg error

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 14:42:11 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
fix category and synopsis.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=145205
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


kern/145211: Memory modified after free

2010-03-30 Thread Nathaniel Filardo

>Number: 145211
>Category:   kern
>Synopsis:   Memory modified after free
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:   serious
>Priority:   medium
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State:  open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:   
>Date-Required:
>Class:  sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Mar 30 15:50:03 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Nathaniel Filardo
>Release:9.0-CURRENT
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD hydra.priv.oc.ietfng.org 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #19: Mon Mar 
29 18:21:58 EDT 2010 
r...@hydra.priv.oc.ietfng.org:/systank/obj/systank/src/sys/NWFKERN  sparc64

>Description:
Kernel panic.  No dump to disk is made.  Moreover, despite having KDB turned 
on, the system did not drop to a db> prompt.

login: Memory modified after free 0xf80019f97000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80019f97000
Memory modified after free 0xf8000569f000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf8000569f000   
Memory modified after free 0xf80005686800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80005686800   
Memory modified after free 0xf800056dd800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf800056dd800   
Memory modified after free 0xf800054ba800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf800054ba800   
Memory modified after free 0xf8000565b000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf8000565b000   
Memory modified after free 0xf80005609800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80005609800   
Memory modified after free 0xf80005608000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80005608000   
Memory modified after free 0xf80005695800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80005695800   
Memory modified after free 0xf8000563e800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf8000563e800   
Memory modified after free 0xf800055c2000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf800055c2000   
Memory modified after free 0xf80019f77800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80019f77800   
Memory modified after free 0xf8001920b000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf8001920b000   
Memory modified after free 0xf80019fae000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80019fae000   
Memory modified after free 0xf800055a6800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf800055a6800   
Memory modified after free 0xf8000565e000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf8000565e000   
Memory modified after free 0xf80005641800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80005641800   
Memory modified after free 0xf80005675000(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf80005675000   
Memory modified after free 0xf8000564c800(2048) val=dead0003 @ 
0xf8000564c800   
panic: pcib: PCI bus B error AFAR 0 AFSR 0 PCI CSR 0x10730b2aff IOMMU 0x3060003 
STATUS 0x2a0
cpuid = 1

On pcib bus B I seem to have the following devices:

pcib0:  mem 
0x4000ff0-0x4000ff0afff,0x4000fc1-0x4000fc1701f,0x7f6-0x7f600ff,0x4000ff8-0x4000ff8
 irq 2035,2032,2033,2036,2019 on nexus0
pcib0: Tomatillo, version 4, IGN 0x1f, bus B, 66MHz
pcib0: DVMA map: 0xc000 to 0xdfff 65536 entries
pci0:  on pcib0
pci0:  on pcib0
bge0:  mem 
0x20-0x20,0x11-0x11 at device 2.0 on pci0
bge1:  mem 
0x40-0x40,0x12-0x12 at device 2.1 on pci0
atapci0:  port 
0x900-0x907,0x918-0x91b,0x910-0x917,0x908-0x90b,0x920-0x92f at device 13.0 on 
pci1
atapci0: [ITHREAD]
atapci0: using PIO transfers above 137GB as workaround for 48bit DMA access 
bug, expect reduced performance

There's only a DVD drive attached to atapci0, and the driver for that is not 
loaded.

pcib3:  mem 
0x4000ef0-0x4000ef0afff,0x4000ec1-0x4000ec1701f,0x7c6-0x7c600ff,0x4000ef8-0x4000ef8
 irq 1907,1904,1905,1908,1893 on nexus0
pcib3: Tomatillo, version 4, IGN 0x1d, bus B, 66MHz
pcib3: DVMA map: 0xc000 to 0xdfff 65536 entries
pci3:  on pcib3
bge2:  mem 
0x20-0x20,0x11-0x11 at device 2.0 on pci3
bge3:  mem 
0x40-0x40,0x12-0x12 at device 2.1 on pci3
atapci1:  port 0x300-0x3ff mem 
0x60-0x6f,0x80-0xbf at device 1.0 on pci3
ata8:  on atapci1
ata9:  on atapci1
ata10:  on atapci1
ata11:  on atapci1
ad0: 715404MB  at ata8-master UDMA100 SATA 3Gb/s
ad1: 715404MB  at ata9-master UDMA100 SATA 3Gb/s
ad2: 715404MB  at ata10-master UDMA100 SATA 
3Gb/s
ad3: 715404MB  at ata11-master UDMA100 SATA 
3Gb/s

These four disks form a RAIDZ.

Kernel configuration options that seem relevant:

options SMP
options KDB
options INVARIANTS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
options WITNESS
options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN
device  ata
device  atadisk
nodeviceatapicd
nodeviceatapifd
nodeviceatapist
device  atamarvell

What more would be useful to know?
>How-To-Repeat:
Unknown; the crash has happened twice so far, once with a kernel from January 
after weeks of uptime and once with a kernel from yesterday after only a few 
hours.  The system routinely survives multiple zfs scrubs of the four disks 
hanging off of pci3, so

Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load

2010-03-30 Thread Bruce Evans

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Rich Ercolani wrote:


Description:

nfsd performs abysmally on this machine under conditions in which Solaris's NFS 
implementation is reasonably fast, and while local IO to the same filesystems 
is still zippy.


Please don't format lines for 200+ column terminals.

Does it work better when limited to 1 thread (nfsd -n 1)?  In at least
some versions of it (or maybe in nfsiod), multiple threads fight each other
under load.


For instance, copying a 4GB file over NFSv3 from a ZFS filesystem with the 
following flags 
[rw,nosuid,hard,intr,nofsc,tcp,vers=3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,sloppy,addr=X.X.X.X](Linux
 client, the above is the server), I achieve 2 MB/s, fluctuating between 1 and 
3. (pv reports 2.23 MB/s avg)

Locally, on the server, I achieve 110-140 MB/s (at the end of pv, it reports 
123 MB/s avg).

I'd assume network latency, but nc with no flags other than port achieves 30-50 
MB/s between server and client.

Latency is also abysmal - ls on a randomly chosen homedir full of files, 
according to time, takes:
real0m15.634s
user0m0.012s
sys 0m0.097s
while on the local machine:
real0m0.266s
user0m0.007s
sys 0m0.000s


It probably is latency.  nfs is very latency-sensitive when there are lots
of small files.  Transfers of large files shouldn't be affected so much.


The server in question is a 3GHz Core 2 Duo, running FreeBSD RELENG_8. The 
kernel conf, DTRACE_POLL, is just the stock AMD64 kernel with all of the 
DTRACE-related options turned on, as well as the option to enable polling in 
the NIC drivers, since we were wondering if that would improve our performance.


Enabling polling is a good way to destroy latency.  A ping latency of
more that about 50uS causes noticable loss of performance for nfs, but
LAN latency is usually a few times higher than that, and polling without
increasing the clock interrupt frequency to an excessively high value
gives a latency of at least 20 times higher than that.  Also, -current
with debugging options is so bloated that even localhost has a ping
latency of about 50uS on a Core2 (up from 2uS for FreeBSD-4 on an
AthlonXP).  Anyway try nfs on localhost to see if reducing the latency
helps.


We tested this with a UFS directory as well, because we were curious if this was an 
NFS/ZFS interaction - we still got 1-2 MB/s read speed and horrible latency while 
achieving fast throughput and latency local to the server, so we're reasonably certain 
it's not "just" ZFS, if there is indeed any interaction there.


After various tuning and bug fixing (now partly committed by others) I get
improvements like the following on low-end systems with ffs (I don't use
zfs):
- very low end with 100Mbps ethernet: little change; bulk transfers always
  went at near wire speed (about 10 MB/S)
- low end with 1Gbps/S: bulk transfers up from 20MB/S to 45MB/S (local ffs
  50MB/S).  buildworld over nfs of 5.2 world down from 1200 seconds to 800
  seconds (this one is very latency-sensitive.  Takes about 750 seconds on
  local ffs).


Read speed of a randomly generated 6500 MB file on UFS over NFSv3 with the same 
flags as above: 1-3 MB/s, averaging 2.11 MB/s
Read speed of the same file, local to the server: consistently between 40-60 
MB/s, averaging 61.8 MB/s [it got faster over time - presumably UFS was 
aggressively caching the file, or something?]


You should use a file size larger than the size of main memory to prevent
caching, especially for reads.  That is 1GB on my low-end systems.


Read speed of the same file over NFS again, after the local test:
Amusingly, worse (768 KB/s-2.2 MB/s, with random stalls - average reported 270 
KB/s(!)).


The random stalls are typical of the problem with the nfsd's getting
in each other's way, and/or of related problems.  The stalls that I
saw were very easy to see in real time using "netstat -I 
1" -- they happened every few seconds and lasted a second or 2.  But
they were never long enough to reduce the throughput by more than a
factor of 3, so I always got over 19 MB/S.  The throughput was reduced
by approximately the ratio of stalled time to non-stalled time.


How-To-Repeat:

1) Mount multiple NFS filesystems from the server
2) Watch as your operations latency and throughput rapidly sink to near-zero


Multiple active nfs mounts are probably a different problem.  You certainly
need more than 1 nfsd and/or nfsiod to handle them, and the stalls might
be a result of not having enough daemons.

Bruce
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load

2010-03-30 Thread Bruce Evans
The following reply was made to PR misc/145189; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruce Evans 
To: Rich Ercolani 
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load 
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:50:16 +1100 (EST)

 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Rich Ercolani wrote:
 
 >> Description:
 > nfsd performs abysmally on this machine under conditions in which Solaris's 
 > NFS implementation is reasonably fast, and while local IO to the same 
 > filesystems is still zippy.
 
 Please don't format lines for 200+ column terminals.
 
 Does it work better when limited to 1 thread (nfsd -n 1)?  In at least
 some versions of it (or maybe in nfsiod), multiple threads fight each other
 under load.
 
 > For instance, copying a 4GB file over NFSv3 from a ZFS filesystem with the 
 > following flags 
 > [rw,nosuid,hard,intr,nofsc,tcp,vers=3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,sloppy,addr=X.X.X.X](Linux
 >  client, the above is the server), I achieve 2 MB/s, fluctuating between 1 
 > and 3. (pv reports 2.23 MB/s avg)
 >
 > Locally, on the server, I achieve 110-140 MB/s (at the end of pv, it reports 
 > 123 MB/s avg).
 >
 > I'd assume network latency, but nc with no flags other than port achieves 
 > 30-50 MB/s between server and client.
 >
 > Latency is also abysmal - ls on a randomly chosen homedir full of files, 
 > according to time, takes:
 > real0m15.634s
 > user0m0.012s
 > sys 0m0.097s
 > while on the local machine:
 > real 0m0.266s
 > user 0m0.007s
 > sys  0m0.000s
 
 It probably is latency.  nfs is very latency-sensitive when there are lots
 of small files.  Transfers of large files shouldn't be affected so much.
 
 > The server in question is a 3GHz Core 2 Duo, running FreeBSD RELENG_8. The 
 > kernel conf, DTRACE_POLL, is just the stock AMD64 kernel with all of the 
 > DTRACE-related options turned on, as well as the option to enable polling in 
 > the NIC drivers, since we were wondering if that would improve our 
 > performance.
 
 Enabling polling is a good way to destroy latency.  A ping latency of
 more that about 50uS causes noticable loss of performance for nfs, but
 LAN latency is usually a few times higher than that, and polling without
 increasing the clock interrupt frequency to an excessively high value
 gives a latency of at least 20 times higher than that.  Also, -current
 with debugging options is so bloated that even localhost has a ping
 latency of about 50uS on a Core2 (up from 2uS for FreeBSD-4 on an
 AthlonXP).  Anyway try nfs on localhost to see if reducing the latency
 helps.
 
 > We tested this with a UFS directory as well, because we were curious if this 
 > was an NFS/ZFS interaction - we still got 1-2 MB/s read speed and horrible 
 > latency while achieving fast throughput and latency local to the server, so 
 > we're reasonably certain it's not "just" ZFS, if there is indeed any 
 > interaction there.
 
 After various tuning and bug fixing (now partly committed by others) I get
 improvements like the following on low-end systems with ffs (I don't use
 zfs):
 - very low end with 100Mbps ethernet: little change; bulk transfers always
went at near wire speed (about 10 MB/S)
 - low end with 1Gbps/S: bulk transfers up from 20MB/S to 45MB/S (local ffs
50MB/S).  buildworld over nfs of 5.2 world down from 1200 seconds to 800
seconds (this one is very latency-sensitive.  Takes about 750 seconds on
local ffs).
 
 > Read speed of a randomly generated 6500 MB file on UFS over NFSv3 with the 
 > same flags as above: 1-3 MB/s, averaging 2.11 MB/s
 > Read speed of the same file, local to the server: consistently between 40-60 
 > MB/s, averaging 61.8 MB/s [it got faster over time - presumably UFS was 
 > aggressively caching the file, or something?]
 
 You should use a file size larger than the size of main memory to prevent
 caching, especially for reads.  That is 1GB on my low-end systems.
 
 > Read speed of the same file over NFS again, after the local test:
 > Amusingly, worse (768 KB/s-2.2 MB/s, with random stalls - average reported 
 > 270 KB/s(!)).
 
 The random stalls are typical of the problem with the nfsd's getting
 in each other's way, and/or of related problems.  The stalls that I
 saw were very easy to see in real time using "netstat -I 
 1" -- they happened every few seconds and lasted a second or 2.  But
 they were never long enough to reduce the throughput by more than a
 factor of 3, so I always got over 19 MB/S.  The throughput was reduced
 by approximately the ratio of stalled time to non-stalled time.
 
 >> How-To-Repeat:
 > 1) Mount multiple NFS filesystems from the server
 > 2) Watch as your operations latency and throughput rapidly sink to near-zero
 
 Multiple active nfs mounts are probably a different problem.  You certainly
 need more than 1 nfsd and/or nfsiod to handle them, and the stalls might
 be a result of not having enough daemons.
 
 Bruce
___
freebsd-bu

misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man utilities but not with man pages

2010-03-30 Thread Alexander Sack

>Number: 145212
>Category:   misc
>Synopsis:   Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man utilities 
>but not with man pages
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:   non-critical
>Priority:   low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State:  open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:   
>Date-Required:
>Class:  sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Mar 30 16:10:08 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Alexander Sack
>Release:7.2-amd64, CURRENT
>Organization:
Niksun
>Environment:
>Description:
Currently the WITHOUT_MAN option to the FreeBSD world build will stub out BOTH 
man binaries (gnu/usr.bin/man ad manpath, usr.bin/catman, etc.) as well as 
creation of the man pages.

I would like to build able to build FreeBSD with the man utilities but not the 
man pages since we want to conserve space BUT be able to read third-party or 
custom application generated man pages.

I propose a MK_MAN_UTILS option that allows the following:

WITHOUT_MAN=1 WITH_MAN_UTILS=1 make buildworld

Will build the entire world sans man pages but with binaries

WITHOUT_MAN=1 make buildworld

Will build the entire world without man pages OR man binaries (existing 
behavior)

WITHOUT_MAN_UTILS=1 make buildworld

Will build the entire world without man pages or man binaries (if you have no  
binaries how are you going to read man pages!) - in other words:

WITH_MAN=1 && WITHOUT_MAN_UTILS=1 is illegal

Patches attached against CURRENT.

New file should also be included as well (I forgot it):

$ cat tools/build/options/WITHOUT_MAN_UTILS 
.\" $FreeBSD$
Set to not build any man related utilities such as man, manpath, and catman.

>How-To-Repeat:
Build FreeBSD using src.conf option WITHOUT_MAN=1 and no man utilities will be 
included in your runtime.
>Fix:


Patch attached with submission follows:

Index: etc/Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.381
diff -u -r1.381 Makefile
--- etc/Makefile19 Mar 2010 15:53:02 -  1.381
+++ etc/Makefile30 Mar 2010 14:38:03 -
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 BIN1+= ${.CURDIR}/../usr.bin/mail/misc/mail.rc
 .endif
 
-.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
+.if ${MK_MAN_UTILS} != "no"
 BIN1+= ${.CURDIR}/../gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config
 .endif
 
Index: gnu/usr.bin/Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -u -r1.102 Makefile
--- gnu/usr.bin/Makefile26 Mar 2010 17:02:32 -  1.102
+++ gnu/usr.bin/Makefile30 Mar 2010 14:38:04 -
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 _texinfo=  texinfo
 .endif
 
-.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
+.if ${MK_MAN_UTILS} != "no"
 _man=  man
 .endif
 
Index: share/mk/bsd.own.mk
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -u -r1.83 bsd.own.mk
--- share/mk/bsd.own.mk 26 Mar 2010 17:02:32 -  1.83
+++ share/mk/bsd.own.mk 30 Mar 2010 14:38:15 -
@@ -524,7 +524,8 @@
 # MK_* options whose default value depends on another option.
 #
 .for vv in \
-GSSAPI/KERBEROS
+GSSAPI/KERBEROS \
+MAN_UTILS/MAN 
 .if defined(WITH_${vv:H}) && defined(WITHOUT_${vv:H})
 .error WITH_${vv:H} and WITHOUT_${vv:H} can't both be set.
 .endif
Index: usr.bin/Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.bin/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.332
diff -u -r1.332 Makefile
--- usr.bin/Makefile19 Feb 2010 23:54:12 -  1.332
+++ usr.bin/Makefile30 Mar 2010 14:38:29 -
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
 _atm=  atm
 .endif
 
-.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
+.if ${MK_MAN_UTILS} != "no"
 _catman=   catman
 .endif
 


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load

2010-03-30 Thread Rich
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Evans  wrote:
> Does it work better when limited to 1 thread (nfsd -n 1)?  In at least
> some versions of it (or maybe in nfsiod), multiple threads fight each other
> under load.

It doesn't seem to - nfsd -n 1 still ranges between 1-3 MB/s for files
> RAM on server or client (6 and 4 GB, respectively).

>> For instance, copying a 4GB file over NFSv3 from a ZFS filesystem with the
>> following flags
>> [rw,nosuid,hard,intr,nofsc,tcp,vers=3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,sloppy,addr=X.X.X.X](Linux
>> client, the above is the server), I achieve 2 MB/s, fluctuating between 1
>> and 3. (pv reports 2.23 MB/s avg)
>>
>> Locally, on the server, I achieve 110-140 MB/s (at the end of pv, it
>> reports 123 MB/s avg).
>>
>> I'd assume network latency, but nc with no flags other than port achieves
>> 30-50 MB/s between server and client.
>>
>> Latency is also abysmal - ls on a randomly chosen homedir full of files,
>> according to time, takes:
>> real    0m15.634s
>> user    0m0.012s
>> sys     0m0.097s
>> while on the local machine:
>> real    0m0.266s
>> user    0m0.007s
>> sys     0m0.000s
>
> It probably is latency.  nfs is very latency-sensitive when there are lots
> of small files.  Transfers of large files shouldn't be affected so much.

Sure, and next on my TODO is to look into whether 9.0-CURRENT makes
certain ZFS high-latency things perform better.

>> The server in question is a 3GHz Core 2 Duo, running FreeBSD RELENG_8. The
>> kernel conf, DTRACE_POLL, is just the stock AMD64 kernel with all of the
>> DTRACE-related options turned on, as well as the option to enable polling in
>> the NIC drivers, since we were wondering if that would improve our
>> performance.
>
> Enabling polling is a good way to destroy latency.  A ping latency of
> more that about 50uS causes noticable loss of performance for nfs, but
> LAN latency is usually a few times higher than that, and polling without
> increasing the clock interrupt frequency to an excessively high value
> gives a latency of at least 20 times higher than that.  Also, -current
> with debugging options is so bloated that even localhost has a ping
> latency of about 50uS on a Core2 (up from 2uS for FreeBSD-4 on an
> AthlonXP).  Anyway try nfs on localhost to see if reducing the latency
> helps.

Actually, we noticed that throughput appeared to get marginally better while
causing occasional bursts of crushing latency, but yes, we have it on in the
kernel without using it in any actual NICs at present. :)

But yes, I'm getting 40-90+ MB/s, occasionally slowing to 20-30 MB/s,
average after copying a 6.5 GB file of 52.7 MB/s, on localhost IPv4,
with no additional mount flags. {r,w}size=8192 on localhost goes up to
80-100 MB/s, with occasional sinks to 60 (average after copying
another, separate 6.5 GB file: 77.3 MB/s).

Also:
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.049 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.012 ms
64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.019 ms
64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms

>> We tested this with a UFS directory as well, because we were curious if
>> this was an NFS/ZFS interaction - we still got 1-2 MB/s read speed and
>> horrible latency while achieving fast throughput and latency local to the
>> server, so we're reasonably certain it's not "just" ZFS, if there is indeed
>> any interaction there.
>
> After various tuning and bug fixing (now partly committed by others) I get
> improvements like the following on low-end systems with ffs (I don't use
> zfs):
> - very low end with 100Mbps ethernet: little change; bulk transfers always
>  went at near wire speed (about 10 MB/S)
> - low end with 1Gbps/S: bulk transfers up from 20MB/S to 45MB/S (local ffs
>  50MB/S).  buildworld over nfs of 5.2 world down from 1200 seconds to 800
>  seconds (this one is very latency-sensitive.  Takes about 750 seconds on
>  local ffs).

Is this on 9.0-CURRENT, or RELENG_8, or something else?

>> Read speed of a randomly generated 6500 MB file on UFS over NFSv3 with the
>> same flags as above: 1-3 MB/s, averaging 2.11 MB/s
>> Read speed of the same file, local to the server: consistently between
>> 40-60 MB/s, averaging 61.8 MB/s [it got faster over time - presumably UFS
>> was aggressively caching the file, or something?]
>
> You should use a file size larger than the size of main memory to prevent
> caching, especially for reads.  That is 1GB on my low-end systems.

I didn't mention the server's RAM, explicitly, but it has 6 GB of real
RAM, and the files used were 6.5-7 GB each in that case (I did use a
4GB file earlier - I've avoided doing that again here).

>> Read speed of the same file over NFS again, after the local test:
>> Amusingly, worse (768 KB/s-2.2 MB/s, with random stalls - average reported
>> 270 KB/s(!)).
>
> The random stalls are typical of the problem with the nfsd's getting
> in each other's way, and/or 

Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load

2010-03-30 Thread Rich
The following reply was made to PR misc/145189; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Rich 
To: Bruce Evans 
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:37 -0400

 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Evans  wrote:
 > Does it work better when limited to 1 thread (nfsd -n 1)? =A0In at least
 > some versions of it (or maybe in nfsiod), multiple threads fight each oth=
 er
 > under load.
 
 It doesn't seem to - nfsd -n 1 still ranges between 1-3 MB/s for files
 > RAM on server or client (6 and 4 GB, respectively).
 
 >> For instance, copying a 4GB file over NFSv3 from a ZFS filesystem with t=
 he
 >> following flags
 >> [rw,nosuid,hard,intr,nofsc,tcp,vers=3D3,rsize=3D8192,wsize=3D8192,sloppy=
 ,addr=3DX.X.X.X](Linux
 >> client, the above is the server), I achieve 2 MB/s, fluctuating between =
 1
 >> and 3. (pv reports 2.23 MB/s avg)
 >>
 >> Locally, on the server, I achieve 110-140 MB/s (at the end of pv, it
 >> reports 123 MB/s avg).
 >>
 >> I'd assume network latency, but nc with no flags other than port achieve=
 s
 >> 30-50 MB/s between server and client.
 >>
 >> Latency is also abysmal - ls on a randomly chosen homedir full of files,
 >> according to time, takes:
 >> real =A0 =A00m15.634s
 >> user =A0 =A00m0.012s
 >> sys =A0 =A0 0m0.097s
 >> while on the local machine:
 >> real =A0 =A00m0.266s
 >> user =A0 =A00m0.007s
 >> sys =A0 =A0 0m0.000s
 >
 > It probably is latency. =A0nfs is very latency-sensitive when there are l=
 ots
 > of small files. =A0Transfers of large files shouldn't be affected so much=
 .
 
 Sure, and next on my TODO is to look into whether 9.0-CURRENT makes
 certain ZFS high-latency things perform better.
 
 >> The server in question is a 3GHz Core 2 Duo, running FreeBSD RELENG_8. T=
 he
 >> kernel conf, DTRACE_POLL, is just the stock AMD64 kernel with all of the
 >> DTRACE-related options turned on, as well as the option to enable pollin=
 g in
 >> the NIC drivers, since we were wondering if that would improve our
 >> performance.
 >
 > Enabling polling is a good way to destroy latency. =A0A ping latency of
 > more that about 50uS causes noticable loss of performance for nfs, but
 > LAN latency is usually a few times higher than that, and polling without
 > increasing the clock interrupt frequency to an excessively high value
 > gives a latency of at least 20 times higher than that. =A0Also, -current
 > with debugging options is so bloated that even localhost has a ping
 > latency of about 50uS on a Core2 (up from 2uS for FreeBSD-4 on an
 > AthlonXP). =A0Anyway try nfs on localhost to see if reducing the latency
 > helps.
 
 Actually, we noticed that throughput appeared to get marginally better whil=
 e
 causing occasional bursts of crushing latency, but yes, we have it on in th=
 e
 kernel without using it in any actual NICs at present. :)
 
 But yes, I'm getting 40-90+ MB/s, occasionally slowing to 20-30 MB/s,
 average after copying a 6.5 GB file of 52.7 MB/s, on localhost IPv4,
 with no additional mount flags. {r,w}size=3D8192 on localhost goes up to
 80-100 MB/s, with occasional sinks to 60 (average after copying
 another, separate 6.5 GB file: 77.3 MB/s).
 
 Also:
 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.015 ms
 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.049 ms
 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.012 ms
 64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.019 ms
 64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.015 ms
 
 >> We tested this with a UFS directory as well, because we were curious if
 >> this was an NFS/ZFS interaction - we still got 1-2 MB/s read speed and
 >> horrible latency while achieving fast throughput and latency local to th=
 e
 >> server, so we're reasonably certain it's not "just" ZFS, if there is ind=
 eed
 >> any interaction there.
 >
 > After various tuning and bug fixing (now partly committed by others) I ge=
 t
 > improvements like the following on low-end systems with ffs (I don't use
 > zfs):
 > - very low end with 100Mbps ethernet: little change; bulk transfers alway=
 s
 > =A0went at near wire speed (about 10 MB/S)
 > - low end with 1Gbps/S: bulk transfers up from 20MB/S to 45MB/S (local ff=
 s
 > =A050MB/S). =A0buildworld over nfs of 5.2 world down from 1200 seconds to=
  800
 > =A0seconds (this one is very latency-sensitive. =A0Takes about 750 second=
 s on
 > =A0local ffs).
 
 Is this on 9.0-CURRENT, or RELENG_8, or something else?
 
 >> Read speed of a randomly generated 6500 MB file on UFS over NFSv3 with t=
 he
 >> same flags as above: 1-3 MB/s, averaging 2.11 MB/s
 >> Read speed of the same file, local to the server: consistently between
 >> 40-60 MB/s, averaging 61.8 MB/s [it got faster over time - presumably UF=
 S
 >> was aggressively caching the file, or something?]
 >
 > You should use a file size larger than the size of main memory to prevent
 > caching, especially 

Re: misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man utilities but not with man pages

2010-03-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
The following reply was made to PR misc/145212; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garrett Cooper 
To: Alexander Sack 
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man 
utilities but not with man pages
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:28:44 -0700

 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Sack  wrote:
 >
 >>Number: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 145212
 >>Category: =A0 =A0 =A0 misc
 >>Synopsis: =A0 =A0 =A0 Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man =
 utilities but not with man pages
 >>Confidential: =A0 no
 >>Severity: =A0 =A0 =A0 non-critical
 >>Priority: =A0 =A0 =A0 low
 >>Responsible: =A0 =A0freebsd-bugs
 >>State: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0open
 >>Quarter:
 >>Keywords:
 >>Date-Required:
 >>Class: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0sw-bug
 >>Submitter-Id: =A0 current-users
 >>Arrival-Date: =A0 Tue Mar 30 16:10:08 UTC 2010
 >>Closed-Date:
 >>Last-Modified:
 >>Originator: =A0 =A0 Alexander Sack
 >>Release: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A07.2-amd64, CURRENT
 >>Organization:
 > Niksun
 
 Looks like a worthy patch, but I think you forgot one item:
 If MK_MAN_UTILS =3D=3D "no", then MK_MAN should also be "no".
 Thanks :),
 -Garrett
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man utilities but not with man pages

2010-03-30 Thread Alexander Sack
The following reply was made to PR misc/145212; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexander Sack 
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, as...@niksun.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man
 utilities but not with man pages
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:41:34 -0400

 I'd like to mention also that manctl is not tuned by any of the MK_* 
 knobs so with the advent of MK_MAN_UTILS perhaps something like this 
 should also be part of the patch:
 
 Index: usr.sbin/Makefile
 ===
 RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/Makefile,v
 retrieving revision 1.421
 diff -u -r1.421 Makefile
 --- usr.sbin/Makefile4 Mar 2010 20:31:49 -1.421
 +++ usr.sbin/Makefile30 Mar 2010 17:30:27 -
 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
   mailwrapper \
   makefs \
   ${_makemap} \
 -manctl \
 +${_manctl} \
   memcontrol \
   mergemaster \
   mfiutil \
 @@ -322,6 +322,10 @@
   _lpr=lpr
   .endif
 
 +.if ${MK_MAN_UTILS} != "no"
 +_manctl=manctl
 +.endif
 +
   .if ${MK_NETGRAPH} != "no"
   _flowctl=flowctl
   _lmcconfig=lmcconfig
 
 Another thing my patch DOES NOT address is the mtree hierarchy which I 
 am indifferent about.  I believe as its set up, we should leave the 
 mtree stuff alone (just not populate any man pages in them).
 
 Thanks!
 
 -aps
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man utilities but not with man pages

2010-03-30 Thread Alexander Sack
The following reply was made to PR misc/145212; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexander Sack 
To: Garrett Cooper 
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man
utilities but not with man pages
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:44:30 -0400

 On 3/30/10 1:28 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
 > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Sack  wrote:
 >
 >>  
 >>> Number: 145212
 >>> Category:   misc
 >>> Synopsis:   Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man 
 >>> utilities but not with man pages
 >>> Confidential:   no
 >>> Severity:   non-critical
 >>> Priority:   low
 >>> Responsible:freebsd-bugs
 >>> State:  open
 >>> Quarter:
 >>> Keywords:
 >>> Date-Required:
 >>> Class:  sw-bug
 >>> Submitter-Id:   current-users
 >>> Arrival-Date:   Tue Mar 30 16:10:08 UTC 2010
 >>> Closed-Date:
 >>> Last-Modified:
 >>> Originator: Alexander Sack
 >>> Release:7.2-amd64, CURRENT
 >>> Organization:
 >>>
 >> Niksun
 >>  
 >  Looks like a worthy patch, but I think you forgot one item:
 >  If MK_MAN_UTILS == "no", then MK_MAN should also be "no".
 > Thanks :),
 > -Garrett
 >
 >
 Ah damn did I do thatdamn it...its a small fix for that.
 
 I got a follow up Garrett to add manctl in the mix as well.
 
 -aps
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for -X

2010-03-30 Thread Bruce Evans

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:


Hi,
I'm not 100% satisfied with this patch now. Looking back it fails
the following case:

 -PDo not follow symbolic links in the file hierarchy, instead con-
   sider the symbolic link itself in any comparisons.  This is the
   default.


-P should have the same semantics and description in all utilities.  The
description should not have grammar errors like the above (comma splice).
In cp(1) the description is:

%%%
 -PIf the -R option is specified, no symbolic links are followed.
   This is the default.
 ...
 Symbolic links are always followed unless the -R flag is set, in which
 case symbolic links are not followed, by default.  The -H or -L flags (in
 conjunction with the -R flag) cause symbolic links to be followed as
 described above.  The -H, -L and -P options are ignored unless the -R
 option is specified.  In addition, these options override each other and
 the command's actions are determined by the last one specified.
%%%

I now see that the grammar error is from the original version of mtree(1),
and is probably one of the things you don't like.  mtree also has -L, but
not -R or -P or -h.  It is not clear how any utility that traverses trees
can work without a full complement of -[HLPR] or how any utility that
supports symlinks can work without -h.  cp(1) doesn't support -h either,
but I think mtree is more like chmod(1) here -- it supports setting
attributes (without having an source file or symlink in the hierarchy to
copy the attributes from like cp does), so it should have a way control
whether the attributes are set on a symlink or on the symlink target.


I need to add a check for this option to the patch, use stat if
the `follow links' state is true, otherwise use lstat.


In mtree, -P controls only the tree traversal.  If symlinks are not followed
in the traversal, then it can't be right to always follow them for the final
path component like the current code always does.  The current code never
use, lstat(), lchmod(), lutimes(), etc., so it can't handle symlinks very
well.  You would need to change much more than stat() to lstat() to fix this.
First, there are delicate combinations of the -[HLPR] flags to distinguish
between following symbolic links on the command line and symbolic links in
the file hierarchy.  In cp, these are:

-RH: follow on the command line but not in the hierarchy
-RL: always follow
-RP: never follow.

mtree has -R as implicit and doesn't have -H.  It claims that -P is the
default.  However, this cannot possibly work for leaf symlinks, since
mtree never uses lstat(), lchmod(), etc., so it always follows leaf
symlinks.  Next, there is the -h flag to give control over following
leaf symlinks.  In cp, this isn't really needed since it makes no sense
to use a different "follow" rule for the source and target; so with -R,
-P actually gives "never follow", while without -R, -P has no effect
and gives "always follow"; thus you can get the effect of -h using -RP
for copying a single symlink, and the only difficult operation not getting
the effect of -h for copying hierachies.  In mtree, there is no -h flag,
and no support for it either, and the claimed "never follow" for -P is
just wrong for leaf symlinks.

Oops, further grepping shows that the above is not quite right.  mtree
does use lchown() for creating symlinks.  This might be because ownership
is more important for security than other attributes.  Also, the claim
that -RP always follows symlinks seems to be wrong in all cases except
in cp: in chflags, chmod and chown, it takes -h to follow leaf symlinks;
cp doesn't have -h and -RP is required to preserve everything, so cp
is more careful about this and uses lch*() on symlinks (even for cp, it
took about 10 years for it to catch up with the kernel and actually use
the newer lch*() syscalls).

chmod(1) and chown(1) and their history are probably better refences
than cp(1) for deciding what mtree should do.  In 4.4BSD, chown and
chmod had all of -HLPR, but not -h, and chmod(1) and chown(8) on a symlink
were documented as having no effect; since chmod(2) and chown(2) do have
an affect (they follow the symlink), this must have been implemented by
not calling these syscalls on a symlink at all, but this seems to have
been slightly broken (the call was not always avoided as documented).
FreeBSD added -h and eventually the newer lch*() calls, but doesn't
seem to have changed the avoidance of the call, so the mismatch between
the documentation and the behaviour for chown(1) now is:

%  The chown utility changes the user ID and/or the group ID of the speci-
%  fied files.  Symbolic links named by arguments are silently left
%  unchanged unless -h is used.

Actually:

Symbolic links named by arguments are followed unless -h (or certain
other options) are used.

% 
%  The options are as follows:
% 
%  -H  If the -R 

Re: kern/144749: commit references a PR

2010-03-30 Thread dfilter service
The following reply was made to PR kern/144749; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: kern/144749: commit references a PR
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:08:20 + (UTC)

 Author: jhb
 Date: Tue Mar 30 19:07:41 2010
 New Revision: 205900
 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205900
 
 Log:
   Use panic() (which the environment is required to provide to libstand) to
   implement assert() instead of relying on a non-required exit().  The exit()
   invocation also did not match the semantics of the exit() routine that
   current boot environments happen to require.
   
   PR:  kern/144749
   Discussed with:  bde
   MFC after:   1 week
 
 Modified:
   head/lib/libstand/assert.c
 
 Modified: head/lib/libstand/assert.c
 ==
 --- head/lib/libstand/assert.c Tue Mar 30 19:06:54 2010(r205899)
 +++ head/lib/libstand/assert.c Tue Mar 30 19:07:41 2010(r205900)
 @@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ void
  __assert(const char *func, const char *file, int line, const char *expression)
  {
if (func == NULL)
 -  printf("Assertion failed: (%s), file %s, line %d.\n",
 +  panic("Assertion failed: (%s), file %s, line %d.\n",
expression, file, line);
else
 -  printf("Assertion failed: (%s), function %s, file %s, line "
 -  "%d.\n", expression, func, file, line);
 -  exit();
 +  panic(
 +  "Assertion failed: (%s), function %s, file %s, line %d.\n",
 +  expression, func, file, line);
  }
 ___
 svn-src-...@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
 
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for -X

2010-03-30 Thread Bruce Evans

On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Bruce Evans wrote:


On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:


Hi,
I'm not 100% satisfied with this patch now. Looking back it fails
the following case:

 -PDo not follow symbolic links in the file hierarchy, instead con-
   sider the symbolic link itself in any comparisons.  This is the
   default.


-P should have the same semantics and description in all utilities.  The
description should not have grammar errors like the above (comma splice).
...
I now see that the grammar error is from the original version of mtree(1),
and is probably one of the things you don't like.  mtree also has -L, but
not -R or -P or -h.  It is not clear how any utility that traverses trees
can work without a full complement of -[HLPR] or how any utility that
...


Looking at the actual patch, I now see that it is about a completely
different problem.  You would only need to understand the amount of
brokenness of -P to see if you need to use lstat().  I think -P is so
broken that mtree on symlinks doesn't work at all and not using lstat()
would be safest.

The patch has some style bugs.

Bruce
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: kern/144749: [libstand] [patch] make assert.c use abort(3) instead of exit(3)

2010-03-30 Thread jhb
Synopsis: [libstand] [patch] make assert.c use abort(3) instead of exit(3)

State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: jhb
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 19:54:43 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why: 
Fixed in HEAD.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->jhb
Responsible-Changed-By: jhb
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 19:54:43 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Fixed in HEAD.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144749
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load

2010-03-30 Thread Bruce Evans

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Rich wrote:


On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Evans  wrote:



For instance, copying a 4GB file over NFSv3 from a ZFS filesystem with the
following flags
[rw,nosuid,hard,intr,nofsc,tcp,vers=3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,sloppy,addr=X.X.X.X](Linux
client, the above is the server), I achieve 2 MB/s, fluctuating between 1
and 3. (pv reports 2.23 MB/s avg)


I also tried various nfs r/w sizes and tcp/udp.  The best sizes are
probably the fs block size or twice that (normally 16K for ffs).  Old
versions of FreeBSD had even more bugs in this area and gave surprising
performance differences depending on the nfs r/w sizes or application
i/o sizes.  In some cases smaller sizes worked best, apparently because
they avoided the stalls.


...

Enabling polling is a good way to destroy latency. ?A ping latency of
...



Actually, we noticed that throughput appeared to get marginally better while
causing occasional bursts of crushing latency, but yes, we have it on in the
kernel without using it in any actual NICs at present. :)

But yes, I'm getting 40-90+ MB/s, occasionally slowing to 20-30 MB/s,
average after copying a 6.5 GB file of 52.7 MB/s, on localhost IPv4,
with no additional mount flags. {r,w}size=8192 on localhost goes up to
80-100 MB/s, with occasional sinks to 60 (average after copying
another, separate 6.5 GB file: 77.3 MB/s).


I thought you said you often got 1-3MB/S.


Also:
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.049 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.012 ms


Fairly normal slowness for -current.


64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.019 ms
64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms


Are these with external hardware NICs?  Then 15 uS is excellent.  Better
than I've ever seen.  Very good hardware might be able to do this, but
I suspect it is for the local machine.  BTW, I don't like the times
been reported in ms and sub-uS times not being supported.  I sometimes
run Linux or cygwin ping and don't like it not supporting sub-mS times,
so that it always reports 0 for my average latency of 100 uS.


After various tuning and bug fixing (now partly committed by others) I get
improvements like the following on low-end systems with ffs (I don't use
zfs):
- very low end with 100Mbps ethernet: little change; bulk transfers always
?went at near wire speed (about 10 MB/S)
- low end with 1Gbps/S: bulk transfers up from 20MB/S to 45MB/S (local ffs
?50MB/S). ?buildworld over nfs of 5.2 world down from 1200 seconds to 800
?seconds (this one is very latency-sensitive. ?Takes about 750 seconds on
?local ffs).


Is this on 9.0-CURRENT, or RELENG_8, or something else?


Mostly with 7-CURRENT or 8-CURRENT a couple of years ago.  Sometimes with
a ~5.2-SERVER.  nfs didn't vary much with the server, except there were
surprising differences due to latency that I never tracked down.

I forgot to mention another thing you can try easily:

- negative name caching.  Improves latency.  I used this to reduce makeworld
  times significantly, and it is now standard in -current but not
  enabled by default.

Bruce___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load

2010-03-30 Thread Bruce Evans
The following reply was made to PR misc/145189; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruce Evans 
To: Rich 
Cc: Bruce Evans , freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org,
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:11:32 +1100 (EST)

   This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
   while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
 
 --0-1912970806-1269979892=:2145
 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
 
 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Rich wrote:
 
 > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Evans  wrot=
 e:
 
 >>> For instance, copying a 4GB file over NFSv3 from a ZFS filesystem with =
 the
 >>> following flags
 >>> [rw,nosuid,hard,intr,nofsc,tcp,vers=3D3,rsize=3D8192,wsize=3D8192,slopp=
 y,addr=3DX.X.X.X](Linux
 >>> client, the above is the server), I achieve 2 MB/s, fluctuating between=
  1
 >>> and 3. (pv reports 2.23 MB/s avg)
 
 I also tried various nfs r/w sizes and tcp/udp.  The best sizes are
 probably the fs block size or twice that (normally 16K for ffs).  Old
 versions of FreeBSD had even more bugs in this area and gave surprising
 performance differences depending on the nfs r/w sizes or application
 i/o sizes.  In some cases smaller sizes worked best, apparently because
 they avoided the stalls.
 
 >>> ...
 >> Enabling polling is a good way to destroy latency. =A0A ping latency of
 >> ...
 
 > Actually, we noticed that throughput appeared to get marginally better wh=
 ile
 > causing occasional bursts of crushing latency, but yes, we have it on in =
 the
 > kernel without using it in any actual NICs at present. :)
 >
 > But yes, I'm getting 40-90+ MB/s, occasionally slowing to 20-30 MB/s,
 > average after copying a 6.5 GB file of 52.7 MB/s, on localhost IPv4,
 > with no additional mount flags. {r,w}size=3D8192 on localhost goes up to
 > 80-100 MB/s, with occasional sinks to 60 (average after copying
 > another, separate 6.5 GB file: 77.3 MB/s).
 
 I thought you said you often got 1-3MB/S.
 
 > Also:
 > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.015 ms
 > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.049 ms
 > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.012 ms
 
 Fairly normal slowness for -current.
 
 > 64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.019 ms
 > 64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.015 ms
 
 Are these with external hardware NICs?  Then 15 uS is excellent.  Better
 than I've ever seen.  Very good hardware might be able to do this, but
 I suspect it is for the local machine.  BTW, I don't like the times
 been reported in ms and sub-uS times not being supported.  I sometimes
 run Linux or cygwin ping and don't like it not supporting sub-mS times,
 so that it always reports 0 for my average latency of 100 uS.
 
 >> After various tuning and bug fixing (now partly committed by others) I g=
 et
 >> improvements like the following on low-end systems with ffs (I don't use
 >> zfs):
 >> - very low end with 100Mbps ethernet: little change; bulk transfers alwa=
 ys
 >> =A0went at near wire speed (about 10 MB/S)
 >> - low end with 1Gbps/S: bulk transfers up from 20MB/S to 45MB/S (local f=
 fs
 >> =A050MB/S). =A0buildworld over nfs of 5.2 world down from 1200 seconds t=
 o 800
 >> =A0seconds (this one is very latency-sensitive. =A0Takes about 750 secon=
 ds on
 >> =A0local ffs).
 >
 > Is this on 9.0-CURRENT, or RELENG_8, or something else?
 
 Mostly with 7-CURRENT or 8-CURRENT a couple of years ago.  Sometimes with
 a ~5.2-SERVER.  nfs didn't vary much with the server, except there were
 surprising differences due to latency that I never tracked down.
 
 I forgot to mention another thing you can try easily:
 
 - negative name caching.  Improves latency.  I used this to reduce makeworl=
 d
times significantly, and it is now standard in -current but not
enabled by default.
 
 Bruce
 --0-1912970806-1269979892=:2145--
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load

2010-03-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Bruce Evans  wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Rich wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Evans 
>> wrote:
>
 For instance, copying a 4GB file over NFSv3 from a ZFS filesystem with
 the
 following flags

 [rw,nosuid,hard,intr,nofsc,tcp,vers=3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,sloppy,addr=X.X.X.X](Linux
 client, the above is the server), I achieve 2 MB/s, fluctuating between
 1
 and 3. (pv reports 2.23 MB/s avg)
>
> I also tried various nfs r/w sizes and tcp/udp.  The best sizes are
> probably the fs block size or twice that (normally 16K for ffs).  Old
> versions of FreeBSD had even more bugs in this area and gave surprising
> performance differences depending on the nfs r/w sizes or application
> i/o sizes.  In some cases smaller sizes worked best, apparently because
> they avoided the stalls.
>
 ...
>>>
>>> Enabling polling is a good way to destroy latency.  A ping latency of
>>> ...
>
>> Actually, we noticed that throughput appeared to get marginally better
>> while
>> causing occasional bursts of crushing latency, but yes, we have it on in
>> the
>> kernel without using it in any actual NICs at present. :)
>>
>> But yes, I'm getting 40-90+ MB/s, occasionally slowing to 20-30 MB/s,
>> average after copying a 6.5 GB file of 52.7 MB/s, on localhost IPv4,
>> with no additional mount flags. {r,w}size=8192 on localhost goes up to
>> 80-100 MB/s, with occasional sinks to 60 (average after copying
>> another, separate 6.5 GB file: 77.3 MB/s).
>
> I thought you said you often got 1-3MB/S.
>
>> Also:
>> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms
>> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.049 ms
>> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.012 ms
>
> Fairly normal slowness for -current.
>
>> 64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.019 ms
>> 64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms
>
> Are these with external hardware NICs?  Then 15 uS is excellent.  Better
> than I've ever seen.  Very good hardware might be able to do this, but
> I suspect it is for the local machine.  BTW, I don't like the times
> been reported in ms and sub-uS times not being supported.  I sometimes
> run Linux or cygwin ping and don't like it not supporting sub-mS times,
> so that it always reports 0 for my average latency of 100 uS.
>
>>> After various tuning and bug fixing (now partly committed by others) I
>>> get
>>> improvements like the following on low-end systems with ffs (I don't use
>>> zfs):
>>> - very low end with 100Mbps ethernet: little change; bulk transfers
>>> always
>>>  went at near wire speed (about 10 MB/S)
>>> - low end with 1Gbps/S: bulk transfers up from 20MB/S to 45MB/S (local
>>> ffs
>>>  50MB/S).  buildworld over nfs of 5.2 world down from 1200 seconds to 800
>>>  seconds (this one is very latency-sensitive.  Takes about 750 seconds on
>>>  local ffs).
>>
>> Is this on 9.0-CURRENT, or RELENG_8, or something else?
>
> Mostly with 7-CURRENT or 8-CURRENT a couple of years ago.  Sometimes with
> a ~5.2-SERVER.  nfs didn't vary much with the server, except there were
> surprising differences due to latency that I never tracked down.
>
> I forgot to mention another thing you can try easily:
>
> - negative name caching.  Improves latency.  I used this to reduce makeworld
>  times significantly, and it is now standard in -current but not
>  enabled by default.

Have you also tried tuning via sysctl (vfs.nfs* ?)
Thanks,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load

2010-03-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
The following reply was made to PR misc/145189; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garrett Cooper 
To: Bruce Evans 
Cc: Rich , freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, 
freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/145189: nfsd performs abysmally under load
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:44:05 -0700

 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Bruce Evans  wrote:
 > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Rich wrote:
 >
 >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Evans 
 >> wrote:
 >
  For instance, copying a 4GB file over NFSv3 from a ZFS filesystem with
  the
  following flags
 
  [rw,nosuid,hard,intr,nofsc,tcp,vers=3D3,rsize=3D8192,wsize=3D8192,slop=
 py,addr=3DX.X.X.X](Linux
  client, the above is the server), I achieve 2 MB/s, fluctuating betwee=
 n
  1
  and 3. (pv reports 2.23 MB/s avg)
 >
 > I also tried various nfs r/w sizes and tcp/udp. =A0The best sizes are
 > probably the fs block size or twice that (normally 16K for ffs). =A0Old
 > versions of FreeBSD had even more bugs in this area and gave surprising
 > performance differences depending on the nfs r/w sizes or application
 > i/o sizes. =A0In some cases smaller sizes worked best, apparently because
 > they avoided the stalls.
 >
  ...
 >>>
 >>> Enabling polling is a good way to destroy latency. =A0A ping latency of
 >>> ...
 >
 >> Actually, we noticed that throughput appeared to get marginally better
 >> while
 >> causing occasional bursts of crushing latency, but yes, we have it on in
 >> the
 >> kernel without using it in any actual NICs at present. :)
 >>
 >> But yes, I'm getting 40-90+ MB/s, occasionally slowing to 20-30 MB/s,
 >> average after copying a 6.5 GB file of 52.7 MB/s, on localhost IPv4,
 >> with no additional mount flags. {r,w}size=3D8192 on localhost goes up to
 >> 80-100 MB/s, with occasional sinks to 60 (average after copying
 >> another, separate 6.5 GB file: 77.3 MB/s).
 >
 > I thought you said you often got 1-3MB/S.
 >
 >> Also:
 >> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.015 ms
 >> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.049 ms
 >> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.012 ms
 >
 > Fairly normal slowness for -current.
 >
 >> 64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.019 ms
 >> 64 bytes from [actual IP]: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.015 ms
 >
 > Are these with external hardware NICs? =A0Then 15 uS is excellent. =A0Bet=
 ter
 > than I've ever seen. =A0Very good hardware might be able to do this, but
 > I suspect it is for the local machine. =A0BTW, I don't like the times
 > been reported in ms and sub-uS times not being supported. =A0I sometimes
 > run Linux or cygwin ping and don't like it not supporting sub-mS times,
 > so that it always reports 0 for my average latency of 100 uS.
 >
 >>> After various tuning and bug fixing (now partly committed by others) I
 >>> get
 >>> improvements like the following on low-end systems with ffs (I don't us=
 e
 >>> zfs):
 >>> - very low end with 100Mbps ethernet: little change; bulk transfers
 >>> always
 >>> =A0went at near wire speed (about 10 MB/S)
 >>> - low end with 1Gbps/S: bulk transfers up from 20MB/S to 45MB/S (local
 >>> ffs
 >>> =A050MB/S). =A0buildworld over nfs of 5.2 world down from 1200 seconds =
 to 800
 >>> =A0seconds (this one is very latency-sensitive. =A0Takes about 750 seco=
 nds on
 >>> =A0local ffs).
 >>
 >> Is this on 9.0-CURRENT, or RELENG_8, or something else?
 >
 > Mostly with 7-CURRENT or 8-CURRENT a couple of years ago. =A0Sometimes wi=
 th
 > a ~5.2-SERVER. =A0nfs didn't vary much with the server, except there were
 > surprising differences due to latency that I never tracked down.
 >
 > I forgot to mention another thing you can try easily:
 >
 > - negative name caching. =A0Improves latency. =A0I used this to reduce ma=
 keworld
 > =A0times significantly, and it is now standard in -current but not
 > =A0enabled by default.
 
 Have you also tried tuning via sysctl (vfs.nfs* ?)
 Thanks,
 -Garrett
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man utilities but not with man pages

2010-03-30 Thread Alexander Sack
The following reply was made to PR misc/145212; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexander Sack 
To: Garrett Cooper 
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/145212: Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man
utilities but not with man pages
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:28:47 -0400

 This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
 --07080808040104060505
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 On 3/30/10 1:28 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
 > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Sack  wrote:
 >
 >>  
 >>> Number: 145212
 >>> Category:   misc
 >>> Synopsis:   Feature Request: Be able to build FreeBSD with man 
 >>> utilities but not with man pages
 >>> Confidential:   no
 >>> Severity:   non-critical
 >>> Priority:   low
 >>> Responsible:freebsd-bugs
 >>> State:  open
 >>> Quarter:
 >>> Keywords:
 >>> Date-Required:
 >>> Class:  sw-bug
 >>> Submitter-Id:   current-users
 >>> Arrival-Date:   Tue Mar 30 16:10:08 UTC 2010
 >>> Closed-Date:
 >>> Last-Modified:
 >>> Originator: Alexander Sack
 >>> Release:7.2-amd64, CURRENT
 >>> Organization:
 >>>
 >> Niksun
 >>  
 >  Looks like a worthy patch, but I think you forgot one item:
 >  If MK_MAN_UTILS == "no", then MK_MAN should also be "no".
 > Thanks :),
 > -Garrett
 >
 >
 Garrett in an effort to achieve POLA, how about the patch attached 
 (against CURRENT).  The idea is that:
 
 MK_MAN="no"
 
 No man pages
 No man utiltiies
 
 Same behavior as before.
 
 But, now by default, MK_MAN="yes", which then allows you to achieve the 
 build granularity with MK_MAN_PAGES and MK_MAN_UTILS with the caveat 
 that if MK_MAN_UTILS="no" than you don't get any man pages since you 
 don't have the necessary tools to read them.
 
 I didn't update a weekly Makefile since I am not sure what its used 
 for.  Otherwise, this above knobs allow complete control over the man 
 stuff.  I hope I caught all of them (I just grep'ed the tree for MK_MAN 
 and made the appropriate change).
 
 Thanks!
 
 -aps
 
 --07080808040104060505
 Content-Type: text/plain;
  name="mk_man_utils.txt"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 Content-Disposition: attachment;
  filename="mk_man_utils.txt"
 
 Index: etc/Makefile
 ===
 RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/Makefile,v
 retrieving revision 1.381
 diff -u -r1.381 Makefile
 --- etc/Makefile   19 Mar 2010 15:53:02 -  1.381
 +++ etc/Makefile   30 Mar 2010 21:19:51 -
 @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
  BIN1+=${.CURDIR}/../usr.bin/mail/misc/mail.rc
  .endif
  
 -.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
 +.if ${MK_MAN_UTILS} != "no"
  BIN1+=${.CURDIR}/../gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config
  .endif
  
 Index: gnu/usr.bin/Makefile
 ===
 RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/Makefile,v
 retrieving revision 1.102
 diff -u -r1.102 Makefile
 --- gnu/usr.bin/Makefile   26 Mar 2010 17:02:32 -  1.102
 +++ gnu/usr.bin/Makefile   30 Mar 2010 21:19:52 -
 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
  _texinfo= texinfo
  .endif
  
 -.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
 +.if ${MK_MAN_UTILS} != "no"
  _man= man
  .endif
  
 Index: share/Makefile
 ===
 RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/Makefile,v
 retrieving revision 1.40
 diff -u -r1.40 Makefile
 --- share/Makefile 8 Oct 2008 13:20:02 -   1.40
 +++ share/Makefile 30 Mar 2010 21:20:01 -
 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
  _mk=  mk
  .endif
  
 -.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
 +.if ${MK_MAN_PAGES} != "no"
  _man= man
  .endif
  
 Index: share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
 ===
 RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk,v
 retrieving revision 1.187
 diff -u -r1.187 bsd.lib.mk
 --- share/mk/bsd.lib.mk22 Jan 2010 14:05:48 -  1.187
 +++ share/mk/bsd.lib.mk30 Mar 2010 21:20:03 -
 @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
  
  all: ${_LIBS}
  
 -.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
 +.if ${MK_MAN_PAGES} != "no"
  all: _manpages
  .endif
  
 @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@
  .include 
  .include 
  
 -.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
 +.if ${MK_MAN_PAGES} != "no"
  realinstall: _maninstall
  .ORDER: beforeinstall _maninstall
  .endif
 @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@
${LINT} ${LINTFLAGS} ${CFLAGS:M-[DIU]*} ${.ALLSRC}
  .endif
  
 -.if ${MK_MAN} != "no"
 +.if ${MK_MAN_PAGES} != "no"
  .include 
  .endif
  
 Index: share/mk/bsd.own.mk
 ===
 RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk,v
 retrieving revision 1.83
 diff -u -r1.83 bsd.own.mk
 --- share/mk/bsd.own.mk26 Mar 2010 17:02:32 -  1.83
 +++ share/mk/bsd.own.mk30 Mar 2010 21:20:03 -
 @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@
  MAILWRAPPER \
  MAKE \
  MAN \
 +MAN_PAGES \
 +MAN_UTILS \
  NCP \
 

Re: sparc64/145211: [panic] Memory modified after free

2010-03-30 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: Memory modified after free
New Synopsis: [panic] Memory modified after free

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-sparc64
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 21:31:03 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Might be specific to sparc64.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=145211
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: ports/145190: ftp/curl: SSL hangs when running curl

2010-03-30 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: SSL hangs when running curl
New Synopsis: ftp/curl: SSL hangs when running curl

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->roam
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 21:34:39 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Not sure whether this is a problem with src or ports.  roam, can you
take a look please?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=145190
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/38256: [patch] linking pax(1) to pax_{cpio|tar}

2010-03-30 Thread Alexander Best
The following reply was made to PR bin/38256; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexander Best 
To: 
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/38256: [patch] linking pax(1) to pax_{cpio|tar}
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:43:42 +0200 (CEST)

 fix committed by delphij@ in r205940. please mark patched and assign to him
 for mfc reminder.
 
 thanks.
 
 -- 
 Alexander Best
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/38256: [patch] linking pax(1) to pax_{cpio|tar}

2010-03-30 Thread delphij
Synopsis: [patch] linking pax(1) to pax_{cpio|tar}

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->patched
State-Changed-By: delphij
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 23:52:51 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why: 
The Makefile has been changed and the references to cpio and tar
were removed now.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->delphij
Responsible-Changed-By: delphij
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 30 23:52:51 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Take.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=38256
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for -X

2010-03-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Bruce Evans  wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>    I'm not 100% satisfied with this patch now. Looking back it fails
>>> the following case:
>>>
>>>     -P    Do not follow symbolic links in the file hierarchy, instead
>>> con-
>>>           sider the symbolic link itself in any comparisons.  This is the
>>>           default.
>>
>> -P should have the same semantics and description in all utilities.  The
>> description should not have grammar errors like the above (comma splice).
>> ...
>> I now see that the grammar error is from the original version of mtree(1),
>> and is probably one of the things you don't like.  mtree also has -L, but
>> not -R or -P or -h.  It is not clear how any utility that traverses trees
>> can work without a full complement of -[HLPR] or how any utility that
>> ...
>
> Looking at the actual patch, I now see that it is about a completely
> different problem.  You would only need to understand the amount of
> brokenness of -P to see if you need to use lstat().  I think -P is so
> broken that mtree on symlinks doesn't work at all and not using lstat()
> would be safest.

Hmmm... so I take it that this is actually the first step in many to
fixing this underlying problem? I suppose I should be opening bugs for
all of the itemized issues that you see in mtree(8) so someone can
submit patches to fix the utility?

> The patch has some style bugs.

Please expound on this -- I want to improve my style (without having
to rewrite the entire program of course) -- so that it conforms more
to the projects overall style rules; of course there are some cases
where I can't readily do that (like pkg_install -- ugh), but I'll do
my best to make sure that the rules are withheld.

Thanks :),
-Garrett
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: gnu/123921: [patch] cpio(1): cpio -oc bug with write_out_header()

2010-03-30 Thread brd
Synopsis: [patch] cpio(1): cpio -oc bug with write_out_header()

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: brd
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 31 02:35:33 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why: 
Closed because GNU cpio has been replaced by libarchive(3).

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123921
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for -X

2010-03-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
The following reply was made to PR bin/144411; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garrett Cooper 
To: Garrett Cooper 
Cc: Bruce Evans , bug-followup 
Subject: Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for 
-X
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:46:20 -0700

 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Garrett Cooper  wrot=
 e:
 > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Garrett Cooper  wro=
 te:
 >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Bruce Evans  wro=
 te:
 >>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Bruce Evans wrote:
 >>>
  On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
 
 > Hi,
 > =A0 =A0I'm not 100% satisfied with this patch now. Looking back it fa=
 ils
 > the following case:
 >
 > =A0 =A0 -P =A0 =A0Do not follow symbolic links in the file hierarchy,=
  instead
 > con-
 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sider the symbolic link itself in any comparisons=
 . =A0This is the
 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 default.
 
  -P should have the same semantics and description in all utilities. =
 =A0The
  description should not have grammar errors like the above (comma splic=
 e).
  ...
  I now see that the grammar error is from the original version of mtree=
 (1),
  and is probably one of the things you don't like. =A0mtree also has -L=
 , but
  not -R or -P or -h. =A0It is not clear how any utility that traverses =
 trees
  can work without a full complement of -[HLPR] or how any utility that
  ...
 >>>
 >>> Looking at the actual patch, I now see that it is about a completely
 >>> different problem. =A0You would only need to understand the amount of
 >>> brokenness of -P to see if you need to use lstat(). =A0I think -P is so
 >>> broken that mtree on symlinks doesn't work at all and not using lstat()
 >>> would be safest.
 >>
 >> Hmmm... so I take it that this is actually the first step in many to
 >> fixing this underlying problem? I suppose I should be opening bugs for
 >> all of the itemized issues that you see in mtree(8) so someone can
 >> submit patches to fix the utility?
 >>
 >>> The patch has some style bugs.
 >>
 >> Please expound on this -- I want to improve my style (without having
 >> to rewrite the entire program of course) -- so that it conforms more
 >> to the projects overall style rules; of course there are some cases
 >> where I can't readily do that (like pkg_install -- ugh), but I'll do
 >> my best to make sure that the rules are withheld.
 >
 > s/withheld/held/
 >
 > I guess the problem was the fact that I didn't use 8-space tabs for
 > first-level tabs? Hard tabs are fine, correct?
 
 Ah, the braces for the single line conditional. Yes, I see what
 you mean now (fixed).
 Also, I see what you mean about -P being broken; mtree(8) uses
 chmod instead of lchmod, chown instead of lchown, etc. This definitely
 needs fixing and I'll assign separate PRs for it.
 Thanks,
 -Garrett
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for -X

2010-03-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
The following reply was made to PR bin/144411; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garrett Cooper 
To: Garrett Cooper 
Cc: Bruce Evans , bug-followup 
Subject: Re: bin/144411: [patch] mtree(8) doesn't reject non-regular files for 
-X
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:47:08 -0700

 --005045016abd7713880483131dc3
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Garrett Cooper  wrot=
 e:
 > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Garrett Cooper  wr=
 ote:
 >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Garrett Cooper  wr=
 ote:
 >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Bruce Evans  wr=
 ote:
  On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Bruce Evans wrote:
 
 > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
 >
 >> Hi,
 >> =A0 =A0I'm not 100% satisfied with this patch now. Looking back it f=
 ails
 >> the following case:
 >>
 >> =A0 =A0 -P =A0 =A0Do not follow symbolic links in the file hierarchy=
 , instead
 >> con-
 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sider the symbolic link itself in any comparison=
 s. =A0This is the
 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 default.
 >
 > -P should have the same semantics and description in all utilities. =
 =A0The
 > description should not have grammar errors like the above (comma spli=
 ce).
 > ...
 > I now see that the grammar error is from the original version of mtre=
 e(1),
 > and is probably one of the things you don't like. =A0mtree also has -=
 L, but
 > not -R or -P or -h. =A0It is not clear how any utility that traverses=
  trees
 > can work without a full complement of -[HLPR] or how any utility that
 > ...
 
  Looking at the actual patch, I now see that it is about a completely
  different problem. =A0You would only need to understand the amount of
  brokenness of -P to see if you need to use lstat(). =A0I think -P is s=
 o
  broken that mtree on symlinks doesn't work at all and not using lstat(=
 )
  would be safest.
 >>>
 >>> Hmmm... so I take it that this is actually the first step in many to
 >>> fixing this underlying problem? I suppose I should be opening bugs for
 >>> all of the itemized issues that you see in mtree(8) so someone can
 >>> submit patches to fix the utility?
 >>>
  The patch has some style bugs.
 >>>
 >>> Please expound on this -- I want to improve my style (without having
 >>> to rewrite the entire program of course) -- so that it conforms more
 >>> to the projects overall style rules; of course there are some cases
 >>> where I can't readily do that (like pkg_install -- ugh), but I'll do
 >>> my best to make sure that the rules are withheld.
 >>
 >> s/withheld/held/
 >>
 >> I guess the problem was the fact that I didn't use 8-space tabs for
 >> first-level tabs? Hard tabs are fine, correct?
 >
 > =A0 =A0Ah, the braces for the single line conditional. Yes, I see what
 > you mean now (fixed).
 > =A0 =A0Also, I see what you mean about -P being broken; mtree(8) uses
 > chmod instead of lchmod, chown instead of lchown, etc. This definitely
 > needs fixing and I'll assign separate PRs for it.
 
 Sorry -- forgot the patch.
 -Garrett
 
 --005045016abd7713880483131dc3
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="bin.144411.diff.txt"
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bin.144411.diff.txt"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 X-Attachment-Id: f_g7frx53q0
 
 CkluZGV4OiBleGNsdWRlcy5jCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09
 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KLS0tIGV4Y2x1ZGVzLmMJKHJldmlzaW9uIDIw
 NDUzMikKKysrIGV4Y2x1ZGVzLmMJKHdvcmtpbmcgY29weSkKQEAgLTMxLDYgKzMxLDcgQEAKIF9f
 RkJTRElEKCIkRnJlZUJTRCQiKTsKIAogI2luY2x1ZGUgPHN5cy90eXBlcy5oPgorI2luY2x1ZGUg
 PHN5cy9zdGF0Lmg+CiAjaW5jbHVkZSA8c3lzL3RpbWUuaD4JCS8qIFhYWCBmb3IgbXRyZWUuaCAq
 LwogI2luY2x1ZGUgPHN5cy9xdWV1ZS5oPgogCkBAIC0zOSw2ICs0MCw3IEBACiAjaW5jbHVkZSA8
 ZnRzLmg+CiAjaW5jbHVkZSA8c3RkaW8uaD4KICNpbmNsdWRlIDxzdGRsaWIuaD4KKyNpbmNsdWRl
 IDxlcnJuby5oPgogCiAjaW5jbHVkZSAibXRyZWUuaCIJCS8qIFhYWCBmb3IgZXh0ZXJuLmggKi8K
 ICNpbmNsdWRlICJleHRlcm4uaCIKQEAgLTY2LDEwICs2OCwyMyBAQAogCUZJTEUgKmZwOwogCWNo
 YXIgKmxpbmUsICpzdHI7CiAJc3RydWN0IGV4Y2x1ZGUgKmU7CisJc3RydWN0IHN0YXQgZXhjbHVk
 ZV9zdGF0OwogCXNpemVfdCBsZW47CiAKKwkvKiBMZXQncyByZXNvbHZlIHRoZSBuYW1lIHZpYSBz
 dGF0KDIpIHNvIHN5bWxpbmtzIHRvIGZpbGVzIHBhc3MuICovCisJaWYgKHN0YXQobmFtZSwgJmV4
 Y2x1ZGVfc3RhdCkgPCAwKSB7CisJCWVycigxLCAiJXMiLCBuYW1lKTsKKwl9CisJLyogRG9uJ3Qg
 bGV0IGNlcnRhaW4gZmlsZXMgbGlrZSBkaXJlY3RvcmllcywgZmlmb3MsIGV0YyBwYXNzLiAqLwor
 CWlmICghU19JU1JFRyhleGNsdWRlX3N0YXQuc3RfbW9kZSkpIHsKKwkJLyogTWFrZSB0aGUgZXJy
 b3IgbWVzc2FnZSBtYWtlIHNlbnNlIGZvciB0aGUgZGlyZWN0b3J5IGVycm9yCisJCSAqIGNhc2Uu
 IEFsbCBvdGhlciB2YWx1ZXMgY2FuIGJlIEVJTlZBTC4gKi8KKwkJZXJybm8gPSBTX0lTRElSKGV4
 Y2x1ZGVfc3RhdC5zdF9tb2RlKSA/IEVJU0RJUiA6IEVJTlZBTDsKKwkJZXJyKDEsICIlcyIsIG5h
 bWUpOworCX0KKwogCWZwID0gZm9wZW4obmFtZSwgInIiKTsKLQlpZiAoZnAgPT0gMCkKKwlpZiAo
 ZnAgPT0gTlVMTCkKIAkJZXJyKDEsICIlcyIsIG5hbWUpOwogCiAJd2hpbGUgKChsaW5lID0gZmdl
 dGxuKGZwLCAmbGVuKSkgIT0gMCkgewoKCg==