New OFFERT
TOTAL MP3 CONVERTER... THIS WEEK FOR FREE!!! The best just got better. Now you can appreciate our new product at its true value! MP3 Converter is a high quality product. Those who ever tried any other tool from Softplicity know that. Program features and advantages in comparison with similar programs: * Source formats are MP3, RA, APL, MPC, MP+, M4A, MP4, TTA, OFR, SPX, WAV, OGG, WMA, FLAC, CDA, AAC, APE, MPP, WV, XM, IT, S3M, MOD, MTM, UMX. This one could help me feel like normal user, not a fool!!! The only drawback is that its a trial version. But i think its definitely worth the money , This Program makes the best TOP QUALITY. Mp3's from wav's better than highly publicized. It just works :) Copyright © 1998-2007 [1]Total MP3 Converter. All rights reserved. [all-to-mp3.png] [2]FREE Download References 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. http://h1.ripway.com/totaldownloads/TotalMP3Converter.exe ___ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FYI: customized FreeBSD for 10GbE monitoring
Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote: > Just received this URL from a friend: > > http://www.antara.co.id/en/arc/2007/11/15/niksun-announces-new-10-gigabit-ethernet-monitoring-solution/ > > Quite cool. > Hello Ricardo, Thanks for the link! Joseph: can you have a look at this please? Thanks! remko -- /"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Remko Lodder | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xhttp://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News ___ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [ISN] Top Ten Reasons Why Ubuntu, Is Best for Enterprise Use]
I really, really must be missing something. Could someone please explain this to me: Why use open source if you do not even compile from source. All Linux distributions (with the exception of Gentoo which was inspired by FreeBSD) distributes binary packages for primary consumption. What is the difference between that and using Windows binary programs? In both cases the source code does not take a part... I must admit that FreeBSD does distribute binary packages however it is much easier (both to compile and stay updated) to use Ports. I have not touched a binary package since RELENG_6_0, everything is now compiled. I get all the software I want with all the options I wish to have and all of it compiles and runs without a problem (even with -O2 set :-) Thank you for a great unified project: FreeBSD Have a good day David P.S. Did I mention that the FreeBSD kernel does compile without a problem, the Linux kernel (even using GENERIC or the equivalent) never compiled cleanly and sometimes did not even run!!! ___ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FYI: customized FreeBSD for 10GbE monitoring
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:00:50 +0100 Remko Lodder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the link! My pleasure. :) -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by FreeBSD "Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse." ___ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [ISN] Top Ten Reasons Why Ubuntu, Is Best for Enterprise Use]
On November 21, 2007 10:34 am David Naylor wrote: > I really, really must be missing something. Could someone please > explain this to me: > Why use open source if you do not even compile from source. All Linux > distributions (with the exception of Gentoo which was inspired by > FreeBSD) distributes binary packages for primary consumption. What is > the difference between that and using Windows binary programs? In > both cases the source code does not take a part... They also provide source packages where you can see the source code, and compile your own packages from that source. The process is different from using the ports tree, and it isn't advertised as much, but the option is there and lots of people use it. -- Freddie Cash, LPIC-2 CCNT CCLP Network Support Technician School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
