Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] inline procedures in TP 7.0
Florian Klampfl to Anton Shepelev: > > What about the other registers -- does Turbo Pascal take > > care of them, perhaps enveloping each expansion of an > > inline procedure into a POPs and PUSHes? > > No. Thank you for the reply, Florian. Does that mean that I must take utmost care to preserve every single register when using inline procedures and functions? -- Please, do not forward replies to the list to my e-mail. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] fpmmap arm-linux issue
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 23:36:09 -0300, Fabio Luis Girardi via fpc-pascal wrote: >I'll test it tomorrow. > >Em Dom, 16 de fev de 2020 18:32, Florian Klämpfl >escreveu: > >> Am 01.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb je...@j-software.dk: >> > Agreed, the rtl should definitely divide by pagesize if MMAP2 is >> > defined. I've run into this discrepancy before on ARM at work >> >> I have fixed it meanwhile. >> ___ >> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org >> https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal >> This reply above winds up in a thread named "Demo threads.pp can't run" from May 2004 Seems like there must be a message header problem here. -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] inline procedures in TP 7.0
Am 17.02.20 um 12:31 schrieb Anton Shepelev via fpc-pascal: Florian Klampfl to Anton Shepelev: What about the other registers -- does Turbo Pascal take care of them, perhaps enveloping each expansion of an inline procedure into a POPs and PUSHes? No. Thank you for the reply, Florian. Does that mean that I must take utmost care to preserve every single register when using inline procedures and functions? No. The other way round, except sp and bp, you do not have to take care of any register. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] fpmmap arm-linux issue
About windows CE? Em Seg, 17 de fev de 2020 17:12, Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal < fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> escreveu: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 23:36:09 -0300, Fabio Luis Girardi via fpc-pascal > wrote: > > >I'll test it tomorrow. > > > >Em Dom, 16 de fev de 2020 18:32, Florian Klämpfl > >escreveu: > > > >> Am 01.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb je...@j-software.dk: > >> > Agreed, the rtl should definitely divide by pagesize if MMAP2 is > >> > defined. I've run into this discrepancy before on ARM at work > >> > >> I have fixed it meanwhile. > >> ___ > >> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > >> https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > >> > > This reply above winds up in a thread named "Demo threads.pp can't > run" from May 2004 > > Seems like there must be a message header problem here. > > -- > Bo Berglund > Developer in Sweden > > ___ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
