Re: [fpc-pascal] Constants in generics
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 11:11 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal > wrote: > > Fair enough. In that case support for constants in generics will have to wait > as well. 🤷 Who designed the generics btw? I’m not 100% certain that it’s even safe to change their design like this so it would be nice to hear from them. Inline specializations rely on tprocdef and if I change everything to work on symbols we could break generic procedure overloads. One thing I can do to remove my dummy tgenericparamdef class is to keep a separate list of const syms in tspecializationcontext. Regards, Ryan Joseph ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Constants in generics
On 1/4/19 1:47 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote: On Jan 3, 2019, at 11:11 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: Fair enough. In that case support for constants in generics will have to wait as well. 🤷 Who designed the generics btw? unless i'm highly mistaken, you've been talking to them... they're quoted above, even ;) -- NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval. *Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless* *a signed and pre-paid contract is in effect with us.* ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal