Re: [fpc-pascal] with statement using mulltiple objects

2014-09-17 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2014-09-17 3:11 GMT+02:00 Flávio Etrusco :

> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Philippe  wrote:
> > on compiler implementation:
> >
> > I read in this list that the group lost months due a "with" problem.
> >
> > People use "with", and I guess lot of people use it!
> >
> > I checked the reference
> > http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu58.html#x155-16500013.2.8
> and
> > there is not any warning ... just:
> >
> > The statement
> >
> > With A,B,C,D do Statement;
> >
> > is equivalent to
> >
> > With A do
> >  With B do
> >   With C do
> >With D do Statement;
> >
> > without any warning ...
> >
> (...)
>
> Why would it? As people replied in your thread, this has always been
> the behavior (at least in TP and Delphi), so if anything the only
> thing lacking is some minor documentation.
> Also please don't hijack threads.
>

I guess different communities have different rules, but I don't understand
(and I'd better understand if I don't want to do the same mistake): in what
way was Philippe's post hijacking? This question goes to Philippe too, as
he wrote "we may be out of subject" which shows he felt something wrong.

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

[fpc-pascal] how to implement a RTD server (COM Server) for windows

2014-09-17 Thread Dennis Poon

Window's DDE protocol is too old and the new one is called RTD.
I want to implement such an RTD server for Excel client to connect to.

Is there any examples of implementing COM server with fpc?

Where do I start?

Many thanks in advance.

Dennis
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal templating engines with logical structures

2014-09-17 Thread leledumbo
> What you seem to want is something php-like, to interpret commands from 
the html template. But that way the program logic and display template 
would not be separate.

Right, even a simple for/if statement means there's logic in the template,
which is not desirable. Template should serve as a template, not more. It
should provide parameters for the processing code for flexible display so
flexible display can still work. Here's an example for table and list
formatting of the same values:

https://github.com/leledumbo/QTemplate/blob/master/examples/simple/test.tpl
https://github.com/leledumbo/QTemplate/blob/master/examples/simple/test.lpr




--
View this message in context: 
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Freepascal-templating-engines-with-logical-structures-tp5720098p5720102.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] with statement using mulltiple objects

2014-09-17 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
 wrote:
> 2014-09-17 3:11 GMT+02:00 Flávio Etrusco :
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Philippe  wrote:
>> > on compiler implementation:
>> >
>> > I read in this list that the group lost months due a "with" problem.
>> >
>> > People use "with", and I guess lot of people use it!
>> >
>> > I checked the reference
>> > http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu58.html#x155-16500013.2.8
>> > and
>> > there is not any warning ... just:
>> >
>> > The statement
>> >
>> > With A,B,C,D do Statement;
>> >
>> > is equivalent to
>> >
>> > With A do
>> >  With B do
>> >   With C do
>> >With D do Statement;
>> >
>> > without any warning ...
>> >
>> (...)
>>
>> Why would it? As people replied in your thread, this has always been
>> the behavior (at least in TP and Delphi), so if anything the only
>> thing lacking is some minor documentation.
>> Also please don't hijack threads.
>
>
> I guess different communities have different rules, but I don't understand
> (and I'd better understand if I don't want to do the same mistake): in what
> way was Philippe's post hijacking? This question goes to Philippe too, as he
> wrote "we may be out of subject" which shows he felt something wrong.
>
> --
> Frederic Da Vitoria
> (davitof)
>

The mistake was actually mine :-$ I had deleted part of the thread and
didn't realize this was the old thread.
Sorry Phillippe, and sorry for the noise everybody.

-Flávio
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] with statement using mulltiple objects

2014-09-17 Thread Philippe
 

(tout excusé!)  

Em 17.09.2014 21:45, Flávio Etrusco escreveu:


> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
>
 wrote:
> 
>> 2014-09-17 3:11 GMT+02:00 Flávio
Etrusco : 
>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at
8:09 PM, Philippe  wrote: 
>>> 
 on compiler
implementation: I read in this list that the group lost months due a
"with" problem. People use "with", and I guess lot of people use it! I
checked the reference
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu58.html#x155-16500013.2.8
[1] and there is not any warning ... just: The statement With A,B,C,D do
Statement; is equivalent to With A do With B do With C do With D do
Statement; without any warning ...
>>> (...) Why would it? As people
replied in your thread, this has always been the behavior (at least in
TP and Delphi), so if anything the only thing lacking is some minor
documentation. Also please don't hijack threads.
>> I guess different
communities have different rules, but I don't understand (and I'd better
understand if I don't want to do the same mistake): in what way was
Philippe's post hijacking? This question goes to Philippe too, as he
wrote "we may be out of subject" which shows he felt something wrong. --
Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof)
> 
> The mistake was actually mine :-$ I
had deleted part of the thread and
> didn't realize this was the old
thread.
> Sorry Phillippe, and sorry for the noise everybody.
> 
>
-Flávio
> ___
> fpc-pascal
maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
>
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal [2]




Links:
--
[1]
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu58.html#x155-16500013.2.8
[2]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal