[fpc-pascal] Documentation site: incorrect manual name

2013-05-16 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/
I find
FCL (Free Class Library) reference manual.

however the doc itself (and the 2.6 PDF) specifies Free Component Library

Could this be changed on the site? Does this need to be changed in
Lazarus default online help settings as well?

Thanks,
Reinier
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Error: Duplicate identifier "FarPointer"

2013-05-16 Thread Reimar Grabowski
Same problem here but much funnier FPC message:

Makefile:2704: *** The only supported starting compiler version is
2.7.1. You are trying to build with 2.6.2. If you are absolutely sure
that the current compiler is built from the exact same
version/revision, you can try to use OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 to
override .  Stop.

So I had to use OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 to build my 2.7.1 with 2.6.2. IMHO 
that's not as intended.
But it may be a problem of the create_fpc_deb script provided by Lazarus so 
from my side there is no need for any actions.
Just wanted to share that funny message.

R.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Error: Duplicate identifier "FarPointer"

2013-05-16 Thread Jonas Maebe


On 16 May 2013, at 14:46, Reimar Grabowski wrote:


Same problem here but much funnier FPC message:

Makefile:2704: *** The only supported starting compiler version is
2.7.1. You are trying to build with 2.6.2. If you are absolutely sure
that the current compiler is built from the exact same
version/revision, you can try to use OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 to
override .  Stop.

So I had to use OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 to build my 2.7.1 with 2.6.2.  
IMHO that's not as intended.
But it may be a problem of the create_fpc_deb script provided by  
Lazarus so from my side there is no need for any actions.

Just wanted to share that funny message.


It is indeed a bug in Lazarus' build scripts (also for the rpms). For  
some reason they first replace a bunch of version numbers in the  
Makefile.



Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


[fpc-pascal] Examples of tiOPF logging in the wild

2013-05-16 Thread vfclists .
Are there some examples of using tiOPF logging besides those in the demos?


I want to use tiLogToGUI, but I am not happy with the amount of screen
space it takes. Is there some way it can be adapted or themed to be tidier
or smaller?

The code gives the impression that it can be embedded or extended in
another form or is
that a misconception on my part?

-- 
Frank Church

===
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] TProcess, Batch script and Windows

2013-05-16 Thread Michael Van Canneyt



On Wed, 15 May 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:


Hi,

I want to execute a batch file on Windows (FPC 2.6.2 and Laz trunk)
using TProcess class.
It ONLY works if I use the [poWaitOnExit] and DO NOT USE [poNoConsole] options.

I do not want to see the console so, I need to use [poNoConsole]
option. Is this a bug?


As far as I know, batch files need CMD and that needs a console ?

Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


[fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation site: incorrect manual name

2013-05-16 Thread leledumbo
I think it's the documentation source that needs to be updated, FCL always
means Free Component Library.



--
View this message in context: 
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Documentation-site-incorrect-manual-name-tp5714811p5714827.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


[fpc-pascal] Re: TProcess, Batch script and Windows

2013-05-16 Thread leledumbo
Try this trick: Options := [poNewConsole]; ShowWindow := swoHIDE;



--
View this message in context: 
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/TProcess-Batch-script-and-Windows-tp5714812p5714828.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] TProcess, Batch script and Windows

2013-05-16 Thread Marcos Douglas
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
 wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to execute a batch file on Windows (FPC 2.6.2 and Laz trunk)
>> using TProcess class.
>> It ONLY works if I use the [poWaitOnExit] and DO NOT USE [poNoConsole]
>> options.
>>
>> I do not want to see the console so, I need to use [poNoConsole]
>> option. Is this a bug?
>
>
> As far as I know, batch files need CMD and that needs a console ?

I saw then:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/fcl/process/tprocess.options.html

poNoConsole = Do not allow access to the console window for the
process (Win32 only)

So the "correct" is do not use poNoConsole!

I saw after:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/fcl/process/tprocess.showwindow.html

TProcess.ShowWindow = Determines how the process main window is shown
(Windows only)

I do not understood why the interface of TProcess have a property that
only works on Windows... but works.

Thank you anyway.
Marcos Douglas
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: TProcess, Batch script and Windows

2013-05-16 Thread Marcos Douglas
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:31 PM, leledumbo  wrote:
> Try this trick: Options := [poNewConsole]; ShowWindow := swoHIDE;
>

Yep. Thanks, I saw... unfortunate a long time after.
Thank you.

Marcos Douglas
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


[fpc-pascal] Re: [FPC 0024437]: can not build RTL with 2.7.1 compiler

2013-05-16 Thread Vincent Snijders
--
>  (0067718) Vincent Snijders (manager) - 2013-05-16 18:39
>  http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=24437#c67718
> --
> That compiler is too old, it should be the same revision as the RTL source.
>
> --
>  (0067719) Jonas Maebe (manager) - 2013-05-16 18:57
>  http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=24437#c67719
> --
> No, the starting compiler is too new. Compiling a new compiler directly
> using an
> old compiler and old RTL (in order to then compile the new RTL with the
> resulting compiler) is not supported either.
>
> The only procedure that has always been supported and always only will be
> supported is a "make all" in the top level FPC directory starting with the
> latest release.
>
>
Compiling the RTL of revision 24514 with a compiler of revision 24514 is
supported, isn't it?

Vincent
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: [FPC 0024437]: can not build RTL with 2.7.1 compiler

2013-05-16 Thread Jonas Maebe

On 16 May 2013, at 19:31, Vincent Snijders wrote:

> --
>> (0067718) Vincent Snijders (manager) - 2013-05-16 18:39
>> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=24437#c67718
>> --
>> That compiler is too old, it should be the same revision as the RTL source.
>> 
>> --
>> (0067719) Jonas Maebe (manager) - 2013-05-16 18:57
>> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=24437#c67719
>> --
>> No, the starting compiler is too new. Compiling a new compiler directly
>> using an
>> old compiler and old RTL (in order to then compile the new RTL with the
>> resulting compiler) is not supported either.
>> 
>> The only procedure that has always been supported and always only will be
>> supported is a "make all" in the top level FPC directory starting with the
>> latest release.
>> 
>> 
> Compiling the RTL of revision 24514 with a compiler of revision 24514 is
> supported, isn't it?

Yes, but your message could be interpreted as suggesting that this person, who 
was clearly calling Makefiles in subdirectories directly rather than using the 
top-level Makefile, should have first compiled the new compiler directly, and 
then compile the new RTL using this new compiler. Given the amazingly creative 
ways in which people manage to keep trying to compile FPC in unsupported ways, 
I did not want anyone to get the idea that this would be a good approach.


Jonas

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal