[fpc-pascal] Should FCL documentation be splitted?
I would like to document some of the FCL, however the layout is still like the first time it appears in FPC. Current FCL are splitted into many subpackages, and since the number of units is HUGE (which I guess the same reason why the package was splitted) would it be better to split the documentation as well? -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Should-FCL-documentation-be-splitted-tp5710248.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Should FCL documentation be splitted?
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, leledumbo wrote: I would like to document some of the FCL, however the layout is still like the first time it appears in FPC. Current FCL are splitted into many subpackages, and since the number of units is HUGE (which I guess the same reason why the package was splitted) would it be better to split the documentation as well? No, it's better to keep it together: 1. to have an overview of what is available. 2. cross-referencing across packages in documentation is not easy. Michael. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
